![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,984 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
|
NVIDIA Preparing First Fermi-Derivative Performance GPU, GF104
With the launch of GeForce GTX 400 series enthusiast-grade graphics cards based on the GF100 GPU being a stone's throw away, it is learned that work could be underway at NVIDIA to develop a new performance GPU as a successor to G92 and its various derivatives, according to 3DCenter.org, a German tech portal. Codenamed GF104, the new GPU targets performance/price sweet-spots the way G92 did back in its day with the GeForce 8800 GT and 8800 GTS-512, which delivered high-end sort of performance at "unbelievable" price points. The GF104 is a derivative of the Fermi architecture, and uses a physically down-scaled design of the GF100. It is said to pack 256 CUDA cores, 32 ROPs, 32 TMUs, and a 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface. The more compact die as a result could achieve high clock speeds, like G92 did compared to the G80.
GF104 is believed to form three SKUs to fill performance-thru-mainstream market segments, starting with the fastest GeForce GTS 450, GeForce GTS 440, and GeForce GTS 430 (likely name). Among these, the GTS 450 enables all of GF104's features and specifications, with well over 700 MHz core speed, 1500 MHz shader, and 1800 MHz memory. This part could be priced at around the 240 EUR mark, and target performance levels of the ATI Radeon HD 5830. A notch lower, the GTS 440 has all the hardware inside the GF104 enabled, but has around 20% lower clock speeds, priced over 160 EUR, under 180 EUR. At the bottom is the so-called GTS 430, which could disable a few of the GPU's components, with 192 CUDA cores, and 192-bit GDDR5 memory interface, priced under $150. The lower two SKUs intend to compete with the Radeon HD 5700 series. The source says that the new SKUs could be out this summer. ![]() Source: 3DCenter.org |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
My stars went supernova
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 10,337 (4.16/day)
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 1,477 Times in 1,113 Posts
|
HD 2900XT all over again?????
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Leesburg, FL
Posts: 3,151 (2.25/day)
Thanks: 1,515
Thanked 410 Times in 338 Posts
|
this answers my question... the one i had about which half-assed approach would NV take to compete with the mainstream market. although i will admit this sounds better than i had imagined.
__________________
Stop comparing it to onboard! Compare it to something it falls short to so that we can really understand. HEAT |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to shevanel For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#4 |
|
Overclocking Surrealism
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,065 (3.54/day)
Thanks: 948
Thanked 1,768 Times in 1,308 Posts
|
wtf GF104? lammemeeeeeeeeeeee
__________________
I *UNITE* streamers and content providers on TPU! My Heatware ![]() Matias Quiet Pro (PC) / KBTalking Pro / Das Keyboard Professional S |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,984 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
|
GF104 is a GPU codename like GF100. It won't be printed on boxes so nothing lame about the name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: indonesia ku tercinta
Posts: 1,465 (0.86/day)
Thanks: 231
Thanked 116 Times in 94 Posts
|
WTF!!!!!, is this what nvdia promise ????
![]() it's really lame, i want GTX 480 benched right now!!!!!
__________________
visit indonesia 2010 , dangerously beautiful btw if you really like a very cool music then please go to this site :dangdut "i love opencl and would love to see applications for it. i love porn too, but didnt install it and didnt benchmark it. stop complaining and suggest opencl applications to use" ~W1zzard~ |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ireland.
Posts: 564 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 117
Thanked 101 Times in 81 Posts
|
I'm expecting GTX470 and 480 to be fail., and on that note, With these GF104 chips, I think NV could be on to a real winner. This could replace all of the G92 cards around, and if NV plan it right and set the right price, this would be all OEM's new favorite chip.... rebranding every two months...
I'm not saying I'm happy about it, but it would be a great money spinner for nVidia |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() |
first actually launch the main product, then start boasting about cheaper/better derivatives......
Or maybe they'll just pospone the main product indefinitely and move straight to the derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() |
well I can only expect that they will remove half the sm's completely and 2 memory controllers but keep the layout of the sm's the same, if they did this then the GF104 would not have 64TMU's it would have 32, not even the GTX480 has 64TMU's, but since these chips will be so scalable they could just drop sm's and keep adding new cards by mixing different #'s of sm's with different# of memory controllers.
woops read wrong it says 32 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 72 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
|
So who would buy a gts 450 @ 240 EUR when you can buy a 5850 right now for less?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: California
Posts: 107 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Police/Nanny State of America
Posts: 1,394 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 142 Times in 109 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() They're gonna have to do better than that to compete.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() |
wasn't today supposed to be the release date?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 149 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() |
today is the release at pax east, sposed to have 5 ct
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
TPU Janitor
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 5,984 (4.70/day)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 1,466 Times in 1,213 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() |
Nvidia are actually... replacing G92? Not renaming it again? G92 will finally die?
Credit where credit is due ![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Roph For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#18 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 359 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 74 Times in 66 Posts
|
If these tables prove accurate, these will be the first mid-range video cards to not feature a 128-bit memory bus. The lowest is 192-bit and 256-bit for the middle and highest mid-range parts. I'm actually looking forward to the GTS450!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
Posts: 514 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
|
HD 5770.......
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Imsochobo For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#20 |
![]() |
Its a sign that Nvidia is hyping the party up to confuse people. Fan boys are having techgasms atm while we OC our HD 5000 cards and previous gen cards at this time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,960 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,793
Thanked 12,321 Times in 7,832 Posts
|
People, right in the pictures it shows GTS 430, GTS 440 and GTS 450. I think you can come up with a good guess on what cards they will replace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Szekszárd, Hungary
Posts: 292 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts
|
propably a not fake gtx 480 benchmark
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
Posts: 514 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
|
Quote:
Read wrong on ur comment and on the specs, was sure i read 128 bit, confused me :S Still, theese will be expensive, and yet slower than 5850 all of them, same production price... No 64 bit float like the big bro's. What is there to them ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 359 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 74 Times in 66 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() How do you know the production costs already? The target prices quoted in the article could be inflated by nVidia to start with and not indicative of actual production cost, leaving room for price drops and such. Either way though, those prices seem a bit on the high side, especially considering the very well received 5850 will keep dropping in price bit by bit until these things actually reach the market. Only time will tell I guess! Last edited by gvblake22; Mar 26, 2010 at 09:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NVIDIA Fermi-based GeForce GPU Further Delayed? | btarunr | News | 136 | Jan 3, 2010 10:54 AM |
| NVIDIA Unveils Next Generation CUDA GPU Architecture – Codenamed ''Fermi'' | btarunr | News | 49 | Oct 2, 2009 01:42 PM |
| NVIDIA Collaborates With Microsoft On High Performance GPU Computing | btarunr | News | 18 | Sep 29, 2009 02:01 PM |
| Details of the First Fusion Derivative Called 'Shrike' Surface | btarunr | News | 14 | Jun 28, 2008 03:49 PM |