techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 9, 2010, 08:37 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Super Talent Introduces Value SSD Product Line

Super Talent Technology, a leading manufacturer of Flash storage solutions and DRAM memory modules, today announced a new value solid state drive (SSD) product line dubbed Super Talent VSSD that brings performance and solid-state technology together at an incredible price.

Super Talent VSSD offers shorter OS bootup time, faster application loading, less system power consumption and a brand new experience the customer can never get from traditional hard-disks. VSSD takes full advantage of the 3Gbps SATA-II bandwidth. The VSSD is capable of sequential read speeds up to 150 MB/sec and sequential write speeds up to 100 MB/sec.



Available in capacities from 8GB to 64GB, Super Talent provides customers the option to enter the SSD world with a limited budget, but no compromise in performance. Customers can now build or upgrade a system economically, running the operating system and applications on the VSSD and storing data on a traditional hard-disk.

VSSDs have undergone exhaustive validation and stress testing in both Windows and Linux environments to emerge as one of the most reliable SSDs available. These drives are encased in a lightweight polymer shell that protects the drives against physical damage. VSSDs are dramatically more resistant to shock and vibration than hard drives.

VSSDs are available now from Super Talent resellers worldwide at street prices ranging from about $65 for the 8GB model to around $175 for the 64GB model.

btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2010, 10:02 PM   #2
TheLaughingMan
3500 Posts
 
TheLaughingMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Douglasville, GA USA
Posts: 3,734 (2.48/day)
Thanks: 1,371
Thanked 1,271 Times in 937 Posts
Send a message via MSN to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Yahoo to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Skype™ to TheLaughingMan

System Specs

Honestly?

That is not that much faster than the current gen of HDD's. I can get a 500 GB HDD that will give me about 110 MB/s sustained reads, and 88 MB/s writes. For $75 instead of $175. Or I can get 2 of those drives, go RAID 0 and boost performance beyond these value SSD's, or even RAID 1 and just get the boost in read performance with data redundancy for protection. Either of which are better options that are cheaper.

This just further proves SSD's are still too expensive.
__________________
My Heat

TheLaughingMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 11, 2010, 02:17 AM   #3
extrasalty
75 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 174 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts

System Specs

Value? Not. The smaller one is $8/GB. The biggest one is more than the Indylinx version that I have (from them no less).
__________________
extrasalty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2010, 01:16 AM   #4
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,903 (6.47/day)
Thanks: 785
Thanked 5,185 Times in 3,754 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLaughingMan View Post
That is not that much faster than the current gen of HDD's. I can get a 500 GB HDD that will give me about 110 MB/s sustained reads, and 88 MB/s writes. For $75 instead of $175. Or I can get 2 of those drives, go RAID 0 and boost performance beyond these value SSD's, or even RAID 1 and just get the boost in read performance with data redundancy for protection. Either of which are better options that are cheaper.

This just further proves SSD's are still too expensive.
And that drive can give you 0ms access times?
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2010, 01:37 AM   #5
TheLaughingMan
3500 Posts
 
TheLaughingMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Douglasville, GA USA
Posts: 3,734 (2.48/day)
Thanks: 1,371
Thanked 1,271 Times in 937 Posts
Send a message via MSN to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Yahoo to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Skype™ to TheLaughingMan

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
And that drive can give you 0ms access times?
Nope, I think I can wait out the 4.17 ms access times it takes to find my data. Access time is only important if the drive can then pump out the data at a fast rate. I will not pay $175 bucks to improve my boot time. It is just plain not worth it.

Edit: Tested my Sammy 1 TB, sustained read is 131 MB/s on average and write is 92 MB/s average.
__________________
My Heat

TheLaughingMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2010, 01:41 AM   #6
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,903 (6.47/day)
Thanks: 785
Thanked 5,185 Times in 3,754 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLaughingMan View Post
Nope, I think I can wait out the 4.17 ms access times it takes to find my data. Access time is only important if the drive can then pump out the data at a fast rate. I will not pay $175 bucks to improve my boot time. It is just plain not worth it.

Edit: Tested my Sammy 1 TB, sustained read is 131 MB/s on average and write is 92 MB/s average.
Oh, I won't pay it either, which is why I don't have an SSD, but to some they need to have it... SSDs are fast because of their access times along with read/write speeds.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2010, 02:22 AM   #7
extrasalty
75 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 174 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLaughingMan View Post
I will not pay $175 bucks to improve my boot time. It is just plain not worth it.

Edit: Tested my Sammy 1 TB, sustained read is 131 MB/s on average and write is 92 MB/s average.
Like you I don't care about boot time- Ubuntu does it in seconds anyways, and my laptop rarely gets restarted.
The question is what one cares about. My first Indilinx drive in my desktop worked with the Win 7 beta and was stellar. Then I got lucky to get X25-M G2 at launch day at Newegg for $250. I knew what to expect, and I was a little affraid the write speed is lower than the Indylinx. However nothing in life is sequential. Small file random performance is the real value of SSD. The random performance of the Intel is simply amazing. The multithreded performance is
Virtual machines love SSD, Photoshop loves SSD, Firefox loves SSD. Responsiveness is what I paid for. The difference between access times is nearly 100 times. Not 10%. Not 10 times. A 100 times. When you get used to SSD, you will notice everyone's desktops and laptops are moving so much slower.
The laptop in question is x60 tablet, made in 2006, has SATA1 controller and limits the Intel X25-M to 130 MB/s read. However it kills my i7 with Raptor with almost everything I do. And it goes to sleep and wakes up in 2-3 seconds.
I never regretted the SSD purchases. Especially the Intel since shock-proof and low power is added benefit for the laptop. Just this weekend Fry's had sale on 2TB Seagates for $129. I could care less how it performs - it's a 5900 rpm and it goes in a server. It's scary to think I could have 4TB for the same price of 80GB, but of I had to decide again I will still get a SSD.
I'm hopeful Intel will have the 25nm process drives around November for half-price (same like last year's launch). 160GB for $250 is going to be my next one.
__________________
extrasalty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2010, 02:44 AM   #8
LAN_deRf_HA
3500 Posts
 
LAN_deRf_HA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,068 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 295
Thanked 853 Times in 595 Posts

System Specs

How come SSDs stopped getting cheaper? Seems they haven't budged at all for over a year now. Has there been a problem keeping flash manufacturing process improvements on track?
LAN_deRf_HA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2010, 12:56 AM   #9
tkpenalty
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 5,023 (2.04/day)
Thanks: 412
Thanked 361 Times in 266 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAN_deRf_HA View Post
How come SSDs stopped getting cheaper? Seems they haven't budged at all for over a year now. Has there been a problem keeping flash manufacturing process improvements on track?
memory ICs have been getting more expensive again thanks to demand levels shooting up again after the GFC...
__________________
AMD Radeon X1950~HD4000 Support Clubhouse

“Mac: "Woah, what are you doing?" Mac says as he levitates in the air. PC: "Playing Half-Life 2, this is my gravity gun." Mac: "Well I can sort of do that." PC: "Technically Mac, you have to become me first."” -From_Nowhere
tkpenalty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2010, 06:14 AM   #10
Kantastic
3500 Posts
 
Kantastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 4,991 (3.33/day)
Thanks: 1,252
Thanked 992 Times in 748 Posts

System Specs

The 32GB looks to be priced pretty competitively, it's $85 shipped @ ewiz.
__________________
Heatware
Kantastic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2010, 06:23 AM   #11
extrasalty
75 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 174 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts

System Specs

The 8GB is actually $38 @ewiz. Much better. May even buy one to try it.
__________________
extrasalty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A-Data Adds SX95 2.5 inch SSD to Its XPG Product Line btarunr News 3 Jul 25, 2009 02:55 AM
Super Talent Ships New Line of Flash Disk Modules btarunr News 4 Jun 30, 2009 06:26 PM
Super Talent MasterDrive SSD Gets a Performance Boost Darksaber News 15 Jul 26, 2008 04:12 AM
Super Talent Launches 256GB SATA SSD malware News 12 Dec 5, 2007 12:27 AM
Super Talent Expands Line of IDE Flash Drives W1zzard News 0 Oct 24, 2006 12:54 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts