![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
|
Abit AW9D-MAX reaches retail
Sicness, a member of XtremeSystems, is among the first to have received his ABIT AW9D Max retail motherboard. This motherboard is one of the first "new" generation motherboards, not just an updated version to support Conroe CPUs. Overclockers have high expectations from this motherboard in helping them to push their CPUs even further.
The motherboard was purchased from www.e-bug.de ![]() Source: Xtreme Systems Last edited by D_o_S; Sep 15, 2006 at 01:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,066 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 827
Thanked 913 Times in 746 Posts
|
http://www.abit-usa.com/products/mb/...es=1&model=326
Finally... One gripe - I wish they made room for the ONE PCI slot - if you have a CF setup, you have no legacy PCI slots to work with... at least it appears that way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() |
omg that board looks sweet
hmm well atleast there put one pci slot otherwise no sound card |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.11/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,526 Times in 865 Posts
|
the lack of pci slots maybe their own demise
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Semi-Retired Folder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,762 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,118 Times in 3,708 Posts
|
I wish they would make up their damn minds. Personally I don't care one way or the other about PCI vs. PCI-e x1. I just wish they would pick one. It seems like the motherboard manufacturers want to go PCI-e but the add-on card makers seem to want to stick with PCI. If the motherboard manufacturers want PCI-e then I say get together and just decide that there will be no more PCI on boards, or maybe one port at the most. Force the add-on card makers, such as Creative and the like, to get over the PCI thing and just start making PCI-e cards, then people won't bitch that there isn't enough PCI slots on the new motherboards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() |
...Dude Why does ABIT's board layouts suck so much!? Can't they learn to put all the SATA and PATA ports on 1 side of the damned motherboard!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,792 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,289 Times in 3,175 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,066 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 827
Thanked 913 Times in 746 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Semi-Retired Folder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,762 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,118 Times in 3,708 Posts
|
The floppy connect does suck at the bottom of the board like that, simply because it would be a pain to run a ribbon cable all the way down there, but the SATA right above it shouldn't be a problem since the cables are easier to work with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Worcester, England
Posts: 140 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
floppy connector??? Whats that!!!
..... I recollect some talk of those, but that was some years ago!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sweden (08-Stockholm)
Posts: 307 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
As already mentioned a few times! WHY Cant ABIT learn how to have smart layouts on their boards. If i would have CF which i would if i bought the mobo, then i would have sacrifice my x-fi for it!? How and what are Abit thinking?? This is why I still stay with my beloved Asus brand!
__________________
Break´n the law... Break´n the law...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() |
Yeah, only 1 PCI isn't a smart choice now if you have a sound card, but in the future, I'm sure a lot of things, including sound will be PCI-E x1. But the Floppy I don't really care about. I only use it to install RAID, which doesn't take too long.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The 13th room on the 13th floor of the 13th building.
Posts: 1,427 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 48 Times in 39 Posts
|
are the ports on the board sata or sata2?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 368 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
|
SATA II according to the specs on the Abit site linked on page 1, but they have disguised it by referign to it as SATA 3Gb/s (which is perfectly valid, but why is there 3 names for the same thing, SATA II, SATA 3GB/s and SATA3000 ?)
Internal I/O Connectors - 1 x Floppy port, 1 x UDMA 100/66/33 connector - 7 x SATA 3Gb/s connectors - 2 x USB 2.0 headers, 2 x IEEE1394 headers - 1 x FP-Audio header, 1 x CD-IN |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area, California, USA, Earth
Posts: 6,158 (2.36/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 708 Times in 595 Posts
|
just installed one, didnt post. just installed the asus delux mobo, didnt post. installed gigabytes quad and it posted....
so far the g/b is my fav. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,066 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 827
Thanked 913 Times in 746 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area, California, USA, Earth
Posts: 6,158 (2.36/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 708 Times in 595 Posts
|
today was pretty bad for the customer i was building this for. we went thru so many mobos. seems like a bad batch of 965s'. the asus board got some dma issue, the abit got some floppy issue and a c1 error, but the g/b board posted with out a hitch. personally (building over 100 units using the finest board the market had to offer) gigabyte is my fav manafacture. then comes dfi, and a fight between abit and asus for third.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|