![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
|
Another Radeon HD 4770 Pictured, Tested
As we head towards the launch of AMD's newest GPU, the ATI Radeon HD 4770, things certainly seem to be looking good from what we have seen of the sub-$100 accelerator so far. After the recent exposé of the HIS HD 4770, it's time now for the one from another AIB.
The card features an identical overall design to the one from HIS, indicating that the cooler is a standard reference design, not what we had seen from the company presentation of HD 4770, showing a rather visually-appealing cooler. The card features 512 MB of GDDR5 memory across a 128-bit interface, 640 stream processors, and DirectX 10.1 compliance. Taiwanese website CoolPC put the card through a round of 3DMark06, 3DMark Vantage, and FurMark. The testbed consisted of an Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor and 4 GB of DDR2-800 memory. The card secured 12,042 points at 3DMark06, and P7408 at 3DMark Vantage. After 350 seconds of FurMark stability test, the GPU temperatures were tipping 72 degrees Celsius, with the fan running at 42% speed. Here's one card to look out for. ![]() Source: CoolPC Taiwan Last edited by btarunr; Apr 23, 2009 at 09:23 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
|
Many Thanks to Duncan1 for sending this in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 935 (0.49/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 92 Times in 72 Posts
|
I dont like that sticker* fin on the heatsink. Looks better bare heatsink in my opinion.
EDIT: Heh, spelling. I mean that flat thing on top. Its ugly. Last edited by ShogoXT; Apr 22, 2009 at 03:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Semi-Retired Folder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,741 (6.49/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,113 Times in 3,704 Posts
|
I hope one of the manufacturers put a rear exhausting fan on this, because the stock cooler is butt ugly.
Looks like I have something to look forward to, probably going to upgrade my HD4670.
__________________
Rig1: System Specs. Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5 Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,679 (1.30/day)
Thanks: 577
Thanked 592 Times in 450 Posts
|
I wish they showed it's OC capabilities. There must be huge OC potential with a 40nm chip and maybe a vmod
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The Doctor is in the house
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.29/day)
Thanks: 976
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
|
God that heatsink is ugly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Switzerland, Heart of Europe
Posts: 3,798 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 340
Thanked 862 Times in 705 Posts
|
I'm one more to find that fan thing fugly. But seems to be a nice card. And sub 100$, would be an ideal backup card.
__________________
![]() [I.R.A.] FBi I wouldnt buy toilet paper from MSI as it may be missing the preforations |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Laval, Qc
Posts: 1,575 (0.88/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 300 Times in 199 Posts
|
Those GPU-Z Sensor tab look dubious. 2000mhz gpu core !?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
My stars went supernova
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 10,337 (4.17/day)
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 1,477 Times in 1,113 Posts
|
I'm sold now!
Im getting 4 of these! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Athens GREECE
Posts: 702 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 50 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
The Doctor is in the house
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.29/day)
Thanks: 976
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,920 (1.02/day)
Thanks: 461
Thanked 282 Times in 230 Posts
|
128 bit bus with GDDR5 = 256 bit bus with GDDR3, because of the GDDR5 quad data rate VS the GDDR 3 double data rate.
__________________
HTC - Hugo Teve Cá I'm PORTUGUESE: apologies for any spelling mistakes! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Athens GREECE
Posts: 702 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 50 Times in 43 Posts
|
Ok thats good.But what about OCing the ram?It operates at lower voltages so maybe its more fragile to overvoltage.Time will tell though as we might start getting vmods and results!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 66 feet from the ground
Posts: 825 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts
|
why? you see it on the screen always?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The Doctor is in the house
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.29/day)
Thanks: 976
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,920 (1.02/day)
Thanks: 461
Thanked 282 Times in 230 Posts
|
Since my card is a 4670, i can't answer that question: ask dudes with 4870 / 4890 cards since those have GDDR5.
__________________
HTC - Hugo Teve Cá I'm PORTUGUESE: apologies for any spelling mistakes! |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
where the hell are my stars
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.43/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,753 Times in 2,222 Posts
|
now were is the 4770X2
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
|
The chips in use are marked Qimonda "IDGV1G-05A1F1C-40X", these chips are spec'd by Qimonda to run at 1000 MHz (and 4 GT/s per pin). ATI is running them at 800 MHz. So you already have a 25% headroom there.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#19 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 66 feet from the ground
Posts: 825 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts
|
Quote:
my point if a cooler done his job =good ![]() btw this card beat my 3870
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
The Knife in your Back
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 6,711 (4.13/day)
Thanks: 3,093
Thanked 2,312 Times in 1,556 Posts
|
Is it just me, or is this thing as fast as a 4870?
__________________
![]() Youtube - The WarZ Myths + Gameplay, BF3 Weapon Reviews and more Dual Loop HAF 922 Build | Dxtory and x264 Codec Guide “Daniel Craig is my Wookiee bitch now!” -Harrison Ford |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
Posts: 514 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
|
Expect oc versions to be like a 4850.
This would be up and down on the 4830, it got less bandwidth, the memory modules are rated at 1000 mhz, which is actually lowest ive seen GDDR5 rated as. as an effect, theese push same bandwidth and speed like an simular videocard(4830) with crazy overclocks and 1000 mhz memory on 256 bit memory bus. It isnt as fast as a 4870 by a long shot, 4870 got twice the memory bandwidht, is approx 30-40% faster, depending on game, settings and resolution. due to memory bandwidth, this wouldnt allow high AA levels, but would allow AA levels up to 8X and 12X in many of new titles at a 1680x1050. This is a very very popular monitor resolution. 4850 is still faster due to more shaders, higher memory performance, by default. Expect to see almost neck to neck results when overclocked to 1ghz memory, this would be an 65 gb/sec memory bandwidth versus an 62.8 gb on 4850, 4850 may still have more headroom on gpu overclock. *Remember, 4770 runs a high default core clock, and 640 shaders versus 800 on 4850, 4850 got a good headroom, closing to 4870 at 720 mhz is max ive done on relativly stock cooler, voltage. Still, best card there is at sub 99$, ati will harvest some serious cash with this card, due to 128 bit design is cheap, licence money for 40 NM may be expensive, but should pay off due to cheap design. I'm expecting much of this card, and the downfall of GTS 240 250 9800 GT 9600 GT and the whole G8x g9x series cause of this card. My thought: Killer card for the 1680x1050 and lower gaming, i'd reccon 4870 and alike for the 1920x1200, if you like high settings, for those who do not like it, i really think 4850 would be best killer for mainstream card at 1920x1200 .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() |
I'm actually very dissapointed if that GPU-Z shot is right, it seems alot slower than it was said to be, . . . . only 8 rops T.T
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() |
with only 8 rops and 640 shaders I can't see how this card will even outperform a HD4830 with 16 rops and 640 shaders, . . . even if it does have GDDR5 . . . on a 128bit bus
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
|
It already did. Check Guru3D's preview.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Alcpone's Official 3dMark Vantage Compilation | jbunch07 | General Software | 2955 | Dec 8, 2009 07:32 PM |
| ATI Catalyst 9.4 Released | alexp999 | News | 183 | Apr 17, 2009 01:39 AM |
| GET up to 34% performance increase in DX10 games | saikamaldoss | AMD / ATI | 149 | Mar 22, 2009 09:15 PM |
| Post your 3dmark Vantage Scores | candle_86 | Graphics Cards | 437 | Aug 31, 2008 10:01 PM |