Seagate Readies its First SATA 6 Gbps Hard Drive

btarunr · Sep 21, 2009, 09:54 AM

Hard drive specialist Seagate is readying its first line of performance hard drives to feature the new SATA 6 Gb/s interface, under the banner Barracuda XT. Some of the first in this family include 2 TB drives made with 500 GB platters, with spindle speeds of 7200 rpm. The drives will feature 64 MB caches, and are expected to sustain transfer rates of 140 MB/s. These drives are expected to have rated MTBF at 750,000 hours and are backed by 5 year company warranty.

The Seagate Barracuda XT faces competition from WD Caviar Black 2 TB, even as the latter features the SATA 3 Gb/s interface. The contribution of the interface bandwidth to the actual performance remains largely to be seen, although developments in the fields of solid-state drives show them to have a bright future with the SATA 6 Gb/s interface. The Seagate Barracuda XT is expected to cost around US $300, and will start shipping later this week.

Sources: The Tech Report, TechConnect Magazine

wiak · Sep 21, 2009, 09:59 AM

Seagate Readies its First SATA 3 Gbps Hard Drive

REVHEAD · Sep 21, 2009, 10:14 AM

Quote:

140 MB/s

not exactly groundbreaking, you can acheive this on a Sata 2.0 interface.

Solaris17 · Sep 21, 2009, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by REVHEAD

not exactly groundbreaking, you can acheive this on a Sata 2.0 interface.

and though it is acheivable it is not the base line.

Cheeseball · Sep 21, 2009, 10:33 AM

Seagate Readies its First SATA 3 Gbps Hard Drive

Roph · Sep 21, 2009, 11:13 AM

Why the posting "3Gbps" and then thanking? Am I missing something? =o

And it's nice to see them back with a 5 year warranty on these

Fishymachine · Sep 21, 2009, 11:19 AM

Marketing schemes...

and to thing you elect people to represent and protect us.
It is impractical to make a 300MB(3Gb)ps mechanical hard drive.Sata 6gig is for SSD's

lemonadesoda · Sep 21, 2009, 11:32 AM

In theory, you CAN double the performance of a HDD. But it becomes more expensive to build/manufacture and calibrate. How to do it?

>> Build a drive with TWO head arms 180° opposite from each other, so there are now TWO heads on each platter surface. You RAID 0 the heads. The alternative it so have just one arm, but with two heads at the end, offset by a small amount.

To fit the double arm system in a 3.5" drive, you would need to reduce the size of the platters somewhat. Not as small as a 2.5" drive, probably somewhere in between.

Capacity would go down a bit, but performance would double, and seek times would improve in the double-arm approach (you would constrain each head arm to use only half of the disk, so there would be less head movement and seek time for each arm), but remain the same in the double-head approach.

There are ways of doing it... but the question is are the economics right for the market? Possibly it will be the only way to keep HDDs competitive against SSDs.

inferKNOX · Sep 21, 2009, 12:16 PM

With how Samsung has been surging, I thought they'd be the first ones to present this.
I wonder if they're (Samsung) trying to make their new 500GB platters work blazing fast then put them into the 6Gb/s bracket so that they don't get the, "What's the speed increase?" complaint that everyone is giving.

I also wonder what the price of the 1GB version will be from each company?

Mussels · Sep 21, 2009, 12:31 PM

its good to see the standard pick up, although i'd rather see it on SSD's.

newtekie1 · Sep 21, 2009, 12:41 PM

Sweet, so we can see sustaind transfer rates that don't even max out SATA 1.5Gbps... why do hard drives need SATA 6Gbps?

Solaris17 · Sep 21, 2009, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by newtekie1

Sweet, so we can see sustaind transfer rates that don't even max out SATA 1.5Gbps... why do hard drives need SATA 6Gbps?

because with the introduction of a biger number we can pretty much garentee that now the HDD's will start doing tricks? god try to understand the article plz

:P

inferKNOX · Sep 21, 2009, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roph

Why the posting "3Gbps" and then thanking? Am I missing something? =o

And it's nice to see them back with a 5 year warranty on these

They're trying to bring attention to the fact that the full bandwidth of the 3Gb/s has not been maxed, nevermind needing 6Gb/s.
I agree, but think it's better to remove the bottleneck before it arises.
Lol, and think about it everyone... the storage side of the news has been really lacking, so this gives them a story, ROFL!

wiak · Sep 21, 2009, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by REVHEAD

not exactly groundbreaking, you can acheive this on a Sata 2.0 interface.

Samsung Spinpoint F3 does that on 3Gbps

Mussels · Sep 21, 2009, 12:57 PM

i suppose the main point of this is that they test it on a mechanical drive and work out any bandwidth inhibiting kinks in the controller, before moving it to their SSD lineup (when they make one :P)

PP Mguire · Sep 21, 2009, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mussels

i suppose the main point of this is that they test it on a mechanical drive and work out any bandwidth inhibiting kinks in the controller, before moving it to their SSD lineup (when they make one :P)

I was just about to say something like that. Seagate already makes good HDs, they should leave those on sata 300 and just make SSDs now. The more SSDs the cheaper they will become. And SSDs have to be cheaper to produce than HDDs.

inferKNOX · Sep 21, 2009, 01:37 PM

I agree that HDDs should be left to 3Gb/s & SSDs be the focus for the 6Gb/s.

thebeephaha · Sep 21, 2009, 04:15 PM

Everyone needs to stop bitching.

It is a technological step forward. Doesn't matter if the drives actually use it or not. It just starts to force the interface to become mainstream quicker.

PP Mguire · Sep 21, 2009, 04:23 PM

Seagate should release SSDs to make that mainstream faster

TheLaughingMan · Sep 21, 2009, 10:20 PM

I am looking forward to Rectangular Hard Disk Drives in the next few years. RHD will be the real competition for SSD's and it is good to see Seagate is working on improving IO for HDD which will help advance both RHD's and SSD's in the future.

Though I will be sticking to getting a sustained throughput of 84 MB/s on a 5400 RPM Sammy F3.

PP Mguire · Sep 21, 2009, 11:30 PM

I think ill stick with fast SSDs and Seagate awesome big drives for storage.

Zubasa · Sep 22, 2009, 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thebeephaha

Everyone needs to stop bitching.

It is a technological step forward. Doesn't matter if the drives actually use it or not. It just starts to force the interface to become mainstream quicker.

If this "technological step forward" means polluting the world with useless junk then no thanks.

What they really should do is force SSDs to mainsteam, not $300 HDDs that can't even utilize the original SATA 1.5Gb/s.

Kantastic · Sep 22, 2009, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLaughingMan

I am looking forward to Rectangular Hard Disk Drives in the next few years. RHD will be the real competition for SSD's and it is good to see Seagate is working on improving IO for HDD which will help advance both RHD's and SSD's in the future.

Though I will be sticking to getting a sustained throughput of 84 MB/s on a 5400 RPM Sammy F3.

Unfortunately by the time RHD's are ready to be released, SSD's would have gone mainstream unless RHD's are released a lot sooner than expected.

lemonadesoda · Sep 22, 2009, 11:16 AM

In theory you could combine the "best" of HDD and RHD. That is... have a spinning disk with a FIXED ARM... that has multiple heads on it. Then there is no head seek time... there is a head for each track on the HDD. There would be no seek noise or clattering either.

They would be unbelievably fast because you would RAID0 across all the heads... if there were 512 heads then you could get 64 way RAID or better. (cant do them ALL at the same time due to magnetic interference)

However, it would be a big change in how they are made... and I would imagine wiring multiple heads would be expensive... and the processing power to handle that data trhoughput would have to be an order of magnitude higher than today. But doable. They would probably also be more shock tolerant... since MOST HDD damage is due to arm moving the wrong way and folding the heads over.

TheLaughingMan · Sep 22, 2009, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemonadesoda

In theory you could combine the "best" of HDD and RHD. That is... have a spinning disk with a FIXED ARM... that has multiple heads on it. Then there is no head seek time... there is a head for each track on the HDD. There would be no seek noise or clattering either.

They would be unbelievably fast because you would RAID0 across all the heads... if there were 512 heads then you could get 64 way RAID or better. (cant do them ALL at the same time due to magnetic interference)

However, it would be a big change in how they are made... and I would imagine wiring multiple heads would be expensive... and the processing power to handle that data trhoughput would have to be an order of magnitude higher than today. But doable. They would probably also be more shock tolerant... since MOST HDD damage is due to arm moving the wrong way and folding the heads over.

Well that is almost exactly what a RHD is suppose to be minus the RAID. A single dual sided platter, multiple heads (32 and 64 being tested as of now), with fixed arms. Each head gets a sector and movement of the drive is limited to a very small area resulting in very low or no seek time. Honestly, from the little I know, there is really nothing but testing for issues like the one you mention and manufacturing concerns in their way. It is possible they could be released next year.

Sep 21, 2009, 09:54 AM	#1
btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Hyderabad, India Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day) Thanks: 788 Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts System Specs	Seagate Readies its First SATA 6 Gbps Hard Drive Hard drive specialist Seagate is readying its first line of performance hard drives to feature the new SATA 6 Gb/s interface, under the banner Barracuda XT. Some of the first in this family include 2 TB drives made with 500 GB platters, with spindle speeds of 7200 rpm. The drives will feature 64 MB caches, and are expected to sustain transfer rates of 140 MB/s. These drives are expected to have rated MTBF at 750,000 hours and are backed by 5 year company warranty. The Seagate Barracuda XT faces competition from WD Caviar Black 2 TB, even as the latter features the SATA 3 Gb/s interface. The contribution of the interface bandwidth to the actual performance remains largely to be seen, although developments in the fields of solid-state drives show them to have a bright future with the SATA 6 Gb/s interface. The Seagate Barracuda XT is expected to cost around US $300, and will start shipping later this week. Sources: The Tech Report, TechConnect Magazine Last edited by btarunr; Sep 21, 2009 at 10:40 AM.

System Name:	Blackbox
Processor:	Intel Core i7-950
Motherboard:	Intel Extreme Series DX58OG
Cooling:	Xigmatek Aegir SD128264 with IC Diamond 24 Thermal Compound
Memory:	12GB ADATA Premier (3x 4GB) DDR3-1333 MHz
Video Card:	Palit GeForce GTX 680 JetStream 2GB outfitted with IC Diamond 24 TIM
Hard Disk:	Samsung 840 Series 250GB, Random 8 TB storage
Optical Drive:	HT-LG DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	ViewSonic VX2450wm-LED
Case:	Cooler Master CM690 Window
Sound Card:	Creative SB Recon3D
PSU:	Corsair HX850W
Software:	Windows 8 Pro 64-bit

Sep 21, 2009, 09:59 AM	#2
wiak Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Norway Posts: 1,681 (0.53/day) Thanks: 15 Thanked 199 Times in 156 Posts	Seagate Readies its First SATA 3 Gbps Hard Drive __________________ My rig @ overclock.net \| My new friend OpenShot

System Name:	Wiak's Gaming Rig v4.0
Processor:	AMD Phenom II 965 125W Rev. C3
Motherboard:	Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-UD5P (8+2 Phase)
Cooling:	1x 140mm 3x 120mm, Zalman CPNS9500LED
Memory:	OCZ Platinum XTC 4096MB DDR3 1600mhz Dual Channel @ 1333mhz 6-6-6-24
Video Card:	Sapphire Radeon HD 7970 3GB GDDR5 (Stock Cooler)
Hard Disk:	1x Cruical M4 128GB 1x Samsung F3 1TB 1x WD My Book 3.0 2TB
Optical Drive:	LH BH10 Blu-Ray Writer and CH08 Blu-Ray Reader
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell UltraSharp U2410 24" 1920x1200 H-IPS
Case:	Antec Three Hundred
Sound Card:	Asus Xonar DX
PSU:	Corsair AX 850W
Software:	Windows 7 Home Premium x64 Edition SP1

Processor:	Intel i7 920 d0 stepping @ 200x19 qpi
Motherboard:	Gigabyte EX58-UD3R
Cooling:	Noctua
Memory:	Patriot 1333 MHZ ram 6gb Triple Channel @ 1600 MHZ
Video Card:	ATI 5870 x2 in Crossfire
Hard Disk:	4X WD 80gb Veloci Raptors in Raid 0 & Seagate 500gb 7200.11 x 2 in raid 0
Optical Drive:	LG HL-DT-ST BDDVDRW-GGC-H20L
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell 3007 WFP
Case:	Lian Li A-10b
Sound Card:	Asus Xonar STX
PSU:	CoolerMaster realpower pro 1000w
Software:	Windows 7 X64 ultimate RC

System Name:	Prometheus
Processor:	Xeon W 3520 4.5ghz
Motherboard:	DFI Lanparty UT t3eH8
Cooling:	Xigmatek Dark Knight
Memory:	(3x8GB) 24GB Avexir Core series triple channel 1600mhz
Video Card:	MSI GTX470
Hard Disk:	OCZ Agility3 120, SS 1TB, SS 2TB
Optical Drive:	Pioneer DVD Dual layer burner R+RW (Firmware Upgrade)/Philips lightscribe DVD burner Dual layer
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell 2007FP
Case:	Xigmatek Utgard
Sound Card:	ASUS Xonar D2X 7.1 on Logitec X-540/Razer Carcharias
PSU:	Corsair HX1000
Software:	Windows8 x64 \|\|Poser7, Cinema4D, CS5, 3DSM10, Lightwave9, Bryce7
Benchmarks:	I'm such a tease

Sep 21, 2009, 10:33 AM	#5
Cheeseball Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 598 (0.37/day) Thanks: 53 Thanked 66 Times in 51 Posts System Specs	Seagate Readies its First SATA 3 Gbps Hard Drive

Processor:	AMD Phenom II X2 965 3.4 GHz @ 3.6 GHz
Motherboard:	ASUS M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3
Cooling:	Tuniq Tower 120
Memory:	Kingston HyperX Genesis 2x4 GB DDR3 @ 1866MHz
Video Card:	PowerColor Radeon HD 7870 XT Myst Edition 2 GB GDDR5
Hard Disk:	WD SiliconEdge Blue 64 GB SSD, WD Scorpio Blue 640 GB
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung 6-series UN32C6500 HDTV
PSU:	FSP Group (Unnamed) 850W
Software:	Windows 7 Professional 64-bit SP1

Sep 21, 2009, 11:13 AM	#6
Roph Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 254 (0.15/day) Thanks: 383 Thanked 65 Times in 37 Posts System Specs	Why the posting "3Gbps" and then thanking? Am I missing something? =o And it's nice to see them back with a 5 year warranty on these

System Name:	No name, built for quietness / efficiency
Processor:	Intel Pentium Dual Core E5200, @ 3.1Ghz
Motherboard:	Asus P5QL SE
Cooling:	Arctic Cooling Alpine 7
Memory:	4GB OCZ Gold XTC DDR2 800Mhz
Video Card:	XFX Radeon HD 7770 1GB
Hard Disk:	Samsung Spinpoint F1 640GB, Spinpoint F3 1TB, Spinpoint F4 2TB, Hitachi Touro USB3.0 2TB
Optical Drive:	Samsung DVD+/-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	Digimate 23" 1920x1080 LCD
Case:	Cooler Master Elite 330 Black
Sound Card:	Realtek Built in HD Audio
PSU:	Coolermaster eXtremePower 460W
Software:	XP Pro SP3

Sep 21, 2009, 11:19 AM	#7
Fishymachine Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 206 (0.14/day) Thanks: 16 Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts System Specs	Marketing schemes... and to thing you elect people to represent and protect us. It is impractical to make a 300MB(3Gb)ps mechanical hard drive.Sata 6gig is for SSD's

Processor:	Athlon II X$ 635
Motherboard:	Asrock 880G Extreme3
Memory:	A-Data 2*2GB 1333 CAS8
Video Card:	HD 4250
Hard Disk:	WD Green 640
PSU:	Nexus RX5300

Sep 21, 2009, 11:32 AM	#8
lemonadesoda Eligible for custom title Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day) Thanks: 749 Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts System Specs	In theory, you CAN double the performance of a HDD. But it becomes more expensive to build/manufacture and calibrate. How to do it? >> Build a drive with TWO head arms 180° opposite from each other, so there are now TWO heads on each platter surface. You RAID 0 the heads. The alternative it so have just one arm, but with two heads at the end, offset by a small amount. To fit the double arm system in a 3.5" drive, you would need to reduce the size of the platters somewhat. Not as small as a 2.5" drive, probably somewhere in between. Capacity would go down a bit, but performance would double, and seek times would improve in the double-arm approach (you would constrain each head arm to use only half of the disk, so there would be less head movement and seek time for each arm), but remain the same in the double-head approach. There are ways of doing it... but the question is are the economics right for the market? Possibly it will be the only way to keep HDDs competitive against SSDs.

System Name:	ICE-QUAD // ICE-CRUNCH
Processor:	Q6600 // 2x Xeon 5472
Memory:	2GB DDR // 8GB FB-DIMM
Video Card:	HD3850-AGP // FireGL 3400
CRT/LCD Model:	2 x Samsung 204Ts = 3200x1200
Sound Card:	Audigy 2
Software:	Windows Server 2003 R2 as a Workstation

Sep 21, 2009, 12:16 PM	#9
inferKNOX Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: SouthERN Africa Posts: 880 (0.63/day) Thanks: 77 Thanked 118 Times in 93 Posts System Specs	With how Samsung has been surging, I thought they'd be the first ones to present this. I wonder if they're (Samsung) trying to make their new 500GB platters work blazing fast then put them into the 6Gb/s bracket so that they don't get the, "What's the speed increase?" complaint that everyone is giving. I also wonder what the price of the 1GB version will be from each company? __________________ CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked

System Name:	inferKNIGHT
Processor:	AMD Phenom II X4 955BE @ 3.6GHz (on Vstock)
Motherboard:	MSI 790FX-GD70 [BIOS 1.F] (HTT & NB @ 2.4GHz on Vstock)
Cooling:	Prolimatech Mega Shadow w/ silver 120mm Enermax Apollish Vegas + Apollish (push-pull)
Memory:	A-DATA 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3-1333 Dual Channel Kit (HY63I1B16K)
Video Card:	ASUS Radeon HD6950 2GB w/ 1536 shaders @ 910/1250 on 1.175V
Hard Disk:	2 x 1TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 6Gb/s
Optical Drive:	LG generic DVD±R(W)
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung SyncMaster T260
Case:	NZXT Phantom (White)
Sound Card:	Realtek ALC889 (onboard) + Roccat KAVE 5.1 headset
PSU:	Corsair Pro Series HX750W
Software:	Windows 7 x64 + Ubuntu 10.04 (Karmic Koala) x64

Sep 21, 2009, 12:31 PM	#10
Mussels Doctor Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA) Posts: 34,559 (10.96/day) Thanks: 3,700 Thanked 8,693 Times in 6,392 Posts System Specs	its good to see the standard pick up, although i'd rather see it on SSD's. __________________ Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United!

System Name:	Real Men use Real Cores!
Processor:	Phenom II x6 1090T: 3600Mhz undervolted (NB+HT at 2.6)
Motherboard:	Gigabyte 890FXA-UD5
Cooling:	Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme (Lapped + ducted)
Memory:	8GB Corsair Dominator DDR3 - 1600Mhz 7-7-7-20 1.65V
Video Card:	AMD Radeon 5870 1GB Crossfire
Hard Disk:	Intel 520 SSD (120GB), 500GB OS + 18TB of storage (mostly external)
Optical Drive:	Samsung Blu Ray drive (SH-B083A)
CRT/LCD Model:	23.6" Samsung 1080P / Samsung 40" HDTV - 1360x768P
Case:	Coolermaster CM 690 II Advanced (non window)
Sound Card:	Auzentech X-Mystique (Logitech Z5500D + sennheiser HD555 + RE2's)
PSU:	Corsair HX 1000W
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate x64 - kaspersky internet security 2013
Benchmarks:	Laptop: AMD A6 APU 1.4GHz @2.2GHz quad core + APU crossfire.Iphone 5, Samsung galaxy tab 2 7"

Sep 21, 2009, 12:41 PM	#11
newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Indiana Posts: 17,761 (6.48/day) Thanks: 780 Thanked 5,118 Times in 3,708 Posts System Specs	Sweet, so we can see sustaind transfer rates that don't even max out SATA 1.5Gbps... why do hard drives need SATA 6Gbps? __________________ Rig1: System Specs. Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5 Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate

Processor:	Intel Core i7 875K@4.0GHz(200x20)
Motherboard:	eVGA P55 FTW 200
Cooling:	Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme w/ Corsair SP120 High Performance Edition
Memory:	8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 7-7-7-20
Video Card:	ASUS GTX 670 4GB DirectCU II @ 1015/3600
Hard Disk:	1TB Seagate 7200.12(OS), 3x 1.5TB Seagate 7200.11 in RAID 5
Optical Drive:	Lite-On Blu-Ray Combo Drive IHES108
CRT/LCD Model:	HP 25" 2509m 1080p LCD
Case:	Lian-Li Lancool Metal Boned K7 w/ Windowed Side Panel
Sound Card:	Onboard is good enough for me
PSU:	Corsair HX850
Software:	Windows 7 x64 Professional

Sep 21, 2009, 12:57 PM	#15
Mussels Doctor Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA) Posts: 34,559 (10.96/day) Thanks: 3,700 Thanked 8,693 Times in 6,392 Posts System Specs	i suppose the main point of this is that they test it on a mechanical drive and work out any bandwidth inhibiting kinks in the controller, before moving it to their SSD lineup (when they make one :P) __________________ Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United!

System Name:	Univac \ Univaclap
Processor:	Intel Core i3 @ 4.4ghz\ C2D P8400
Motherboard:	Gigabyte P55-UD3R\ Intel MP45
Cooling:	True 120 Black \ 17" Zalman cooler black
Memory:	2x2gb Kingson HyperX 2000mhz \ 4gig DDR3 1066
Video Card:	XFX 4890\ 9800 GTS M
Hard Disk:	64gig G.Skill SSD + 1tb Seagate + 2tb Seagate + 160gb WD Black 2.5 + 120Gb Maxtor (XP)
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung 23" Syncmaster 2343 2048x1152 \ 17" 1920x1200
Case:	NZXT Beta \ Laptop
Sound Card:	Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer PCI
PSU:	Thermaltake 1000watt Toughpower Modular
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate X64 OEM (Legit) + XP SP2 x86 dual boot
Benchmarks:	27,192 3dmark06 (4.0ghz i5 + 280 SLI all air) 23k 06 single 280 4.6ghz i5 single stage 14k 06 4850

Sep 21, 2009, 01:37 PM	#17
inferKNOX Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: SouthERN Africa Posts: 880 (0.63/day) Thanks: 77 Thanked 118 Times in 93 Posts System Specs	I agree that HDDs should be left to 3Gb/s & SSDs be the focus for the 6Gb/s. __________________ CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked

Sep 21, 2009, 04:15 PM	#18
thebeephaha Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Seattle/Shoreline WA Posts: 992 (0.45/day) Thanks: 170 Thanked 103 Times in 95 Posts System Specs	Everyone needs to stop bitching. It is a technological step forward. Doesn't matter if the drives actually use it or not. It just starts to force the interface to become mainstream quicker. __________________ <--System 1 Specs "Holy crap! Disco shit!" -Thrackan -->System 2 Specs: ASUS G50VT-A1 Notebook (X5 Case Mod) w/ T9400 2.53GHz, 4GB, 2x250GB 7200RPM Seagates in RAID0, 9800GS 512MB, 15.4" 1650x1080, Intel 5300 AGN, 6 & 9 Cell Batteries, 7 Ultimate 64 -->System 3 Specs: Norco RPC-4020, ASUS M2N32-SLI DLX, AMD Phenom X4 9150e, 4GB PC2-6400, 19 HDDs = 15TB, Windows Home Server w/ remote web access, FTP access, proxy server, BT server, & more!

System Name:	NORMANDY
Processor:	Intel Core i7 920 D0 @ 4GHz OC (20x200) 1.318v / 1.31v VTT
Motherboard:	DFI LP UT X58-T3eH8 w/ Xigmatek Porter N881 on the NB
Cooling:	Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus (CM Beta Test!) + Dual AC AF12025 PWM Fans
Memory:	12GB Kingston HyperX 1600 9-9-9-27 1.65v (3x4GB) - Thanks to t_ski for these!
Video Card:	GTX285 1GB BFG OC2 w/ modded Accelero Xtreme 280 @ 702/1584/2664 OC
Hard Disk:	4xOCZ Summit 60GB SSDs in RAID0 via Adaptec 5405
Optical Drive:	Samsung DVD-RW DL SH-S203B 20x SATA (meh)
CRT/LCD Model:	20" Viewsonic VP201b on left, 24" Dell 2407WFP in middle, 22" Viewsonic VX2233wm on right
Case:	CM Stacker 832 + 8x120mm CM TLF-S12-EB \| 1x120mm AC AF12025 PWM \| 1x92mm SilverStone FN83 fans
Sound Card:	Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer
PSU:	Cooler Master Ultimate Circuit Protection 900w (CM Beta Test!)
Software:	Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Benchmarks:	3DMark06: n/a \| 3DMark Vantage: n/a

Sep 21, 2009, 04:23 PM	#19
PP Mguire Banned Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Venus, Texas Posts: 2,272 (1.30/day) Thanks: 276 Thanked 461 Times in 394 Posts System Specs	Seagate should release SSDs to make that mainstream faster

Sep 21, 2009, 10:20 PM	#20
TheLaughingMan Join Date: May 2009 Location: Douglasville, GA USA Posts: 3,701 (2.50/day) Thanks: 1,365 Thanked 1,264 Times in 930 Posts System Specs	I am looking forward to Rectangular Hard Disk Drives in the next few years. RHD will be the real competition for SSD's and it is good to see Seagate is working on improving IO for HDD which will help advance both RHD's and SSD's in the future. Though I will be sticking to getting a sustained throughput of 84 MB/s on a 5400 RPM Sammy F3.

System Name:	ZEUS
Processor:	AMD FX-8350 @ 4.2 GHz
Motherboard:	GIGABYTE 990FX-UD7
Cooling:	Gelid GX-7 w / 2 Cougar 120mm PWN fans
Memory:	Patriot 8GB (2x4GB) @ 1866 MHz 9-10-9-27
Video Card:	2x AMD HD 7770 GHz Edition (1125 MHz, 5800 MHz effective)
Hard Disk:	OCZ Agility 4 512 GB :: WD Caviar Black 2TB
Optical Drive:	LG Blu-ray Drive
CRT/LCD Model:	Acer X233H 23.6" Widescreen 5ms LCD Monitor
Case:	Rosewill Thor V2
Sound Card:	Onboard Realtek 889c + Logitech X-540 5.1
PSU:	Antec HCP 850 80+ Gold
Software:	Windows 7 Pro 64-bit
Benchmarks:	I don't benchmark.

Sep 21, 2009, 11:30 PM	#21
PP Mguire Banned Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Venus, Texas Posts: 2,272 (1.30/day) Thanks: 276 Thanked 461 Times in 394 Posts System Specs	I think ill stick with fast SSDs and Seagate awesome big drives for storage.

Processor:	AMD FX-8150
Motherboard:	MSI 990FXA-GD80
Cooling:	Noctua NH-D14
Memory:	Team Xtreeem Dark 1600 @1866 4GBx2
Video Card:	PowerColor HD7970 3GB V3
Hard Disk:	OCZ Vertex 3 120G + Max IOPS 120G + Seagate 7200.12 250GB 2 Raid 0 + Samsung HD103UJ 1TB 2 RAID 0
Optical Drive:	HP 1260i 24x Multi-Drive
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung SyncMaster S24B370
Case:	SilverStone Raven RV01
PSU:	Corsair TX850W
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

System Name:	Silencio
Processor:	Intel Core i3-3225
Motherboard:	Gigabyte GA-Z77N-WIFI
Cooling:	Corsair A70 (Passive)
Memory:	Samsung 8GB MV-3V4G3D/US
Video Card:	MSI GTX 650 1GB + Arctic Cooling Accelero S1 Plus (Passive)
Hard Disk:	OCZ Agility 4 128GB
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell UltraSharp U2312HM
Case:	BitFenix Prodigy (Arctic White)
PSU:	FSP Zen 400 (Fanless)
Software:	OS X 10.8.2 Mountain Lion

Sep 22, 2009, 11:16 AM	#24
lemonadesoda Eligible for custom title Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day) Thanks: 749 Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts System Specs	In theory you could combine the "best" of HDD and RHD. That is... have a spinning disk with a FIXED ARM... that has multiple heads on it. Then there is no head seek time... there is a head for each track on the HDD. There would be no seek noise or clattering either. They would be unbelievably fast because you would RAID0 across all the heads... if there were 512 heads then you could get 64 way RAID or better. (cant do them ALL at the same time due to magnetic interference) However, it would be a big change in how they are made... and I would imagine wiring multiple heads would be expensive... and the processing power to handle that data trhoughput would have to be an order of magnitude higher than today. But doable. They would probably also be more shock tolerant... since MOST HDD damage is due to arm moving the wrong way and folding the heads over.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Seagate and AMD Unveil World's First Demonstration of Serial ATA 6 Gbps	malware	News	20	Mar 10, 2009 07:16 AM
AMD and Seagate to Demo 6 Gbps SATA Interface	btarunr	News	10	Mar 3, 2009 04:40 AM
Seagate Launches First Laptop Hybrid Hard Drive	JacKz5o	News	12	Oct 10, 2007 04:28 AM
Seagate readies 10 000 RPM SATA HDD	D_o_S	News	19	Jun 26, 2007 01:18 PM
Seagate Releases the First-ever 750GB External Hard Drive	malware	News	6	Apr 29, 2006 06:58 AM