techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 3, 2010, 10:34 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,036 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 792
Thanked 13,034 Times in 5,721 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

ASUS Readies M4A89TD PRO Motherboard

At its displays at the ongoing CeBIT event, ASUS surprised many with a pair of Crosshair IV Series motherboards showing a renewed interest at the very high-end of the AMD platform. Incidentally, the company is also preparing a mid-range motherboard based on the AMD 890FX chipset, the M4A89TD PRO. The new board builds entirely on what the chipset has to offer with a slight addition of a two-port USB 3.0 controller. The AM3 socket is powered by a 10-phase VRM, supporting 140W CPUs. It is wired to four DDR3 DIMM slots with its own 2-phase VRM.

The 890FX chipset gives out two PCI-Express 2.0 x16 full-bandwidth slots, other expansion slots include an open-ended PCI-E 1.1 x4, a PCI-E x1, and two PCI slots. All six SATA 6 Gb/s ports the SB850 southbridge gives out are internal, an additional JMicron controller gives out IDE and eSATA. The board boasts of ASUS' "Core Unlocker" switch which simplifies unlocking disabled physical cores on some dual, triple, and quad-core chips. Other features include 7.1 channel audio, gigabit Ethernet, and USB 3.0 for connectivity. The M4A89TD PRO should be released around the time when AMD unveils its latest processors.



Source: PC Watch
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 11:22 AM   #2
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.88/day)
Thanks: 3,709
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts

System Specs

this board looks good - odd layout with the large spacing between the PCI-E slots however.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 11:23 AM   #3
Marineborn
1000 Posts
 
Marineborn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,716 (1.06/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 315 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

they gotta really slot putting that 1x slot under the first 16x, any current and last gen video card is gonna cover it up and screw you right out of the abilitiy to go 16x 16 Crossfire...*sigh*
__________________
1st pc= 2x7970@1125/15757/asrock fatality motherboard/ ocz ssd 120gig/1300watt psu/3770kivy at 4.2/16gigs ddr dominator.
Marineborn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 11:25 AM   #4
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.88/day)
Thanks: 3,709
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marineborn View Post
they gotta really slot putting that 1x slot under the first 16x, any current and last gen video card is gonna cover it up and screw you right out of the abilitiy to go 16x 16 Crossfire...*sigh*
agreed. the board only has 6 slots, so why not leave that bit blank and put it ABOVE the top 16x slot?
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 11:26 AM   #5
Marineborn
1000 Posts
 
Marineborn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,716 (1.06/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 315 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
agreed. the board only has 6 slots, so why not leave that bit blank and put it ABOVE the top 16x slot?
come on mussels, thats would make sense we cant have any of that. lol
__________________
1st pc= 2x7970@1125/15757/asrock fatality motherboard/ ocz ssd 120gig/1300watt psu/3770kivy at 4.2/16gigs ddr dominator.
Marineborn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 11:28 AM   #6
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.88/day)
Thanks: 3,709
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marineborn View Post
come on mussels, thats would make sense we cant have any of that. lol
and people wonder why i havent bought an AM3 system yet...


seriously, whats with these people? dont they think? do they not use video cards in their test labs?
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 11:31 AM   #7
Marineborn
1000 Posts
 
Marineborn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,716 (1.06/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 315 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

im betting this is there logic, okay a low end user might have to use that pci1 slot for a random card and can stick his video card in the second pcie16 slot, single card...okay...now there like okay if they have 2 cards, they can just use a 8x port to use anything else they have, its universal, DAM IM A GENIUS theres no way this can fail
__________________
1st pc= 2x7970@1125/15757/asrock fatality motherboard/ ocz ssd 120gig/1300watt psu/3770kivy at 4.2/16gigs ddr dominator.
Marineborn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 11:41 AM   #8
va4leo
200 Posts
 
va4leo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Posts: 283 (0.21/day)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 30 Times in 29 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to va4leo

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
this board looks good - odd layout with the large spacing between the PCI-E slots however.
Would fit three slot graphics quite nicely in SLI / CF ^^
va4leo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 11:45 AM   #9
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.88/day)
Thanks: 3,709
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by va4leo View Post
Would fit three slot graphics quite nicely in SLI / CF ^^
quite true. sadly, leaves you no real usable slots if you do however.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 11:57 AM   #10
Velvet Wafer
3500 Posts
 
Velvet Wafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North of Germany
Posts: 3,850 (2.63/day)
Thanks: 2,288
Thanked 1,027 Times in 840 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Velvet Wafer Send a message via MSN to Velvet Wafer

System Specs

i find the positioning of the NB highly exotic
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Velvet Wafer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 12:02 PM   #11
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.18/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet Wafer View Post
i find the positioning of the NB highly exotic


I approve of this NB position


Have to agree about slot layout, but this isn't a high end board and non high end boards tend to be layed out stupidly for some reason ( perhaps they do it to force people to buy a highend board for crossfire)
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 12:05 PM   #12
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.88/day)
Thanks: 3,709
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts

System Specs

hey i didnt notice the NB... looks awesome, wont conflict with massive CPU heatsinks
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 12:12 PM   #13
Velvet Wafer
3500 Posts
 
Velvet Wafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North of Germany
Posts: 3,850 (2.63/day)
Thanks: 2,288
Thanked 1,027 Times in 840 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Velvet Wafer Send a message via MSN to Velvet Wafer

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
hey i didnt notice the NB... looks awesome, wont conflict with massive CPU heatsinks
also, you only need one fan, and not 2, to cool both the NB and Mosfet area of the board
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Velvet Wafer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 12:14 PM   #14
AsRock
TPU addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,913 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,730
Thanked 1,384 Times in 1,200 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
this board looks good - odd layout with the large spacing between the PCI-E slots however.
Yeah it be a pain with those sata ports there. It's enough for me not to buy it too however i do like the rest and how it is.
AsRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 12:16 PM   #15
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.88/day)
Thanks: 3,709
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by AsRock View Post
Yeah it be a pain with those sata ports there. It's enough for me not to buy it too however i do like the rest and how it is.
better than most. i absolutely hate those right angled sata connectors many high end boards use, since it means you cant hook up sata to e-sata brackets at the back of the case (cables dont reach)

a really massive GPU might inhibit you using some of those sata ports, but shit.. if you get two massive cards (5970's?) for crossfire, you gotta expect to lose something in return.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 12:35 PM   #16
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.18/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Mussels, buy some longer cables you cheapy bastard
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2010, 12:38 PM   #17
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.88/day)
Thanks: 3,709
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by pantherx12 View Post
Mussels, buy some longer cables you cheapy bastard
cant.



these things only come in two lengths: short and really short.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mussels For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 3, 2010, 01:00 PM   #18
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.18/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Well that's not very useful at all D:
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 4, 2010, 04:40 PM   #19
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.94/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

I don't wonder Mussels, lol. I like that VRM/NB cooler, SB looks like cheapo thrown in. I don't mind the spacing, but that 1x is really in a bad spot.
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASUS M4A89GTD Pro / USB3 Motherboard Pictured btarunr News 53 Feb 18, 2010 04:16 PM
ASUS Readies ROG Maximus III Extreme Motherboard btarunr News 12 Nov 18, 2009 06:24 AM
ASUS Readies P7H57D-V EVO Motherboard btarunr News 10 Nov 16, 2009 03:44 PM
ASUS Readies P7P55-M Micro-ATX Motherboard btarunr News 1 Oct 23, 2009 07:16 PM
ASUS Readies P7P55 LX Motherboard btarunr News 5 Sep 30, 2009 02:36 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts