techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 19, 2005, 06:13 PM   #1
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,792 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,289 Times in 3,175 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Zalman VF700-AlCu

To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Zalman/VF700-AlCu/

Last edited by W1zzard; Feb 28, 2005 at 07:39 PM.
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2005, 07:49 PM   #2
storkman
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Thanks for the review.

Could you give some comparisons between the VF700-Alcu and the ATI Silencer 4 that you last reviewed? I always see reviews of these 2 separately, and they are both always good reviews, but I never get a relative comparison... I would be nice to see some relative graphs on heat and noise levels. And of course the VF700-Cu as well when you review it.

Actually I'm particularly curious about the difference in memory cooling.

Stork

Last edited by storkman; Feb 28, 2005 at 06:58 AM.
storkman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2005, 12:10 AM   #3
JALOOS
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 29 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

I currently use the VF700-ALCU on an XFX 6600GT at clocks of 570/1100 (stock 500/1000).
Since I put it on the temps have dropped 8 to 10 degrees idle and 6 to 8 degrees loaded. This is with it being clocked farther than I had it with stock setup.
I have also noticed the recover back to idle temp from load is excellent and sure drops alot faster than stock.
As I have a XFX 6600 GT AGP the board layout is different and I opted to go with the lighter of the 2 models as it will be sitting closer to the outside edge of the card. In fact it hangs over the side of the card about 3 cm. The 90 gram difference might make a difference or not. Why risk it.

Sorry bout the pic size.
And as room had to be made for the HSI chip on the board the ram is much closer to the GPU leaving not enough clearence at base of HS to accomodate the ramsinks. Mind you the jury is still out on wheather the ramsinks help or not. Either way with the setup as is the fan is moving alot of air past the ram and keeping plenty cool I am sure.

All things aside it performs excellent and from what I have managed to find one of the only aftermarket HSF a person can get to fit the 6600GT AGP. Well worth it.

Here is some links to the Zalman:


Card compatible list
http://www.zalman.co.kr/product/cool...elist_eng.html

Card incompatible list
http://www.zalman.co.kr/product/cool...elist_eng.html

6600GT AGP compatability
http://www.zalman.co.kr/product/cool...600GT_eng.html
__________________
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum
AMD ATHLON 64 3500+ NEWCASTLE @ 2.60GHZ 260 mhz FSB CPU X10 HTT X4
Swiftech MCW6002 Water Block
1024MB PC3200 2.5 3 3 6 1T @ 432mhz
XFX GeForce 6600 GT (128 MB) @ 600/1200
Danger Den Maze4 GPU Water Block
Ultra X Connect 500w PSU UV GREEN

Last edited by JALOOS; Mar 31, 2005 at 12:27 AM.
JALOOS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 1, 2005, 04:59 PM   #4
SPOOKYSHOGUN
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Connecting the fan

I saw a review by a gentleman who connected the fan directly to the card by modifying the connector. Smart move or no?
 
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 1, 2005, 05:13 PM   #5
SPOOKYSHOGUN
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

link

The review I mentioned can be found here:

http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/Graphics/...lmanVF700.html

It's from a Mac site mind you but I don't see what the difference would be for this simple mod. What setting would the fan be running on then? 12V?
 
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 1, 2005, 05:36 PM   #6
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,792 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,289 Times in 3,175 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

the high end cards have fan outputs which are controlled dynamically varying on gpu temperature.

one thing i would be careful about is that the big zalman fan could draw too much current for the fan output circuitry of the card. this shouldnt be an issue, just food for thought if someone wants to be absolutely safe.
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 1, 2005, 05:46 PM   #7
SPOOKYSHOGUN
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Thanks for the info. Is there any way to find out about the circuitry capabilities for different cards? This seems like it might be a good solution if one doesn't want to dangle any more wires on the inside of their machine. I wonder what the RPM rating would be, coming from the card?
 
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 1, 2005, 11:27 PM   #8
JALOOS
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 29 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPOOKYSHOGUN
I wonder what the RPM rating would be, coming from the card?
Only if the card supports it in the first place. Why don't you route the wire along the motherboard and plug it in one of the motherboard fan headers. You will not draw all that extra juice from your video card and will more than likely also let you monitor the rpm.
__________________
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum
AMD ATHLON 64 3500+ NEWCASTLE @ 2.60GHZ 260 mhz FSB CPU X10 HTT X4
Swiftech MCW6002 Water Block
1024MB PC3200 2.5 3 3 6 1T @ 432mhz
XFX GeForce 6600 GT (128 MB) @ 600/1200
Danger Den Maze4 GPU Water Block
Ultra X Connect 500w PSU UV GREEN
JALOOS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2005, 01:34 AM   #9
SPOOKYSHOGUN
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Good point on running it off the motherboard. Maybe I'll give that a shot.
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 5, 2005, 05:26 AM   #10
DudesBoss
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 21 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DudesBoss

i reently just got this graphics fan

1 word

AMAZING

my system is a lot quieter, seeming the x700 stock fan is noisy, so 1st its quieter and i have it running at max speed. and the overclocing. wow. i got 40 mhz more in core then the previous overclock i obtained with the stock fan. memory only overclocked by 26 mhz more, but hey every mhz counts :P

a very good graphics fan. completly recomend this to anyone in need of a fan, make sure its compatible first
__________________
Intel Pentium D 950 (3.4 ghz OC'D to 3.92 GHZ)
Watercooled with Thermaltake Bigwater 735
Asus P5WD2-E Premimum Mobo
OCZ DDR2-800mhz (2x 1gb sticks)
ATI Radeon x1800gto 256mb 500/500x2 stock, OC'D To 575/550x2 watercooled gpu.
DudesBoss is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zalman VF1000 & RHS88 Frederik S Reviews 24 Dec 24, 2007 10:38 AM
geforce fx 5200 and zalman vf700? Boneface Graphics Cards 17 Jul 10, 2006 04:55 PM
Zalman VF700-Cu W1zzard Reviews 9 Nov 15, 2005 09:19 PM
Arctic Cooling Silencer 2 vs ZALMAN VF700??? Spule Overclocking & Cooling 4 Feb 4, 2005 06:24 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts