Kingston Digital Ships First 256GB USB Flash Drive in the U.S.

btarunr · Feb 18, 2010, 05:07 PM

Kingston Digital, Inc., the Flash memory affiliate of Kingston Technology Company, Inc., the independent world leader in memory products, today announced the release of DataTraveler 310, the first 256GB USB Flash drive in the United States. The DataTraveler 310 replaces the 256GB DataTraveler 300, released in July 2009 to the Asia/Pacific and Europe, Middle East and Africa regions.

“We saw an opportunity to push the capacity envelope for USB Flash drives in the marketplace. Customer feedback and our research determined that this is a great solution for designers, engineers and architects who have a need to easily store and transport large data files,” said Andrew Ewing, USB business manager, Kingston. “For the enthusiast who wants easy access to their full media library, the DataTraveler 310 can store up to 365 CDs, 54 DVDs or 51,000 images*. This device makes an entire collection of data easily portable.”

The DataTraveler 310 features Password Traveler software, which allows the user to create and access a password-protected privacy zone. The secure area of the drive can account for up to 90 percent of the drive’s capacity and does not require administrator rights.

The DataTraveler 310 has a protective cap that snaps onto the back for the drive for convenient storage when not in use. This drive is available only in 256GB and is backed by a five-year warranty and 24/7 tech support.

DataTraveler 310 Product Features and Specifications:

Capacity**: 256 GB
Fast***: data transfer rates of 25MB/sec. read and 12MB/sec. write
Safeguarded: includes Password Traveler
Convenient: does not require Administrator rights to access the Privacy Zone
Dimensions: 2.90" x 0.87" x 0.63" (73.70mm x 22.20mm x 16.10mm)
Operating Temperature: 32°F to 140° F (0°C to 60° C)
Storage Temperature: -4°C to 185°F (-20°C to 85° C)
Simple: just plug into a USB port
Practical: loop supports most key rings
Guaranteed: five-year warranty

* Storage listings based on Kingston testing, individual results may vary.
** Some of the listed capacity is used for formatting and other functions and thus is not available for data storage.
*** Speed may vary due to host hardware, software and usage.

BazookaJoe · Feb 18, 2010, 05:33 PM

25 / 12?

On 256GB?!?! USB3 or GTFO!

TheLostSwede · Feb 18, 2010, 05:59 PM

Indeed, what's the point of this? At those speeds it'll take a month to copy all that data onto it...

HeroPrinny · Feb 18, 2010, 06:08 PM

IT would be pretty handy but I'm betting this thing is formatted in the fat32 file-system, making not only slow as heck to fill but really annoying to fill. USB 3.0 would have been a really nice feature to have on a memory stick this size.

a_ump · Feb 18, 2010, 06:09 PM

yea for real, they shoulda gone with 3.0 specs with 400mb/s transfers.

btarunr · Feb 18, 2010, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLostSwede

Indeed, what's the point of this? At those speeds it'll take a month to copy all that data onto it...

The idea is not to buy it and dump 256 GB of stuff right away. It is to pile up stuff by regular use, over a period of time and "never" run out of space. Now I have a ton of stuff on my 8 GB disk. I didn't dump all that stuff the moment I bought it.

a_ump · Feb 18, 2010, 06:22 PM

i suppose it'd be good for backing up data. "just incase" situation. still though, 3.0 spec is well known and set in stone, why not make it with 3.0 specs and make it a hella better product.

Roph · Feb 18, 2010, 06:25 PM

Probably to keep the already high cost as low as possible.

I'm curious what this looks like when taken apart

CharlO · Feb 18, 2010, 07:18 PM

Yeap, wonder about filling a Pen for 6 hours then getting it off for 3... And also almost sure is more expensive than a HDD.

OneCool · Feb 18, 2010, 09:23 PM

This would be good for storing hard drive images.

Someone buy me one

Mussels · Feb 18, 2010, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneCool

This would be good for storing hard drive images.

Someone buy me one

it would be very slooooooooow for storing those images.

Polarman · Feb 18, 2010, 10:00 PM

I have a 16GB usb stick and it does take time to fill. I'm tring to imagine how long it would take to fill this thing up.

Mussels · Feb 18, 2010, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polarman

I have a 16GB usb stick and it does take time to fill. I'm tring to imagine how long it would take to fill this thing up.

start the transfer before you go to work.

Jizzler · Feb 19, 2010, 12:42 AM

$1108!? That doesn't look like an ivory outer casing and cursed Mayan gold contacts.

But really, I'll just carry around an SSD. Tranfer little things, transfer large things, not a problem.

BazookaJoe · Feb 19, 2010, 04:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by btarunr

The idea is not to buy it and dump 256 GB of stuff right away. It is to pile up stuff by regular use, over a period of time and "never" run out of space. Now I have a ton of stuff on my 8 GB disk. I didn't dump all that stuff the moment I bought it.

Love your work btarunr, but this time I HAVE to disagree with you.

At 256GB there is no debate what-so-ever that this device is intended to carry large amounts of data.

In fact, your defense opens a much more terrifying problem, if it only hits 12 writing sequential LARGE files, how bad will it perform if you where actually using it to store hundreds of thousands of small files?

Even if you where only copying a portion of the drives size in files, 40, or 50 gigs transferred to this drive wouldn't even be a quarter of it's capacity and would still be an extremely painful process.

25 / 12 is not only virtually unusable, but bordering on flat out incompetent in this day and age where even the cheapest of common flash devices are starting to hit 35 / 25. We have to ASSUME that this drive in fact uses multiple memory chips , witch taken any reasonable design philosophy, should in fact open an excellent opportunity to make this drive note-ably faster than standard single chip devices, by using some form of internal "raid".

I'm sorry but, in my opinion, there is no validating argument for a 256GB device that (assuming claims correctly) can only do 25 / 12 :\

Unless it hits the shelf at $20.. then I'll take 4...

DirectorC · Feb 19, 2010, 04:29 AM

It would take 6 minutes to copy a DVD5 image to the drive.

That's not so bad. Quitcherbitchin.

Mussels · Feb 19, 2010, 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirectorC

It would take 6 minutes to copy a DVD5 image to the drive.

That's not so bad. Quitcherbitchin.

with this size drive, people would use blu ray images - or tens of DVD images.

DirectorC · Feb 19, 2010, 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mussels

with this size drive, people would use blu ray images - or tens of DVD images.

What's so bad either way about setting the file transfers to go and just waiting it out?

Mussels · Feb 19, 2010, 04:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirectorC

What's so bad either way about setting the file transfers to go and just waiting it out?

the fact that a drive at 1/10th the price could do it in half the time?

DirectorC · Feb 19, 2010, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mussels

the fact that a drive at 1/10th the price could do it in half the time?

But the drive you speak of doesn't fit in a jean's third pocket correct?

BazookaJoe · Feb 19, 2010, 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mussels

the fact that a drive at 1/10th the price could do it in half the time?

That's kinda my whole point

Wile E · Feb 19, 2010, 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirectorC

But the drive you speak of doesn't fit in a jean's third pocket correct?

Sure it does.

I agree with the others that this product is fail. Transfer speeds are far too low for that capacity. I have a 16GB Patriot Xporter XT, and copying the contents of the main CS4 iso to it took 3 hours at around 8GB, and it's faster than this drive. This drive needed to be USB 3.0 speeds, or it the whole concept needed shelved.

robodude666 · Feb 19, 2010, 04:00 PM

It seems companies forgot one can get a 320GB 2.5" HDD for $75 and a 2.5" enclosure for $20-30, not to mention there are three USB 3.0 external HDDs for $150-180 on NewEgg right now. Hell, you can get a SSD that has built in USB 2.0 support.

A flash drive beyond 16/32GB seems a bit pointless, no?

Frick · Feb 20, 2010, 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robodude666

It seems companies forgot one can get a 320GB 2.5" HDD for $75 and a 2.5" enclosure for $20-30, not to mention there are three USB 3.0 external HDDs for $150-180 on NewEgg right now. Hell, you can get a SSD that has built in USB 2.0 support.

The memory stick is waaay smaller.

I'm still amazed we live in a world when we can cram this much storage on a thing as big as my finger. Frikkin' amazing, although I kinda agree on this is a waste of money.

Mussels · Feb 20, 2010, 11:16 AM

true that the memory stick is smaller, but why not buy an 8/16GB thats twice as fast and tons cheaper? you still get the same job done.. the only benefit of THIS, is that it holds more files, and that gets negated when you consider it takes twice as long to get them on there.

Feb 18, 2010, 05:07 PM	#1
btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Hyderabad, India Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day) Thanks: 788 Thanked 12,908 Times in 5,654 Posts System Specs	Kingston Digital Ships First 256GB USB Flash Drive in the U.S. Kingston Digital, Inc., the Flash memory affiliate of Kingston Technology Company, Inc., the independent world leader in memory products, today announced the release of DataTraveler 310, the first 256GB USB Flash drive in the United States. The DataTraveler 310 replaces the 256GB DataTraveler 300, released in July 2009 to the Asia/Pacific and Europe, Middle East and Africa regions. “We saw an opportunity to push the capacity envelope for USB Flash drives in the marketplace. Customer feedback and our research determined that this is a great solution for designers, engineers and architects who have a need to easily store and transport large data files,” said Andrew Ewing, USB business manager, Kingston. “For the enthusiast who wants easy access to their full media library, the DataTraveler 310 can store up to 365 CDs, 54 DVDs or 51,000 images. This device makes an entire collection of data easily portable.” The DataTraveler 310 features Password Traveler software, which allows the user to create and access a password-protected privacy zone. The secure area of the drive can account for up to 90 percent of the drive’s capacity and does not require administrator rights. The DataTraveler 310 has a protective cap that snaps onto the back for the drive for convenient storage when not in use. This drive is available only in 256GB and is backed by a five-year warranty and 24/7 tech support. DataTraveler 310 Product Features and Specifications: Capacity: 256 GB Fast*: data transfer rates of 25MB/sec. read and 12MB/sec. write Safeguarded: includes Password Traveler Convenient: does not require Administrator rights to access the Privacy Zone Dimensions: 2.90" x 0.87" x 0.63" (73.70mm x 22.20mm x 16.10mm) Operating Temperature: 32°F to 140° F (0°C to 60° C) Storage Temperature: -4°C to 185°F (-20°C to 85° C) Simple: just plug into a USB port Practical: loop supports most key rings Guaranteed: five-year warranty Storage listings based on Kingston testing, individual results may vary. Some of the listed capacity is used for formatting and other functions and thus is not available for data storage. * Speed may vary due to host hardware, software and usage.

System Name:	Blackbox
Processor:	Intel Core i7-950
Motherboard:	Intel Extreme Series DX58OG
Cooling:	Xigmatek Aegir SD128264 with IC Diamond 24 Thermal Compound
Memory:	12GB ADATA Premier (3x 4GB) DDR3-1333 MHz
Video Card:	Palit GeForce GTX 680 JetStream 2GB outfitted with IC Diamond 24 TIM
Hard Disk:	Samsung 840 Series 250GB, Random 8 TB storage
Optical Drive:	HT-LG DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	ViewSonic VX2450wm-LED
Case:	Cooler Master CM690 Window
Sound Card:	Creative SB Recon3D
PSU:	Corsair HX850W
Software:	Windows 8 Pro 64-bit

Feb 18, 2010, 05:33 PM	#2
BazookaJoe Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 800 (0.46/day) Thanks: 41 Thanked 207 Times in 125 Posts	25 / 12? On 256GB?!?! USB3 or GTFO! __________________ *"I used to be an adventurer like you... Then a Skyrim patch corrupted all my saved games"*

System Name:	Overlord Mk XX.VI
Processor:	Core i7-3770K @ 4.4GHz
Motherboard:	Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H-WB
Cooling:	Corsair H60
Memory:	8GB Kingston HyperX 2133MHz DDR3
Video Card:	Galaxy GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2 GB GC
Hard Disk:	256GB Plextor M5 Pro SSD, 60GB SSD, 2TB, 1TB, 1TB
Optical Drive:	Pioneer SATA DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung SyncMaster BW2343+ 2048x1152 & a 26in 1920x1200 screen
Case:	Lian-Li PC-B25F
Sound Card:	Creative Labs X-Fi Elite Pro
PSU:	Akasa Freedom Power 750W
Software:	Windows 7/Lion 10.8.x

Feb 18, 2010, 06:09 PM	#5
a_ump Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Fairmont, WV Posts: 3,081 (1.53/day) Thanks: 450 Thanked 317 Times in 294 Posts System Specs	yea for real, they shoulda gone with 3.0 specs with 400mb/s transfers. __________________ My Heatware “MRCL:What if Jesus came by and Apocalypse actually would happen? Weer:Then I'd be more afraid that other works of fiction would come true, such as Harry Potter.”

Feb 18, 2010, 05:59 PM	#3
TheLostSwede Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: A little green island far far away Posts: 843 (0.27/day) Thanks: 16 Thanked 152 Times in 113 Posts System Specs	Indeed, what's the point of this? At those speeds it'll take a month to copy all that data onto it...

Feb 18, 2010, 06:08 PM	#4
HeroPrinny Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 72 (0.06/day) Thanks: 4 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	IT would be pretty handy but I'm betting this thing is formatted in the fat32 file-system, making not only slow as heck to fill but really annoying to fill. USB 3.0 would have been a really nice feature to have on a memory stick this size.

System Name:	Boss
Processor:	Core i7-2630QM@2ghz
Motherboard:	laptop
Cooling:	laptop
Memory:	6gb
Video Card:	HD 6770m
Hard Disk:	750gb
Optical Drive:	BD drive
CRT/LCD Model:	15.6" 1360x768
Case:	laptop
Sound Card:	onboard
PSU:	laptop
Software:	Win 7 x64

Feb 18, 2010, 06:22 PM	#7
a_ump Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Fairmont, WV Posts: 3,081 (1.53/day) Thanks: 450 Thanked 317 Times in 294 Posts System Specs	i suppose it'd be good for backing up data. "just incase" situation. still though, 3.0 spec is well known and set in stone, why not make it with 3.0 specs and make it a hella better product. __________________ My Heatware “MRCL:What if Jesus came by and Apocalypse actually would happen? Weer:Then I'd be more afraid that other works of fiction would come true, such as Harry Potter.”

Feb 18, 2010, 06:25 PM	#8
Roph Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 254 (0.15/day) Thanks: 383 Thanked 65 Times in 37 Posts System Specs	Probably to keep the already high cost as low as possible. I'm curious what this looks like when taken apart __________________

System Name:	No name, built for quietness / efficiency
Processor:	Intel Pentium Dual Core E5200, @ 3.1Ghz
Motherboard:	Asus P5QL SE
Cooling:	Arctic Cooling Alpine 7
Memory:	4GB OCZ Gold XTC DDR2 800Mhz
Video Card:	XFX Radeon HD 7770 1GB
Hard Disk:	Samsung Spinpoint F1 640GB, Spinpoint F3 1TB, Spinpoint F4 2TB, Hitachi Touro USB3.0 2TB
Optical Drive:	Samsung DVD+/-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	Digimate 23" 1920x1080 LCD
Case:	Cooler Master Elite 330 Black
Sound Card:	Realtek Built in HD Audio
PSU:	Coolermaster eXtremePower 460W
Software:	XP Pro SP3

Feb 18, 2010, 07:18 PM	#9
CharlO Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 59 (0.03/day) Thanks: 13 Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts	Yeap, wonder about filling a Pen for 6 hours then getting it off for 3... And also almost sure is more expensive than a HDD. __________________ CharlO

Feb 18, 2010, 09:23 PM	#10
OneCool Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Look behind you!! Posts: 799 (0.29/day) Thanks: 73 Thanked 61 Times in 41 Posts	This would be good for storing hard drive images. Someone buy me one

System Name:	Real Men use Real Cores!
Processor:	Phenom II x6 1090T: 3600Mhz undervolted (NB+HT at 2.6)
Motherboard:	Gigabyte 890FXA-UD5
Cooling:	Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme (Lapped + ducted)
Memory:	8GB Corsair Dominator DDR3 - 1600Mhz 7-7-7-20 1.65V
Video Card:	AMD Radeon 5870 1GB Crossfire
Hard Disk:	Intel 520 SSD (120GB), 500GB OS + 18TB of storage (mostly external)
Optical Drive:	Samsung Blu Ray drive (SH-B083A)
CRT/LCD Model:	23.6" Samsung 1080P / Samsung 40" HDTV - 1360x768P
Case:	Coolermaster CM 690 II Advanced (non window)
Sound Card:	Auzentech X-Mystique (Logitech Z5500D + sennheiser HD555 + RE2's)
PSU:	Corsair HX 1000W
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate x64 - kaspersky internet security 2013
Benchmarks:	Laptop: AMD A6 APU 1.4GHz @2.2GHz quad core + APU crossfire.Iphone 5, Samsung galaxy tab 2 7"

Feb 18, 2010, 10:00 PM	#12
Polarman Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Laval, Qc Posts: 1,575 (0.88/day) Thanks: 41 Thanked 300 Times in 199 Posts System Specs	I have a 16GB usb stick and it does take time to fill. I'm tring to imagine how long it would take to fill this thing up. __________________

System Name:	Polar's Dragon
Processor:	AMD Phenom II 975BE
Motherboard:	MSI 890FXA-GD65 (Bios 18.7)
Cooling:	Zalman CNPS 9700 Led
Memory:	Gskill 4GB DDR3-1333 (8,8,8,21)
Video Card:	MSI HD6870 Hawk
Hard Disk:	WD RE4 500GB
Optical Drive:	Asus DRW-24B1ST
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung T240 (1920 X1200)
Case:	Silverstone Raven 2
Sound Card:	Realtek ALC892
PSU:	PC Power&Cooling Silencer 750 (Red)
Software:	Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit + SP1

Feb 19, 2010, 12:42 AM	#14
Jizzler Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Geneva, FL, USA Posts: 3,010 (1.42/day) Thanks: 567 Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts System Specs	$1108!? That doesn't look like an ivory outer casing and cursed Mayan gold contacts. But really, I'll just carry around an SSD. Tranfer little things, transfer large things, not a problem.

Processor:	AMD FX-8120
Motherboard:	ASRock Fatal1ty 990FX Professional
Cooling:	Scythe Ninja 3
Memory:	G.Skill DDR3-1866 8GB x 2
Video Card:	Gigabyte GTX 660 2GB
Hard Disk:	Crucial M4 128GB, WD 640GB x 4, 2TB Seagate
Optical Drive:	Asus SATA DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	Asus 24" HD+ (1920x1200)
Case:	Lian Li PC-A17B
Sound Card:	Onboard
PSU:	OCZ GameXtreme 700w
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate

Feb 19, 2010, 04:29 AM	#16
DirectorC Banned Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Florizy Posts: 1,597 (1.23/day) Thanks: 90 Thanked 269 Times in 248 Posts System Specs	It would take 6 minutes to copy a DVD5 image to the drive. That's not so bad. Quitcherbitchin.

System Name:	-= Son of a Whore =-
Processor:	E8400 @ 4.0GHz (445 x 9)
Motherboard:	Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R
Cooling:	Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Memory:	3GB Corsair XMS2
Video Card:	EVGA 8800 GT 512
Hard Disk:	74GB Raptor + Caviars in RAID0
CRT/LCD Model:	I-Inc 19" LCD 1440x900
Sound Card:	Audigy SE & Logitech X-540
PSU:	Corsair 750TX
Software:	Win32 v6.1.7600
Benchmarks:	Logitech KB & Sidewinder X3

System Name:	The ClusterF**k
Processor:	980X @ 4212Mhz 24/7
Motherboard:	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling:	MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory:	3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24
Video Card:	Evga GTX 580
Hard Disk:	Seagate 7200.10 320GB x2 RAID0; 2 x Samsung F2 1.5TB; 1 x F1 1TB; 1 x F4 2TB
Optical Drive:	LG WH10LS30K 10X Blu-ray Burner
CRT/LCD Model:	HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case:	Technofront Bench Station
Sound Card:	Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
PSU:	ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software:	Win7 Ultimate N x64

Feb 19, 2010, 04:00 PM	#23
robodude666 Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 133 (0.06/day) Thanks: 8 Thanked 20 Times in 14 Posts System Specs	It seems companies forgot one can get a 320GB 2.5" HDD for $75 and a 2.5" enclosure for $20-30, not to mention there are three USB 3.0 external HDDs for $150-180 on NewEgg right now. Hell, you can get a SSD that has built in USB 2.0 support. A flash drive beyond 16/32GB seems a bit pointless, no?

Processor:	Intel E8400 @ 4GHz
Motherboard:	Gigabyte EP35
Cooling:	Noctua NH-U12P w/ dual NF-P12
Memory:	G.Skill 2x1GB DDR2-800 @ 650MHz
Video Card:	HD 3870 512MB
Hard Disk:	WD 250GB, Sammy 80GB, WD 80GB, Seagate 80GB
Optical Drive:	El Cheapo Sony DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	HP w2408h
Case:	CoolerMaster ATCS 840
Sound Card:	Onboard Audio
PSU:	ThermalTake ToughPower 850w Modular
Software:	Windows Vista Business 64-bit, Ubuntu 9.04, Windows XP Pro SP2

System Name:	Ongoing scavanging
Processor:	Sempron 140
Motherboard:	MSI 760GM-P23 (FX)
Cooling:	Somesuch
Memory:	2GB DDR3
Video Card:	Something
Hard Disk:	160GB + 1TB
Optical Drive:	Yes
CRT/LCD Model:	19" 1280 x 1024
Case:	Wossname
Sound Card:	Creative Audigy 2 ZS with front panel
PSU:	FSP400-60APN
Software:	Windows 7 Pro

Feb 20, 2010, 11:16 AM	#25
Mussels Doctor Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA) Posts: 34,559 (10.96/day) Thanks: 3,700 Thanked 8,693 Times in 6,392 Posts System Specs	true that the memory stick is smaller, but why not buy an 8/16GB thats twice as fast and tons cheaper? you still get the same job done.. the only benefit of THIS, is that it holds more files, and that gets negated when you consider it takes twice as long to get them on there. __________________ Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Kingston Digital Launches New Ultra-Secure USB Flash Drive	btarunr	News	2	Jan 28, 2010 09:40 AM
Kingston Digital Ships Secure, Affordable USB Flash Drive	btarunr	News	0	Nov 17, 2009 06:02 PM
Kingston Increases Speed on DataTraveler 410 USB Flash Drive	btarunr	News	3	Sep 23, 2009 06:01 AM
Western Digital Ships Industry's First 1 TB Mobile Hard Drive	btarunr	News	15	Jul 28, 2009 05:23 AM
Kingston Out With 256 GB DataTraveller USB Flash Drive	btarunr	News	32	Jul 21, 2009 05:48 PM