NVIDIA Pitches GeForce GTX 300 Series to Clinch Performance Crown - Page 3

laszlo · Dec 14, 2009, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amok

you can't see it because i zoomed in on the picture in photoshop and screenshoted it. At the normal low resolution it's not noticeable, but once you zoom in it's really obvious.

I made another zoom in, even further in...
See what i mean. Do it yourself, you will see it as well. Really shabby work from the guy who faked it.
http://i45.tinypic.com/n71o9e.jpg

i zoom it at max ....nothing... take the posted picture not the uploaded

Mussels · Dec 14, 2009, 12:37 PM

arent those three games nvidia "the way its meant to be played" titles?

crow1001 · Dec 14, 2009, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by t77snapshot

hey show some respect to our news Editors ok.

Get a clue, they are fake, editor needs to acknowledge this in the first post or lock it here, the original thread where these fake results came from has been locked until there is proof to support them, I suggest this goes the same way, but being as they ARE fake that will never happen.

Amok · Dec 14, 2009, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by laszlo

i zoom it at max ....nothing... take the posted picture not the uploaded

Yeah, the jpg version had bad compression, but as you can see, i did another version, would you believe what i did if some guy posted it on the web or in the news section of some big site?

shevanel · Dec 14, 2009, 12:39 PM

just another ploy to keep people talking and that is all good.

meanwhile, I'm about to play some Dirt 2 w/ DX11.. anyone down?

WarEagleAU · Dec 14, 2009, 12:41 PM

I really do not expect Fermi to be better than cypress to the points made in the graphs. I Think Fermi will be a great nvidia product, but AMD is in the win with their ATI cards now and will continue to be when they drop the prices the day Fermi launches.

laszlo · Dec 14, 2009, 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amok

Yeah, the jpg version had bad compression, but as you can see, i did another version, would you believe what i did if some guy posted it on the web or in the news section of some big site?

see what i mean: http://i49.tinypic.com/23mk11d.jpg

Imsochobo · Dec 14, 2009, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyordie

You guys do realize ATI isn't just gonna stand around and watch this unfold...

There will be an HD5980 or equivalent. ;-p

Probably a 512bit GDDR5 HD5890... As we all know the HD58xx series is very bandwidth starved... giving it that extra bandwidth should pull it ahead of almost everything Nvidia can throw out...

They aint, i gained less on a memory clock from 1000 mhz vs 1400 mhz.
a core clock from 850 to 950 = way more fps gain, meaning, they aint memory bottlenecked as MANY belive.

G300 will have a 384 bit memory bus running GDDR5 memory modules.
That will have an estimated memory bandwidth of 185-200 gb/sec.

Its funny how 128 bit memory bus diffrence on the 4870 could mean just mere 5-8% eh? they aint very memory bottlenecked, stop arguing about the damn bus, ati know better than you, i belive they've done EXTENSIVE testing to find out what gives most bang for the buck.

shevanel · Dec 14, 2009, 01:00 PM

yeah 512mb of 384bit memory probably.

I'll probably buy one when they release. I'd like to be able to kick paper in Batman AA while simultaneously having DX11 features for my other games.

Amok · Dec 14, 2009, 01:41 PM

Look at what i found... neat huh?

KainXS · Dec 14, 2009, 02:02 PM

never trust any internal or pre release reviews, most of the time they will be fake, and this one could have been done by a little kid from the looks I could make a review saying the HD8870 will be faster than the GTX600, would anyone like to see that, of course not, because it would be fake, just like this.

I can't even believe the mods posted this crap, lol you don't even know what the source is

Mussels · Dec 14, 2009, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KainXS

never trust any internal or pre release reviews, most of the time they will be fake, and this one could have been done by a little kid from the looks I could make a review saying the HD8870 will be faster than the GTX600, would anyone like to see that, of course not, because it would be fake, just like this.

I can't even believe the mods posted this crap,

newsposters and mods arent the same people

besides, if you'd actually clicked the link for source...

KainXS · Dec 14, 2009, 02:05 PM

coulda fooled me ^^

crow1001 · Dec 14, 2009, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mussels

newsposters and mods arent the same people

besides, if you'd actually clicked the link for source...

http://img.techpowerup.org/091214/Capture293.jpg

Well you not think it right that techpowerup should display the same disclaimer in its post?

Mussels · Dec 14, 2009, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crow1001

Well you not think it right that techpowerup should display the same disclaimer in its post?

up to the discretion of the news poster - they DO provide links to the source, under the assumption that anyone interested in the source of the post would click it for further information.

TooFast · Dec 14, 2009, 02:11 PM

by the time this thing comes out, the 5890 and 5990 will be ready.

EastCoasthandle · Dec 14, 2009, 02:11 PM

Was this ever confirmed by nvidia? From what was told this is fake. It started in Tom's Hardware Thread. As you can see it looks like an official TM benchmark result but look at the user name (Successful_Troll). Then it appeared the next day at OCUK forum to look like official nvidia slide. In this thread, the poster here links back to TM forum grinning about the thread created there.

This is why I ask if this has been officially confirmed by nvidia via press release on their homepage (for example). Because as it stands now it doesn't look real based on how this came about.

Mussels · Dec 14, 2009, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EastCoasthandle

Was this ever confirmed by nvidia? From what was told this is fake. It started in Tom's Hardware Thread. As you can see it looks like an official TM benchmark result but look at the user name (Successful_Troll). Then it was photoshoped in the nd was photoshopped again at the OCUK forum to look like official nvidia slide. In this thread, the poster here links back to TM forum grinning about the thread created there.

This is why I ask if this has been officially confirmed by nvidia via press release on their homepage (for example). Because as it stands now it doesn't look real based on how this came about.

it looks to be completely fake.

crow1001 · Dec 14, 2009, 02:13 PM

I think you will agree when I say techpowerup is a very popular site, so to have something real dodgy pasted on the front page for all to view and with no disclaimer unless you go to the source, this is correct? I think not.

Amok · Dec 14, 2009, 02:13 PM

Don't you understand, both posters on THG and overclockers.co.uk are actually Jen Hsuan in disguise... trying to ruin AMDs Christmas sale...

KainXS · Dec 14, 2009, 02:15 PM

A monkey came back from the future and posted this on those forums, thats the source lol

Mussels · Dec 14, 2009, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crow1001

I think you will agree when I say techpowerup is a very popular site, so to have something real dodgy pasted on the front page for all to view and with no disclaimer unless you go to the source, this is correct? I think not.

indeed.

The case has been made, so hopefully BTA will read these points and edit his post.

scope54 · Dec 14, 2009, 02:17 PM

Fake:
http://techreport.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=69653

BAD NEWS- slide is a fake. (straight from NVIDIA, this is not leaked)

Mistral · Dec 14, 2009, 02:20 PM

Amok, the graph you posted is out of date. Here's the latest, straight from nV's official internal testing. You can see why it hasn't been made public before.

As you can notice, it includes data from the upcoming mainstream offering of the third major superpower in the graphics market.

shevanel · Dec 14, 2009, 02:22 PM

System Name:	AMD reborned
Processor:	Amd Toledo x2 4200+@2740
Motherboard:	DFI NF4 Inf.
Cooling:	Cooler Master Hyper TX2
Memory:	2 GB G.Skill F1-4000USU2
Video Card:	MSI HD6850 Cyclone;860/1100 Mhz
Hard Disk:	Excelstor 160Gb;Seagate 500Gb
Optical Drive:	Teac DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung 2032BW
Case:	UTT ME09AL - B - Air
Sound Card:	Audigy SE soft modded to X-Fi Extr.Audio with Z-5500
PSU:	Cooleer Master RP M520
Software:	win7 sp1
Benchmarks:	3dmark 2006-10250

Dec 14, 2009, 12:37 PM	#52
Mussels Doctor Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA) Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day) Thanks: 3,699 Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts System Specs	arent those three games nvidia "the way its meant to be played" titles? __________________ Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United!

System Name:	Real Men use Real Cores!
Processor:	Phenom II x6 1090T: 3600Mhz undervolted (NB+HT at 2.6)
Motherboard:	Gigabyte 890FXA-UD5
Cooling:	Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme (Lapped + ducted)
Memory:	8GB Corsair Dominator DDR3 - 1600Mhz 7-7-7-20 1.65V
Video Card:	AMD Radeon 5870 1GB Crossfire
Hard Disk:	Intel 520 SSD (120GB), 500GB OS + 18TB of storage (mostly external)
Optical Drive:	Samsung Blu Ray drive (SH-B083A)
CRT/LCD Model:	23.6" Samsung 1080P / Samsung 40" HDTV - 1360x768P
Case:	Coolermaster CM 690 II Advanced (non window)
Sound Card:	Auzentech X-Mystique (Logitech Z5500D + sennheiser HD555 + RE2's)
PSU:	Corsair HX 1000W
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate x64 - kaspersky internet security 2011
Benchmarks:	Laptop: AMD A6 APU 1.4GHz @2.2GHz quad core + APU crossfire. 8GB DDR3, 750GB HDD

Processor:	i5 2500k @4.7Ghz
Motherboard:	ASUS P8Z68-V
Cooling:	Noctua se2 u12p
Memory:	8GB CORSAIR 1600Mhz
Video Card:	EVGA GTX 480 850 core
Hard Disk:	CORSAIR P64GB SSD SAMSUNG 1TB
Optical Drive:	LG DVD/RW
CRT/LCD Model:	NEC 20WGX2
Case:	Lian Li PC-60FW
Sound Card:	Asus Xonar D2X
PSU:	CORSAIR HX750W
Software:	WINDOWS 7 64

Dec 14, 2009, 12:39 PM	#55
shevanel Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Leesburg, FL Posts: 3,151 (2.26/day) Thanks: 1,515 Thanked 410 Times in 338 Posts System Specs	just another ploy to keep people talking and that is all good. meanwhile, I'm about to play some Dirt 2 w/ DX11.. anyone down? __________________ Stop comparing it to onboard! Compare it to something it falls short to so that we can really understand. HEAT

Dec 14, 2009, 12:41 PM	#56
WarEagleAU Bird of Prey Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Gurley, AL Posts: 9,994 (3.99/day) Thanks: 3,810 Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts System Specs	I really do not expect Fermi to be better than cypress to the points made in the graphs. I Think Fermi will be a great nvidia product, but AMD is in the win with their ATI cards now and will continue to be when they drop the prices the day Fermi launches. __________________ =-TheEagle-= http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454 “You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120 - Edited for content and clarity

System Name:	Boddha Getta
Processor:	AMD FX 6100 @ 4.432Ghz @1.401V
Motherboard:	ASUS M5A99X EVO AMD 990X AMD SB950
Cooling:	Custom Water. EK 240MM Kit, Supreme HSF - Runs 35C
Memory:	2 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance White LP @ 1.35V
Video Card:	XFX Radeon HD 6870 900/1050 (no OC yet)
Hard Disk:	WD Caviar Black 1.0TB, WD Caviar Green 1.0TB, WD 160GB
Optical Drive:	Samung SH22SL 22X Lightscribe DVD+/-R/RW LG BDRE Reader/Burner Lite ON Max Burner for burning Xbox
CRT/LCD Model:	Asus VH222/S 22: (21.5" Viewable) 1920x1080p HDMI LCD Monitor
Case:	NZXT White Phantom
Sound Card:	Onboard Realtek 5.1
PSU:	NZXT Hale 90 Gold Cert 750W Modular PSU
Software:	Windows 7 Pro 64 bit.
Benchmarks:	5.9 Windows Index rating 3D06 - 17472

System Name:	My system, my servers are faster :(
Processor:	Amd phenom II 1055 (10 bucks LOL!)
Motherboard:	MSI GD65
Cooling:	Air.
Memory:	4 GB 1866 mhz corsair dom GT
Video Card:	5850- Crossfire
Hard Disk:	Samsung 1tb/NAS 500Mb/SEC
Optical Drive:	Some blueray drive
CRT/LCD Model:	42" Toshiba TV/26"mon/Projector
Case:	Silverstone GD04B
Sound Card:	ATI HDMI.
PSU:	Corsair HX1000
Software:	UBuntu win7 etc.
Benchmarks:	running esxI cluster for my server needs :) 24 cores in total!

Dec 14, 2009, 01:00 PM	#59
shevanel Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Leesburg, FL Posts: 3,151 (2.26/day) Thanks: 1,515 Thanked 410 Times in 338 Posts System Specs	yeah 512mb of 384bit memory probably. I'll probably buy one when they release. I'd like to be able to kick paper in Batman AA while simultaneously having DX11 features for my other games. __________________ Stop comparing it to onboard! Compare it to something it falls short to so that we can really understand. HEAT

Dec 14, 2009, 01:41 PM	#60
Amok Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 14 (0.01/day) Thanks: 2 Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts	Look at what i found... neat huh?

Dec 14, 2009, 02:02 PM	#61
KainXS Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 4,678 (2.27/day) Thanks: 181 Thanked 464 Times in 381 Posts System Specs	never trust any internal or pre release reviews, most of the time they will be fake, and this one could have been done by a little kid from the looks I could make a review saying the HD8870 will be faster than the GTX600, would anyone like to see that, of course not, because it would be fake, just like this. I can't even believe the mods posted this crap, lol you don't even know what the source is

System Name:	GhetO.O
Processor:	Core2Quad Q8400@4.1Ghz/2500K
Motherboard:	MSI P35 Neo 2 FR/Sabertooth
Cooling:	GEMINII+2 120MM fans/Corsair
Memory:	8GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2 1066/16GB Crucial Ballistix
Video Card:	ASUS GTX460 SliFire/GTX680 SLI
Hard Disk:	1TB Spinpoint/2 SSD + 1 500GB WD
Optical Drive:	Lite On DVD+DL/None
CRT/LCD Model:	Acer 22 inch/ IPS Asus 26inch
Case:	Antec 300/CM HAF
Sound Card:	Xonar Essence
PSU:	Thermaltake 600
Software:	Windows 7

Dec 14, 2009, 02:05 PM	#63
KainXS Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 4,678 (2.27/day) Thanks: 181 Thanked 464 Times in 381 Posts System Specs	coulda fooled me ^^

Dec 14, 2009, 02:11 PM	#66
TooFast Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: montreal quebec Posts: 387 (0.14/day) Thanks: 3 Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts System Specs	by the time this thing comes out, the 5890 and 5990 will be ready. __________________ ATI RULES COME TO NETCORE.24 76.65.250.134:28960 COD4

System Name:	OVERKILL
Processor:	INTEL I7 965@ 3.6
Motherboard:	ASUS RAMPAGE 2
Cooling:	STOCK
Memory:	6GB DDR3 1333
Video Card:	ATI HD 5970
Hard Disk:	4X 60GB SSD RAID 0
Optical Drive:	BLURAY
CRT/LCD Model:	30 INCH DELL
Case:	ANTEC 1200
Sound Card:	XFI-PCI-E
PSU:	CORSAIR 1000WATT
Software:	WIN 7
Benchmarks:	netcore.24 COD4 server 76.65.250.134:28960

Dec 14, 2009, 02:11 PM	#67
EastCoasthandle Eligible for custom title Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 6,244 (2.12/day) Thanks: 382 Thanked 1,526 Times in 865 Posts System Specs	Was this ever confirmed by nvidia? From what was told this is fake. It started in Tom's Hardware Thread. As you can see it looks like an official TM benchmark result but look at the user name (Successful_Troll). Then it appeared the next day at OCUK forum to look like official nvidia slide. In this thread, the poster here links back to TM forum grinning about the thread created there. This is why I ask if this has been officially confirmed by nvidia via press release on their homepage (for example). Because as it stands now it doesn't look real based on how this came about. __________________ Windows 7 Club!, Online Gaming Lag and You GPU/CPU Water Cooling Club, Q9650 OC'd vs 2600K Stock PC Air Cooling Club, Game Performance Tips

System Name:	MY PC
Processor:	E8400 @ 3.80Ghz > Q9650 3.60Ghz
Motherboard:	Maximus Formula
Cooling:	D5, 7/16" ID Tubing, Maze4 with Fuzion CPU WB
Memory:	XMS 8500C5D @ 1066MHz
Video Card:	HD 2900 XT 858/900 to 4870 to 5870 (Keep Vreg area clean)
Hard Disk:	2
Optical Drive:	2
CRT/LCD Model:	24"
Case:	P180
Sound Card:	X-fi Plantinum
PSU:	Silencer 750
Software:	XP Pro SP3 to Windows 7
Benchmarks:	This varies from one driver to another.

Dec 14, 2009, 02:13 PM	#69
crow1001 Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 361 (0.16/day) Thanks: 9 Thanked 29 Times in 20 Posts System Specs	I think you will agree when I say techpowerup is a very popular site, so to have something real dodgy pasted on the front page for all to view and with no disclaimer unless you go to the source, this is correct? I think not.

Dec 14, 2009, 02:15 PM	#71
KainXS Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 4,678 (2.27/day) Thanks: 181 Thanked 464 Times in 381 Posts System Specs	A monkey came back from the future and posted this on those forums, thats the source lol

Dec 14, 2009, 02:17 PM	#73
scope54 Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Southern California :) Posts: 257 (0.09/day) Thanks: 12 Thanked 28 Times in 24 Posts System Specs	Fake: http://techreport.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=69653 BAD NEWS- slide is a fake. (straight from NVIDIA, this is not leaked) __________________ CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked

System Name:	Big Beast
Processor:	Intel i7 3770k
Motherboard:	Asrock Z77 Extreme 4
Cooling:	Corsair H70
Memory:	G.Skill Sniper series 2133mhz @ 9-11-10-28
Video Card:	HIS IceQ X Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
Hard Disk:	640Gb WD Caviar Black
Optical Drive:	LG Blu Ray & HD-DVD player
CRT/LCD Model:	Asus 22" HDMI LCD
Sound Card:	Audigy 2 zs Gamer
PSU:	OCZ 550watt
Software:	Windows 7 Home Premium x64

Dec 14, 2009, 02:20 PM	#74
Mistral Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Montreal Posts: 356 (0.19/day) Thanks: 37 Thanked 54 Times in 32 Posts System Specs	Amok, the graph you posted is out of date. Here's the latest, straight from nV's official internal testing. You can see why it hasn't been made public before. As you can notice, it includes data from the upcoming mainstream offering of the third major superpower in the graphics market.

System Name:	Sairikiki / Nameless
Processor:	i7 920@3.36 / e8400@3.66
Motherboard:	GB EX58-UDP4 / GB EP45-DS4P
Cooling:	H60 / AC FreezerX
Memory:	OCZ Reaper 1600 / Buffalo 1066
Video Card:	7950 Windforce @ 1kMHz / XFX 6950 unlocked
Hard Disk:	Seagate 500 and WD 640 / Seagate 620x2 and WD 1TB
CRT/LCD Model:	PCBank 2560x1440 / Toshi 525U
Case:	AzzA 1000 / Tempest
Sound Card:	Auzen Forte / board
PSU:	Corsair HX750 / Corsair HX520
Software:	w7 64 / w7 64
Benchmarks:	I don't play benchmarks...

Dec 14, 2009, 02:22 PM	#75
shevanel Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Leesburg, FL Posts: 3,151 (2.26/day) Thanks: 1,515 Thanked 410 Times in 338 Posts System Specs	__________________ Stop comparing it to onboard! Compare it to something it falls short to so that we can really understand. HEAT

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
NVIDIA Extends Performance Lead With New GeForce GTX 275 GPU	alexp999	News	41	Apr 5, 2009 08:55 AM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 and GeForce GTX 295 Launch Dates Announced	malware	News	49	Jan 14, 2009 03:10 PM
NVIDIA GeForce 181.20 WHQL Released - Adds Support for GeForce GTX 295 and GTX 285	malware	News	21	Jan 11, 2009 09:40 AM
Nvidia Geforce GTX 200 Series: Any new cards coming?	MaxAwesome	NVIDIA	0	Dec 5, 2008 09:39 PM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 and GeForce 280 GTX Price Cuts Now Official	malware	News	37	Jul 17, 2008 03:26 AM