techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 22, 2009, 01:56 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Another Radeon HD 4770 Pictured, Tested

As we head towards the launch of AMD's newest GPU, the ATI Radeon HD 4770, things certainly seem to be looking good from what we have seen of the sub-$100 accelerator so far. After the recent exposé of the HIS HD 4770, it's time now for the one from another AIB.

The card features an identical overall design to the one from HIS, indicating that the cooler is a standard reference design, not what we had seen from the company presentation of HD 4770, showing a rather visually-appealing cooler. The card features 512 MB of GDDR5 memory across a 128-bit interface, 640 stream processors, and DirectX 10.1 compliance. Taiwanese website CoolPC put the card through a round of 3DMark06, 3DMark Vantage, and FurMark. The testbed consisted of an Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor and 4 GB of DDR2-800 memory. The card secured 12,042 points at 3DMark06, and P7408 at 3DMark Vantage. After 350 seconds of FurMark stability test, the GPU temperatures were tipping 72 degrees Celsius, with the fan running at 42% speed. Here's one card to look out for.



Source: CoolPC Taiwan

Last edited by btarunr; Apr 23, 2009 at 09:23 AM.
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 22, 2009, 01:58 PM   #2
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Many Thanks to Duncan1 for sending this in.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 02:03 PM   #3
ShogoXT
500 Posts
 
ShogoXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 935 (0.49/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 92 Times in 72 Posts

System Specs

I dont like that sticker* fin on the heatsink. Looks better bare heatsink in my opinion.

EDIT: Heh, spelling. I mean that flat thing on top. Its ugly.

Last edited by ShogoXT; Apr 22, 2009 at 03:06 PM.
ShogoXT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 02:04 PM   #4
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,741 (6.49/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,113 Times in 3,704 Posts

System Specs

I hope one of the manufacturers put a rear exhausting fan on this, because the stock cooler is butt ugly.

Looks like I have something to look forward to, probably going to upgrade my HD4670.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 02:11 PM   #5
oli_ramsay
2000 Posts
 
oli_ramsay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,679 (1.30/day)
Thanks: 577
Thanked 592 Times in 450 Posts
Send a message via MSN to oli_ramsay

System Specs

I wish they showed it's OC capabilities. There must be huge OC potential with a 40nm chip and maybe a vmod
oli_ramsay is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 02:21 PM   #6
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
 
DrPepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.29/day)
Thanks: 976
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DrPepper Send a message via Skype™ to DrPepper

System Specs

God that heatsink is ugly.
DrPepper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 02:22 PM   #7
MRCL
3500 Posts
 
MRCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Switzerland, Heart of Europe
Posts: 3,798 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 340
Thanked 862 Times in 705 Posts

System Specs

I'm one more to find that fan thing fugly. But seems to be a nice card. And sub 100$, would be an ideal backup card.
__________________

[I.R.A.] FBi I wouldnt buy toilet paper from MSI as it may be missing the preforations
MRCL is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 03:04 PM   #8
Polarman
1000 Posts
 
Polarman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Laval, Qc
Posts: 1,575 (0.88/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 300 Times in 199 Posts

System Specs

Those GPU-Z Sensor tab look dubious. 2000mhz gpu core !?
__________________
http://forums.techpowerup.com/image.php?u=55205&type=sigpic&dateline=1220312009
Polarman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 03:13 PM   #9
DaMulta
My stars went supernova
 
DaMulta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 10,337 (4.17/day)
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 1,477 Times in 1,113 Posts

System Specs

I'm sold now!

Im getting 4 of these!
__________________
ocLIT The Hardware Punishers
DaMulta is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 03:16 PM   #10
theorw
500 Posts
 
theorw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Athens GREECE
Posts: 702 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 50 Times in 43 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polarman View Post
Those GPU-Z Sensor tab look dubious. 2000mhz gpu core !?
It ll probably get fixed on the next GPUZ release.
Nice card but i d rather buy a 4830 for 90 euros here...
I dont like the 128 bit bus...40nm though IDK...
theorw is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 03:23 PM   #11
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
 
DrPepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.29/day)
Thanks: 976
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DrPepper Send a message via Skype™ to DrPepper

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by theorw View Post
It ll probably get fixed on the next GPUZ release.
Nice card but i d rather buy a 4830 for 90 euros here...
I dont like the 128 bit bus...40nm though IDK...
128bit bus is negated by the GDDR5 which runs at QDR speeds.
DrPepper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 03:26 PM   #12
HTC
1000 Posts
 
HTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,920 (1.02/day)
Thanks: 461
Thanked 282 Times in 230 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by theorw View Post
It ll probably get fixed on the next GPUZ release.
Nice card but i d rather buy a 4830 for 90 euros here...
I dont like the 128 bit bus...40nm though IDK...
128 bit bus with GDDR5 = 256 bit bus with GDDR3, because of the GDDR5 quad data rate VS the GDDR 3 double data rate.
__________________
HTC - Hugo Teve Cá

I'm PORTUGUESE: apologies for any spelling mistakes!
HTC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 04:01 PM   #13
theorw
500 Posts
 
theorw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Athens GREECE
Posts: 702 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 50 Times in 43 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by HTC View Post
128 bit bus with GDDR5 = 256 bit bus with GDDR3, because of the GDDR5 quad data rate VS the GDDR 3 double data rate.
Ok thats good.But what about OCing the ram?It operates at lower voltages so maybe its more fragile to overvoltage.Time will tell though as we might start getting vmods and results!
theorw is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 04:03 PM   #14
laszlo
500 Posts
 
laszlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 66 feet from the ground
Posts: 825 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPepper View Post
God that heatsink is ugly.

why?

you see it on the screen always?
__________________
laszlo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 04:11 PM   #15
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
 
DrPepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.29/day)
Thanks: 976
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DrPepper Send a message via Skype™ to DrPepper

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by laszlo View Post
why?

you see it on the screen always?
Its just I try make the inside of my case look nice even though I cant see in it.
DrPepper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 04:15 PM   #16
HTC
1000 Posts
 
HTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,920 (1.02/day)
Thanks: 461
Thanked 282 Times in 230 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by theorw View Post
Ok thats good.But what about OCing the ram?It operates at lower voltages so maybe its more fragile to overvoltage.Time will tell though as we might start getting vmods and results!
Since my card is a 4670, i can't answer that question: ask dudes with 4870 / 4890 cards since those have GDDR5.
__________________
HTC - Hugo Teve Cá

I'm PORTUGUESE: apologies for any spelling mistakes!
HTC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 04:20 PM   #17
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.43/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,753 Times in 2,222 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

now were is the 4770X2
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 04:21 PM   #18
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by theorw View Post
Ok thats good.But what about OCing the ram?It operates at lower voltages so maybe its more fragile to overvoltage.Time will tell though as we might start getting vmods and results!
The chips in use are marked Qimonda "IDGV1G-05A1F1C-40X", these chips are spec'd by Qimonda to run at 1000 MHz (and 4 GT/s per pin). ATI is running them at 800 MHz. So you already have a 25% headroom there.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 22, 2009, 04:27 PM   #19
laszlo
500 Posts
 
laszlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 66 feet from the ground
Posts: 825 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPepper View Post
Its just I try make the inside of my case look nice even though I cant see in it.
you have to look from the ground to see it;even at transparent panels you don't see it

my point if a cooler done his job =good


btw this card beat my 3870
__________________
laszlo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 05:05 PM   #20
1Kurgan1
The Knife in your Back
 
1Kurgan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 6,711 (4.13/day)
Thanks: 3,093
Thanked 2,312 Times in 1,556 Posts

System Specs

Is it just me, or is this thing as fast as a 4870?
__________________
1Kurgan1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 05:14 PM   #21
Imsochobo
500 Posts
 
Imsochobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
Posts: 514 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Imsochobo

System Specs

Expect oc versions to be like a 4850.

This would be up and down on the 4830, it got less bandwidth, the memory modules are rated at 1000 mhz, which is actually lowest ive seen GDDR5 rated as.

as an effect, theese push same bandwidth and speed like an simular videocard(4830) with crazy overclocks and 1000 mhz memory on 256 bit memory bus.

It isnt as fast as a 4870 by a long shot, 4870 got twice the memory bandwidht, is approx 30-40% faster, depending on game, settings and resolution.
due to memory bandwidth, this wouldnt allow high AA levels, but would allow AA levels up to 8X and 12X in many of new titles at a 1680x1050.

This is a very very popular monitor resolution.
4850 is still faster due to more shaders, higher memory performance, by default.

Expect to see almost neck to neck results when overclocked to 1ghz memory, this would be an 65 gb/sec memory bandwidth versus an 62.8 gb on 4850, 4850 may still have more headroom on gpu overclock.
*Remember, 4770 runs a high default core clock, and 640 shaders versus 800 on 4850, 4850 got a good headroom, closing to 4870 at 720 mhz is max ive done on relativly stock cooler, voltage.
Still, best card there is at sub 99$, ati will harvest some serious cash with this card, due to 128 bit design is cheap, licence money for 40 NM may be expensive, but should pay off due to cheap design.

I'm expecting much of this card, and the downfall of GTS 240 250 9800 GT 9600 GT and the whole G8x g9x series cause of this card.

My thought:
Killer card for the 1680x1050 and lower gaming, i'd reccon 4870 and alike for the 1920x1200, if you like high settings, for those who do not like it, i really think 4850 would be best killer for mainstream card at 1920x1200 .
__________________
Imsochobo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 05:20 PM   #22
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
KainXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,678 (2.27/day)
Thanks: 181
Thanked 464 Times in 381 Posts

System Specs

I'm actually very dissapointed if that GPU-Z shot is right, it seems alot slower than it was said to be, . . . . only 8 rops T.T
KainXS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 05:22 PM   #23
Duncan1
75 Posts
 
Duncan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: greece
Posts: 84 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Duncan1

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Kurgan1 View Post
Is it just me, or is this thing as fast as a 4870?
No man, the HD4770 is a little more slower than HD4850.
Duncan1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 05:27 PM   #24
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
KainXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,678 (2.27/day)
Thanks: 181
Thanked 464 Times in 381 Posts

System Specs

with only 8 rops and 640 shaders I can't see how this card will even outperform a HD4830 with 16 rops and 640 shaders, . . . even if it does have GDDR5 . . . on a 128bit bus
KainXS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2009, 05:46 PM   #25
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by KainXS View Post
with only 8 rops and 640 shaders I can't see how this card will even outperform a HD4830 with 16 rops and 640 shaders, . . . even if it does have GDDR5 . . . on a 128bit bus
It already did. Check Guru3D's preview.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alcpone's Official 3dMark Vantage Compilation jbunch07 General Software 2955 Dec 8, 2009 07:32 PM
ATI Catalyst 9.4 Released alexp999 News 183 Apr 17, 2009 01:39 AM
GET up to 34% performance increase in DX10 games saikamaldoss AMD / ATI 149 Mar 22, 2009 09:15 PM
Post your 3dmark Vantage Scores candle_86 Graphics Cards 437 Aug 31, 2008 10:01 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts