BenQ Intros Two LED-Backlit HD Displays

btarunr · Dec 23, 2009, 11:35 AM

BenQ will release two new full-HD LCD monitors to the market, the 21.5 inch G2222HDL and 24-inch G2420HDBL. The two are characterized by LED backlit illumination, and share nearly identical specifications which include glossy black frames, native resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixel TN panels, 5 ms response time, 1,000:1 contrast ratio with 5,000,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio, brightness of 250 cd/m², and connectivity which includes DVI and D-Sub. The G2222HDL and G2420HDBL are expected to be priced at £149 and £169, respectively, available from this week.

Source: TechConnect Magazine

Abir053 · Dec 23, 2009, 12:16 PM

benq is very good in terms of image quality. i'm using a benq v2400w 24'' monitor(1920*1200) and it's awesome.

Fourstaff · Dec 23, 2009, 12:34 PM

Price is not too bad too! I wonder what input does it have?

Kaleid · Dec 23, 2009, 12:37 PM

Bah, it's a TN-panel

Mussels · Dec 23, 2009, 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourstaff

Price is not too bad too! I wonder what input does it have?

DVI and VGA. its in the first post.

Mistral · Dec 23, 2009, 01:12 PM

Almost there, BenQ!

Now please include 120Hz and DisplayPort. Then I'll be able to stomach the TN and gladly buy a 24" one...

EastCoasthandle · Dec 23, 2009, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abir053

benq is very good in terms of image quality. i'm using a benq v2400w 24'' monitor(1920*1200) and it's awesome.

Yeah but once you get use to 1920x1200, using 1920x1080 is a down grade IMO. Go ahead and change the resolution to 1920x1080 and see how much real estate you will lose from top to bottom. Now image if that's a real 24" screen what that means is that you will lose 3/4" from the top and 3/4" from the bottom. That's huge for a 24" screen. If they want to move over to 1080 resolution, why don't they just use a smaller screen thus a cost savings for the consumers.

pr0n Inspector · Dec 23, 2009, 03:05 PM

TN + whiteblue LEDs = CRAP. But mindless consumers will buy them anyway.

EnergyFX · Dec 23, 2009, 03:48 PM

Stupid bean counters thinking everything must be 1080 because that's what "HD" is. Morons!!

I propose we start using the term "HD+" to indicate 1200 res. That's like... woah... better than HD!!! The moron bean counters will wet themselves over it and want everything to be "HD+".

pentastar111 · Dec 23, 2009, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EnergyFX

Stupid bean counters thinking everything must be 1080 because that's what "HD" is. Morons!!

I propose we start using the term "HD+" to indicate 1200 res. That's like... woah... better than HD!!! The moron bean counters will wet themselves over it and want everything to be "HD+".

LOL!!! HD+

Yep i could just see that happening.

Jizzler · Dec 24, 2009, 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EnergyFX

Stupid bean counters thinking everything must be 1080 because that's what "HD" is. Morons!!

I propose we start using the term "HD+" to indicate 1200 res. That's like... woah... better than HD!!! The moron bean counters will wet themselves over it and want everything to be "HD+".

Yeah!!! I've already changed my system specs

pentastar111 · Dec 24, 2009, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jizzler

Yeah!!! I've already changed my system specs

LOL!! Me too.

Dec 24, 2009, 02:50 AM

At the guys bashing the 1080 vs 1200 resolution:

Well guys, actually the joke is on you. Just put 2 monitors next, one 22" with 1920x1200 and one with 24" with 1920x1080 then fire up a game. Now compare who has the more viewing space...

pentastar111 · Dec 24, 2009, 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAViX

At the guys bashing the 1080 vs 1200 resolution:

Well guys, actually the joke is on you. Just put 2 monitors next, one 22" with 1920x1200 and one with 24" with 1920x1080 then fire up a game. Now compare who has the more viewing space...

Mine's a 25.5 at 1920X1200, I still win

EnergyFX · Dec 24, 2009, 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAViX

At the guys bashing the 1080 vs 1200 resolution:

Well guys, actually the joke is on you. Just put 2 monitors next, one 22" with 1920x1200 and one with 24" with 1920x1080 then fire up a game. Now compare who has the more viewing space...

I have a 24" @ 1920x1200. My wife's 28" is 1920x1200. Soooo...

Besides... what kind of argument logic is that? How about comparing two 22" or two 24" monitors.

Mussels · Dec 24, 2009, 04:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EnergyFX

I have a 24" @ 1920x1200. My wife's 28" is 1920x1200. Soooo...

Besides... what kind of argument logic is that? How about comparing two 22" or two 24" monitors.

22" is 1680x1050
23.6" is 1920x1080
24" is 1920x1200 only.

you cant really get a screen with the same physical dimensions, and different aspect ratios

EnergyFX · Dec 24, 2009, 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mussels

22" is 1680x1050
23.6" is 1920x1080
24" is 1920x1200 only.

you cant really get a screen with the same physical dimensions, and different aspect ratios

I'm having a hard time deciphering what you are trying to say here... I read it several times. You can get those resolutions in tons of different sizes. Now if you were trying to imply that those resolutions are what you get at the closest comparison to a 1920x1200 24" monitor then I guess I kind of see where you are going. Still... if a manufacturer offers a ~24" monitor at 1920x1200 and ~24" at 1920x1080... which one would you rather view?

Basically, you have to up the size of a 1920x1080 monitor to get the same viewable area as a comparably sized 1920x1200 monitor. Hence you have to pit a 24" 1080 against a 22" 1200 to make it a fair "viewable area" argument... and in that argument the 1080 trumps itself by requiring larger screen dimension to compete.

Mussels · Dec 24, 2009, 04:41 AM

if you look, you'll find not a single 24" screen with 1920x1080

as you look into the specs, you find out stores are misleading you on the size and they're smaller than their 16:10 counterparts

EnergyFX · Dec 24, 2009, 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mussels

if you look, you'll find not a single 24" screen with 1920x1080

as you look into the specs, you find out stores are misleading you on the size and they're smaller than their 16:10 counterparts

Now I can't figure out if you are debating with me or agreeing with me. You're tone suggests you are debating me and defending your 1080 monitor... but you're posting stuff that seems to agree with what I am saying.

Yes, you're right... 24" monitors @ 1080 res are actually smaller than 24". However, 1200 res models are for the most part a full 24".

Are you or are you not saying that 1920x1080 is better than 1920x1200 at advertised dimension?

Mussels · Dec 24, 2009, 06:54 AM

no i was just stating that the screens are physically smaller.

It was said "if a manufacturer offers a ~24" monitor at 1920x1200 and ~24" at 1920x1080... which one would you rather view? "

its 23.6 vs 24 - i was mostly intending to clarify that.

pr0n Inspector · Dec 24, 2009, 06:58 AM

This is why PPI is a better measurement.

Dec 24, 2009, 10:59 AM

LOL. I didn't meant the size of the screen! haha.

I was trying to explain that having a standard HD resolution offers you more viewing space on the left/right side of the screen. Just take 2 screenshots 1 at x1200 and 1 at x1080 and see the diference.

And naturaly a 22" 1920x1080 monitor is smaller than a 22" 1920x1200. That's why I said a 22" and a 24" ... My bad.

Mussels · Dec 24, 2009, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAViX

LOL. I didn't meant the size of the screen! haha.

I was trying to explain that having a standard HD resolution offers you more viewing space on the left/right side of the screen. Just take 2 screenshots 1 at x1200 and 1 at x1080 and see the diference.

And naturaly a 22" 1920x1080 monitor is smaller than a 22" 1920x1200. That's why I said a 22" and a 24" ... My bad.

i dont see how that gives you more side? the change is in vertical height... or do you mean its "wider" ?

Dec 24, 2009, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mussels

i dont see how that gives you more side? the change is in vertical height... or do you mean its "wider" ?

you have extra details on left/right side. I'll take some screens to prove it.

Dec 24, 2009, 11:24 AM

Check the screens here, and why an 1920x1080 is better than a 1920x1200 monitor.

1920x1080 :

1920x1200 :

So this is what I meant when said "extra viewing space"...

Dec 23, 2009, 11:35 AM	#1
btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Hyderabad, India Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day) Thanks: 788 Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts System Specs	BenQ Intros Two LED-Backlit HD Displays BenQ will release two new full-HD LCD monitors to the market, the 21.5 inch G2222HDL and 24-inch G2420HDBL. The two are characterized by LED backlit illumination, and share nearly identical specifications which include glossy black frames, native resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixel TN panels, 5 ms response time, 1,000:1 contrast ratio with 5,000,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio, brightness of 250 cd/m², and connectivity which includes DVI and D-Sub. The G2222HDL and G2420HDBL are expected to be priced at £149 and £169, respectively, available from this week. Source: TechConnect Magazine

System Name:	Blackbox
Processor:	Intel Core i7-950
Motherboard:	Intel Extreme Series DX58OG
Cooling:	Xigmatek Aegir SD128264 with IC Diamond 24 Thermal Compound
Memory:	12GB ADATA Premier (3x 4GB) DDR3-1333 MHz
Video Card:	Palit GeForce GTX 680 JetStream 2GB outfitted with IC Diamond 24 TIM
Hard Disk:	Samsung 840 Series 250GB, Random 8 TB storage
Optical Drive:	HT-LG DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	ViewSonic VX2450wm-LED
Case:	Cooler Master CM690 Window
Sound Card:	Creative SB Recon3D
PSU:	Corsair HX850W
Software:	Windows 8 Pro 64-bit

Processor:	Intel Core i5 750 2.66ghz@3.6ghz(stock cooler)
Motherboard:	Gigabyte ga-p55a-ud3(rev 1.0)
Cooling:	Stock
Memory:	Elixir 4gb(2*2gb) ddr3 1333mhz@1440mhz
Video Card:	Sapphire HD5870 1gb @900/1250mhz
Hard Disk:	Hitachi 500gb+ Samsung 1tb f3
Optical Drive:	Asus 24x dvd rw, Sony BD rom drive
CRT/LCD Model:	Benq v2400w(1920*1200)
Case:	Thermaltake M9D
Sound Card:	Creative X-fi Titanium pci-e
PSU:	Thermaltake Toughpower 750watt
Software:	Windows7 64bit

System Name:	Asus K50-X5DAB
Processor:	Athlon QL-65 2.2Ghz
Memory:	1x1GB + 1X2GB
Video Card:	Mobility Radeon HD4570 512mb
Hard Disk:	Samsung 840 250Gb
CRT/LCD Model:	15.6" 1366x768

System Name:	Name? Nada. Go for silence and power
Processor:	i3 530 @ 4.04
Motherboard:	Asus P7P55D-E
Cooling:	Scythe Mugen 2 rev.B passive
Memory:	2x4GB Kingston 1333 8-8-8-20
Video Card:	Sapphire 6850 Toxic 1GB with Arctic S1 revB / 700rpm (55C full load)
Hard Disk:	Samsung F4 2TB + WD20EARX 2TB (in softmounted Scythe quietdrive)
Optical Drive:	Pioneer 216D (excellently quiet)
CRT/LCD Model:	Philips 200WP7ES 20.1" Wide S-IPS
Case:	Antec P182 (2x500rpm fans +modded of course.)
Sound Card:	Creative X-fi Xtreme Gamer / Muse t-amp / Ino Audio piPcrt
PSU:	Silverpower 750w (+Silverstone PSU cover)
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Dec 23, 2009, 12:16 PM	#2
Abir053 Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh Posts: 34 (0.03/day) Thanks: 1 Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts System Specs	benq is very good in terms of image quality. i'm using a benq v2400w 24'' monitor(1920*1200) and it's awesome.

Dec 23, 2009, 12:34 PM	#3
Fourstaff TPU Janitor Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Science Museum, Londinium Posts: 5,979 (4.70/day) Thanks: 261 Thanked 1,464 Times in 1,211 Posts System Specs	Price is not too bad too! I wonder what input does it have?

Dec 23, 2009, 12:37 PM	#4
Kaleid Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 116 (0.06/day) Thanks: 3 Thanked 16 Times in 8 Posts System Specs	Bah, it's a TN-panel

System Name:	Real Men use Real Cores!
Processor:	Phenom II x6 1090T: 3600Mhz undervolted (NB+HT at 2.6)
Motherboard:	Gigabyte 890FXA-UD5
Cooling:	Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme (Lapped + ducted)
Memory:	8GB Corsair Dominator DDR3 - 1600Mhz 7-7-7-20 1.65V
Video Card:	AMD Radeon 5870 1GB Crossfire
Hard Disk:	Intel 520 SSD (120GB), 500GB OS + 18TB of storage (mostly external)
Optical Drive:	Samsung Blu Ray drive (SH-B083A)
CRT/LCD Model:	23.6" Samsung 1080P / Samsung 40" HDTV - 1360x768P
Case:	Coolermaster CM 690 II Advanced (non window)
Sound Card:	Auzentech X-Mystique (Logitech Z5500D + sennheiser HD555 + RE2's)
PSU:	Corsair HX 1000W
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate x64 - kaspersky internet security 2013
Benchmarks:	Laptop: AMD A6 APU 1.4GHz @2.2GHz quad core + APU crossfire.Iphone 5, Samsung galaxy tab 2 7"

Dec 23, 2009, 01:12 PM	#6
Mistral Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Montreal Posts: 356 (0.19/day) Thanks: 37 Thanked 54 Times in 32 Posts System Specs	Almost there, BenQ! Now please include 120Hz and DisplayPort. Then I'll be able to stomach the TN and gladly buy a 24" one...

System Name:	Sairikiki / Nameless
Processor:	i7 920@3.36 / e8400@3.66
Motherboard:	GB EX58-UDP4 / GB EP45-DS4P
Cooling:	H60 / AC FreezerX
Memory:	OCZ Reaper 1600 / Buffalo 1066
Video Card:	7950 Windforce @ 1kMHz / XFX 6950 unlocked
Hard Disk:	Seagate 500 and WD 640 / Seagate 620x2 and WD 1TB
CRT/LCD Model:	PCBank 2560x1440 / Toshi 525U
Case:	AzzA 1000 / Tempest
Sound Card:	Auzen Forte / board
PSU:	Corsair HX750 / Corsair HX520
Software:	w7 64 / w7 64
Benchmarks:	I don't play benchmarks...

System Name:	MY PC
Processor:	E8400 @ 3.80Ghz > Q9650 3.60Ghz
Motherboard:	Maximus Formula
Cooling:	D5, 7/16" ID Tubing, Maze4 with Fuzion CPU WB
Memory:	XMS 8500C5D @ 1066MHz
Video Card:	HD 2900 XT 858/900 to 4870 to 5870 (Keep Vreg area clean)
Hard Disk:	2
Optical Drive:	2
CRT/LCD Model:	24"
Case:	P180
Sound Card:	X-fi Plantinum
PSU:	Silencer 750
Software:	XP Pro SP3 to Windows 7
Benchmarks:	This varies from one driver to another.

Dec 23, 2009, 03:05 PM	#8
pr0n Inspector Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 1,193 (0.73/day) Thanks: 65 Thanked 139 Times in 107 Posts System Specs	TN + whiteblue LEDs = CRAP. But mindless consumers will buy them anyway.

System Name:	sans nom
Processor:	AMD 1090T, EK Supreme hf
Motherboard:	MSI 890GXM-G65
Cooling:	Feser X-480, MCR220-QP, MCP655, Ek D5 TOP
Memory:	2 x G.Skill F3-12800CL9D-4GBRL
Video Card:	EVGA GTX 570, Ek GTX 580 FC block
Hard Disk:	X25M 80GB 34nm, WDC WD20EARS, WD15EADS, WD6401AALS
Optical Drive:	Pioneer DVR-216D
CRT/LCD Model:	Acer P191w, Philips 240PW9EB, ColorMunki Photo
Case:	SST-TJ07B-W
Sound Card:	Asus Essence ST
PSU:	Corsair TX750

Dec 23, 2009, 03:48 PM	#9
EnergyFX Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Annapolis, MD Posts: 1,396 (0.69/day) Thanks: 477 Thanked 350 Times in 237 Posts System Specs	Stupid bean counters thinking everything must be 1080 because that's what "HD" is. Morons!! I propose we start using the term "HD+" to indicate 1200 res. That's like... woah... better than HD!!! The moron bean counters will wet themselves over it and want everything to be "HD+". __________________ Feedback/Rep: Heat -- eBay There is an elegant solution for every problem... and sometimes elegance comes in the form of a very large hammer. Last edited by EnergyFX; Dec 23, 2009 at 03:56 PM.

System Name:	n.audBl
Processor:	E8500 @ 3.80GHz
Motherboard:	ASUS Striker Extreme
Cooling:	Full liquid (everything except power supply)
Memory:	4Gb OCZ DDR2 PC9600
Video Card:	Dual EVGA GTX 280 SSC Edition
Hard Disk:	Dual WD Raptor in RAID 0 (300Gb), Dual WD 1Tb Cavair in RAID 1
Optical Drive:	ASUS CD/DVD Burner
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell 2407 24" HD+ Widescreen
Case:	Theraltake Tai-Chi
Sound Card:	X-Fi Fata1ty (bleh!)
PSU:	Ultra X3 1000W
Software:	Win 7 64bit

Processor:	i7 920
Motherboard:	EVGA X58
Cooling:	eight 120mm fans, Swiftech GTZ cpu block, 3 120mm radiator, MCP655 pump, primochill tubing
Memory:	6 gig G-Skill DDR3 1600
Video Card:	GTX 285's (SLI)
Hard Disk:	500GB Western Digital
Optical Drive:	Asus SATA drives
CRT/LCD Model:	3 Asus 23 in inchers
Case:	Lian Li A77B
Sound Card:	on board 7.1
PSU:	Corsair 1000
Software:	win 7 64

Processor:	AMD FX-8120
Motherboard:	ASRock Fatal1ty 990FX Professional
Cooling:	Scythe Ninja 3
Memory:	G.Skill DDR3-1866 8GB x 2
Video Card:	Gigabyte GTX 660 2GB
Hard Disk:	Crucial M4 128GB, WD 640GB x 4, 2TB Seagate
Optical Drive:	Asus SATA DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	Asus 24" HD+ (1920x1200)
Case:	Lian Li PC-A17B
Sound Card:	Onboard
PSU:	OCZ GameXtreme 700w
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate

Dec 24, 2009, 02:50 AM	#13
TAViX Guest Posts: n/a (0/day)	At the guys bashing the 1080 vs 1200 resolution: Well guys, actually the joke is on you. Just put 2 monitors next, one 22" with 1920x1200 and one with 24" with 1920x1080 then fire up a game. Now compare who has the more viewing space...

Dec 24, 2009, 04:41 AM	#18
Mussels Doctor Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA) Posts: 34,561 (10.96/day) Thanks: 3,700 Thanked 8,696 Times in 6,393 Posts System Specs	if you look, you'll find not a single 24" screen with 1920x1080 as you look into the specs, you find out stores are misleading you on the size and they're smaller than their 16:10 counterparts __________________ Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United!

Dec 24, 2009, 06:54 AM	#20
Mussels Doctor Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA) Posts: 34,561 (10.96/day) Thanks: 3,700 Thanked 8,696 Times in 6,393 Posts System Specs	no i was just stating that the screens are physically smaller. It was said "if a manufacturer offers a ~24" monitor at 1920x1200 and ~24" at 1920x1080... which one would you rather view? " its 23.6 vs 24 - i was mostly intending to clarify that. __________________ Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United!

Dec 24, 2009, 06:58 AM	#21
pr0n Inspector Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 1,193 (0.73/day) Thanks: 65 Thanked 139 Times in 107 Posts System Specs	This is why PPI is a better measurement.

Dec 24, 2009, 10:59 AM	#22
TAViX Guest Posts: n/a (0/day)	LOL. I didn't meant the size of the screen! haha. I was trying to explain that having a standard HD resolution offers you more viewing space on the left/right side of the screen. Just take 2 screenshots 1 at x1200 and 1 at x1080 and see the diference. And naturaly a 22" 1920x1080 monitor is smaller than a 22" 1920x1200. That's why I said a 22" and a 24" ... My bad.

Dec 24, 2009, 11:24 AM	#25
TAViX Guest Posts: n/a (0/day)	Check the screens here, and why an 1920x1080 is better than a 1920x1200 monitor. 1920x1080 : 1920x1200 : So this is what I meant when said "extra viewing space"...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
NEC Preps White LED Backlit MultiSync Monitor	btarunr	News	22	Sep 14, 2009 05:41 AM
LED backlit LCD Laptops	Gzero	General Hardware	0	May 3, 2009 09:55 AM
Dell Driving Transition to Energy-Efficient LED Displays	malware	News	13	Sep 26, 2008 11:07 AM
ViewSonic to Soon Offer the 22-inch LED Backlit VLED221wm Desktop Monitor	malware	News	2	Jan 11, 2008 06:23 PM
Samsung Develops 24-inch LED-backlit LCD Panels	malware	News	2	Apr 12, 2007 11:09 PM