|
Oct 17, 2006, 06:43 PM
|
#1 |
 Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: norway
Posts: 105 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
nvidia faster than ati???????
for an example:
Why come the 7900gt is faster than the x1800xt when.............. 7900gt= Memory: 256MB GDDR3 Clocks: 450Mhz / 660Mhz Process: 0.09u Transistors:: 278M Fillrate: 7.20GPixel/s Mem. Bandwith: 21.12GB/s and the x1800xt= Memory: 256MB GDDR3 Clocks: 625Mhz / 750Mhz Process: 0.09u Transistors:: 321M Fillrate: 10.00GPixel/s Mem. Bandwith: 24.00GB/s |
|
|
|
Oct 17, 2006, 06:46 PM
|
#2 |
 
|
Honestly,
I depends on the games that you are benching. Based on the different technologies that ATI and Nvidia uses, some games favor ATI while others favor Nvidia. For example: Doom3 performs better on Nvidia cards while Half Life 2 is better on ATI cards.
__________________
RIG #1 - See System Specs. RIG #2  AMD X2 3600+ (AM2), Biostar TF550, 2 x 1GB Buffalo Firestix, XFX 9800GTX+, WD 250 GB HD, NZXT Nemesis Elite Case, Lite-On Combo Drive and Lite-On DVD RW Drive, Antec TruePower 550W, 20.1" Dell w/ 17" Sony LCD |
|
|
|
|
Oct 17, 2006, 06:48 PM
|
#3 |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,792 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,291 Times in 3,175 Posts
   |
  
|
|
|
|
Oct 17, 2006, 06:52 PM
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: norway
Posts: 105 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
yeh well look at this http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=542
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 17, 2006, 07:06 PM
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: norway
Posts: 105 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
he..okay very even.. but there was this other site that said somthing different... but the r520 chip has 321m transisors and 7900gt has 278mill.. "overclocking potential of the 7900GT core, which is immense" he??
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 17, 2006, 07:12 PM
|
#6 |
|
|
Just to let you kno stinzza,
Paper specs. dont always live up to their hype. That is why people usually wait for benchmarks for real world stats.
__________________
RIG #1 - See System Specs. RIG #2 AMD X2 3600+ (AM2), Biostar TF550, 2 x 1GB Buffalo Firestix, XFX 9800GTX+, WD 250 GB HD, NZXT Nemesis Elite Case, Lite-On Combo Drive and Lite-On DVD RW Drive, Antec TruePower 550W, 20.1" Dell w/ 17" Sony LCD |
|
|
|
|
Oct 17, 2006, 07:21 PM
|
#7 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: norway
Posts: 105 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
what about 7950gtx in sli vs x1950xtx in crossfire??
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 17, 2006, 07:24 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,066 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 827
Thanked 913 Times in 746 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 17, 2006, 11:24 PM
|
#9 |
 Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Czech Rep. - Central Euro
Posts: 31 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
     
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 18, 2006, 11:42 AM
|
#10 |
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Getafe, Spain
Posts: 84 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
The raw speed isn't the best parameter to compare this things, and currently nearly nothing is comparable only by the MHz. The S3 Graphics Chrome S27 was launched about one year ago with a then surprising 650MHz on the GPU core, and my older nVidia GeForce 6800GT with only 350MHz GPU crushes it. Number of pixel and vertex processors and it's efficiency, the memory bus efficiency... many factors come into account on this matters.
__________________
Si vis pacem para bellum |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
System Specs
