techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Storage

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jun 4, 2009, 09:18 PM   #1
Thrackan
2000 Posts
 
Thrackan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,159 (1.84/day)
Thanks: 235
Thanked 652 Times in 533 Posts

System Specs

Motherboard blew up, bye bye RAID 0 array?

Ok, so I've done something extremely stupid. I blew up some stuff on my motherboard and now I've got a new one.
I migrated from a Gigabyte EX58-UD3R to a EX58-UD5 and I was using Gigabyte's onboard raid controller for a RAID-0 setup (not the ICH10R from Intel) with 2 500Gb harddisks.

Now I've built everything around the UD5, but I am kind of a n00b with RAID controllers. I plugged in the disks in the same order on Gigabyte's own controller again but no RAID as far as I can tell.
I'm holding back to reinitialise the array since it effectively holds everything that was on the computer, including over 200Gbs of music and I don't know if initialising means data loss.

UD3R's controller is a JMicron JMB363 and so is the UD5's.

If someone can point me to utilities, boot cd's or whatever I can use to double and triple check whether my data will still be there when I reinitialise the array I'd be very, very thankful
Thrackan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2009, 09:31 PM   #2
Asylum
2000 Posts
 
Asylum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,687 (1.49/day)
Thanks: 849
Thanked 657 Times in 502 Posts

System Specs

Did you go into bios and enable raid for your harddrives?
__________________

My Bad Company 2 team is recruiting.
Stop by and check us out. -GuNS- CLAN
HEATWARE LINK
Rate My Rig
Asylum is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2009, 09:34 PM   #3
Thrackan
2000 Posts
 
Thrackan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,159 (1.84/day)
Thanks: 235
Thanked 652 Times in 533 Posts

System Specs

I enabled the raid controller itself. Then I went into the SmartBackup section, which basically allows me to "set" the raid level for the Jmicron controller. The big fat warning for data loss is holding me back to set it on raid-0 though (plus it's on 0 already).
I can try if this can be done without the disks present and then plug them in afterwards.
Thrackan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2009, 09:35 PM   #4
freaksavior
To infinity ... and beyond!
 
freaksavior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: H-Town Texas
Posts: 6,790 (2.85/day)
Thanks: 1,032
Thanked 860 Times in 585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to freaksavior Send a message via MSN to freaksavior Send a message via Yahoo to freaksavior

System Specs

your fine.

i've gone from ich8, to 9 to 10 without problem. just enable it. intel raid is ok with it.
freaksavior is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2009, 09:37 PM   #5
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,347 (2.15/day)
Thanks: 750
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Subscribed! Either you will get thanks or a death threat! LOL
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to lemonadesoda For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 4, 2009, 09:37 PM   #6
Thrackan
2000 Posts
 
Thrackan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,159 (1.84/day)
Thanks: 235
Thanked 652 Times in 533 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by freaksavior View Post
your fine.

i've gone from ich8, to 9 to 10 without problem. just enable it. intel raid is ok with it.
I'm not using the Intel raid chip.
Thrackan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2009, 09:50 PM   #7
mudkip
1000 Posts
 
mudkip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,132 (0.69/day)
Thanks: 175
Thanked 146 Times in 129 Posts

System Specs

connect the two drives to the WHITE sata ports and enable raid in BIOS

oh you already did that. maby you can try it with two other cheap HD's to test it
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked

Last edited by mudkip; Jun 4, 2009 at 10:43 PM.
mudkip is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2009, 10:57 PM   #8
freaksavior
To infinity ... and beyond!
 
freaksavior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: H-Town Texas
Posts: 6,790 (2.85/day)
Thanks: 1,032
Thanked 860 Times in 585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to freaksavior Send a message via MSN to freaksavior Send a message via Yahoo to freaksavior

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thrackan View Post
I'm not using the Intel raid chip.
oh whopps, i misread.
freaksavior is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2009, 11:56 PM   #9
angelkiller
1000 Posts
 
angelkiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,228 (0.66/day)
Thanks: 446
Thanked 225 Times in 201 Posts

Tough situation. The exact reason why I stopped using Raid 0. I think Raid 0 does give some nice benefits, but my data is too important.

AFAIK, all your data is currently in tact. However I'm not sure what 'initialization' will include. If it just creates the RAID structure, you should be ok. (The current sturcture will simply be overwritten by the new one, leaving data in place) But 'initialization' could involve more than that which will put your data in jeopardy. But you prolly knew everything I just said.

I do have to ask, why did you pick the JMicron controller over the ICH10R?
angelkiller is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 06:56 AM   #10
Thrackan
2000 Posts
 
Thrackan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,159 (1.84/day)
Thanks: 235
Thanked 652 Times in 533 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by angelkiller View Post
Tough situation. The exact reason why I stopped using Raid 0. I think Raid 0 does give some nice benefits, but my data is too important.

AFAIK, all your data is currently in tact. However I'm not sure what 'initialization' will include. If it just creates the RAID structure, you should be ok. (The current sturcture will simply be overwritten by the new one, leaving data in place) But 'initialization' could involve more than that which will put your data in jeopardy. But you prolly knew everything I just said.
What you say is exactly why I'm hesitating

Quote:
I do have to ask, why did you pick the JMicron controller over the ICH10R?
No particular reason really, guess I was thinking something in the likes of balancing the load between the chipsets.
Thrackan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 07:41 AM   #11
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.89/day)
Thanks: 3,708
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts

System Specs

try and find a PCI or PCI-E SATA raid card with the same chipset as your old motherboard. you should be able to fire up the raid on that with no problems.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 07:47 AM   #12
Thrackan
2000 Posts
 
Thrackan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,159 (1.84/day)
Thanks: 235
Thanked 652 Times in 533 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
try and find a PCI or PCI-E SATA raid card with the same chipset as your old motherboard. you should be able to fire up the raid on that with no problems.
I was thinking that should work on the UD5 as well as the Jmicron chip is the same...

I'm getting confused now, I'm not even sure anymore which disk was disk 0 and which one was disk 1... Stupid panic.

Can anyone point me to a handy tool for figuring out stuff like that? Something to detect RAID configiration from harddisks even when they're not initialised on a controller?
Thrackan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 07:51 AM   #13
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.89/day)
Thanks: 3,708
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts

System Specs

if its the same chip, it should work. just make sure its set to RAID mode in the BIOS.
Oh and assuming its not your boot drive, your OS is gunna need the drivers installed.

I avoid RAID because this happened to me years ago, with 2x120GB drives. buying a PCI card with compatible chipset/drivers saved me then.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 07:55 AM   #14
Thrackan
2000 Posts
 
Thrackan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,159 (1.84/day)
Thanks: 235
Thanked 652 Times in 533 Posts

System Specs

I just got a tip from a colleague, gonna see if I can set some jumper or something on these disks to write-protect them and then initialise the RAID. Though a tool for checking which disk is which would still be very much welcomed.
Thrackan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 08:05 AM   #15
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Just move the disks to another board, and place them in a similar hierarchy (order of SATA port number). Set the controller to RAID mode, and see if the array gets listed in the RAID BIOS setup. I was able to migrate my RAID 0 intact between a motherboard with AMD SB600 to one with SB700.
__________________

Gadgets, Gaming, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 08:08 AM   #16
Thrackan
2000 Posts
 
Thrackan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,159 (1.84/day)
Thanks: 235
Thanked 652 Times in 533 Posts

System Specs

I'm not sure of the order anymore... I did label them, but I can't quite remember if I labeled them correctly or if I misread ports 0 and 1.
Thrackan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 08:50 AM   #17
zAAm
500 Posts
 
zAAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Africa
Posts: 790 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 74 Times in 50 Posts

System Specs

Well, if they'll initialize fine in the correct config you could just switch them around till they work?
__________________
Intel Extreme DX58SO | i7 920 @ 4.0GHz | 16GB Corsair DDR3-1333 8-8-8-19 | HD4870 @ 780/1000 | 8600GT 256MB | GeForce 210 lol
Intel 520 240GB + Intel X25-M 80GB + 4TB Seagate/WD | 24" Samsung SA350 + 24" BenQ G2410HD + 2x22" Samsung 2253GW's LCD + 1x19" B91D LCD | CoolerMaster CM690 | Corsair TX750 PSU | Logitech Z-5500


Join The Core i7 Overclockers Club
[Core i7 Overclocking Basics] [Logitech Z-5500 Digital Soundroom] [Katy Towells' Childrin R Skary]
zAAm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 08:55 AM   #18
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,347 (2.15/day)
Thanks: 750
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

I can see this is a major PITA Thrackan - good luck!

Can you use something like Acronis Disk Director to image your drives for backup purpose in case it goes wrong? I dont know if that is possible, but just a thought.

Otherwise to be on the VERY SAFE side, I would suggest you pick up an identical mainboard off ebay. Get the drives booted. Save the critical data. Migrate. Resell the ebay board. Total loss: time and shipping costs and maybe a small trading loss. But it is the safest bet.

http://shop.ebay.nl/?_from=R40&_trks...All-Categories

Oh, only new ones available at the moment.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 08:58 AM   #19
Thrackan
2000 Posts
 
Thrackan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,159 (1.84/day)
Thanks: 235
Thanked 652 Times in 533 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonadesoda View Post
I can see this is a major PITA Thrackan - good luck!

Can you use something like Acronis Disk Director to image your drives for backup purpose in case it goes wrong? I dont know if that is possible, but just a thought.

Otherwise to be on the VERY SAFE side, I would suggest you pick up an identical mainboard off ebay. Get the drives booted. Save the critical data. Migrate. Resell the ebay board. Total loss: time and shipping costs. But it is the safest bet.
Even on an identical board I still need to plug in the drives in the correct way and initialise the RAID array I'm looking my ass off for a good tool, Acronis has helped me in the past with TrueImage though, I might take a look there as well.

Isn't it great, working on private problems at work?
Thrackan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 08:59 AM   #20
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,347 (2.15/day)
Thanks: 750
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

oh-oh. Caught red handed!
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 09:51 AM   #21
Thrackan
2000 Posts
 
Thrackan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,159 (1.84/day)
Thanks: 235
Thanked 652 Times in 533 Posts

System Specs

Oh, I just remembered something:

I tried simply booting with the disks plugged in either way (so without RAID enabled).

One way gives me a "NON SYSTEM DISK" message
The other way gives me a "Read error" message

My hunch is that the NON SYSTEM DISK message is caused by an incorrect order since it can't find an MBR and the "Read error" tells me that it found an MBR record but cannot read the next bits correctly since RAID isn't configured.

Am I thinking the right way?
Thrackan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 09:55 AM   #22
Studabaker
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere in the underground
Posts: 1,028 (0.66/day)
Thanks: 52
Thanked 76 Times in 75 Posts

System Specs

first of all it doesn't matter what order the disks are in. second, all you should have to do is enable RAID in the BIOS for the proper SATA ports, save and reboot and when the intel RAID screen comes up it should detect the RAID array. the only time this has not worked for me is when moving from an nvidia chipset to a intel chipset. i can vouch for moving from one nvidia chipset to a completely different one, and i've read a lot of people say they migrated on intel chipsets too. if it doesn't just get recognized as an array when you enable SATA RAID in the BIOS then maybe you lost data on the drives somewhere during the transfer (it can take less magnetic energy than you think).

a NSD message just means that a bootsector wasn't found on the drive(s), which makes sense considering the drives don't have any data that can be used outside of the array.
Studabaker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 09:58 AM   #23
Thrackan
2000 Posts
 
Thrackan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,159 (1.84/day)
Thanks: 235
Thanked 652 Times in 533 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Studabaker View Post
first of all it doesn't matter what order the disks are in. second, all you should have to do is enable RAID in the BIOS for the proper SATA ports, save and reboot and when the intel RAID screen comes up it should detect the RAID array. the only time this has not worked for me is when moving from an nvidia chipset to a intel chipset. i can vouch for moving from one nvidia chipset to a completely different one, and i've read a lot of people say they did it on their intels too. if it doesn't just get recognized as an array when you enable SATA RAID in the BIOS then maybe you lost data on the drives somewhere during the transfer (it can take less magnetic energy than you think).

a NSD message just means that a bootsector wasn't found on the drive(s).
So the configuration that gives me NSD is the wrong one and I should swap the drives? That was my hunch at least...

According to several colleagues here (IT department) the order is important when striping, not when mirroring.
Thrackan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 10:00 AM   #24
Studabaker
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere in the underground
Posts: 1,028 (0.66/day)
Thanks: 52
Thanked 76 Times in 75 Posts

System Specs

i changed the order of the drives on my nvidia RAID (striped) and it didn't matter. but it could vary from nvidia to intel.
Studabaker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2009, 09:49 PM   #25
Static~Charge
200 Posts
 
Static~Charge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 421 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 76 Times in 59 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Studabaker View Post
i changed the order of the drives on my nvidia RAID (striped) and it didn't matter. but it could vary from nvidia to intel.
FYI - His RAID wasn't plugged into the Intel southbridge's ports, it was plugged into the JMicron's ports.
Static~Charge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sapphire PURE Innovation PI-A9RX480 W1zzard Reviews 11 May 8, 2009 08:46 PM
Adaptec Launches Unified Serial RAID Controllers for PCIe Interface malware News 9 Mar 19, 2007 07:03 PM
System Builder's Guide 2006 djbbenn Articles 37 Aug 25, 2006 02:47 AM
DFI LanParty NF4 SLI-DR Expert W1zzard Reviews 9 Feb 21, 2006 10:11 PM
DFI LanParty UT NF4 Ultra-D W1zzard Reviews 2 Oct 8, 2005 12:32 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts