techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > General Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 28, 2009, 08:42 AM   #151
hoss331
75 Posts
 
hoss331's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 93 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts

System Specs

If you want you can delete my other runs and just use this one.

hoss331 | Q9650 @ 4.32ghz | 60.63655 | 14.03623 | 64-bit | max memory 3250mb

__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
hoss331 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 28, 2009, 10:41 AM   #152
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

We can all play the increase-memory-for-a-better-score game

lemonadesoda | 2x E5420 @ 2.50 Ghz | 62.21 | 24.88 | 32-bit | max memory 2047 mb



Let's keep the benchmark table simple: stick with 1024 MB RAM. While most users could do 2048MB runs, and get better scores, it means recreating the table. Mixing and matching memory in the table is clearly not a good idea.

Hoss, try OC your 1024MB run again, fiddling with memory timings... if you want to get to the top of the scoreboard... keep trying.

Then I'll OC my sytem rather than running it at stock. ROFL

Last edited by lemonadesoda; May 28, 2009 at 10:55 AM.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to lemonadesoda For This Useful Post:
Old May 28, 2009, 11:02 AM   #153
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanishDevil View Post
One suggestion, for those with Dual CPU scores, could we cut their Score/GHz in two because they have two physical processors? It makes it a bit skewed if we're comparing GFlops/GHz in different processors.
Nope. Because a Quad is TWO Duals on one die. Do you suggesting cutting those scores in two also?

What you could do however is to have a THIRD calculation that is the Score per Ghz per virtual core. That means divinding by 1 for Pentium 3. By 2 for P4 on HT, by 2 for Core 2, by 4 for Core 2 Quad, by 8 for Nehalem on HTT, by 8 for Dual Core Quad Xeons.

Getting a bit confusing though. Anyway, that's not the point of benchmarking. You dont want to keep dividing like that. What you want to do is assess the TOTAL CAPABILITY of the rig. The only reason we have the GHz divider is to see who much the results are from OC, and whether we want to OC our existing setups further, or move over to a newer faster architecture.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 28, 2009, 01:51 PM   #154
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,752 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

Table "Update", and I put that in quotes for a reason. I added nothing new, but I did go through and delete any score that was done with the memory setting different than 1024MB. No score will be accepted unless all the rules in the original thread are followed. The only exception will be for computer that physically don't have enough RAM to allow 1024MB runs.

Also, I've fixed the column problems with the 2 scores, I was in a hurry last night trying to finish the updating and missed adding in the manufacturer.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to newtekie1 For This Useful Post:
Old May 28, 2009, 05:12 PM   #155
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

newtekie, please update your OP, to make it clear what the rules are. The OP doesnt state, MUST RUN AT 1024MB... etc. etc.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 28, 2009, 05:59 PM   #156
Naekuh
200 Posts
 
Naekuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Miko Fox? Fire Miko? Its FireFox-Tan!
Posts: 412 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 108 Times in 90 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonadesoda View Post
If you want to get to the top of the scoreboard... keep trying.

Then I'll OC my sytem rather than running it at stock. ROFL
u think 4.4 is the best i can do on a 975 + classified?

Im waiting for someone to beat me, so i can put pressure again.
That brings fun in competition, not when one person just slaughters the board via landslide.
Naekuh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 28, 2009, 06:10 PM   #157
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

I just knew you were holding something back. What a teaser.

Just to whet your appetite, at a moments notice I can BSEL mod my Xeons to get another 10%. So start practising at pulling in 70 Gflops... or you will be in trouble. But the drama is when I pull out from 5th place to regain the crown. LOL
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 28, 2009, 06:30 PM   #158
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,752 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonadesoda View Post
newtekie, please update your OP, to make it clear what the rules are. The OP doesnt state, MUST RUN AT 1024MB... etc. etc.
The original post says to run it at the standard stress level, this is 1024MB.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old May 28, 2009, 06:42 PM   #159
Naekuh
200 Posts
 
Naekuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Miko Fox? Fire Miko? Its FireFox-Tan!
Posts: 412 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 108 Times in 90 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonadesoda View Post
I just knew you were holding something back. What a teaser.

Just to whet your appetite, at a moments notice I can BSEL mod my Xeons to get another 10%. So start practising at pulling in 70 Gflops... or you will be in trouble. But the drama is when I pull out from 5th place to regain the crown. LOL
LOL well.. im only pushing 1.35vcore with a dedicated cpu loop.

My load temps for that 4.4 didnt push into 70's.

So i figure i have about another 300-400mhz (linpack stable) as backup incase someone decides to bring a nuke into this thread.
Naekuh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 28, 2009, 10:26 PM   #160
hoss331
75 Posts
 
hoss331's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 93 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonadesoda View Post
We can all play the increase-memory-for-a-better-score game
Are we taking this a little to seriously? I didnt recall seeing a limit on how much ram we could use, and its not like I was trying to pass if off as a 1gb run. Yea im a cheater because I used a harder test. I dont see what the big deal is using max as long as it was notated.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
hoss331 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 28, 2009, 10:54 PM   #161
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Read the rest of my post and dont be so uptight. Perhaps also read the next post I made to newtekie to point out that perhaps the memory limit wasnt clear to everyone. Then read your post above, sit down, have a drink, and start OC'ing.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 29, 2009, 12:51 AM   #162
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,752 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoss331 View Post
I didnt recall seeing a limit on how much ram we could use
It has been in the first post since I created the thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
...run the standard stress level.
Standard = 1024MB =/= Custom
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old May 29, 2009, 02:39 PM   #163
DOM
Eligible for custom title
 
DOM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TX, USA
Posts: 6,473 (2.54/day)
Thanks: 292
Thanked 791 Times in 707 Posts

System Specs

Add Me

DOM | Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 5.1GHz | 34.7517 | 6.8141 | 64-bit |

__________________
DOM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 29, 2009, 02:44 PM   #164
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,557 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,700
Thanked 8,692 Times in 6,391 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOM View Post
DOM | Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 5.1GHz | 34.7517 | 6.8141 | 64-bit |

http://img.techpowerup.org/090529/Untitled.jpg
i am thoroughly impressed.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mussels For This Useful Post:
Old May 29, 2009, 03:17 PM   #165
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,752 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

Table Updated
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old May 29, 2009, 03:44 PM   #166
mudkip
1000 Posts
 
mudkip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,132 (0.70/day)
Thanks: 175
Thanked 146 Times in 129 Posts

System Specs

maby it would be nice if you'd order the table on Gflops.. now they're all just random
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mudkip is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 29, 2009, 04:53 PM   #167
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,752 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
Results: Click the column headers to sort the table.
Its too much work to sort the table manually.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2009, 03:22 AM   #168
dcf-joe
200 Posts
 
dcf-joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nebraska, USA
Posts: 327 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 61
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts

System Specs

Add Me

dcf-joe | Intel | Core i7 920 @ 3.8 GHz | 48.04096 | 12.64235789 | 64-Bit | Program set to run on 8 threads

dcf-joe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2009, 07:54 AM   #169
DanTheBanjoman
Seņor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
Its too much work to sort the table manually.
That's why you don't do it manually:

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showpo...6&postcount=23
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2009, 07:59 AM   #170
DanTheBanjoman
Seņor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonadesoda View Post
Sorry to hear that YET ANOTHER Asus Z7S is troublesome.

Can you warranty it out for the DSEB/DG? That is what I have got, and it is rock solid. However, you will need to BSEL mod to OC the FSB since there is no BIOS options. Repeat DSEB is rock solid.
And then? The DSEB/DG doesn't have any options to change vcore in the first place. So there is no gain.

As for Z7S's being troublesome, this is only my second. Some people at XS had more

Strange though, changing vcore worked fine before with this BIOS version. Not sure what changed, the thread on XS mentions it as a common issue though. Either way, my new board is ordered. The Z7S will be degraded to secondary machine, will sell the S5370 and X7DAL-E.

Also, BSEL mods are needed either way since there is no control over the FSB/memory divider.
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2009, 01:35 PM   #171
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,752 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

Table updated

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanTheBanjoman View Post
That's why you don't do it manually:

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showpo...6&postcount=23
That doesn't work properly, I tried it. For some reason it sorts them, but not in the correct order. It gets them close to sorted into the right oder, but it puts some of the scores in the 40s higher than the 50s and 60s. Sorting by clicking the table headers works perfectly though.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2009, 01:57 PM   #172
DanTheBanjoman
Seņor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
That doesn't work properly, I tried it. For some reason it sorts them, but not in the correct order. It gets them close to sorted into the right oder, but it puts some of the scores in the 40s higher than the 50s and 60s. Sorting by clicking the table headers works perfectly though.
That some reason was a space missing in those entries, I'm not sure why you have all those spaces in there in the first place anyway. I added the space and it's sorted fine now.
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DanTheBanjoman For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 2, 2009, 02:10 PM   #173
entropy13
2000 Posts
 
entropy13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Philippines
Posts: 3,423 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 42
Thanked 1,132 Times in 713 Posts

System Specs

entropy13 | Intel| Core i7 920 @ stock w/ HT and Turbo on | 28.0738 | 10.5541 | 64-bit
__________________
MSI P67A-GD65 (B3), Intel Core i5 2500K, Corsair H60, 2x MSI GTX 570 Twin Frozr II/OC, G.Skill RipjawsX (2x4GB) DDR3-1600 RAM, OCZ Agility 3 120GB + 2TB, Corsair AX1200, Corsair Carbide 400R

MSI Z68MA-ED55, i5 2500K, Noctua NH-U9B SE2, Inno3D GTX 570, Corsair Vengeance LP 8GB, OCZ Agility 3 120GB + 1TB, Seasonic X660, Lian Li PC-V600FB

The Big Useful List of Free Useful Programs To Use Usually For Free
entropy13 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2009, 02:38 PM   #174
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,752 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

Table Updated

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanTheBanjoman View Post
That some reason was a space missing in those entries, I'm not sure why you have all those spaces in there in the first place anyway. I added the space and it's sorted fine now.
Thanks, I figured it was something stupid on my part like that, but when I tried it it didn't work correctly right away and I said screw it and just added the ability to sort by column headers and haven't had the time or patience to mess around with figuring it out(though it was on my list of things to do).

I put the spaces there simply to make things easier to read if I have to edit the table, like when I had to go back and add the Chip Maker manually for most of the entries.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2009, 05:46 PM   #175
Bot
500 Posts
 
Bot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: LACA
Posts: 533 (0.36/day)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 103 Times in 82 Posts

System Specs

BoT | Intel | Q9450 @ 3.6 | 47.2457 | 13.1238 | 64 bit

Click image for larger version

Name:	burnin_06.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	82.5 KB
ID:	26315

really nice scalling with the cpu and fsb speed combination in this bench
Bot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alcpone's Official 3dMark Vantage Compilation jbunch07 General Software 2955 Dec 8, 2009 07:32 PM
Alcpone's Official 3DMark '06 Compilation jbunch07 General Software 1810 Dec 8, 2009 07:28 PM
Alcpone's Official 3DMark '06 Compilation Alcpone General Software 4979 Sep 24, 2008 12:08 AM
Wolfdale Tempurature Compilation BigD6997 Overclocking & Cooling 13 Mar 7, 2008 10:26 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts