techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 27, 2009, 03:01 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,908 Times in 5,654 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Point of View Out With 2 GB GeForce GTX 285

NVIDIA partners seem to be gaining interest in releasing GeForce GTX 200 series products with double the amount of memory. Several partners have announced 1792 MB variants for the GTX 260 and GTX 275, while GTX 285 with its lavish 512-bit memory interface is facilitating 2 GB of memory. Point of View now has one such model of its own.

The card uses reference clock speeds as far as the GPU goes: 648 MHz (core) and 1476 MHz (shader), while going light with its memory, 1161 MHz against the reference speed of 1242 MHz. The rest of the card is pretty standard: 240 shader processors, acceleration for NVIDIA CUDA, and support for PhysX technology, and 3-way SLI support.



Source: Tweak.dk
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2009, 03:14 PM   #2
N4cot1c
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 131 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

Sweet card. I bet the 4870x2 barely edges this card out.
N4cot1c is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2009, 03:29 PM   #3
oli_ramsay
2000 Posts
 
oli_ramsay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,679 (1.29/day)
Thanks: 577
Thanked 592 Times in 450 Posts
Send a message via MSN to oli_ramsay

System Specs

Yea the extra 1GB will make this card crush even xFired 4890's.
oli_ramsay is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oli_ramsay For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 27, 2009, 03:32 PM   #4
ZoneDymo
200 Posts
 
ZoneDymo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 303 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 35 Times in 23 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by oli_ramsay View Post
Yea the extra 1GB will make this card crush even xFired 4890's.

Well I for one lol'd
ZoneDymo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2009, 03:35 PM   #5
nafets
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 610 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 134 Times in 107 Posts

What a joke.

They should have just went for the uber l33t 4GB models. Nobody uses puny 2GB cards anymore...
nafets is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2009, 03:42 PM   #6
mlee49
Eligible for custom title
 
mlee49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: KU
Posts: 6,921 (3.50/day)
Thanks: 1,598
Thanked 2,048 Times in 1,602 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to mlee49

System Specs

How about instead of doubling the memory on the card companies double the memory bandwidth.

That would make for a nice re-release of a card.
__________________
mlee49 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2009, 03:43 PM   #7
1Kurgan1
The Knife in your Back
 
1Kurgan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 6,722 (4.13/day)
Thanks: 3,098
Thanked 2,317 Times in 1,561 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by N4cot1c View Post
Sweet card. I bet the 4870x2 barely edges this card out.
What?
__________________
1Kurgan1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2009, 04:08 PM   #8
Selene
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 223 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

This card wont do much on its own, but wait till you start seeing SLI and Tri SLI benchmarks with 2gig frame buffers, it should realy do well in game like Crysis, GTA and FC2.
Selene is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2009, 05:14 PM   #9
iStink
200 Posts
 
iStink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 492 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 49 Times in 47 Posts

System Specs

this card will completely and utterly dominate and destroy 8 4890x2's in crossfire!
</sarcasm>
__________________
iStink is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2009, 05:23 PM   #10
stefanels
200 Posts
 
stefanels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Transylvania (RO) working in Valencia (ES)
Posts: 483 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 404
Thanked 256 Times in 163 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by N4cot1c View Post
Sweet card. I bet the 4870x2 barely edges this card out.
Just LOL... The extra 1Gb on a GTX285 i guess it's increases the performance by 5-10% max and not with 50% to get in the game with a HD4870x2...
stefanels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2009, 05:24 PM   #11
mastrdrver
2000 Posts
 
mastrdrver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,346 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 498
Thanked 492 Times in 396 Posts

System Specs

Wait until games start using more than more than 512mb of frame buffer even with 8xaa turned on. I don't even see that level of usage on COD WaW on XP at 1920x1200 with 8xAA/16xAF. Besides, if your running 32 bit XP/Vista you just lost another 1gb of usable memory something that helped my performance in WaW when I went to x64 Vista and 4gb. Now it uses up to 2.5gb of memory instead of just under 2gb in XP. It does help pick up frame rates. I can't see the game using more than 640gb at 2560x1600 with the same aa/af levels. Maybe once 64 bit OS are common will game developers start using more frame buffer memory.
mastrdrver is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2009, 06:14 PM   #12
N4cot1c
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 131 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Kurgan1 View Post
What?
I know you have a 4870x2. Anyone who has one would reply like that. I for one am unbiased. A GTX285 is 5-12 fps behind some games and in nvidia games sometimes does better. the extra memory should help as high res.
N4cot1c is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2009, 07:01 PM   #13
Valdez
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Szekszárd, Hungary
Posts: 292 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by N4cot1c View Post
I know you have a 4870x2. Anyone who has one would reply like that. I for one am unbiased. A GTX285 is 5-12 fps behind some games and in nvidia games sometimes does better. the extra memory should help as high res.
HD4870x2 and gtx285 are not in the same category, the x2 is much faster and it is the competitor of gtx295.
Valdez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2009, 08:32 PM   #14
Weer
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York / Israel
Posts: 1,293 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 60
Thanked 95 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valdez View Post
HD4870x2 and gtx285 are not in the same category, the x2 is much faster and it is the competitor of gtx295.
The difference between the GTX 295 and the 4870X2 is about the same as the difference between the 4870X2 and the GTX 285.
Weer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 07:23 AM   #15
Bjorn_Of_Iceland
2000 Posts
 
Bjorn_Of_Iceland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Húsiđ mitt
Posts: 2,608 (1.32/day)
Thanks: 480
Thanked 357 Times in 266 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valdez View Post
HD4870x2 and gtx285 are not in the same category, the x2 is much faster and it is the competitor of gtx295.
wuh?.. GTX 295 has a competitor?
__________________

SIEG HEIL!!
Bjorn_Of_Iceland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 08:18 AM   #16
random
2000 Posts
 
random's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,473 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 1,248
Thanked 627 Times in 407 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bjorn_Of_Iceland View Post
wuh?.. GTX 295 has a competitor?
Yes, 4890 crossfire .

I've never heard of point of view, but that sticker looks pretty sweet.
random is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 08:21 AM   #17
Valdez
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Szekszárd, Hungary
Posts: 292 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weer View Post
The difference between the GTX 295 and the 4870X2 is about the same as the difference between the 4870X2 and the GTX 285.
That's not true.

gtx295 is only 10-15% faster than hd4870x2 in lower resolutions. In high res, high aa they perform the same (these cards are mostly used in high res - around 1920x1200 or 1080p). And they are both much faster than gtx285.

In 1920 and 8xaa, the hd4870x2 is the winner, not the gtx295.

http://www.hardware-infos.com/tests....st=66&seite=15

http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/h...formancerating
Valdez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 08:21 AM   #18
Valdez
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Szekszárd, Hungary
Posts: 292 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bjorn_Of_Iceland View Post
wuh?.. GTX 295 has a competitor?
Yes, the hd4870x2.
Valdez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 11:20 AM   #19
gumpty
500 Posts
 
gumpty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Posts: 564 (0.30/day)
Thanks: 229
Thanked 135 Times in 96 Posts

System Specs

Ha ha look at all the fanbois rage!

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wont this extra memory only really help when AA is on, coupled with big resolutions (2560 x 1600)? In which case people with those screens would most-likely have X2s/295s anyway.
__________________
"It's going to install and overwrite the OS. It will kill all your family pets and everything in the 'fridge will go bad. The shingles on your roof will curl and ants will infest your underwear drawer."Kreij

gumpty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 11:36 AM   #20
silkstone
2000 Posts
 
silkstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: HCM Vietnam
Posts: 2,186 (1.31/day)
Thanks: 323
Thanked 346 Times in 289 Posts

System Specs

This card is a ridiculous waste of ram - would GTAIV even use that much?
__________________
Thanks to BradleyKZN for polishing my sig

“oooooooooooh fire!!! and girls...GIRLS and fire!!!!!!! oooooooooooooh *runz around clapping hands together*” -Marineborn
silkstone is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 11:46 AM   #21
random
2000 Posts
 
random's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,473 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 1,248
Thanked 627 Times in 407 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by silkstone View Post
This card is a ridiculous waste of ram - would GTAIV even use that much?
Yes actually . But apart from GTA IV, I can't see the relevance except for resolutions above 1080p.
random is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I'm moving to the dark side! random NVIDIA 152 Mar 28, 2009 12:45 AM
Zotac Officially Launches the GeForce GTX 285 Infinity Edition Video Card malware News 5 Mar 1, 2009 09:46 AM
Inno3D Unleashes GeForce GTX 295 and GTX 285 Graphics Cards btarunr News 0 Jan 9, 2009 06:47 AM
Zotac GeForce GTX 260 Amp˛ Edition 216 Shaders W1zzard Reviews 59 Sep 28, 2008 03:37 PM
GeForce 7900 GTX vs. 7950 GX2 Performance Darksaber Reviews 38 Sep 15, 2006 11:45 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts