techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > General Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:18 AM   #1
hat
Maximum Overclocker
 
hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,236 (5.15/day)
Thanks: 2,054
Thanked 2,039 Times in 1,549 Posts

System Specs

What comes after nanometer?

With the thread in the News about new 22nm hardware, I am forced to wonder what will come after nanometer?
__________________
My Heatware
“Inb4 smartphone LN2 overclocking.” -radrok
hat is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:20 AM   #2
Assassin48
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 95350
Posts: 2,760 (1.65/day)
Thanks: 286
Thanked 518 Times in 460 Posts

System Specs

wouldn't it be the atom?
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Assassin48 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:26 AM   #3
theorw
500 Posts
 
theorw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Athens GREECE
Posts: 702 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 50 Times in 43 Posts

System Specs

No its PICOmeter...
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
theorw is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to theorw For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:37 AM   #4
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

i dont think we'll see CPU's based on a picmoter design in our lifetimes.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:45 AM   #5
Velvet Wafer
3500 Posts
 
Velvet Wafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North of Germany
Posts: 3,846 (2.68/day)
Thanks: 2,286
Thanked 1,025 Times in 838 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Velvet Wafer Send a message via MSN to Velvet Wafer

System Specs

At some point CPUs cant be build any smaller because auf physical limitations... at this point they have to ramp up the number of cores dramatically, or they have to build a quantum or DNA-based computer... to get uberperformance,or at least, more than with just a shrink

look at 45 nm cpus, theyre a lot more fragile than 65 or even 110 nm...So, at one point, ultimative fragility will have been reached. and that will probably be not far from 22 nm
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Velvet Wafer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:48 AM   #6
tigger
I'm the only one
 
tigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,196 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 469
Thanked 943 Times in 776 Posts
Send a message via MSN to tigger

System Specs

Eventually it will just be lots of nanobots on a wafer doing the buisness.
tigger is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:49 AM   #7
Velvet Wafer
3500 Posts
 
Velvet Wafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North of Germany
Posts: 3,846 (2.68/day)
Thanks: 2,286
Thanked 1,025 Times in 838 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Velvet Wafer Send a message via MSN to Velvet Wafer

System Specs

Gives the term "Grey Goo" a whole new meaning
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Velvet Wafer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:50 AM   #8
Bundy
1000 Posts
 
Bundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 1,070 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 189
Thanked 165 Times in 141 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
i dont think we'll see CPU's based on a picmoter design in our lifetimes.
Brave statement. I'm going to make sure I live long enough to prove you wrong now

I think in 10 years we will be seeing entirly different fabrication methods and materials that may make what we have now look rather shabby.
Bundy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:52 AM   #9
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bundy View Post
Brave statement. I'm going to make sure I live long enough to prove you wrong now

I think in 10 years we will be seeing entirly different fabrication methods and materials that may make what we have now look rather shabby.
i think they'll focus more on parallelism than shrinking it down.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:52 AM   #10
InnocentCriminal
Resident Grammar Amender
 
InnocentCriminal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 'ereyfurd, UK
Posts: 5,471 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 198
Thanked 855 Times in 667 Posts

System Specs

I think in 10 years I'll be dead.
__________________
Post count isn't an intelligence meter.
During the rectification of the Vuldronaii the Traveler came as a large, moving Torb. Then, during the third reconciliation of the last of the Meketrex supplicants they chose a new form for him—that of a giant Sloar! Many Shubs and Zuuls knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Sloar that day, I can tell you.

Musek: "InnocentCriminal - a Chuck Norris of the TPU - knows what you are about to type and he WILL type it faster than you."
InnocentCriminal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:55 AM   #11
Velvet Wafer
3500 Posts
 
Velvet Wafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North of Germany
Posts: 3,846 (2.68/day)
Thanks: 2,286
Thanked 1,025 Times in 838 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Velvet Wafer Send a message via MSN to Velvet Wafer

System Specs

Youre to positive... i bet you will have to live at least 20 years from now

i tend to high tech supercomputers, and if these wont be constructed, they could at least throw this 24core mainstream proc to the market ^^
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Velvet Wafer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 11:16 AM   #12
Bundy
1000 Posts
 
Bundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 1,070 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 189
Thanked 165 Times in 141 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
i think they'll focus more on parallelism than shrinking it down.
yes I agree but dont power usage and size count as well?
Bundy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 11:19 AM   #13
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,764 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,209 Times in 3,157 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet Wafer View Post
At some point CPUs cant be build any smaller because auf physical limitations...
use google and find out what the real physical limitations are. there is a good article on that. we are at least several hundred years away from those
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 11:33 AM   #14
Velvet Wafer
3500 Posts
 
Velvet Wafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North of Germany
Posts: 3,846 (2.68/day)
Thanks: 2,286
Thanked 1,025 Times in 838 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Velvet Wafer Send a message via MSN to Velvet Wafer

System Specs

sorry im german my english isnt that good, my ways of adequate conversation are a little limited... i meant the leakage issue, which will get a problem if they make continous die-shrinks... i must not tell you, you already know what i mean

At some point there will be Inventions that will change everything about them little chips. no more SOI and HKMG tech. but thats far in the future...
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Velvet Wafer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 11:36 AM   #15
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

w1zzards from germany too, i'm sure you could post something in german if you dont know how to translate it. Just try and keep an english version in the same post (to the best of your ability)
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 11:38 AM   #16
DanTheBanjoman
Señor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet Wafer View Post
sorry im german my english isnt that good, my ways of adequate conversation are a little limited... i meant the leakage issue, which will get a problem if they make continous die-shrinks... i must not tell you, you already know what i mean
Exactly, an issue. And there is a solution, most likely many. Believing there is an end to progress really is foolish.
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 11:41 AM   #17
Velvet Wafer
3500 Posts
 
Velvet Wafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North of Germany
Posts: 3,846 (2.68/day)
Thanks: 2,286
Thanked 1,025 Times in 838 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Velvet Wafer Send a message via MSN to Velvet Wafer

System Specs

i never knew.... seems germans are responsible for nearly everything: Luxury Cars, processor diffusing, TPU?

Progress ist dependant on the Intelectual Powers of the Inventor. (And i dont see Intel getting better. except for integrated MC)
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked

Last edited by Velvet Wafer; Jun 17, 2009 at 11:46 AM.
Velvet Wafer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 11:50 AM   #18
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,764 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,209 Times in 3,157 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet Wafer View Post
Progress ist dependant on the Intelectual Powers of the Inventor. (And i dont see Intel getting better. except for integrated MC)
intel has the best people on the planet, that money can buy. they have been the leading company in that segment for over 20 consecutive years.

why isnt intel getting better ? p4 -> c2d -> c2q -> i7
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 11:50 AM   #19
Odin Eidolon
500 Posts
 
Odin Eidolon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockclimbing somewhere in Italy
Posts: 818 (0.42/day)
Thanks: 395
Thanked 162 Times in 145 Posts

System Specs

quantum computers FTW!

EDIT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computer
__________________
[CENTER]
“Being human is quite overrated.” -DanTheBanjoman
[FONT="Arial Black"]
Odin Eidolon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 11:51 AM   #20
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 11:54 AM   #21
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
intel has the best people on the planet, that money can buy. they have been the leading company in that segment for over 20 consecutive years.

why isnt intel getting better ? p4 -> c2d -> c2q -> i7
lets pretend P4 wasnt part of that. Early P4 was slower than P3.


Intel seems to have a trend now: first generation on a new socket runs fast, but also very hot: they work on power efficiency with the later generations. Once they get it all down and perfect (think 45nm C2D vs early 775 P4) they start a new socket, and let it go all over again.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 12:04 PM   #22
DanTheBanjoman
Señor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet Wafer View Post
And i dont see Intel getting better. except for integrated MC)
How exactly is the memory controller related to the production process which your leakage issue belongs to?
Besides Intel there are more giants pumping billions into research of both their production process and chip designs, think IBM, Samsung, TI, TSMC, Toshiba, etc.
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 12:06 PM   #23
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,764 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,209 Times in 3,157 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
Intel seems to have a trend now: first generation on a new socket runs fast, but also very hot: they work on power efficiency with the later generations. Once they get it all down and perfect (think 45nm C2D vs early 775 P4) they start a new socket, and let it go all over again.
anything wrong with that?
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 12:06 PM   #24
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
anything wrong with that?
not at all. it seems to work quite well for them.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 12:09 PM   #25
Velvet Wafer
3500 Posts
 
Velvet Wafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North of Germany
Posts: 3,846 (2.68/day)
Thanks: 2,286
Thanked 1,025 Times in 838 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Velvet Wafer Send a message via MSN to Velvet Wafer

System Specs

They sure have. They also have an inhuman management, regarding Prices and their ways of forcing AMD out of the business. I mean, when you buy a Proc from them, its most Times more expensive than its AMD Counterpart,not ever,but mostly. due to hkmg these things do real well, but tend to die faster than their amd cousins, when overclocked with increased Vcore (so i read). Most Intel procs needed somehow more expensive hardware, to catch up with it. Amd builds were cheap as hell since i ever touched a keyboard. The only thing that Intel did better since Socket A days, was Performance.... (and they dont fucked their first quadcore) but i dindt mind if i dont have the fastest proc. (lets say 20-25% slower overall) and its more reliable,cheaper, and cooler (phenom 2 compared to i7 in this case)

It was just in my Eyes, other People might think other...
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Velvet Wafer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What goes up, comes down! mod2max General Hardware 18 Feb 6, 2008 11:25 PM
MSI 8800 gtx 459.00 after a rebate comes with CO. OF Hero's trt740 Hot Deals 4 Nov 14, 2007 12:44 PM
What kind of heatsink fan AM2 X2 comes with? macbeth General Hardware 3 Aug 7, 2006 10:21 AM
No 65 nanometer GPU's until 2007 POGE News 10 Aug 3, 2006 01:16 PM
110 Nanometer VPU W1zzard News 0 May 31, 2004 10:16 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts