techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Graphics Cards

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 16, 2010, 11:45 AM   #26
Lionheart
2000 Posts
 
Lionheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,415 (1.85/day)
Thanks: 2,482
Thanked 740 Times in 527 Posts

System Specs

Hey guys, just wanted to know if anyone has used these before, they aren't benchmarks, just graphic demo's and quiet nice too.

http://developer.amd.com/samples/dem...timedemos.aspx
Lionheart is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2010, 06:59 PM   #27
OnBoard
2000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.14/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

Yep, I do load every new demo from ATI/NVIDIA when I go for new graphics card/make. Installed my card 2 days ago and run the demos yeasterday Ladybug was nice, but the other one a bit boring. NVIDIA hair demo seemed more impressive.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OnBoard For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 21, 2010, 11:38 PM   #28
SUPERREDDEVIL
200 Posts
 
SUPERREDDEVIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 228 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 178
Thanked 36 Times in 28 Posts
Send a message via MSN to SUPERREDDEVIL

System Specs

Tested all demos from AMD/ATI, really awesome, really heavy, you can test fully your machine with this ones, not only your graphics card, uses a lot of processor and memory, give it a try, you will not be dissapointed
__________________
Hardware Rule #234809

"If it works, DONT TOUCH IT!"

SUPERREDDEVIL is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 21, 2010, 11:59 PM   #29
LagunaX
500 Posts
 
LagunaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 953 (0.62/day)
Thanks: 76
Thanked 273 Times in 185 Posts

System Specs

Someone upload it megaupload or some host so I can try it - not a torrent guy...

EDIT: Nevermind - officially released at:
http://www.stonegiant.se/
__________________
i7-3770k 4.8ghz 1.21-1.24v Delidded 3231B415
i7-2600k 4.8ghz L041C108 1.32v PLL off Venomous-X Push/Pull
Asus P8P67 Vanilla
Samsung 30nm MV-3V4G3D/US 2x4GB @ 9-10-10-28 1T DDR3 2133 1.6v
Diamond HD 7970
Corsair TX750W
CM 690 II Advanced

Last edited by LagunaX; Apr 22, 2010 at 12:28 AM.
LagunaX is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to LagunaX For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 22, 2010, 12:46 AM   #30
Apa
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Swedenland
Posts: 75 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by LagunaX View Post
Someone upload it megaupload or some host so I can try it - not a torrent guy...

EDIT: Nevermind - officially released at:
http://www.stonegiant.se/
Meh and here I was uploading it to both rapidshare and megaupload for you. :P

Anyway, here's the links just in case you are getting slow DL speed from their website.

http://rapidshare.com/files/37862935...etup.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/37863231...etup.part2.rar

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=UMVZV517
__________________
Apa is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Apa For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 22, 2010, 01:23 AM   #31
LagunaX
500 Posts
 
LagunaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 953 (0.62/day)
Thanks: 76
Thanked 273 Times in 185 Posts

System Specs

Thank you very much Apa for your time and effort.
I'll DL from your rapidshare as a free user to get u points =)
__________________
i7-3770k 4.8ghz 1.21-1.24v Delidded 3231B415
i7-2600k 4.8ghz L041C108 1.32v PLL off Venomous-X Push/Pull
Asus P8P67 Vanilla
Samsung 30nm MV-3V4G3D/US 2x4GB @ 9-10-10-28 1T DDR3 2133 1.6v
Diamond HD 7970
Corsair TX750W
CM 690 II Advanced

Last edited by LagunaX; Apr 22, 2010 at 01:56 AM.
LagunaX is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2010, 01:25 AM   #32
SUPERREDDEVIL
200 Posts
 
SUPERREDDEVIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 228 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 178
Thanked 36 Times in 28 Posts
Send a message via MSN to SUPERREDDEVIL

System Specs

Tnx for megaupload dude cheers
__________________
Hardware Rule #234809

"If it works, DONT TOUCH IT!"

SUPERREDDEVIL is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2010, 05:25 AM   #33
RejZoR
3500 Posts
 
RejZoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia
Posts: 3,963 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 752 Times in 540 Posts

System Specs

Cool. Gotta try it when i get from work.
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk
RejZoR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2010, 06:38 AM   #34
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,766 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,213 Times in 3,159 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads...DX11_Demo.html

Last edited by W1zzard; Apr 22, 2010 at 06:54 AM.
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2010, 07:07 AM   #35
Binge
Overclocking Surrealism
 
Binge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,065 (3.55/day)
Thanks: 948
Thanked 1,768 Times in 1,308 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Binge Send a message via MSN to Binge

System Specs

This is a nice demo. There's a great amount of tessellation but it runs well at just about any resolution. Probably due to the lack of AA/AF, but still pretty gorgeous.
__________________
I *UNITE* streamers and content providers on TPU!
My Heatware


Matias Quiet Pro (PC) / KBTalking Pro / Das Keyboard Professional S
Binge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2010, 04:44 PM   #36
RejZoR
3500 Posts
 
RejZoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia
Posts: 3,963 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 752 Times in 540 Posts

System Specs

I'm just wondering one thing around all this "tessellation" mumbo jumbo. Isn't tessellation suppose to work this way:

When something is viewed at close range (from viewport), you get loads of polygons, when object goes away from the viewport, polys decrease. This is suppose to work dynamically just like old model LOD. Just fully dynamic and much more flexible.

But from my observation, they are using tessellation on EVERYTHING regardless of "true" distance, they just increase polygons on EVERYTHING even more when you get closer. That kinda defeats a purpose of even doing tessellation, doesn't it? I mean, with it, you could pump out incredible facial animations and detailed objects in front of you without sacrificing any performance or even gaining some. Who cares about distant polygons that are blured by DOF anyway and you are focused on object in front of you anyway. Stuff far away behind it should have really low poly count and power should be shifted to objects in front where you want and expect detail. But now, framerate just goes doooooown. Like they are all thrilled by the technology but no one is using it properly.
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk
RejZoR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2010, 05:06 PM   #37
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,766 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,213 Times in 3,159 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by RejZoR View Post
I'm just wondering one thing around all this "tessellation" mumbo jumbo. Isn't tessellation suppose to work this way:

When something is viewed at close range (from viewport), you get loads of polygons, when object goes away from the viewport, polys decrease. This is suppose to work dynamically just like old model LOD. Just fully dynamic and much more flexible.

But from my observation, they are using tessellation on EVERYTHING regardless of "true" distance, they just increase polygons on EVERYTHING even more when you get closer. That kinda defeats a purpose of even doing tessellation, doesn't it? I mean, with it, you could pump out incredible facial animations and detailed objects in front of you without sacrificing any performance or even gaining some. Who cares about distant polygons that are blured by DOF anyway and you are focused on object in front of you anyway. Stuff far away behind it should have really low poly count and power should be shifted to objects in front where you want and expect detail. But now, framerate just goes doooooown. Like they are all thrilled by the technology but no one is using it properly.
thats not how tesselation works.
tesselation uses a few-polygon model, does some tesselation magic (typically through a displacement map) and you get a high-poly model out, and it all happens inside the gpu

the advantage over high poly model all the way from hdd->memory->directx->pcie->gpu is that you move much less bytes = more performance per triangle
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 22, 2010, 10:04 PM   #38
LagunaX
500 Posts
 
LagunaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 953 (0.62/day)
Thanks: 76
Thanked 273 Times in 185 Posts

System Specs

Crap I only get 30 FPS @ 1920x1200 stock 5870.
When at 900/1250 I get 32FPS...

Someone run their 5770 and make me feel better...
__________________
i7-3770k 4.8ghz 1.21-1.24v Delidded 3231B415
i7-2600k 4.8ghz L041C108 1.32v PLL off Venomous-X Push/Pull
Asus P8P67 Vanilla
Samsung 30nm MV-3V4G3D/US 2x4GB @ 9-10-10-28 1T DDR3 2133 1.6v
Diamond HD 7970
Corsair TX750W
CM 690 II Advanced

Last edited by LagunaX; Apr 22, 2010 at 10:13 PM.
LagunaX is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 23, 2010, 11:40 AM   #39
OnBoard
2000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.14/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by LagunaX View Post
Crap I only get 30 FPS @ 1920x1200 stock 5870.
When at 900/1250 I get 32FPS...

Someone run their 5770 and make me feel better...
Got 50 frames with 5770



Well that was without tessellation. High tessellation dipped to 19fps, medium a bit better.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OnBoard For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unigine DX11 "Heaven" Benchmark HeX_00 AMD / ATI 156 Jan 21, 2010 04:28 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts