techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Software > Linux / BSD / Mac OS X

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 21, 2010, 08:55 PM   #1
Soylent Joe
2000 Posts
 
Soylent Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,039 (2.05/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 685 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

Best GNU/Linux OS option for an old machine

I have a HP Pavilion 7935 with a 1.3GHz Athlon, 512MB memory, and a 40GB IDE HDD. It was designed for XP, but the previous user installed Windows 2000 on it. When I got it, I put XP Pro on there and it was absolutely unusable with the stock 128MB memory. So, I upgraded to 512MB and wha-la, it's still unusable. Firefox will max out the CPU to 100% and it's still incredibly slow while doing easy things such as opening the start menu, exploring files, etc. I'm not really sure what's wrong with it, I mean, it was designed for XP when it only had 128MB of RAM, it should be acting fine with four times that amount.


So now I'm inquiring as to what "alternative operating system" would work best on it. But, there are some requirements:
  • It has to support my wireless adapter or I'll have no internet access.
  • It must be able to be installed by way of CD (CD Writer only, no DVD drive) or possibly though USB.
  • Doesn't have to be too fancy, I'm mainly looking for speed and a lighter browser than FF.

I was looking into Debian but the only one I've ever used was Ubuntu 9.10 and that was only for about 10 minutes, so it's basically up to you guys.
__________________

Last edited by Soylent Joe; Mar 22, 2010 at 12:11 AM.
Soylent Joe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2010, 09:04 PM   #2
mlee49
Eligible for custom title
 
mlee49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: KU
Posts: 6,934 (3.47/day)
Thanks: 1,603
Thanked 2,064 Times in 1,610 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to mlee49

System Specs

If you havn't ever installed a linux OS I suggest Ubuntu. It's highly compatible with most drivers, extremely lite, and almost everything an older PC would be good for(web/email/solitare).

It's CD size small and quite low on resources, also it's well supported so alot of development does happen.


Edit, you could try U-Lite which was Ubuntulite at one point, just not supported.

http://u-lite.org/
__________________
mlee49 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mlee49 For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 21, 2010, 09:12 PM   #3
Soylent Joe
2000 Posts
 
Soylent Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,039 (2.05/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 685 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

U-Lite seems to be just right, thanks man. Congrats on your 4000th post too
__________________
Soylent Joe is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Soylent Joe For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 21, 2010, 09:36 PM   #4
Odin Eidolon
500 Posts
 
Odin Eidolon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockclimbing somewhere in Italy
Posts: 818 (0.42/day)
Thanks: 395
Thanked 162 Times in 145 Posts

System Specs

Hi,
if you are new to linux I suggest Linux Mint. Its based on Ubuntu, but has some nicer features and great community. It will run fine with 512mb, exspecially if you want to tweak it a bit.

MEPIS is another distro I like, runs very well on 512mb.

The best you could do is installing an Archlinux distro (or the simplified, but less customizable, version, Chakra). It couldrequire some learning tho.

I dont love Ulite, but that's simply cause I dont like Openbox.

Why don't you jst grab a 1GB usb per or a cd-rw and try all of them?

PS: have a look at distrowatch.com
__________________
[CENTER]
“Being human is quite overrated.” -DanTheBanjoman
[FONT="Arial Black"]
Odin Eidolon is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Odin Eidolon For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 21, 2010, 09:39 PM   #5
DirectorC
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florizy
Posts: 1,597 (1.21/day)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 269 Times in 248 Posts

System Specs

I would go with Ubuntu. Boot up the LiveCD and see how it does, do the install if it works well.
DirectorC is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DirectorC For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 21, 2010, 09:41 PM   #6
Soylent Joe
2000 Posts
 
Soylent Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,039 (2.05/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 685 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Odin Eidolon View Post
Hi,
if you are new to linux I suggest Linux Mint. Its based on Ubuntu, but has some nicer features and great community. It will run fine with 512mb, exspecially if you want to tweak it a bit.

MEPIS is another distro I like, runs very well on 512mb.

The best you could do is installing an Archlinux distro (or the simplified, but less customizable, version, Chakra). It couldrequire some learning tho.

I dont love Ulite, but that's simply cause I dont like Openbox.

Why don't you jst grab a 1GB usb per or a cd-rw and try all of them?

PS: have a look at distrowatch.com
Well that was a thought of mine, to try out different versions of Linux on there to see what I like best and to learn about them. I'm going to try out U-Lite first though. What's Openbox?
__________________
Soylent Joe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2010, 09:52 PM   #7
Odin Eidolon
500 Posts
 
Odin Eidolon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockclimbing somewhere in Italy
Posts: 818 (0.42/day)
Thanks: 395
Thanked 162 Times in 145 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soylent Joe View Post
Well that was a thought of mine, to try out different versions of Linux on there to see what I like best and to learn about them. I'm going to try out U-Lite first though. What's Openbox?
Its the window manager. Just google and you will find everything. I personally prefer KWin, and for lower end hardware, Enlightement.
In fact, i forgot to mention elive (wich uses enlightement) in the previous list of distros... give it a try. The latest version was released a couple weeks ago, and looks great. Its mainly a LiveCD, but can be installed on HD too... however last time I checked this required you to pay 15$. Worth it though.
__________________
[CENTER]
“Being human is quite overrated.” -DanTheBanjoman
[FONT="Arial Black"]
Odin Eidolon is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Odin Eidolon For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 21, 2010, 10:20 PM   #8
Soylent Joe
2000 Posts
 
Soylent Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,039 (2.05/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 685 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

Meanwhile, at SJ's house:





Trying to boot U-Lite 0.8 Beta 2. What's going on here?
__________________
Soylent Joe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2010, 10:30 PM   #9
Odin Eidolon
500 Posts
 
Odin Eidolon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockclimbing somewhere in Italy
Posts: 818 (0.42/day)
Thanks: 395
Thanked 162 Times in 145 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soylent Joe View Post
Uhm... sounds like something went wrong with the GRUB configuration?
__________________
[CENTER]
“Being human is quite overrated.” -DanTheBanjoman
[FONT="Arial Black"]
Odin Eidolon is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Odin Eidolon For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 21, 2010, 10:35 PM   #10
mlee49
Eligible for custom title
 
mlee49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: KU
Posts: 6,934 (3.47/day)
Thanks: 1,603
Thanked 2,064 Times in 1,610 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to mlee49

System Specs

Thanks man, never figured 4000th post would be a Linux recommendation.


Does U-Lite need Ubuntu installed first?
__________________
mlee49 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mlee49 For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 21, 2010, 10:40 PM   #11
933k
5 Posts
 
933k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 19 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Send a message via AIM to 933k Send a message via MSN to 933k

System Specs

is the CDROM drive on the primary IDE channel, and the hard drive on the secondary IDE channel

if so try swapping them around
933k is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 933k For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 21, 2010, 10:41 PM   #12
933k
5 Posts
 
933k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 19 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Send a message via AIM to 933k Send a message via MSN to 933k

System Specs

oops sorry about the double post, chromium doesn't like this forum and gets stuck when i click the quick post button
933k is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 933k For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 21, 2010, 10:53 PM   #13
Soylent Joe
2000 Posts
 
Soylent Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,039 (2.05/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 685 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

Well, I just put Ubuntu 9.10 on there. I ran the Live CD and it was pretty smooth, so I went ahead and did a full install. I'll post up the end results in a bit when it's all done.

A question: It seems that a better 10.XX version is going to come out shortly. When it does, and if I want to upgrade, will it treat the new one as like a service pack and update or will I have to do a full re-install?


Also... 1500 posts!
__________________
Soylent Joe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2010, 12:02 AM   #14
DirectorC
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florizy
Posts: 1,597 (1.21/day)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 269 Times in 248 Posts

System Specs

The process is as simple as clicking on an 'Upgrade' button.

http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/upgrading

DirectorC is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DirectorC For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 22, 2010, 12:09 AM   #15
Soylent Joe
2000 Posts
 
Soylent Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,039 (2.05/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 685 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirectorC View Post
The process is as simple as clicking on an 'Upgrade' button.

http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/upgrading

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/5326/um1.png
Ah, that's awesome. Well I'm in the process right now of trying to get the driver set up for my wireless adapter. Hopefully it will work :/
__________________
Soylent Joe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2010, 12:13 AM   #16
DirectorC
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florizy
Posts: 1,597 (1.21/day)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 269 Times in 248 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soylent Joe View Post
Ah, that's awesome. Well I'm in the process right now of trying to get the driver set up for my wireless adapter. Hopefully it will work :/
It should. Linux doesn't suck as much as it used to.

Maybe 10.04 has the driver in the kernel already. I had that with my current craptastic wireless adapter (and the driver actually wouldn't work on Ubuntu) and the next Ubuntu version out it detected and connected automatically.
DirectorC is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DirectorC For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 22, 2010, 12:23 AM   #17
Soylent Joe
2000 Posts
 
Soylent Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,039 (2.05/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 685 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

Ah well what would you know, it got the receiver working by itself. I had the driver on a USB stick all ready to go too. I'm actually posting from the machine right now. The internet is pretty slow as I'm about 40 ft away from the router right now and Firefox is still taking up 90-100% of the CPU, even with just one tab. Anyone know of any extremely light browsers that will run on Ubuntu? Anyways, the upside is that the general computing aspect is about 50% faster than before.
__________________
Soylent Joe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2010, 12:32 AM   #18
DirectorC
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florizy
Posts: 1,597 (1.21/day)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 269 Times in 248 Posts

System Specs

Maybe Opera, but most likely Chrome.
DirectorC is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DirectorC For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 22, 2010, 12:35 AM   #19
933k
5 Posts
 
933k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 19 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Send a message via AIM to 933k Send a message via MSN to 933k

System Specs

i like netsurf at the moment for a light browser

arora is another good one, based on webkit so its nice and fast
933k is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 933k For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 22, 2010, 12:42 AM   #20
DirectorC
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florizy
Posts: 1,597 (1.21/day)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 269 Times in 248 Posts

System Specs

I like this Arora, nice looking little browser I'd never heard of.
DirectorC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2010, 12:48 AM   #21
Soylent Joe
2000 Posts
 
Soylent Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,039 (2.05/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 685 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirectorC View Post
I like this Arora, nice looking little browser I'd never heard of.
What part of preferences would I look in to get this fixed?

__________________
Soylent Joe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2010, 01:04 AM   #22
DirectorC
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florizy
Posts: 1,597 (1.21/day)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 269 Times in 248 Posts

System Specs

Hm that is odd. The tmp folder shouldn't have any permissions that keep you from putting files there. In the mean time, put your DLs elsewhere.

EXE file won't work in Linux though. Go to the Apps / package manager in Ubuntu and search for Arora, there is most likely a package.
DirectorC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2010, 01:14 AM   #23
Soylent Joe
2000 Posts
 
Soylent Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,039 (2.05/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 685 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirectorC View Post
Hm that is odd. The tmp folder shouldn't have any permissions that keep you from putting files there. In the mean time, put your DLs elsewhere.

EXE file won't work in Linux though. Go to the Apps / package manager in Ubuntu and search for Arora, there is most likely a package.
I ended up just getting Chrome, they added some nice support for Linux. But, the CPU is still maxing out. I don't think there's any way around it, the Athlon is just a POS.
__________________
Soylent Joe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2010, 01:26 AM   #24
DirectorC
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florizy
Posts: 1,597 (1.21/day)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 269 Times in 248 Posts

System Specs

Ancient CPU is ancient.
DirectorC is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DirectorC For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 22, 2010, 01:32 AM   #25
Soylent Joe
2000 Posts
 
Soylent Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,039 (2.05/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 685 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirectorC View Post
Ancient CPU is ancient.
Well I wouldn't be doing any of this if I hadn't got a somewhat nice 16" CRT for $6 today. More or less just something to play with. I'm sure sooner or later it's going to the yard sale or it will make a few last friends (baseball bat, firecrackers, sledgehammer, etc.)
__________________
Soylent Joe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
temp monitoring program for old athlon xp machine? hat Overclocking & Cooling 11 Jul 10, 2009 11:14 AM
Best upgrade option for my store bought machine... Bokteelo Graphics Cards 8 Mar 31, 2009 10:19 AM
Looking for an E8400 would best option be trade or piece out this ? viczulis Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 0 Mar 26, 2008 05:47 PM
Online Petition: For ATi to bring back the old control panel as an option. Moodles Graphics Cards 8 Dec 27, 2005 08:43 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts