![]() |
|
|
#226 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 22 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Shadowdust: Interesting... Did you try tweaking NB and CPU-NB voltage? Maybe some increasing on NB and CPU-NB help you with CPU OC. Try CPU 1.425, CPU-NB +0.1 ( NB set do default speed - 2000MHz), NB 0.1V and RAM to 800 speed and loose timings. Then try to boot at 3.6 and do so stress testing - if CPU fail, try with more CPU voltage, if fail too you have probadly "ordinary" CPU nad over 3.5 dont go. I can do 3650 with 2600 NB, but 3720 isnt totally stable, but CB x64 and wprime is ok, but linx not. If you need fufther info please send me PM.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to froxic For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#227 |
![]() |
My NIC disappeared once too but I reset CMOS and all was fine.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Ozpa For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#228 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Martinez, CA
Posts: 333 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 85
Thanked 88 Times in 63 Posts
|
Thanks for the info guys.
If I ever decide to put the 940 back in my case, I'll try the settings you suggested, froxic. Currently, I'm using a PII 550 BE oc'd to 3.6 GHz on 1.40 vcore. Also, I was fortunate enough to unlock the other two cores with ACC. When the NIC issue first started, I tried resetting the CMOS but no luck with everything returning to normal. What's interesting is that my router detects the port in gigabit mode. But when I check the cable status in the BIOS it says something about testing a virtual connection as if there is no connection. I may try resetting the CMOS again just to be sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
#229 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: czech republic
Posts: 146 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 53 Times in 31 Posts
|
Quote:
my AIR x4 955 1.475V and 3.895 GHz stable, NB 2665 MHz . I know some guys with 3.9 up or 4 GHz stable at AIR, but it with only x4 955 BE and x4 965 BE (better chips).For x4 940 is mostly 3.6-3.7GHz stable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#230 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 22 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Yep for 940 is common 3.6-3.7. 3.8 GHz is for best chips, and in your case 3.4-3.5 is for worst - but this is normal in overclocking that some chips are better then other. Anyway - 3.5 is 500 MHz difference and for free. I remember my first AMD rig with Athlon XP Palomino - i was very dissapointed, because i can overclock it from 1666 to 1700 and no further
|
|
|
|
|
|
#231 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: czech republic
Posts: 146 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 53 Times in 31 Posts
|
guys, watch at this, this must be gold binned chip!
user blackwarriors, really only 1.375V !!! And AIR ![]() And 1.25V for boot to windows 4 GHz ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#232 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 22 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
very nice OC for 955 with that low voltages. But performence wouldnt be supreme instead of 2000 MHz NB clock. For 4GHz is 2800-3000 NB ideal. 2000 NB - thin bottle neck ( sorry for my expresions. Im not native speaker
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#233 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: czech republic
Posts: 146 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 53 Times in 31 Posts
|
:-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#234 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pernik, Bulgaria
Posts: 5 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hi, I'm currently with bios F3f.I want to try to unlock my Ph II 550 but I can't see the Hybrid mode in the BIOS.In the last few pages it was mentioned that in the BIOS I'm using this function is missing.So which BIOS do you recommend me?
I got my CPU to 3830MHz stable.It probably can do more but i'm not the best overclocker.Now I'm using it on default with Cool'n'Quiet enabled. P.S. Sorry for my bad English.
Last edited by Stiliyan; Sep 8, 2009 at 08:34 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#235 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 22 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
You must push CTRL+F1 (maybe ALT+F1) in main bios scrren, then some hided parts of bios appear. Then go to ACC ( Advanced clock calibration ) page, and there is hybrid mode you wished. And you can be calm, in my opinion F3 has same OC cappabilities like F5, so you can stay at F3 version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#236 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pernik, Bulgaria
Posts: 5 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'm with BIOS F3F and it isn't working with ctrl+F1.It just opens a HT link Wildth which is on auto and btw how it is better on Auto/8x/16x?
http://www.picvalley.net/v.php?p=u/1...49cvDsXAuO.JPG Hybrid mode as you see doesn't appear in the menu.I am considering BIOS F5. |
|
|
|
|
|
#237 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 22 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Ohh, sorry, youre using F3F, F3 is newer one. So flash F3, better F5 and EC firmware selection - hybrid mode / normal appears
http://img9.imgup.eu/DSC01625.JPG |
|
|
|
|
|
#238 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pernik, Bulgaria
Posts: 5 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() http://www.picvalley.net/v.php?p=u/2...3dK9LqMlOG.PNG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#239 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 22 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Quote:
You can find worst core too if youre set afinity to core 1.. to core 4 in steps, then you can add more voltage with ACC to worst/faulty core indepedently to other cores. Overclocking is hard work, but you can push it harder and maybe you can unlock to 4 stable cores after some tweaking
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to froxic For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#240 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: czech republic
Posts: 146 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 53 Times in 31 Posts
|
On weekends Il try some Benchmarks: my point are:
Cinebench in x64 at 3.95 GHz Superpi 32M: more than 4 GHz all AIR cooling |
|
|
|
|
|
#241 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 22 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#242 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pernik, Bulgaria
Posts: 5 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
How can I set afinity to one of the cores?In the ACC I tried to put lower percents on the thirt and the fourth cores but with no success. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#243 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 22 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
In taskmanager in windows, browse to process tab, then choose process that you want change affinity and right click on in and choose set affinity ...
![]() So when youre stress testing CPU, do it separately for each core EDIT: ACC is none-related to CPU affinity, In ACC you can only increase or decrease CPU cores voltage separately. So for examle you find that core 4 is faulty and you have ACC setings +2 +2 +2 +2 on all cores, you put new settings +2 +2 +2 +4(+6) or somethink like that and you can pray that it will works. But first, try to boot at very low speeds, like 800 or 1000 MHz on CPU, when it will be unstable, i think you havent chance to stable it EDIT2: Im hit my personal record in superII. ![]() 3919,6MHz - 17.628s Last edited by froxic; Sep 9, 2009 at 11:12 AM. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to froxic For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#244 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pernik, Bulgaria
Posts: 5 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I will put the multiplier on 7(1400MHz) and in the AOD there is a function to test each core.Should I turn on the calculation and MCA test?
http://pics.data.bg/zoom/albums/7345...97bffc7970c714 EDIT1 :I caught the bad core with the set affinity - CPU Core 0. AOD confirmed that : http://pics.data.bg/zoom/albums/ec0d...2ad73f4a7253da In ACC I will set +2(4/5/8/10);-2;-2;-2 on 1500/2000/2500MHz EDIT2 : It didn't work on +2/4/6/8/12/-2/-4/-8/-10.Can I stop one of the four cores? Last edited by Stiliyan; Sep 9, 2009 at 08:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#245 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Finland (northern)
Posts: 619 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 89 Times in 54 Posts
|
Offtopic, but I think its pointless to add a new thread.
Question about 790GX-UD4H. Is the onboard audio any better than on DS4H? I thought there could possibly be less interference due the thicker copper layers...
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
#246 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: czech republic
Posts: 146 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 53 Times in 31 Posts
|
790x-ud4 isnt dead...Great board
|
|
|
|
|
|
#247 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 22 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
lol, youre still alive, arent you death instead benchmarkung?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#248 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: czech republic
Posts: 146 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 53 Times in 31 Posts
|
not now
...maybe later, today i was fighting with Cinebenchs run and wprime, but i forgot save wprime screens (32M 9.1s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#249 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 41 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I have gone through 3 790x ud4s in the past 3 months, i have had a running time of about 1.5 weeks between them, the third one turned up DOA with a cpu pin in the socket and thermal paste on it.
They have now sent me a ud3p saying that they have changed it as they have had problems with the 790x ud4 model. |
|
|
|
|
|
#250 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: czech republic
Posts: 146 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 53 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Gigabyte Announces GA-EG45M-UD2H Ultra Durable 3 Motherboard | btarunr | News | 3 | Feb 23, 2009 02:00 AM |
| Gigabyte Introduces Next Generation AMD AM3 Dragon Motherboard | btarunr | News | 21 | Jan 23, 2009 01:25 PM |
| GIGABYTE Announces MA78GM-S2H Motherboard | Jimmy 2004 | News | 5 | Mar 4, 2008 06:14 AM |
| Comparison 2 AMD Processors | anti-liberal | General Hardware | 21 | Oct 5, 2006 02:05 PM |