techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Storage

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 19, 2010, 01:13 AM   #1
ShRoOmAlIsTiC
500 Posts
 
ShRoOmAlIsTiC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 790 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 161 Times in 120 Posts

System Specs

2 x samsung f1 1tb raid 0 vs velociraptor 300gb

what whould be faster, I know transfer speeds is faster on the raid 0 but will the v-raptor be faster in any other way?

would short stroking the raid 0 to 300gb make a difference?
__________________
Heatware/Ebay=Shroomalistic
ShRoOmAlIsTiC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19, 2010, 01:16 AM   #2
MKmods
Case Mod Guru
 
MKmods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nevada
Posts: 4,711 (2.46/day)
Thanks: 2,879
Thanked 1,766 Times in 1,364 Posts

System Specs

I LOVE Raid0! (running Raptor Xs in Raid0)
but would be really scared to have 2TB in Raid0(that would suck so bad to lose that much no matter how fast it was)
__________________
Buy tin snips FIRST!
MKmods is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19, 2010, 01:47 AM   #3
ShRoOmAlIsTiC
500 Posts
 
ShRoOmAlIsTiC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 790 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 161 Times in 120 Posts

System Specs

well it wouldnt be 2tb of storage, just a 300 gb partition with nothing else used for a primary windows drive.

I was reading how a stroked to 300gb 1.5tb seagate drive was as fast as a 300gb v-raptor but wasnt too sure about that. So i figured if I had 2x 1tb in raid 0 stroked to a 300gb drive should blow away a v-raptor but im getting mixed info from friends and stuff that i read.

http://www.techwarelabs.com/seagate_1-5tb-mod/
__________________
Heatware/Ebay=Shroomalistic
ShRoOmAlIsTiC is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ShRoOmAlIsTiC For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 19, 2010, 01:50 AM   #4
MKmods
Case Mod Guru
 
MKmods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nevada
Posts: 4,711 (2.46/day)
Thanks: 2,879
Thanked 1,766 Times in 1,364 Posts

System Specs

Im not sure with the new Hdds.. back in the day I had 4 hitachi 80s in Raid0 that kicked ass (was faster than a pair of raptors too) It FELT much faster..

But now a days I dont notice such a difference in speed.

I never considered a partition, thanks for bringing that up.
__________________
Buy tin snips FIRST!
MKmods is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19, 2010, 02:02 AM   #5
kenkickr
3500 Posts
 
kenkickr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Springfield, IL
Posts: 4,490 (2.25/day)
Thanks: 1,024
Thanked 1,328 Times in 1,094 Posts

System Specs

Is this what you were looking to do? It does look really interesting
kenkickr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kenkickr For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 19, 2010, 03:33 AM   #6
ShRoOmAlIsTiC
500 Posts
 
ShRoOmAlIsTiC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 790 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 161 Times in 120 Posts

System Specs

yeah pretty much, except use the estool from samsung and make both drives 150gb and raid them to make them 300gb total. still be cheaper then the v-raptor and hopefully smoke it. Im currently running on my v-raptor right now but I might be pulling my 2 f1 spinpoints out soon and was mainly wondering if it would be worth it to do this.
__________________
Heatware/Ebay=Shroomalistic
ShRoOmAlIsTiC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 21, 2010, 01:45 PM   #7
Carl2
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 51 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

I think the access time on the velocity Raptor is lower also.
Carl2
Carl2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 21, 2010, 01:54 PM   #8
DirectorC
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florizy
Posts: 1,597 (1.23/day)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 269 Times in 248 Posts

System Specs

Yeah you're basically looking at much lower seek & access times on the Vraptor. RAID arrays automatically raise your seek times.
DirectorC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2010, 06:07 PM   #9
t00nCiNaToR
5 Posts
 
t00nCiNaToR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 18 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

System Specs

I'm happy with my Raptors but if I split my RAID0 drive in Half 300/300 it would smoke!

HD Tune 2.55(RAID0 2x300gb Raptors 1 partition)
Now I get:

Min: 136.6
Max: 231.1
Avr. 186.2

Access time - 7.2
Burst Rate - 185
t00nCiNaToR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2010, 06:15 PM   #10
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.28/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Raid zero will fuck a single raptor up with a modern 7200rpm drive.

Raptors arnt all that faster then standard hardrives after all.

Certainly not worth the cost brand new.
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2010, 06:25 PM   #11
twicksisted
2000 Posts
 
twicksisted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,234 (1.09/day)
Thanks: 391
Thanked 358 Times in 285 Posts

System Specs

the raptors give you fast access times though which means better responsiveness overall in your system
__________________
twicksisted is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2010, 06:30 PM   #12
Kenshai
1000 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 1,582 (0.83/day)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 223 Times in 207 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by pantherx12 View Post
Raid zero will fuck a single raptor up with a modern 7200rpm drive.

Raptors arnt all that faster then standard hardrives after all.

Certainly not worth the cost brand new.

The speed difference is more in the access time instead of file transfer.
Kenshai is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2010, 06:31 PM   #13
t00nCiNaToR
5 Posts
 
t00nCiNaToR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 18 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

System Specs

I copied 500GIG's in ISO's Movies etc from my RAID5 Apps drive last night and the copy never went under 180MB/s I never saw that with my 7200 drives in RAID0.

Started copying them back this morn to my Newly built RAID5(1TBx3) and it never went over 35mb/s... doh!
t00nCiNaToR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2010, 06:33 PM   #14
panchoman
Sold my stars!
 
panchoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,650 (3.11/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 1,227 Times in 1,036 Posts

System Specs

isn't the 300 gb just so that you're only using 1 of the platters rather then switching platters? I believe the reason velociraptors can't go beyond 300 gb is because they use a single platter that spins very fast. I think what the person in the article was doing was limiting the drive so that it only used the 1st platter, and didn't waste time switching platters and all. If that is the case, the 1.5 tb drives have 4 platters consisting of 375gb each. you could raid the 1st platter of each drive, resulting in 750 gb..
__________________


Need any Graphics Made? Visit Graphic Artists United!
R.I.P Megan--Heaven has a new angel
panchoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2010, 06:35 PM   #15
Kenshai
1000 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 1,582 (0.83/day)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 223 Times in 207 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by t00nCiNaToR View Post
I copied 500GIG's in ISO's Movies etc from my RAID5 Apps drive last night and the copy never went under 180MB/s I never saw that with my 7200 drives in RAID0.

Started copying them back this morn to my Newly built RAID5(1TBx3) and it never went over 35mb/s... doh!
That sounds like you have an issue with the drives. My 1TB seagate pushes 110 MB/s no issues on its own.
Kenshai is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2010, 06:36 PM   #16
t00nCiNaToR
5 Posts
 
t00nCiNaToR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 18 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

System Specs

I don't think RAID0 works that way, I could make a 64gb partition and it would still split the data between the 2 disks and then my Reads would probably beat most SSD's I'm sure.
t00nCiNaToR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2010, 06:38 PM   #17
t00nCiNaToR
5 Posts
 
t00nCiNaToR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 18 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenshai View Post
That sounds like you have an issue with the drives. My 1TB seagate pushes 110 MB/s no issues on its own.
They'll all do that on there own... but in RAID5 everything slows down for some reason.

Sorry for the double post...
t00nCiNaToR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2010, 11:50 AM   #18
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.28/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenshai View Post
The speed difference is more in the access time instead of file transfer.

Yes handy when opening shit tons of small files, but how many of you buy a fast drive for that?

The small delay from using a standard drive drives in raid would be counter acted by the file transfer times.
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[FS][US] WD Velociraptor 300gb SNiiPE_DoGG Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 3 Nov 13, 2009 05:37 PM
1tb vs velociraptor 300gb Anath Storage 5 Oct 6, 2009 03:29 AM
[FS][US] AMD Phenom 2 940, 300GB VelociRaptor ANTEC900 Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 11 Jul 18, 2009 05:19 PM
[FS/FT][US] 300GB VelociRaptor ANTEC900 Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 8 Jul 15, 2009 08:08 PM
Samsung Announces New Spinpoint F1 RAID Edition 1TB 3.5” Hard Disk Drives malware News 1 Jan 7, 2008 08:51 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts