![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,898 Times in 5,649 Posts
|
Core i7 Dual-Socket Operation Possible?
Intel's Core i7 processor in the LGA1366 package is currently leading in the performance front, some of the fastest processors for the desktop platform fall in this league. Despite lacking a directly competitive processor, the platform had its share of competition thanks to motherboard manufacturers competing within themselves. EVGA for one, is set to unveil a bleeding-edge motherboard later this year, which supports two LGA1366 processors. So far, enthusiasts working for EVGA have only disclosed that the motherboard would work with Intel's DP Xeon 5000 series LGA1366 processors, which are officially capable of working on dual-socket server and workstation motherboards.
However, a plausible rumor doing rounds has it that EVGA may attempt to make its motherboard work with Core i7 series processors - which are incapable to operate in pairs, at least from what we're led to believe. EVGA is attempting to do this by modifying the reference Intel design for the platform. To begin with, Intel with use the 5500 series IO hub instead of X58 Express. A BIOS modification on the QuickPath Interconnect routing table will connect Processor1 to Processor2 via the IO hub, in absence of a physical QPI link between the two CPU sockets (enabled on the Xeon DP processors). This approach, while making the setup possible, also increases system interconnect latencies almost two-fold. ![]() The approach could cut platform costs at a theoretical performance penalty, letting you use Core i7 or the cheaper Xeon UP processors. Use of Xeon DP processors could then still make for a good buy, if performance at any cost matters. Much like Intel's previous attempt at a dual-socket capable processor from the Core family (Core 2 Extreme QX9775), a real DP capable Core processor cannot be written off. There is no comment yet from EVGA, in this regard. With inputs from Semi-Accurate. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Porto
Posts: 845 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 172 Times in 135 Posts
|
Ah reminds me of the Abit BP6 more than 10 years ago (wow, it's been that long!)
![]() I had one. It was quite cheap (same as any other 440BX board) and buying two Celeron would cost less than a same speed Pentium 2 by then. Unfortunately, having 2 CPUs by then wasn't useful at all, during the board's lifetime. But hey, I was happy with it :P Of course, this LGA1366 board will never be marketed towards budget systems.. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to ToTTenTranz For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,650 (1.25/day)
Thanks: 80
Thanked 221 Times in 161 Posts
|
so in other words desktop i7s will work in dual socket lga1366 mainboards just as its xeon version?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() |
Guys,
This was actually first reported by me from CES an hour after being the first person to see the board hands-on, here: http://www.techreaction.net/2010/01/...d-270-gt-w555/ You guys definitely extrapolated on this, but S|A shouldn't be acting like they got the scoop. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brasil
Posts: 2,607 (1.42/day)
Thanks: 295
Thanked 268 Times in 204 Posts
|
I would say great news, but that is actually something people should totally be expecting, since why make a Classified board that only real enthusiasts with 3K for spending in processors would get, I think that like only 10% of classified owners have a 975 instead of a 920.
Now spending 400+800 in a dual socket processing monster would be a lot more appealing to potential customers like myself |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: A little green island far far away
Posts: 843 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 152 Times in 113 Posts
|
Hehe, had a BP6 with a pair of Celeron's in it. That was a fun rig, shame there were so few applications that took advantage of the second CPU back then...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
Posts: 514 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
|
Quote:
440BX dual Pentium III 550 mhz ;D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,558 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 312
Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts
|
I thought they gonna put 2 i7 on a same package to make an 8 cores cpu.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,766 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,213 Times in 3,159 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 44 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
lucid hydra can make ati and nvidia gpu working together,
now evga try to make corei7 working with another core i7 i believe it possible. hopefully someone try to make intel cpu working with amd cpu, ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Eleet Hardware Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
|
before anyone gets all huffy puffy about this i think it needs a bit of explaining.
to keep manufacturing costs down intel produces a single wafer of CPU cores and IOH cores, as they have for many years. these cores are then divided and placed into their respectable packages. xeons and i7s are all the same die. what sets them apart is the xeon 5XXX series has 2 QPIs while the i7's and 3XXX series xeons get 1 QPI disabled. this is also true with the intel 5520 server chipset which is used on the evga dual socket motherboard. it has 2 QPI links while the desktop counterpart x58 chipset is a neutered 5520 IOH chip that lacks the 2nd QPI link. by disabling the 2nd QPI on both the CPU and IOH you also loose features that require the use of the 2nd QPI such as Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O which wouldnt make a huge difference on x58.
Last edited by Fitseries3; Jan 27, 2010 at 05:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Porto
Posts: 845 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 172 Times in 135 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() |
Right, clearly I misunderstand what S|A was reporting, but it was never meant to be a slight at your post. I just don't have an account at S|A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,766 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,213 Times in 3,159 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Eleet Hardware Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
|
oh i know... just wanting everyone to have some background on how things work so they can fully understand whats trying to be accomplished by EVGA here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Semi-Retired Folder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,747 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts
|
Very interesting, considering the outragous costs of 1366 xeons compared to the i7s.
I wonder how much of a performance hit we are talking about though, it can't be that bad compared to the drastic savings. Though I also have to ask myself how many people buying this board will actually be worried about the cost savings...
__________________
Rig1: System Specs. Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5 Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: EU
Posts: 209 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 386 (0.22/day)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 47 Times in 46 Posts
|
Yay I really want this to happen, then I can run 2x W3570's (even though they are xeon they still only have 1 QPI), or my W3570 and W3540.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Seņor Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
|
I'm very skeptical. Intel has made it impossible to run desktop chips in DP configurations since the P3 (first FCPGA Celerons, later desktop Tualatins). After i875 they even removed such features from desktop chipsets as well, so no DP boards could be made using cheap chipsets. It would be odd if they suddenly don't block these things anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 28 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
DP boards...
were so much fun back in the day, I had a Tyan Tomcat with dual P166MMX processors. Woot
__________________
Just say NO to Vista. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [WTB][US] dual core socket M cpu | cganesh75 | Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum | 4 | Jan 25, 2010 12:32 PM |
| [WTB][US] Socket 775 Dual Core & Dual Core 939 Cpu & More! | topdog5252 | Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum | 5 | Nov 9, 2009 04:00 PM |
| [FS][US] Socket 939 4200+ Dual Core | Exeodus | Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum | 6 | Sep 11, 2009 03:52 PM |