techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 27, 2010, 02:29 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,898 Times in 5,649 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Core i7 Dual-Socket Operation Possible?

Intel's Core i7 processor in the LGA1366 package is currently leading in the performance front, some of the fastest processors for the desktop platform fall in this league. Despite lacking a directly competitive processor, the platform had its share of competition thanks to motherboard manufacturers competing within themselves. EVGA for one, is set to unveil a bleeding-edge motherboard later this year, which supports two LGA1366 processors. So far, enthusiasts working for EVGA have only disclosed that the motherboard would work with Intel's DP Xeon 5000 series LGA1366 processors, which are officially capable of working on dual-socket server and workstation motherboards.

However, a plausible rumor doing rounds has it that EVGA may attempt to make its motherboard work with Core i7 series processors - which are incapable to operate in pairs, at least from what we're led to believe. EVGA is attempting to do this by modifying the reference Intel design for the platform.

To begin with, Intel with use the 5500 series IO hub instead of X58 Express. A BIOS modification on the QuickPath Interconnect routing table will connect Processor1 to Processor2 via the IO hub, in absence of a physical QPI link between the two CPU sockets (enabled on the Xeon DP processors). This approach, while making the setup possible, also increases system interconnect latencies almost two-fold.



The approach could cut platform costs at a theoretical performance penalty, letting you use Core i7 or the cheaper Xeon UP processors. Use of Xeon DP processors could then still make for a good buy, if performance at any cost matters. Much like Intel's previous attempt at a dual-socket capable processor from the Core family (Core 2 Extreme QX9775), a real DP capable Core processor cannot be written off.

There is no comment yet from EVGA, in this regard.

With inputs from Semi-Accurate.
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 27, 2010, 02:40 PM   #2
ToTTenTranz
500 Posts
 
ToTTenTranz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Porto
Posts: 845 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 172 Times in 135 Posts

System Specs

Ah reminds me of the Abit BP6 more than 10 years ago (wow, it's been that long!)



I had one. It was quite cheap (same as any other 440BX board) and buying two Celeron would cost less than a same speed Pentium 2 by then.

Unfortunately, having 2 CPUs by then wasn't useful at all, during the board's lifetime.
But hey, I was happy with it :P





Of course, this LGA1366 board will never be marketed towards budget systems..
ToTTenTranz is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ToTTenTranz For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 27, 2010, 02:51 PM   #3
Morgoth
2000 Posts
 
Morgoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,650 (1.25/day)
Thanks: 80
Thanked 221 Times in 161 Posts

System Specs

so in other words desktop i7s will work in dual socket lga1366 mainboards just as its xeon version?
Morgoth is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 03:00 PM   #4
EnJoY
75 Posts
 
EnJoY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 120 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 19 Times in 7 Posts
Send a message via AIM to EnJoY Send a message via MSN to EnJoY

Guys,

This was actually first reported by me from CES an hour after being the first person to see the board hands-on, here: http://www.techreaction.net/2010/01/...d-270-gt-w555/

You guys definitely extrapolated on this, but S|A shouldn't be acting like they got the scoop.
__________________
Follow TechREACTION on Twitter!
EnJoY is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 03:02 PM   #5
douglatins
2000 Posts
 
douglatins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brasil
Posts: 2,607 (1.42/day)
Thanks: 295
Thanked 268 Times in 204 Posts
Send a message via MSN to douglatins Send a message via Skype™ to douglatins

System Specs

I would say great news, but that is actually something people should totally be expecting, since why make a Classified board that only real enthusiasts with 3K for spending in processors would get, I think that like only 10% of classified owners have a 975 instead of a 920.
Now spending 400+800 in a dual socket processing monster would be a lot more appealing to potential customers like myself
__________________

douglatins is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 03:04 PM   #6
TheLostSwede
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: A little green island far far away
Posts: 843 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 152 Times in 113 Posts

System Specs

Hehe, had a BP6 with a pair of Celeron's in it. That was a fun rig, shame there were so few applications that took advantage of the second CPU back then...
TheLostSwede is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 03:19 PM   #7
Imsochobo
500 Posts
 
Imsochobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
Posts: 514 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Imsochobo

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLostSwede View Post
Hehe, had a BP6 with a pair of Celeron's in it. That was a fun rig, shame there were so few applications that took advantage of the second CPU back then...
I had a cant remember the name.

440BX dual Pentium III 550 mhz ;D
__________________
Imsochobo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 03:22 PM   #8
kid41212003
2000 Posts
 
kid41212003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,558 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 312
Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts

System Specs

I thought they gonna put 2 i7 on a same package to make an 8 cores cpu.
__________________
kid41212003 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 03:41 PM   #9
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,766 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,213 Times in 3,159 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by EnJoY View Post
Guys,

This was actually first reported by me from CES an hour after being the first person to see the board hands-on, here: http://www.techreaction.net/2010/01/...d-270-gt-w555/

You guys definitely extrapolated on this, but S|A shouldn't be acting like they got the scoop.
uh yes, the board is old news, what is new (even though i think shamino hinted at it during the meeting) is that core i7 UP cpus might work on a dual socket motherboard using the IOH as bridge for the second missing QPI link on either processor
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 04:55 PM   #10
ariff_tech
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 44 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts

lucid hydra can make ati and nvidia gpu working together,
now evga try to make corei7 working with another core i7
i believe it possible.

hopefully someone try to make intel cpu working with amd cpu,
ariff_tech is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 05:10 PM   #11
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
 
Fitseries3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Fitseries3

System Specs

before anyone gets all huffy puffy about this i think it needs a bit of explaining.

to keep manufacturing costs down intel produces a single wafer of CPU cores and IOH cores, as they have for many years.

these cores are then divided and placed into their respectable packages.

xeons and i7s are all the same die.

what sets them apart is the xeon 5XXX series has 2 QPIs while the i7's and 3XXX series xeons get 1 QPI disabled.

this is also true with the intel 5520 server chipset which is used on the evga dual socket motherboard. it has 2 QPI links while the desktop counterpart x58 chipset is a neutered 5520 IOH chip that lacks the 2nd QPI link.

by disabling the 2nd QPI on both the CPU and IOH you also loose features that require the use of the 2nd QPI such as Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O which wouldnt make a huge difference on x58.


Last edited by Fitseries3; Jan 27, 2010 at 05:15 PM.
Fitseries3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 05:11 PM   #12
ToTTenTranz
500 Posts
 
ToTTenTranz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Porto
Posts: 845 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 172 Times in 135 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ariff_tech View Post
hopefully someone try to make intel cpu working with amd cpu,
Back in the days of Socket 7, that would be possible.
Right now it would be a complete destruction of R&D resources.
ToTTenTranz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 06:10 PM   #13
EnJoY
75 Posts
 
EnJoY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 120 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 19 Times in 7 Posts
Send a message via AIM to EnJoY Send a message via MSN to EnJoY

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
uh yes, the board is old news, what is new (even though i think shamino hinted at it during the meeting) is that core i7 UP cpus might work on a dual socket motherboard using the IOH as bridge for the second missing QPI link on either processor
Right, clearly I misunderstand what S|A was reporting, but it was never meant to be a slight at your post. I just don't have an account at S|A.
__________________
Follow TechREACTION on Twitter!
EnJoY is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 06:51 PM   #14
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,766 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,213 Times in 3,159 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitseries3 View Post
before anyone gets all huffy puffy about this i think it needs a bit of explaining.

to keep manufacturing costs down intel produces a single wafer of CPU cores and IOH cores, as they have for many years.

these cores are then divided and placed into their respectable packages.

xeons and i7s are all the same die.

what sets them apart is the xeon 5XXX series has 2 QPIs while the i7's and 3XXX series xeons get 1 QPI disabled.

this is also true with the intel 5520 server chipset which is used on the evga dual socket motherboard. it has 2 QPI links while the desktop counterpart x58 chipset is a neutered 5520 IOH chip that lacks the 2nd QPI link.

by disabling the 2nd QPI on both the CPU and IOH you also loose features that require the use of the 2nd QPI such as Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O which wouldnt make a huge difference on x58.

http://ark.intel.com/inc/images/diagrams/diagram-17.gif http://ark.intel.com/inc/images/diagrams/diagram-16.gif
and the news post suggests that even with 1 qpi on each cpu you can magically make SMP work by using the IOH as bridge. we're not talking about enabling the 2nd qpi link here
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 06:53 PM   #15
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
 
Fitseries3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Fitseries3

System Specs

oh i know... just wanting everyone to have some background on how things work so they can fully understand whats trying to be accomplished by EVGA here.
Fitseries3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 07:01 PM   #16
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,747 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

Very interesting, considering the outragous costs of 1366 xeons compared to the i7s.

I wonder how much of a performance hit we are talking about though, it can't be that bad compared to the drastic savings.

Though I also have to ask myself how many people buying this board will actually be worried about the cost savings...
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 07:49 PM   #17
Wshlist
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: EU
Posts: 209 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by EnJoY View Post
Guys,

This was actually first reported by me from CES an hour after being the first person to see the board hands-on, here: http://www.techreaction.net/2010/01/...d-270-gt-w555/

You guys definitely extrapolated on this, but S|A shouldn't be acting like they got the scoop.
Haha, you think CES is some private get-together between you and manufacturers?
Wshlist is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 10:29 PM   #18
fatguy1992
200 Posts
 
fatguy1992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 386 (0.22/day)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 47 Times in 46 Posts
Send a message via MSN to fatguy1992

System Specs

Yay I really want this to happen, then I can run 2x W3570's (even though they are xeon they still only have 1 QPI), or my W3570 and W3540.
fatguy1992 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 10:38 PM   #19
DanTheBanjoman
Seņor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

I'm very skeptical. Intel has made it impossible to run desktop chips in DP configurations since the P3 (first FCPGA Celerons, later desktop Tualatins). After i875 they even removed such features from desktop chipsets as well, so no DP boards could be made using cheap chipsets. It would be odd if they suddenly don't block these things anymore.
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 01:13 AM   #20
EnJoY
75 Posts
 
EnJoY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 120 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 19 Times in 7 Posts
Send a message via AIM to EnJoY Send a message via MSN to EnJoY

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wshlist View Post
Haha, you think CES is some private get-together between you and manufacturers?
Nope, I just know I was the first one to get to their suite.
__________________
Follow TechREACTION on Twitter!
EnJoY is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 02:23 AM   #21
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imsochobo View Post
I had a cant remember the name.

440BX dual Pentium III 550 mhz ;D
Might have been Tyan Tiger, Thunder 100, or an Asus P2B? Some popular dualie boards back then.

I had dreams about the Thunder 100 and Thunder X...

Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 12:25 PM   #22
MGrant1957
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 28 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

DP boards...

were so much fun back in the day, I had a Tyan Tomcat with dual P166MMX processors. Woot
__________________
Just say NO to Vista.
MGrant1957 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[WTB][US] dual core socket M cpu cganesh75 Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 4 Jan 25, 2010 12:32 PM
[WTB][US] Socket 775 Dual Core & Dual Core 939 Cpu & More! topdog5252 Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 5 Nov 9, 2009 04:00 PM
[FS][US] Socket 939 4200+ Dual Core Exeodus Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 6 Sep 11, 2009 03:52 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts