techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Sep 24, 2009, 08:53 AM   #26
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.89/day)
Thanks: 3,708
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts

System Specs

i tried telling people i only took a 10% performance hit on a 4x slot when i ran a 16x/4x crossfire setup, and no one beleived me.

that was with 4870s on a 1.1 motherboard, at least i finally have someone else with similar findings now.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mussels For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 24, 2009, 10:14 AM   #27
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,865 (4.17/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,448 Times in 3,216 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard Send a message via Skype™ to W1zzard

System Specs

i'll have the cf x8 and x4 numbers today as well
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2009, 10:25 AM   #28
tzitzibp
1000 Posts
 
tzitzibp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Larisa, Greece
Posts: 1,689 (0.83/day)
Thanks: 330
Thanked 329 Times in 321 Posts
Send a message via MSN to tzitzibp

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
i'll have the cf x8 and x4 numbers today as well
*anxiously waiting*
__________________
People who think that know it all are just annoying to us who do!



(Updated) My WOODEN CASE BUILD... vote and comment here: StarCruiser Dark Knight
tzitzibp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2009, 11:24 AM   #29
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
 
qubit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Quantumville UK
Posts: 8,719 (4.31/day)
Thanks: 4,216
Thanked 3,334 Times in 1,970 Posts

System Specs

Really useful review, thanks.

If the difference between 8x & 16x is so small on this new beast of a card, I'm sure that it practically disappears on older, slower cards (eg 8800 GTX, HD4850 etc) which most people will currently have. Therefore, we don't have to worry about losing performance in 8x mode.

Last edited by qubit; Sep 24, 2009 at 11:33 AM. Reason: Typos
qubit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2009, 11:49 AM   #30
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,865 (4.17/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,448 Times in 3,216 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard Send a message via Skype™ to W1zzard

System Specs

in x8 2.0 .. x8 1.1 is equivalent to x4 2.0
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2009, 01:15 PM   #31
T3kl0rd
200 Posts
 
T3kl0rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 397 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 37 Times in 34 Posts

System Specs

Great article. Can't wait for the CF results. Seeing as how I am choosing a X58 mobo over P55, it will be interesting to see the percentage decrease, to say the least. 10% or so is reason enough for me to go X58.
T3kl0rd is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 25, 2009, 04:19 AM   #32
yogurt_21
3500 Posts
 
yogurt_21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,058 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 2,249
Thanked 542 Times in 443 Posts

System Specs

very interesting. I find it comforting that my 16x 1.1 bus will not penalize me nearly at all should I end up getting one of these cards. based on current budgeting, it seems to be ahard push to get anew gpou and upgrade cpu/mobo/memeory.

thanks!
yogurt_21 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 25, 2009, 10:35 PM   #33
sethk
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 63 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

This is interesting because it gives you a preview of how well it could work in a ExpressCard docking station solution for a laptop, where you could conceivable game with a 5850/5870 connected to your latop through ExpressCard (essentially PCIe 1x), with better framerates than almost anything available for most laptops.
sethk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2009, 01:29 AM   #34
the_pharaoh
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

"Buy one of these accelerators now, and give them a neighborhood when they become more affordable, and you will have secured yourself future-proofing for quite long."

Wow, what on earth does that even mean? Proof-reading please.
the_pharaoh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2009, 09:33 PM   #35
Dan848
5 Posts
 
Dan848's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Central Ohio
Posts: 16 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
in x8 2.0 .. x8 1.1 is equivalent to x4 2.0
I have a version 1.0 Gigabyte P35-DS3R that uses PCIe x16, so, that would be the same as x8 in version 2.0 PCIe?

Thank you,

Dan
Dan848 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2009, 12:25 AM   #36
jmcslob
2000 Posts
 
jmcslob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Internet Heaven
Posts: 2,733 (1.75/day)
Thanks: 793
Thanked 424 Times in 328 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan848 View Post
I have a version 1.0 Gigabyte P35-DS3R that uses PCIe x16, so, that would be the same as x8 in version 2.0 PCIe?

Thank you,

Dan
Yes
jmcslob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2009, 12:33 AM   #37
[I.R.A]_FBi
Eligible for custom title
 
[I.R.A]_FBi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: c:\programs\kitteh.exe
Posts: 6,152 (2.77/day)
Thanks: 724
Thanked 556 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sihastru View Post
This means 2 x 58x0 CF setups are viable even on the old P45 motherboards (2 x 8x PCIe 2.0). I am very surprised about the 4x PCIe 2.0 performance... it's too good.
My P45 has three .. no more worries ..
__________________
Rig 1+1
Athlon XP 2200+, MSI KM2M Combo, ATI 9200SE 128 MB DDR, 2 X 512 MB DDR333, 250GB + 80 HDD?

“try intel cpu, amd is only good for going to nude sites” -firehawkxd
“go for the 5850 now and play games while the nvidiots wait for the ceo to show an actual working product” -W1zzard
“An MSI logo? This offends my retina. I await your apology.” -MRCL

www.autolounge.com.jm
[I.R.A]_FBi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 2009, 06:26 PM   #38
Bo_Fox
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
Posts: 499 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 166
Thanked 59 Times in 39 Posts

System Specs

Awesome article.. havent seen an article like that in years! Kudos, W1z and btarunr!
Bo_Fox is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 1, 2009, 12:28 PM   #39
stupido
75 Posts
 
stupido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 140 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

well, if possible, I would like to see the impact of chipset too... I mean compared P45, P55 and X58?
this review was done on i7 machine, but what on i5 machine or Core2Quad?
stupido is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 1, 2009, 12:29 PM   #40
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.89/day)
Thanks: 3,708
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by stupido View Post
well, if possible, I would like to see the impact of chipset too... I mean compared P45, P55 and X58?
this review was done on i7 machine, but what on i5 machine or Core2Quad?
it would be irrelevant. CPU bottlenecks would be the only thing that changed the results.

Obviously, on a weaker system the maximum FPS would be lower, therefore the performance differential would decrease across the tests.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 2009, 01:15 PM   #41
matrices
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

I'm a little confused by the analysis. Does your x4 simulation accurately emulate the actual x4 on the P55 PCH? In a review of x16/x4 P55 boards (Asus and Gigabyte), you wrote:

"The top slot gets a full 16 lanes of PCIe 2.0 from the CPU, while the second slot harnesses four of the not-quite-second-gen PCI Express lanes built into the PCH. Intel labels the P55's eight PCI Express lanes as 2.0, but they only signal at 2.5GT/s—gen-one speed. That's still plenty of bandwidth for Gigabit Ethernet and most reasonable auxiliary storage configurations. However, it might be a hindrance to CrossFire configurations."

I can't decipher that. Four "not-quite-second-gen" PCI-E lanes? So these are x4 PCI-E 1.0 lanes, not x4 PCI-E 2.0 lanes? Are they the same type that you measured in this simulation? And since some P55 boards have 8/8/4, is the "4" from there the same speed as the "4" in the board you reviewed above?

Anandtech has already done the CF test with ATI 5870 in 16/16 versus 8/8, and we already know the difference is negligible there. What would be truly interesting is to test Tri-Fire and CF with Physx (with the hack) in 16/16/16 versus 8/8/4 (whatever "4" that may be).

Also, while the continuing usefulness of the x8 slot means that older 750i/680i SLI boards and Intel P35 boards will not be bottlenecked by PCI-E bandwidth, the C2D and C2Q are definitely bottlenecked to some degree by SLI and CF, period. Very few people have done the analysis but there's an article at Guru3D conclusively demonstrating that in some games, dual-card CF/SLI is 50% more effective on the i7 than the C2D/Q. And Tri-SLI (and therefore presumably Tri-CF) is almost completely wasted on non i7/i5 chipsets, according to the numbers.
matrices is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to matrices For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 12, 2009, 01:54 AM   #42
sideeffect
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts

Nice article, it was very informative.

Out of interest if you run PCI-E 2.0 8x at 125MHz Bus speed does that increase the bandwidth to 5 GB/s?
sideeffect is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2009, 08:39 PM   #43
Bo_Fox
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
Posts: 499 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 166
Thanked 59 Times in 39 Posts

System Specs

Once again, an awesome article!
Bo_Fox is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2009, 04:02 PM   #44
Calle2003
5 Posts
 
Calle2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 9 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

System Specs

What's up with Dawn of War 2 1280x1024 2xAA 8xAF?
x4 and x8 fares better than x16!
Calle2003 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2009, 11:42 PM   #45
Bo_Fox
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
Posts: 499 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 166
Thanked 59 Times in 39 Posts

System Specs

^^ Hmm, what do you mean?
Bo_Fox is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2009, 09:38 PM   #46
Calle2003
5 Posts
 
Calle2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 9 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bo_Fox View Post
^^ Hmm, what do you mean?
Check out Page 8: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...Scaling/8.html
Calle2003 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2009, 05:13 PM   #47
Geofrancis
500 Posts
 
Geofrancis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SCOTLAND!
Posts: 949 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 98
Thanked 142 Times in 111 Posts

System Specs

i am glad somone did an article like this it proves that my hd 4850 runs fine in my J&W MITX 780G board that only has 4x pci-e 2.0 slot along with all the next generation graphics cards.

on another note why are none of the new ati graphics cards single slot? that was one of the great features of the card.
__________________
machine XII AMD Phenom II x6 1155t, 8Gb XMS3 1600,Asus M4A88TD-M EVO/USB3, HD5970, 128gb sandisk SSD, mcubed t-balancer,water cooled
HP EliteBook 2530p SL9400 Core 2 Duo ULV @ 0.9v, 4Gb ddr2, 80Gb Intel X-18m G2, 64Gb express card SSD, Ubiquiti SR71-E 400mw wifi, 21mb HSPA+
ESXI Server Intel i5 2400, Asus P8H67-M, 12Gb ddr3, IBM M1015 sas, Dell sas 6i, 10 drive 8tb UNRAID array.
Old Builds :watercooled matx rig|Water Cooled ITX rig |EeePC 701 7" netbook | ITX Gaming raid build

Last edited by Geofrancis; Nov 25, 2009 at 05:37 PM.
Geofrancis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 11, 2009, 10:37 PM   #48
zed011
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
i'll have the cf x8 and x4 numbers today as well
Nowhere to be found?
zed011 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 11, 2009, 11:37 PM   #49
Bo_Fox
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
Posts: 499 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 166
Thanked 59 Times in 39 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calle2003 View Post
Sorry I missed your post..

This is interesting.. perhaps it's a benchmark variation? Sometimes you have to consider a +/-3% margin of error. Well, I guess!
Bo_Fox is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 27, 2009, 04:02 AM   #50
TAViX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Guys, one question.

I have an Asus P5Q Deluxe mobo with 1 PCI-E x16 and 2 PCI-E x8. I'm running now an 5770 on the main slot, but I'm thinking to buy another card and Crossfire-it. The question is, are those 2 cards going to run on x8 or only one of them? I'm also curious what's the performance drop between x16/x16, x16/x8 and x8/x8

thanks.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Cypress ''Radeon HD 5870'' Stripped btarunr News 163 Sep 14, 2009 12:19 PM
PCI express 2.0 graphics card on a PCI express mobo TylerZambori General Hardware 11 Feb 22, 2009 03:49 PM
Gigabyte Radeon HD 4870X2 2GB GDDR5, PCI-Express 2.0 € 89,00 Morgoth Hot Deals 39 Aug 25, 2008 03:52 PM
AMD RS740 chipset wins PCI Express approval DaMulta Motherboards & Memory 2 Jul 15, 2007 01:38 AM
Will PCI Express x16 work in PCI Express x1? Azn Tr14dZ Graphics Cards 11 Aug 3, 2006 09:45 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts