techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 26, 2010, 07:13 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,984 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

NVIDIA Preparing First Fermi-Derivative Performance GPU, GF104

With the launch of GeForce GTX 400 series enthusiast-grade graphics cards based on the GF100 GPU being a stone's throw away, it is learned that work could be underway at NVIDIA to develop a new performance GPU as a successor to G92 and its various derivatives, according to 3DCenter.org, a German tech portal. Codenamed GF104, the new GPU targets performance/price sweet-spots the way G92 did back in its day with the GeForce 8800 GT and 8800 GTS-512, which delivered high-end sort of performance at "unbelievable" price points. The GF104 is a derivative of the Fermi architecture, and uses a physically down-scaled design of the GF100. It is said to pack 256 CUDA cores, 32 ROPs, 32 TMUs, and a 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface. The more compact die as a result could achieve high clock speeds, like G92 did compared to the G80.

GF104 is believed to form three SKUs to fill performance-thru-mainstream market segments, starting with the fastest GeForce GTS 450, GeForce GTS 440, and GeForce GTS 430 (likely name). Among these, the GTS 450 enables all of GF104's features and specifications, with well over 700 MHz core speed, 1500 MHz shader, and 1800 MHz memory. This part could be priced at around the 240 EUR mark, and target performance levels of the ATI Radeon HD 5830. A notch lower, the GTS 440 has all the hardware inside the GF104 enabled, but has around 20% lower clock speeds, priced over 160 EUR, under 180 EUR. At the bottom is the so-called GTS 430, which could disable a few of the GPU's components, with 192 CUDA cores, and 192-bit GDDR5 memory interface, priced under $150. The lower two SKUs intend to compete with the Radeon HD 5700 series. The source says that the new SKUs could be out this summer.





Source: 3DCenter.org
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 07:17 PM   #2
DaMulta
My stars went supernova
 
DaMulta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 10,337 (4.16/day)
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 1,477 Times in 1,113 Posts

System Specs

HD 2900XT all over again?????
__________________
ocLIT The Hardware Punishers
DaMulta is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 07:18 PM   #3
shevanel
2000 Posts
 
shevanel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Leesburg, FL
Posts: 3,151 (2.25/day)
Thanks: 1,515
Thanked 410 Times in 338 Posts
Send a message via AIM to shevanel Send a message via Skype™ to shevanel

System Specs

this answers my question... the one i had about which half-assed approach would NV take to compete with the mainstream market. although i will admit this sounds better than i had imagined.
__________________



Stop comparing it to onboard! Compare it to something it falls short to so that we can really understand.

HEAT
shevanel is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to shevanel For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 26, 2010, 07:21 PM   #4
Binge
Overclocking Surrealism
 
Binge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,065 (3.54/day)
Thanks: 948
Thanked 1,768 Times in 1,308 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Binge Send a message via MSN to Binge

System Specs

wtf GF104? lammemeeeeeeeeeeee
__________________
I *UNITE* streamers and content providers on TPU!
My Heatware


Matias Quiet Pro (PC) / KBTalking Pro / Das Keyboard Professional S
Binge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 07:22 PM   #5
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,984 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Binge View Post
wtf GF104? lammemeeeeeeeeeeee
GF104 is a GPU codename like GF100. It won't be printed on boxes so nothing lame about the name.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 07:25 PM   #6
wahdangun
1000 Posts
 
wahdangun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: indonesia ku tercinta
Posts: 1,465 (0.86/day)
Thanks: 231
Thanked 116 Times in 94 Posts

System Specs

WTF!!!!!, is this what nvdia promise ????


it's really lame, i want GTX 480 benched right now!!!!!
__________________
visit indonesia 2010 , dangerously beautiful
btw if you really like a very cool music then please go to this site :dangdut
"i love opencl and would love to see applications for it.
i love porn too, but didnt install it and didnt benchmark it. stop complaining and suggest opencl applications to use"
~W1zzard~
wahdangun is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 07:33 PM   #7
roast
500 Posts
 
roast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ireland.
Posts: 564 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 117
Thanked 101 Times in 81 Posts
Send a message via MSN to roast Send a message via Yahoo to roast

System Specs

I'm expecting GTX470 and 480 to be fail., and on that note, With these GF104 chips, I think NV could be on to a real winner. This could replace all of the G92 cards around, and if NV plan it right and set the right price, this would be all OEM's new favorite chip.... rebranding every two months...

I'm not saying I'm happy about it, but it would be a great money spinner for nVidia
__________________
heatware: roast
roast is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 07:33 PM   #8
kajson
75 Posts
 
kajson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 135 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts

System Specs

first actually launch the main product, then start boasting about cheaper/better derivatives......

Or maybe they'll just pospone the main product indefinitely and move straight to the derivatives
kajson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 07:39 PM   #9
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
KainXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,701 (2.27/day)
Thanks: 186
Thanked 466 Times in 383 Posts

System Specs

well I can only expect that they will remove half the sm's completely and 2 memory controllers but keep the layout of the sm's the same, if they did this then the GF104 would not have 64TMU's it would have 32, not even the GTX480 has 64TMU's, but since these chips will be so scalable they could just drop sm's and keep adding new cards by mixing different #'s of sm's with different# of memory controllers.

woops read wrong it says 32
KainXS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 07:45 PM   #10
EchoMan
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 72 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts

So who would buy a gts 450 @ 240 EUR when you can buy a 5850 right now for less?
EchoMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 07:57 PM   #11
Divide Overflow
75 Posts
 
Divide Overflow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: California
Posts: 107 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
GF104 is a GPU codename like GF100. It won't be printed on boxes so nothing lame about the name.
Actual product name GF404?
Divide Overflow is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 08:00 PM   #12
TheGuruStud
1000 Posts
 
TheGuruStud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Police/Nanny State of America
Posts: 1,394 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 142 Times in 109 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by EchoMan View Post
So who would buy a gts 450 @ 240 EUR when you can buy a 5850 right now for less?
Yeah, the price and perf is

They're gonna have to do better than that to compete.
__________________
TheGuruStud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 08:02 PM   #13
monte84
75 Posts
 
monte84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 152 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts

System Specs

wasn't today supposed to be the release date?
monte84 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 08:10 PM   #14
springs113
75 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 149 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by monte84 View Post
wasn't today supposed to be the release date?
i thought the same over @ xtremes....they have posted some numbers and i must say ATI win NV Fail
springs113 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 08:19 PM   #15
madswimmer
75 Posts
 
madswimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 96 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

System Specs

today is the release at pax east, sposed to have 5 ct
madswimmer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 08:26 PM   #16
Fourstaff
TPU Janitor
 
Fourstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 5,984 (4.70/day)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 1,466 Times in 1,213 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Divide Overflow View Post
Actual product name GF404?
Error code 404, more like
Fourstaff is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 08:29 PM   #17
Roph
200 Posts
 
Roph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 254 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 383
Thanked 65 Times in 37 Posts

System Specs

Nvidia are actually... replacing G92? Not renaming it again? G92 will finally die?

Credit where credit is due

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourstaff View Post
Error code 404, more like
__________________
Roph is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Roph For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 26, 2010, 08:38 PM   #18
gvblake22
200 Posts
 
gvblake22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 359 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 74 Times in 66 Posts
Send a message via AIM to gvblake22

System Specs

If these tables prove accurate, these will be the first mid-range video cards to not feature a 128-bit memory bus. The lowest is 192-bit and 256-bit for the middle and highest mid-range parts. I'm actually looking forward to the GTS450!
gvblake22 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 08:40 PM   #19
Imsochobo
500 Posts
 
Imsochobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
Posts: 514 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Imsochobo

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvblake22 View Post
If these tables prove accurate, these will be the first mid-range video cards to not feature a 128-bit memory bus. The lowest is 192-bit and 256-bit for the middle and highest mid-range parts. I'm actually looking forward to the GTS450!
HD 5770.......
__________________
Imsochobo is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Imsochobo For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 26, 2010, 08:43 PM   #20
PCpraiser100
1000 Posts
 
PCpraiser100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,059 (0.60/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 68 Times in 61 Posts

System Specs

Its a sign that Nvidia is hyping the party up to confuse people. Fan boys are having techgasms atm while we OC our HD 5000 cards and previous gen cards at this time.
PCpraiser100 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 09:10 PM   #21
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,960 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,793
Thanked 12,321 Times in 7,832 Posts

System Specs

People, right in the pictures it shows GTS 430, GTS 440 and GTS 450. I think you can come up with a good guess on what cards they will replace.
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 09:14 PM   #22
Valdez
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Szekszárd, Hungary
Posts: 292 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

propably a not fake gtx 480 benchmark
Valdez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 09:18 PM   #23
gvblake22
200 Posts
 
gvblake22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 359 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 74 Times in 66 Posts
Send a message via AIM to gvblake22

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imsochobo View Post
HD 5770.......
I may be reading this wrong, but it looks like it says Bus Width: 128 Bit...

gvblake22 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 09:34 PM   #24
Imsochobo
500 Posts
 
Imsochobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
Posts: 514 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Imsochobo

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvblake22 View Post
I may be reading this wrong, but it looks like it says Bus Width: 128 Bit...

http://tpucdn.com/reviews/HIS/HD_577...es/gpuz_oc.gif
Sorry mate, late at night after a loong day, or three loong weeks with work everyday, starting to get to me, finally holiday.

Read wrong on ur comment and on the specs, was sure i read 128 bit, confused me :S

Still, theese will be expensive, and yet slower than 5850 all of them, same production price...
No 64 bit float like the big bro's.

What is there to them ?
__________________
Imsochobo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2010, 09:42 PM   #25
gvblake22
200 Posts
 
gvblake22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 359 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 74 Times in 66 Posts
Send a message via AIM to gvblake22

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imsochobo View Post
Sorry mate, late at night after a loong day, or three loong weeks with work everyday, starting to get to me, finally holiday.
HAHA, no worries bro.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imsochobo View Post
Still, theese will be expensive, and yet slower than 5850 all of them, same production price...
No 64 bit float like the big bro's.
How do you know the production costs already? The target prices quoted in the article could be inflated by nVidia to start with and not indicative of actual production cost, leaving room for price drops and such. Either way though, those prices seem a bit on the high side, especially considering the very well received 5850 will keep dropping in price bit by bit until these things actually reach the market. Only time will tell I guess!

Last edited by gvblake22; Mar 26, 2010 at 09:47 PM.
gvblake22 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NVIDIA Fermi-based GeForce GPU Further Delayed? btarunr News 136 Jan 3, 2010 10:54 AM
NVIDIA Unveils Next Generation CUDA GPU Architecture – Codenamed ''Fermi'' btarunr News 49 Oct 2, 2009 01:42 PM
NVIDIA Collaborates With Microsoft On High Performance GPU Computing btarunr News 18 Sep 29, 2009 02:01 PM
Details of the First Fusion Derivative Called 'Shrike' Surface btarunr News 14 Jun 28, 2008 03:49 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts