techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 11, 2010, 11:27 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,033 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Intel Lets Loose Core i7 980X Performance Evaluations

On the occasion of Game Developers Conference, an annual conclave of game developers, in San Fransisco, USA, Intel previewed to audiences its latest Core i7 980X Extreme Edition six-core processor. This meant that the media could publish performance evaluations of the new processor. Intel seems to have pulled it off with this launch. There is a broad consensus among the media that the six-core processor has a performance incentive with most of today's multi-threaded application that scales up well compared to quad-core processors.

The 980X is also the first high-performance processor based on the 32 nm Westmere architecture. The processor is able to maintain a TDP rating of 130W, on par with its 45 nm Nehalem quad-core counterparts. It has six cores operating at 3.33 GHz, with HyperThreading technology enabled, there are 12 logical CPUs (threads) for the operating system to deal with. Each core has 64 KB L1, 256 KB L2 caches, while a large 12 MB L3 cache is shared between all the cores. The Core i7 980X comes in the LGA-1366 package. Most existing motherboards with the Intel X58 Express chipset will be able to support it with a BIOS update. Intel will formally release the processor by April, at an estimated price of US $999.


Last edited by btarunr; Mar 11, 2010 at 11:34 AM.
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 11, 2010, 11:43 AM   #2
toyo
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 221 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 32 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

So beautiful. I wonder if they have a quad-core, no HT, cache-crippled 32nm variant in plans. I could well upgrade to one of those, if price is beneath 200$. Or wait for Sandy Bridge... my E7200, overclocked at 3,4-3,6 GHz still serves me very well.
toyo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 11:45 AM   #3
Cleorina
5 Posts
 
Cleorina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 18 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Wow... Cool i was hope it run on LGA1156
Cleorina is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 12:01 PM   #4
filip007
75 Posts
 
filip007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 151 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts

System Specs

Winrar did hit the limit by 3.5MB/s not any faster with 6-core.
http://www.pc-max.de/artikel/prozess...e-i7-980x/5738
filip007 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 12:27 PM   #5
AlienIsGOD
2000 Posts
 
AlienIsGOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,694 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 4,438
Thanked 1,169 Times in 668 Posts

System Specs

A Crunching monster IMO :O
__________________
Distributed Computing Hardware

CPU: i5 3570K and i5 2400 = 8 cores (Crunching for TPU atm)
GPU: 7870 (8 wu's) and 7770 (4 wu's) = 1920 GCN cores (Folding for TPU atm)

AlienIsGOD is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU Folding for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 12:44 PM   #6
MickNat
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 27 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts

System Specs

Think I will have me one of these hexacores the end of this year or by next year
MickNat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 01:01 PM   #7
CDdude55
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
 
CDdude55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,437 (2.97/day)
Thanks: 3,511
Thanked 1,285 Times in 937 Posts

System Specs

Very nice.

Congrats to the rich people who are getting this.
__________________
Currently playing: Team Fortress 2 (PC)

"And remember if you didn't build it yourself, it's not really yours."
CDdude55 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 01:03 PM   #8
MickNat
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 27 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDdude55 View Post
Very nice.

Congrats to the rich people who are getting this.
I wont be buying a EE no way could/would I blow that kind of money on a proc, I will wait for one of the lower priced non EE chips
MickNat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 01:03 PM   #9
afw
500 Posts
 
afw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 629 (0.40/day)
Thanks: 93
Thanked 129 Times in 97 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to afw

System Specs

Almost every site which has a review on it has got it up to 4.4Ghz ... and some 5.0Ghz (unstable) .... this is a monster for sure ....
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Main Rig : Asus Sabertooth z77 , Intel i7 2700k, Corsair Vengeance 8GB , Corsair FORCE GT 120GB, Seasonic x650 GOLD , Acer G235H , SilverStone Raven RV02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

afw is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 01:14 PM   #10
Pickles24
75 Posts
 
Pickles24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The ATL
Posts: 143 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 61 Times in 37 Posts

System Specs

Twice as fast as the 920 in benchmarks.. I want..
__________________
Pickles24 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 01:51 PM   #11
dr emulator (madmax)
1000 Posts
 
dr emulator (madmax)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: the uk that's all you need to know ;)
Posts: 1,107 (0.74/day)
Thanks: 758
Thanked 181 Times in 169 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pickles24 View Post
Twice as fast as the 920 in benchmarks.. I want..
you better start saving then
as i've seen a msrp of about $999
dr emulator (madmax) is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 01:55 PM   #12
PVTCaboose1337
Graphical Hacker
 
PVTCaboose1337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 7,478 (2.78/day)
Thanks: 798
Thanked 1,174 Times in 834 Posts

System Specs

I can see the price coming down once AMD counters it.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
PVTCaboose1337 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 01:58 PM   #13
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
 
Frick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 8,051 (3.02/day)
Thanks: 1,100
Thanked 1,500 Times in 1,193 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by MickNat View Post
I wont be buying a EE no way could/would I blow that kind of money on a proc, I will wait for one of the lower priced non EE chips
Those are due next year or so, no? Or was it Q3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PVTCaboose1337 View Post
I can see the price coming down once AMD counters it.
Naaah, it's an EE chip. They're always expensive.
__________________
"The 'gentle biker' look is overdone. I'm going for 'psycho hillbilly.' "
Frick is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 02:13 PM   #14
mtosev
1000 Posts
 
mtosev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by PVTCaboose1337 View Post
I can see the price coming down once AMD counters it.
with what?

amd doesn't have a cpu that is on par with the i7 975.
__________________
My notebook:

Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset

[img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG]

CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"
mtosev is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 02:25 PM   #15
sunil
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 41 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts

I Can't wait to see AMD 6 Core CPU.
sunil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 02:52 PM   #16
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,033 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by PVTCaboose1337 View Post
I can see the price coming down once AMD counters it.
Yeah, like AMD really countered the $999 Core i7 975 XE with its PII X4 965.
__________________

Gadgets, Gaming, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 11, 2010, 02:56 PM   #17
Binge
Overclocking Surrealism
 
Binge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,065 (3.49/day)
Thanks: 948
Thanked 1,768 Times in 1,308 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Binge Send a message via MSN to Binge

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by PVTCaboose1337 View Post
I can see the price coming down once AMD counters it.
AMD has nothing. Sadly.
__________________
I *UNITE* streamers and content providers on TPU!
My Heatware


Matias Quiet Pro (PC) / KBTalking Pro / Das Keyboard Professional S
Binge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 03:16 PM   #18
AddSub
500 Posts
 
AddSub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 990 (0.39/day)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 144 Times in 109 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtosev View Post
with what?

amd doesn't have a cpu that is on par with the i7 975.
Hope springs eternal, no?

Seriously though, AMD doesn't have a CPU to truly compete with high end LGA775 stuff much less with i7 stuff. As for i7 980X, I think this one is geared towards serious power-users who get their hands on such CPU's before they hit retail anyways. I'm pretty sure almost every i7 CPU owner will agree, but other than dedicated videophiles, rest of us with i7 setups can't even being to utilize our little i7 920/930 quad's, much less a 6-core monster.

I have a secondary monitor that I use as a resource and hardware monitoring display, and in over a year now I haven't seen all my CPU cores being tasked @ 100% in any situation, other than benchmarking stuff like Prime95/OCCT. Heck, stuff like Crysis makes one or two of my cores hit 35% with spikes into 70% territory and that's it. Everyday poweruser stuff like specialized graphics design apps and similar kick up 2-or-3 cores to 50% and that's where it ends. Standard stuff like browsing, playing music and similar show negligible usage. Even lowest-end i7 CPU's are simply overkill for most tasks today, although if Microsoft continues with their tradition we might need 12-core monsters to run Windows 8.
AddSub is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 03:24 PM   #19
Fourstaff
TPU Janitor
 
Fourstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 6,146 (4.74/day)
Thanks: 267
Thanked 1,495 Times in 1,234 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtosev View Post
with what?

amd doesn't have a cpu that is on par with the i7 975.
I think an oc'ed 920 will kick 965's ass any day.
Fourstaff is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 03:27 PM   #20
theubersmurf
500 Posts
 
theubersmurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dawn
Posts: 859 (0.55/day)
Thanks: 118
Thanked 102 Times in 79 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
Yeah, like AMD really countered the $999 Core i7 975 XE with its PII X4 965.
If they release hex-core processors at several price points, they in a roundabout way may challenge it. I think Intel needs it's head examined for releasing a single hex-core chip, at a single huge price point. Obviously AMD isn't going to release any single chip that can compete with gulftown, but in terms of market, they may be able to steal a bit of it with a wider variety of hex-core chips.
__________________
my heatware
ebay feedback
theubersmurf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 03:39 PM   #21
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,033 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by theubersmurf View Post
If they release hex-core processors at several price points, they in a roundabout way may challenge it. I think Intel needs it's head examined for releasing a single hex-core chip, at a single huge price point. Obviously AMD isn't going to release any single chip that can compete with gulftown, but in terms of market, they may be able to steal a bit of it with a wider variety of hex-core chips.
AMD can release any number of six-core processors. That won't affect 980X in any way, as long as it's the fastest chip, overclocked or not.
__________________

Gadgets, Gaming, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 03:40 PM   #22
mtosev
1000 Posts
 
mtosev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by AddSub View Post
Hope springs eternal, no?

Seriously though, AMD doesn't have a CPU to truly compete with high end LGA775 stuff much less with i7 stuff. As for i7 980X, I think this one is geared towards serious power-users who get their hands on such CPU's before they hit retail anyways. I'm pretty sure almost every i7 CPU owner will agree, but other than dedicated videophiles, rest of us with i7 setups can't even being to utilize our little i7 920/930 quad's, much less a 6-core monster.

I have a secondary monitor that I use as a resource and hardware monitoring display, and in over a year now I haven't seen all my CPU cores being tasked @ 100% in any situation, other than benchmarking stuff like Prime95/OCCT. Heck, stuff like Crysis makes one or two of my cores hit 35% with spikes into 70% territory and that's it. Everyday poweruser stuff like specialized graphics design apps and similar kick up 2-or-3 cores to 50% and that's where it ends. Standard stuff like browsing, playing music and similar show negligible usage. Even lowest-end i7 CPU's are simply overkill for most tasks today, although if Microsoft continues with their tradition we might need 12-core monsters to run Windows 8.
hmm.... i saw a video on youtube of a guy how he overloaded his i7 and the pc resrated/crashed. trying to find the video
__________________
My notebook:

Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset

[img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG]

CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"
mtosev is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 03:43 PM   #23
mdsx1950
1000 Posts
 
mdsx1950's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In a gaming world :D
Posts: 1,900 (1.45/day)
Thanks: 263
Thanked 418 Times in 305 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourstaff View Post
I think an oc'ed 920 will kick 965's ass any day.
Maybe but not a 975. And specially not a 975 oced.
__________________

Laptop - Alienware M15X - i7 940XM|8GB DDR3 1333MHz|15.6" WideFHD 1080p WLED|HD5850M 1GB|640GB SATAII|BluRay Burner|9-cell Lithium-Ion Battery


Thanks to PVTCaboose1337 for the sig
mdsx1950 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 05:09 PM   #24
theubersmurf
500 Posts
 
theubersmurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dawn
Posts: 859 (0.55/day)
Thanks: 118
Thanked 102 Times in 79 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
AMD can release any number of six-core processors. That won't affect 980X in any way, as long as it's the fastest chip, overclocked or not.
I'm talking about the market, not performance.
__________________
my heatware
ebay feedback
theubersmurf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 05:10 PM   #25
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts

System Specs

Since it's an "Extreme" chip, it will be unlocked, correct?
__________________
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Core i5 661 3.33 GHz GPU Performance Analyzed W1zzard Reviews 45 Jan 15, 2010 12:03 PM
Core i7 980X coming out early 2010 mdsx1950 General Hardware 1 Dec 16, 2009 11:33 AM
Cooler Master Lets Loose at Computex 2009, Including a New LGA1156 Cooler alexp999 News 11 May 26, 2009 10:25 AM
Eurocom Lets Loose D901C Phantom-X 'Server' Laptop malware News 33 Jul 30, 2008 12:22 PM
Dell Lets Loose New Studio Notebooks malware News 1 Jun 26, 2008 04:26 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts