![]() |
|
|
#26 |
|
Doctor Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.89/day)
Thanks: 3,708
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts
|
i tried telling people i only took a 10% performance hit on a 4x slot when i ran a 16x/4x crossfire setup, and no one beleived me.
that was with 4870s on a 1.1 motherboard, at least i finally have someone else with similar findings now.
__________________
![]() Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United! |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Mussels For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#27 |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,865 (4.17/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,448 Times in 3,216 Posts
|
i'll have the cf x8 and x4 numbers today as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Larisa, Greece
Posts: 1,689 (0.83/day)
Thanks: 330
Thanked 329 Times in 321 Posts
|
*anxiously waiting*
__________________
People who think that know it all are just annoying to us who do! ![]() (Updated) My WOODEN CASE BUILD... vote and comment here: StarCruiser Dark Knight |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Overclocked quantum bit
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Quantumville UK
Posts: 8,719 (4.31/day)
Thanks: 4,216
Thanked 3,334 Times in 1,970 Posts
|
Really useful review, thanks.
![]() If the difference between 8x & 16x is so small on this new beast of a card, I'm sure that it practically disappears on older, slower cards (eg 8800 GTX, HD4850 etc) which most people will currently have. Therefore, we don't have to worry about losing performance in 8x mode.
Last edited by qubit; Sep 24, 2009 at 11:33 AM. Reason: Typos |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,865 (4.17/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,448 Times in 3,216 Posts
|
in x8 2.0 .. x8 1.1 is equivalent to x4 2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
![]() |
Great article. Can't wait for the CF results. Seeing as how I am choosing a X58 mobo over P55, it will be interesting to see the percentage decrease, to say the least. 10% or so is reason enough for me to go X58.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,058 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 2,249
Thanked 542 Times in 443 Posts
|
very interesting. I find it comforting that my 16x 1.1 bus will not penalize me nearly at all should I end up getting one of these cards. based on current budgeting, it seems to be ahard push to get anew gpou and upgrade cpu/mobo/memeory.
thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 63 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
This is interesting because it gives you a preview of how well it could work in a ExpressCard docking station solution for a laptop, where you could conceivable game with a 5850/5870 connected to your latop through ExpressCard (essentially PCIe 1x), with better framerates than almost anything available for most laptops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
"Buy one of these accelerators now, and give them a neighborhood when they become more affordable, and you will have secured yourself future-proofing for quite long."
Wow, what on earth does that even mean? Proof-reading please. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Central Ohio
Posts: 16 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Internet Heaven
Posts: 2,733 (1.75/day)
Thanks: 793
Thanked 424 Times in 328 Posts
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: May 2007
Location: c:\programs\kitteh.exe
Posts: 6,152 (2.77/day)
Thanks: 724
Thanked 556 Times in 461 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Rig 1+1 Athlon XP 2200+, MSI KM2M Combo, ATI 9200SE 128 MB DDR, 2 X 512 MB DDR333, 250GB + 80 HDD? “try intel cpu, amd is only good for going to nude sites” -firehawkxd
“go for the 5850 now and play games while the nvidiots wait for the ceo to show an actual working product” -W1zzard
“An MSI logo? This offends my retina. I await your apology.” -MRCL
www.autolounge.com.jm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
Posts: 499 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 166
Thanked 59 Times in 39 Posts
|
Awesome article.. havent seen an article like that in years! Kudos, W1z and btarunr!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 140 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
|
well, if possible, I would like to see the impact of chipset too... I mean compared P45, P55 and X58?
this review was done on i7 machine, but what on i5 machine or Core2Quad? |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Doctor Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.89/day)
Thanks: 3,708
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts
|
Quote:
Obviously, on a weaker system the maximum FPS would be lower, therefore the performance differential would decrease across the tests.
__________________
![]() Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I'm a little confused by the analysis. Does your x4 simulation accurately emulate the actual x4 on the P55 PCH? In a review of x16/x4 P55 boards (Asus and Gigabyte), you wrote:
"The top slot gets a full 16 lanes of PCIe 2.0 from the CPU, while the second slot harnesses four of the not-quite-second-gen PCI Express lanes built into the PCH. Intel labels the P55's eight PCI Express lanes as 2.0, but they only signal at 2.5GT/s—gen-one speed. That's still plenty of bandwidth for Gigabit Ethernet and most reasonable auxiliary storage configurations. However, it might be a hindrance to CrossFire configurations." I can't decipher that. Four "not-quite-second-gen" PCI-E lanes? So these are x4 PCI-E 1.0 lanes, not x4 PCI-E 2.0 lanes? Are they the same type that you measured in this simulation? And since some P55 boards have 8/8/4, is the "4" from there the same speed as the "4" in the board you reviewed above? Anandtech has already done the CF test with ATI 5870 in 16/16 versus 8/8, and we already know the difference is negligible there. What would be truly interesting is to test Tri-Fire and CF with Physx (with the hack) in 16/16/16 versus 8/8/4 (whatever "4" that may be). Also, while the continuing usefulness of the x8 slot means that older 750i/680i SLI boards and Intel P35 boards will not be bottlenecked by PCI-E bandwidth, the C2D and C2Q are definitely bottlenecked to some degree by SLI and CF, period. Very few people have done the analysis but there's an article at Guru3D conclusively demonstrating that in some games, dual-card CF/SLI is 50% more effective on the i7 than the C2D/Q. And Tri-SLI (and therefore presumably Tri-CF) is almost completely wasted on non i7/i5 chipsets, according to the numbers. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to matrices For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#42 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
Nice article, it was very informative.
Out of interest if you run PCI-E 2.0 8x at 125MHz Bus speed does that increase the bandwidth to 5 GB/s? |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
Posts: 499 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 166
Thanked 59 Times in 39 Posts
|
Once again, an awesome article!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
![]() |
What's up with Dawn of War 2 1280x1024 2xAA 8xAF?
x4 and x8 fares better than x16!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
Posts: 499 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 166
Thanked 59 Times in 39 Posts
|
^^ Hmm, what do you mean?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
![]() |
Check out Page 8: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...Scaling/8.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SCOTLAND!
Posts: 949 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 98
Thanked 142 Times in 111 Posts
|
i am glad somone did an article like this it proves that my hd 4850 runs fine in my J&W MITX 780G board that only has 4x pci-e 2.0 slot along with all the next generation graphics cards.
on another note why are none of the new ati graphics cards single slot? that was one of the great features of the card.
__________________
machine XII AMD Phenom II x6 1155t, 8Gb XMS3 1600,Asus M4A88TD-M EVO/USB3, HD5970, 128gb sandisk SSD, mcubed t-balancer,water cooled HP EliteBook 2530p SL9400 Core 2 Duo ULV @ 0.9v, 4Gb ddr2, 80Gb Intel X-18m G2, 64Gb express card SSD, Ubiquiti SR71-E 400mw wifi, 21mb HSPA+ ESXI Server Intel i5 2400, Asus P8H67-M, 12Gb ddr3, IBM M1015 sas, Dell sas 6i, 10 drive 8tb UNRAID array. Old Builds :watercooled matx rig|Water Cooled ITX rig |EeePC 701 7" netbook | ITX Gaming raid build Last edited by Geofrancis; Nov 25, 2009 at 05:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
Posts: 499 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 166
Thanked 59 Times in 39 Posts
|
Quote:
This is interesting.. perhaps it's a benchmark variation? Sometimes you have to consider a +/-3% margin of error. Well, I guess! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a (0/day)
|
Guys, one question.
I have an Asus P5Q Deluxe mobo with 1 PCI-E x16 and 2 PCI-E x8. I'm running now an 5770 on the main slot, but I'm thinking to buy another card and Crossfire-it. The question is, are those 2 cards going to run on x8 or only one of them? I'm also curious what's the performance drop between x16/x16, x16/x8 and x8/x8 thanks. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AMD Cypress ''Radeon HD 5870'' Stripped | btarunr | News | 163 | Sep 14, 2009 12:19 PM |
| PCI express 2.0 graphics card on a PCI express mobo | TylerZambori | General Hardware | 11 | Feb 22, 2009 03:49 PM |
| Gigabyte Radeon HD 4870X2 2GB GDDR5, PCI-Express 2.0 € 89,00 | Morgoth | Hot Deals | 39 | Aug 25, 2008 03:52 PM |
| AMD RS740 chipset wins PCI Express approval | DaMulta | Motherboards & Memory | 2 | Jul 15, 2007 01:38 AM |
| Will PCI Express x16 work in PCI Express x1? | Azn Tr14dZ | Graphics Cards | 11 | Aug 3, 2006 09:45 PM |