techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 9, 2009, 07:58 AM   #1
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

Samsung Intros 250 GB 1.8-inch Spinpoint HDDs with Native USB 2.0 Controller

Strengthening its line up of portable 1.8-inch hard drives for external use, Samsung today announced its 250 Gigabyte (GB) 1.8-inch hard disk drive, the Spinpoint N3U which incorporates a native USB 2.0 controller on its printed circuit board. Most external hard drives require the addition of a bridge circuit board to convert the hard drive's current interface into a USB interface. Samsung's N3U drive, however, uses a native USB interface and as such does not require this bridge board. This optimized design results in a smaller foot print, less power consumption and optimized performance, which is ideal for portable external storage devices. The N3U 1.8-inch drive consumes about 40 percent less power than a normal 2.5-inch hard drive of an equivalent capacity. It has two 125 GB platters for a total of 250 GB data storage capacity. The Spinpoint N3U also comes in 120 GB, 160 GB, and 200 GB capacities, the disk rotation speed is 3600 rpm. The drives are equipped with an 8 MB of cache memory. Initial shipments to OEMs are scheduled from mid-July with a MSRP of $199.00.



Source: NewsWire
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 08:46 AM   #2
tigger
I'm the only one
 
tigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,189 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 469
Thanked 940 Times in 773 Posts
Send a message via MSN to tigger

System Specs

Very nice,but i think usb is for peripharals and useless for large capacity usb storage.It is way too slow to use for large capacity.
tigger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 09:16 AM   #3
satelitko
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 107 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to satelitko

System Specs

250GB with a 3400rpm isn't exactly high-speed enough for the USB to not be able to handle it imo
__________________
CPU: AMD Phenom™ II X3 720BE MB: Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P
RAM: Corsair TWIN2X4096-8500C5D HDD: Western Digital WD6400AAKS
VC: Sapphire HD4890 Toxic PSU: Corsair HX620W
CASE: Cooler Master HAF-922

satelitko is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 09:37 AM   #4
Kitkat
500 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 767 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 44
Thanked 77 Times in 54 Posts

yeah i read it like wtf lol
Kitkat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 09:45 AM   #5
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,544 (10.98/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,686 Times in 6,387 Posts

System Specs

dont forget its 1.8", thats ipod size drive.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 09:47 AM   #6
tigger
I'm the only one
 
tigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,189 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 469
Thanked 940 Times in 773 Posts
Send a message via MSN to tigger

System Specs

I use a 1.8" 20gb hdd in a caddy.
tigger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 09:48 AM   #7
DaveK
1000 Posts
 
DaveK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,268 (0.75/day)
Thanks: 113
Thanked 137 Times in 119 Posts

System Specs

It would go nice in an iPod but Apple ditched the 160GB for the 120GB so I don't see them using it. I'd like to see a hybrid of the Classic and Touch :P
DaveK is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 09:49 AM   #8
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,544 (10.98/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,686 Times in 6,387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveK View Post
It would go nice in an iPod but Apple ditched the 160GB for the 120GB so I don't see them using it. I'd like to see a hybrid of the Classic and Touch :P
stick one in yourself, duh :P
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 11:01 AM   #9
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.18/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Amazng capacity for 1.8".

Shame there isnt BOTH USB and SATA.

Oh, and that PCB and USB socket sticks out quite a bit.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 11:11 AM   #10
laszlo
500 Posts
 
laszlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 66 feet from the ground
Posts: 825 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts

System Specs

thank you samsung but where are the 3.5" drives with usb interface;i'll like to have only drives connected to mobo with usb

i don't ever understand why we have so many different connections (ATA SATA USB..) when the speed of usb is higher and future usb3 reach 4.8gb/s speed that no connected peripheral reach atm.
__________________
laszlo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 11:39 AM   #11
h3llb3nd4
2000 Posts
 
h3llb3nd4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Durban, South Africa
Posts: 2,902 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 372
Thanked 313 Times in 277 Posts
Send a message via MSN to h3llb3nd4

System Specs

this is quite awesome!
I really like 1,8" hdds.
__________________
h3llb3nd4 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 12:00 PM   #12
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,544 (10.98/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,686 Times in 6,387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by laszlo View Post
thank you samsung but where are the 3.5" drives with usb interface;i'll like to have only drives connected to mobo with usb

i don't ever understand why we have so many different connections (ATA SATA USB..) when the speed of usb is higher and future usb3 reach 4.8gb/s speed that no connected peripheral reach atm.
uhh, what? USB 2.0 is one of the slowest connections out. the only slower would be USB 1.1 or floppy drives.

I think you're another person who doesnt know the difference between MB/s and Mb/s
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 12:51 PM   #13
Weer
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York / Israel
Posts: 1,293 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 60
Thanked 95 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

Why don't they make 1.8" passports?
Weer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 12:58 PM   #14
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,735 (6.49/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,110 Times in 3,702 Posts

System Specs

Doesn't really appeal to me. You'd have to use the drive bare, and for a drive that size, I wouldn't want to do that for long periods of time.

I could certianly find some uses for it, mainly using it as a back up drive for customers machines when I do reformats onsite, but I would be too scared to break it carrying it around. Now if they sold a metal enclosure to put the drive in with the USB sticking out, I would jump on it.

Speed wouldn't be an issue, 3600RPM isn't really going to push the USB bus, IMO.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 03:15 PM   #15
laszlo
500 Posts
 
laszlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 66 feet from the ground
Posts: 825 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
uhh, what? USB 2.0 is one of the slowest connections out. the only slower would be USB 1.1 or floppy drives.

I think you're another person who doesnt know the difference between MB/s and Mb/s

as i know Usb2 has a max of 60MB/sec and usb 3 will have 10 times usb2 speed (with required cables) correct me if i'm wrong
__________________
laszlo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 03:19 PM   #16
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,735 (6.49/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,110 Times in 3,702 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by laszlo View Post
as i know Usb2 has a max of 60MB/sec and usb 3 will have 10 times usb2 speed (with required cables) correct me if i'm wrong
Theoretically, yes USB2.0 can provided 60MB/s. However, in reality it is usually closer to 30MB/s. Where as SATA1 gives well over 100MB/s, and SATA2 gives over 250MB/s.

I don't belive the specs for USB3.0 have actually been made public yet, only rumors about it's performance, and I don't think 10x the performance is realistic for USB3.0.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 03:23 PM   #17
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,544 (10.98/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,686 Times in 6,387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by laszlo View Post
as i know Usb2 has a max of 60MB/sec and usb 3 will have 10 times usb2 speed (with required cables) correct me if i'm wrong
30MB/s each way.

USB 3.0 will be 300MB/s (each way) - basically matching sata II, right when sata III comes out.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 04:12 PM   #18
laszlo
500 Posts
 
laszlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 66 feet from the ground
Posts: 825 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post

I don't belive the specs for USB3.0 have actually been made public yet, only rumors about it's performance, and I don't think 10x the performance is realistic for USB3.0.

i think they're public :http://www.usb.org/developers/docs/
__________________
laszlo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 04:16 PM   #19
ArmoredCavalry
500 Posts
 
ArmoredCavalry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 572 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 74 Times in 55 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by laszlo View Post
i don't ever understand why we have so many different connections (ATA SATA USB..) when the speed of usb is higher and future usb3 reach 4.8gb/s speed that no connected peripheral reach atm.
How many people have USB 3.0 now?

For now, if the choice is between SATAII and USB 2.0, the decision should be pretty obvious (clue: it begins with 'S').'

But hey, if you want to hook all you drives up via USB, go for it.
ArmoredCavalry is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 04:18 PM   #20
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,735 (6.49/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,110 Times in 3,702 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmoredCavalry View Post
How many people have USB 3.0 now?

For now, if the choice is between SATAII and USB 2.0, the decision should be pretty obvious (clue: it begins with 'S').'

But hey, if you want to hook all you drives up via USB, go for it.
Super USB?
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 04:20 PM   #21
tigger
I'm the only one
 
tigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,189 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 469
Thanked 940 Times in 773 Posts
Send a message via MSN to tigger

System Specs

All i know is,if you plug in a usb 1tb hdd and copy 50gb of stuff from your pc to the external,you can go to bed and it might be finished copying the 50gb of stuff to it by the time you get up.

I would rather have esata with power and data from 1 plug than usb3.
tigger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 04:26 PM   #22
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,544 (10.98/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,686 Times in 6,387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tigger View Post
All i know is,if you plug in a usb 1tb hdd and copy 50gb of stuff from your pc to the external,you can go to bed and it might be finished copying the 50gb of stuff to it by the time you get up.

I would rather have esata with power and data from 1 plug than usb3.
you have inspired me to do math bad man, bad.


100MB/s = 6,000MB per minute, 360,000MB (351GB) per hour. (modern 1TB drive, SATA/E-sata/USB 3.0 when it exists)

50MB/s = 175GB per hour (average for a 2.5" drive? firewire 400?)

25MB/s = 88GB an hour (USB 2.0 equivalent)
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 07:57 PM   #23
BazookaJoe
500 Posts
 
BazookaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 800 (0.47/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 207 Times in 125 Posts

I think this thing is a Step in the right direction - It may not be FAST per say, but sometimes storage is really the issue, and NOT speed - and this is basically a maga-mechanical flash drive... - for a HECK OF A HELL OF A LOT CHEAPER than you would pay for a flash drive of that size.

I think it'd be very useful - When used for the right reasons.

And we all KNOW it will evolve to USB3 In time. Have to remember ppl's - USB3 is ALREADY being integrated into next gen board controllers right now - we may start seeing first supporting mobo' in just a few months.
BazookaJoe is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 08:01 PM   #24
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,735 (6.49/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,110 Times in 3,702 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tigger View Post
All i know is,if you plug in a usb 1tb hdd and copy 50gb of stuff from your pc to the external,you can go to bed and it might be finished copying the 50gb of stuff to it by the time you get up.
Maybe on USB1.1, but not on USB2.0.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2009, 09:00 PM   #25
ArmoredCavalry
500 Posts
 
ArmoredCavalry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 572 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 74 Times in 55 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
you have inspired me to do math bad man, bad.


100MB/s = 6,000MB per minute, 360,000MB (351GB) per hour. (modern 1TB drive, SATA/E-sata/USB 3.0 when it exists)

50MB/s = 175GB per hour (average for a 2.5" drive? firewire 400?)

25MB/s = 88GB an hour (USB 2.0 equivalent)
Remember to factor in file type though. One 50 Gig file will copy at whole lot faster than a ton of small files adding up to 50 gigs.

I have a 16 gb flash drive, and whenever I need to copy a ton of files with it, I always zip/rar them, it goes so much faster.
ArmoredCavalry is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Toshiba Intros Half-Terabyte 2.5'' HDDs with Quiet Acoustics and Enhanced Durability malware News 4 Nov 19, 2008 04:19 PM
Toshiba Expands 1.8-inch HDD Line with New 160GB 5400 rpm SATA HDDs malware News 3 Jun 12, 2008 04:46 PM
Toshiba Hints at 22-inch LCD Monitor with 3840x2400 QUXGA-W Native Resolution malware News 9 Nov 30, 2007 02:56 PM
SAMSUNG Develops SpinPoint MP1 2.5inch Hard Disk Drives with 7200RPM Bastieeeh News 1 Apr 12, 2007 11:07 PM
SAMSUNG develops SpinPoint M5 hard disk drive series with 5400RPM Bastieeeh News 1 Apr 12, 2007 11:07 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts