techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > General Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 21, 2009, 09:24 PM   #1
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts

System Specs

Intel Core i9: Hands-on test of the six-core Gulftown

Mmmmmmmm six cores. Sorry I was having a Homer moment. Anyway I found this article and benches on Intel's latest 6 core beast! Just keep in mind some of the notes are in German. What surprised me is how much the AMD 965 is kicking ass in the gaming section for the money. However I bet this i9 would be a juggernaut for our folding/crunching community. Enjoy!

Source
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TheMailMan78 For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 21, 2009, 09:26 PM   #2
Jstn7477
2000 Posts
 
Jstn7477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,248 (2.34/day)
Thanks: 397
Thanked 1,249 Times in 840 Posts

System Specs

Nice find. I look forward to reading it while eating a nice delicious pizza.
__________________
Intel Crunchers (34 threads): 4770K 4.3G (7t), 2x 3770K 4.3G (14t), 2600K 4G (7t), X3210 (3t), P-M 735A, P4 HT 3G
AMD Crunchers (12 cores):1100T 3.6G (3t), 1045T 3.4G (2t), X4 640 3.2G, X2 4200+, T64 ML-37
AMD Folders (6272 GCN cores): 2x 7950 1125/1475, 7970 1150/1650, 7770 1100/1200
NV Folders (2336 GF10x + 1344 GK104 cores):GTX 470 & 465 720/1715, 4x 460 768MB 825/2000, GTS 450, 660Ti 1228/6000

HEATWARE
Jstn7477 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2009, 09:28 PM   #3
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jstn7477 View Post
Nice find. I look forward to reading it while eating a nice delicious pizza.
Yeah man. I wanna see an AMD 6 core for the enthusiast market already.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2009, 09:35 PM   #4
TheLaughingMan
3500 Posts
 
TheLaughingMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Douglasville, GA USA
Posts: 3,734 (2.48/day)
Thanks: 1,371
Thanked 1,271 Times in 937 Posts
Send a message via MSN to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Yahoo to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Skype™ to TheLaughingMan

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMailMan78 View Post
Yeah man. I wanna see an AMD 6 core for the enthusiast market already.
Due out to market mid 2010. AMD always leads in gaming by a slim margin and fails miserably at the Pi test.

Most hardcore folders use GPU power. No CPU can compete in folding with a GPU. The architecture is just built to do stuff like that.
TheLaughingMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2009, 09:36 PM   #5
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.18/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Yeah AMD really seam to be able to optimise their chips for gaming, even though clock for clock their not as powerful as intel chips.

Pretty impressive if you ask me : ]
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2009, 09:37 PM   #6
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLaughingMan View Post
Due out to market mid 2010. AMD always leads in gaming by a slim margin and fails miserably at the Pi test.

Most hardcore folders use GPU power. No CPU can compete in folding with a GPU. The architecture is just built to do stuff like that.
I'm glad I don't run Pi nearly as much as I game

Quote:
Originally Posted by pantherx12 View Post
Yeah AMD really seam to be able to optimise their chips for gaming, even though clock for clock their not as powerful as intel chips.

Pretty impressive if you ask me : ]
Well I wouldn't mind having an i9.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2009, 09:41 PM   #7
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.18/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMailMan78 View Post
I'm glad I don't run Pi nearly as much as I game



Well I wouldn't mind having an i9.
Yeah I wouldn't turn my nose up either.

I've got no brand allegiance, who ever gives me best bang for my buck gets my hard earned pennies.
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2009, 09:43 PM   #8
TheLaughingMan
3500 Posts
 
TheLaughingMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Douglasville, GA USA
Posts: 3,734 (2.48/day)
Thanks: 1,371
Thanked 1,271 Times in 937 Posts
Send a message via MSN to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Yahoo to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Skype™ to TheLaughingMan

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by pantherx12 View Post
Yeah I wouldn't turn my nose up either.

I've got no brand allegiance, who ever gives me best bang for my buck gets my hard earned pennies.
Same here, but I kinda committed to AMD AM3 socket for now and just don't plan to replacement my Mobo anytime soon. Especially just for a CPU upgrade. When I am in the market for a major overhaul or mobo switch, whoever is offering the best bang for your buck has my vote.
TheLaughingMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2009, 09:47 PM   #9
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts

System Specs

This i9 is F#@KING AWESOME! However look at that 965 go! Man AMD has come a LONG way since the Phenom 1.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TheMailMan78 For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 21, 2009, 09:49 PM   #10
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.39/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLaughingMan View Post
Due out to market mid 2010. AMD always leads in gaming by a slim margin and fails miserably at the Pi test.

Most hardcore folders use GPU power. No CPU can compete in folding with a GPU. The architecture is just built to do stuff like that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pantherx12 View Post
Yeah AMD really seam to be able to optimise their chips for gaming, even though clock for clock their not as powerful as intel chips.

Pretty impressive if you ask me : ]
It's not anything to do with optimizing for gaming. It's just that beyond a certain amount of processing power, you pass the point of diminishing returns, and the gpu becomes the single largest factor in gaming performance. Pretty much any modern Quad or better is going to perform about the same in games.

It's everywhere else that the cpu can make a difference. Can't wait to see how well it crunches and how well it encodes. This will likely be my next cpu.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2009, 09:57 PM   #11
Tom20
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 60 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

System Specs

Do not need a 6 core... yet! 4 cores is enough!
Tom20 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2009, 10:01 PM   #12
francis511
2000 Posts
 
francis511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.Ireland
Posts: 2,363 (0.97/day)
Thanks: 145
Thanked 277 Times in 257 Posts

System Specs

Very interesting article nicht wahr ?
__________________
francis511 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2009, 10:08 PM   #13
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
KainXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,732 (2.26/day)
Thanks: 190
Thanked 473 Times in 389 Posts

System Specs

I'm just getting my I7 rig back together, and not I9 is coming out, . . . . . .

anyway I'ma skip this and wait till 2012 to upgrade again, internal sources are pointing to 2012 being a big year for the CPU ,GPU, and consoles
KainXS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2009, 12:50 AM   #14
Lionheart
2000 Posts
 
Lionheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,424 (1.83/day)
Thanks: 2,492
Thanked 745 Times in 530 Posts

System Specs

looks good but not great, just more cores, might get one down the track, I want higher clock speeds not more cores with slower cpu speeds, boooo!!!! I read an article awhile back that some university is making some type of new silicon, i think it was graphite, who knows im no scientist but they said they could manage speeds up to 100ghz, now that friggin nuts, gimme now. They said it would probably take about 5 yrs to start manufacturing this awesome tech!!!
Lionheart is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2009, 01:58 AM   #15
Paulieg
The Mad Moderator
 
Paulieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wherever I can find the iron.
Posts: 11,448 (4.95/day)
Thanks: 2,519
Thanked 3,054 Times in 2,098 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Paulieg

System Specs

This is going to be a seriously expensive cpu. Though I may just have to buy one for crunching.
__________________
"I have found the Iron to be my greatest friend. It never freaks out on me, never runs. Friends may come and go. But two hundred pounds is always two hundred pounds."
-Henry Rollins


My heatware
Save lives by joining the TPU WCG team!
Paulieg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2009, 02:09 AM   #16
Velvet Wafer
3500 Posts
 
Velvet Wafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North of Germany
Posts: 3,849 (2.63/day)
Thanks: 2,288
Thanked 1,026 Times in 839 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Velvet Wafer Send a message via MSN to Velvet Wafer

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by francis511 View Post
Very interesting article nicht wahr ?
the guy reviewing it, dont likes the proc, somehow... i can read that from the way he "talks"in german.
even if he remarks it, the german passages sound likes he sues it somehow. he is clearly NOT excited (i were, if i had that thing to crunch)
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Velvet Wafer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2009, 02:09 AM   #17
TheLaughingMan
3500 Posts
 
TheLaughingMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Douglasville, GA USA
Posts: 3,734 (2.48/day)
Thanks: 1,371
Thanked 1,271 Times in 937 Posts
Send a message via MSN to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Yahoo to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Skype™ to TheLaughingMan

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
It's not anything to do with optimizing for gaming. It's just that beyond a certain amount of processing power, you pass the point of diminishing returns, and the gpu becomes the single largest factor in gaming performance. Pretty much any modern Quad or better is going to perform about the same in games.

It's everywhere else that the cpu can make a difference. Can't wait to see how well it crunches and how well it encodes. This will likely be my next cpu.
Not sure why my comment was included their. I was stating a fact. I have no idea why that is true, nor did I imply AMD did something for that to come up so often. Simply fact. A i7 will walk all over a 955, except in games. The 955 for some reason will have a 1 to 4 FPS advantage. It is so small it is impossible to notice, but we AMD guys will tak'em it where we can get'em.
TheLaughingMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2009, 02:12 AM   #18
Jstn7477
2000 Posts
 
Jstn7477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,248 (2.34/day)
Thanks: 397
Thanked 1,249 Times in 840 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by KainXS View Post
I'm just getting my I7 rig back together, and not I9 is coming out, . . . . . .

anyway I'ma skip this and wait till 2012 to upgrade again, internal sources are pointing to 2012 being a big year for the CPU ,GPU, and consoles
lol you may not need to upgrade in 2012 with the "end of the world" occuring lol jk
__________________
Intel Crunchers (34 threads): 4770K 4.3G (7t), 2x 3770K 4.3G (14t), 2600K 4G (7t), X3210 (3t), P-M 735A, P4 HT 3G
AMD Crunchers (12 cores):1100T 3.6G (3t), 1045T 3.4G (2t), X4 640 3.2G, X2 4200+, T64 ML-37
AMD Folders (6272 GCN cores): 2x 7950 1125/1475, 7970 1150/1650, 7770 1100/1200
NV Folders (2336 GF10x + 1344 GK104 cores):GTX 470 & 465 720/1715, 4x 460 768MB 825/2000, GTS 450, 660Ti 1228/6000

HEATWARE
Jstn7477 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2009, 02:14 AM   #19
Velvet Wafer
3500 Posts
 
Velvet Wafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North of Germany
Posts: 3,849 (2.63/day)
Thanks: 2,288
Thanked 1,026 Times in 839 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Velvet Wafer Send a message via MSN to Velvet Wafer

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jstn7477 View Post
lol you may not need to upgrade in 2012 with the "end of the world" occuring lol jk
wasnt that later? or did the mayan calendar just ends then?
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Velvet Wafer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2009, 03:13 AM   #20
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
 
FordGT90Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,650 (6.23/day)
Thanks: 1,786
Thanked 2,632 Times in 1,986 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMailMan78 View Post
What surprised me is how much the AMD 965 is kicking ass in the gaming section for the money.
No one seems to know why AMD takes a lot of the gaming benchmarks. High clocks and shorter pipes, I suppose, but it should show up in other benchmarks as well, but it doesn't. QuickPath should have eliminated the only major architectural difference between them. The mystery of the 21st century...
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume.

try { SteamDownload(); }
catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }
FordGT90Concept is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2009, 03:40 AM   #21
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.39/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLaughingMan View Post
Not sure why my comment was included their. I was stating a fact. I have no idea why that is true, nor did I imply AMD did something for that to come up so often. Simply fact. A i7 will walk all over a 955, except in games. The 955 for some reason will have a 1 to 4 FPS advantage. It is so small it is impossible to notice, but we AMD guys will tak'em it where we can get'em.
Forgot to reply to your post, that's why. lol. My point is, 1-4fps is not a win. It's within the margins of error and natural variance in game benching. AMD does not game better than i7, nor does it game worse. The are absolute equals in gaming, for the reasons I mentioned above.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wile E For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 22, 2009, 06:45 AM   #22
Yukikaze
2000 Posts
 
Yukikaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 2,121 (1.23/day)
Thanks: 213
Thanked 481 Times in 347 Posts

System Specs

I am soooo gonna buy this to replace my i7 975......NOT.

Seriously, do we need MOAR POWAH ?

Granted, I definitely understand that there are places for this processor, and I cannot really be the voice of reason as far as processor purchases go (I went from an i7 920 to an i7 975), but in reality, in gaming, any quad core hanging around the 3Ghz mark is going to do the trick, unless you want to run two HD5970s in CF or something.

Heck, I run my 975 undervolted (If only it OC'ed as well as it undervolts...) and at stock clocks because there's simply no need for more during normal operation.

But yes, my inner comp geek is screming "do want", even though it makes zero sense.
__________________
Cameron: Core i7 2600K 4.5Ghz, MCR220, 2xMCR120, MCP655, ASRock P67 Extreme4, 4GB DDR3, 2xOCZ Vertex 30GB RAID0, GTX470, 2xHD5670, Modu82+ 625W, TT Xaser VI.
Neuromancer: Core i7 975, DFI DK X58-T3eH6, 12GB DDR3 1333Mhz CL6-6-6-15-1T, 3x9600GSO 384MB, Hiper 880W, TT Xaser VI.
Administrator of a 40 core Hadoop cluster.
Yukikaze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2009, 06:49 AM   #23
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.39/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yukikaze View Post
I am soooo gonna buy this to replace my i7 975......NOT.

Seriously, do we need MOAR POWAH ?

Granted, I definitely understand that there are places for this processor, and I cannot really be the voice of reason as far as processor purchases go (I went from an i7 920 to an i7 975), but in reality, in gaming, any quad core hanging around the 3Ghz mark is going to do the trick, unless you want to run two HD5970s in CF or something.

Heck, I run my 975 undervolted (If only it OC'ed as well as it undervolts...) and at stock clocks because there's simply no need for more during normal operation.

But yes, my inner comp geek is screming "do want", even though it makes zero sense.
You should be ashamed of yourself. There is never such a thing as enough power. MOAR POWAH is absolutely, 100% always needed, no matter what.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wile E For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 22, 2009, 06:51 AM   #24
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
 
FordGT90Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,650 (6.23/day)
Thanks: 1,786
Thanked 2,632 Times in 1,986 Posts

System Specs

Unless all you do is play Solitaire...


...which means you're still using Windows 95 B on a 66 MHz processor like my grandparents...


...to each their own.
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume.

try { SteamDownload(); }
catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }
FordGT90Concept is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2009, 06:54 AM   #25
Yukikaze
2000 Posts
 
Yukikaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 2,121 (1.23/day)
Thanks: 213
Thanked 481 Times in 347 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
You should be ashamed of yourself. There is never such a thing as enough power. MOAR POWAH is absolutely, 100% always needed, no matter what.
You are of course right my friend. *Hangs head down in shame*. As penance, I shall post an update on my overpowered mITX project log

Anyway, the question is how well it OCs.

At stock it runs 6 cores at 2.4Ghz. My i7 runs 4 cores at 3.33Ghz. At stock, I reckon they are about equal in performance in heavily multi-threaded apps, and the the i7 would walk all over it for gaming or any app that cannot utilize over 4 cores.

If the i9 cannot get to over 3.5Ghz land, an i7 of whatever sort at over 4Ghz would still be a better pick, and cost a ton less.
__________________
Cameron: Core i7 2600K 4.5Ghz, MCR220, 2xMCR120, MCP655, ASRock P67 Extreme4, 4GB DDR3, 2xOCZ Vertex 30GB RAID0, GTX470, 2xHD5670, Modu82+ 625W, TT Xaser VI.
Neuromancer: Core i7 975, DFI DK X58-T3eH6, 12GB DDR3 1333Mhz CL6-6-6-15-1T, 3x9600GSO 384MB, Hiper 880W, TT Xaser VI.
Administrator of a 40 core Hadoop cluster.
Yukikaze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Plans Core i7 and Core i5 Dual-Core Ultrathin Notebook Processors in 2010 btarunr News 4 Nov 12, 2009 07:17 PM
Core i9 ''Gulftown'' Comes to Life btarunr News 93 Aug 3, 2009 09:34 AM
Details on Intel's Core Brand Product Placement Emerge, Gulftown to be Named Core i9 btarunr News 46 Jun 26, 2009 04:30 PM
Intel Decides to Unlock the Memory Multiplier of its Core i7-920 and Core i7-940 CPUs malware News 14 Sep 20, 2008 07:22 PM
Intel Planning Six-Core Processor, Will Call it 'Dunnington' zekrahminator News 110 Feb 28, 2008 04:29 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts