techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jun 3, 2010, 05:07 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,908 Times in 5,654 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Galaxy Designs GeForce GTX 480 with Dedicated PhysX GPU

While every NVIDIA GPU since GeForce 8 series, with over 256 MB of memory supports the CUDA GPU compute technology, and with it PhysX GPU acceleration, the prospect of dedicated GPUs for computing PhysX interests many, especially enthusiasts, after NVIDIA stopped production of the PhysX processor from erstwhile Ageia. EVGA first devised a graphics card that has a high-end GPU processing graphics, and a mainstream GPU dedicated to PhysX processing, with its GeForce GTX 275 Co-op. Building on the same principle, Galaxy designed an enthusiast-grade graphics card that uses an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 for DirectX 11 compliant graphics processing, while its sidekick on board is a 40 nm GeForce GT 240 GPU.

The GeForce GTX 480 sticks to specifications, complete with 1536 MB of GDDR5 memory across a 384-bit wide, while the GT 240 has its own 512 MB of GDDR5 memory across a 128-bit wide interface. Both GPUs share the system bus over an NVIDIA nForce 200 bridge chip, which gives both GPUs a PCI-Express 2.0 x16 link. The GTX 480 GPU packs 480 CUDA cores, and features the latest GPU technologies, including 3D Vision surround. Since it is independent from the GT 240, the GTX 480 can pair with three more of its kind for 4-way SLI, without affecting the functionality of the GT 240 in any way.



The GT 240 packs 96 CUDA cores, and is DirectCompute 4.1 compliant. It has enough compute power for offloading PhysX processing from the main GPU. Since the GT 240 in its standalone card form is very energy efficient by not requiring auxiliary power, its presence didn't affect the electricals of this card in any big way. The GTX 480 component seems to be powered by a 6+2 phase digital PWM circuit, while the GT 240 uses a simpler 2+1 phase PWM circuit. Power inputs remain 8-pin and 6-pin. More details as they emerge.
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 3, 2010, 05:21 PM   #2
Nailezs
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DelMarVa
Posts: 829 (0.59/day)
Thanks: 137
Thanked 68 Times in 64 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Nailezs

System Specs

very nice
__________________
Disclaimer: 99% of the time I think I am right. If I am wrong, correct me.
"I only ever made a mistake once in my life - but it was a mistake" - My Dad

“i beat it on pc while chatting in steam and on vent. granted, it took me a few tries but it is do-able.” -Nailezs
“Well I must not be as 1337 as you. I'm going to build a life size vinyl statue of this bitch and commence to face f#$k her it I can't beat her in game.” -TheMailMan78
I AM 1337!!
Nailezs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 05:31 PM   #3
Fourstaff
TPU Janitor
 
Fourstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 5,971 (4.70/day)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 1,461 Times in 1,210 Posts

System Specs

Another marketing ploy to get people to buy GT2xx! Good job Galaxy
Fourstaff is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 05:34 PM   #4
raptori
500 Posts
 
raptori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Baghdad,Iraq
Posts: 506 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 58
Thanked 62 Times in 46 Posts

System Specs

nice now they need to put powerful cooling not the reference.
raptori is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 05:42 PM   #5
Assimilator
200 Posts
 
Assimilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Africa
Posts: 425 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 113
Thanked 56 Times in 41 Posts

System Specs

Is it just my imagination or is that board the same size as the standard GTX 480 PCB? Would be very interesting if Galaxy has managed to squeeze an extra GPU in there!
__________________
<html> <code> <style>

The QuadFather: 4x4x4x4
4 cores (QX9650) / 4 GPUs (2x 9800 GX2) / 4x 2GB DDR2-800 / 4 hard disks (quad 320GB Seagates, RAID-5)
Assimilator is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 05:52 PM   #6
xkche
75 Posts
 
xkche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 82 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

What's the perfomance of GT240 on PhysX?
is enough to move high FPS to the GTX480??
__________________
PC: Phenom II X4 965 - Gigabyte GA-870A-USB - 12GB 1600 DDR3 Patriot Sector 5 / Vector 3 - Asus GTX660 Direct CU OC
All Hail Britannia!
xkche is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 05:55 PM   #7
OnBoard
2000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.14/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Assimilator View Post
Is it just my imagination or is that board the same size as the standard GTX 480 PCB? Would be very interesting if Galaxy has managed to squeeze an extra GPU in there!
Pretty much. They used the air hole space for the extra GPU. Same way they made GTX 470 shorter, get rid of empty space and put it to use
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 05:56 PM   #8
ktr
Eligible for custom title
 
ktr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area, California, USA, Earth
Posts: 6,158 (2.37/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 708 Times in 595 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by xkche View Post
What's the perfomance of GT240 on PhysX?
is enough to move high FPS to the GTX480??
PhysX is mathematical calculations and is independent of graphic rendering.
ktr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ktr For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 3, 2010, 06:02 PM   #9
xkche
75 Posts
 
xkche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 82 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by ktr View Post
PhysX is mathematical calculations and is independent of graphic rendering.
Yes, but.. how can fast can calculate GT240 PhysX, to stay on par of the renders of the GTX480 ?
__________________
PC: Phenom II X4 965 - Gigabyte GA-870A-USB - 12GB 1600 DDR3 Patriot Sector 5 / Vector 3 - Asus GTX660 Direct CU OC
All Hail Britannia!
xkche is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 06:05 PM   #10
ShRoOmAlIsTiC
500 Posts
 
ShRoOmAlIsTiC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 790 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 161 Times in 120 Posts

System Specs

the 240 does just fine with my 5850. Batman AA gets an average of 84fps in the bench with physx on high.
__________________
Heatware/Ebay=Shroomalistic
ShRoOmAlIsTiC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 06:06 PM   #11
phanbuey
Eligible for custom title
 
phanbuey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 5,010 (2.48/day)
Thanks: 1,484
Thanked 959 Times in 812 Posts

System Specs

just dont install the current WHQL's for it... as they seem not to work with 400 and older GPU's for PhysX.
phanbuey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 06:31 PM   #12
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,754 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,116 Times in 3,707 Posts

System Specs

Totally pointless. When I tested a 9600GT with my GTX470, there was no performance difference between having the 9600GT do PhysX and just letting the GTX470 do it. The GTX400 series cards, especially the GTX480, is more than powerful enough to handle PhysX by themselves.

Plus the same problem I had with the special HD5770 with the integrated Killer NIC applies here, when I want to replace the card, I loose the PhysX card.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate

Last edited by newtekie1; Jun 3, 2010 at 06:38 PM.
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 06:35 PM   #13
ktr
Eligible for custom title
 
ktr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area, California, USA, Earth
Posts: 6,158 (2.37/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 708 Times in 595 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by xkche View Post
Yes, but.. how can fast can calculate GT240 PhysX, to stay on par of the renders of the GTX480 ?
Again, it is independent, therefore it does not have to "stay on par" with the GPU. PhysX aids the CPU, not the GPU.
ktr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ktr For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 3, 2010, 06:40 PM   #14
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,754 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,116 Times in 3,707 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ktr View Post
Again, it is independent, therefore it does not have to "stay on par" with the GPU. PhysX aids the CPU, not the GPU.
I think what he is asking is if the GT240 is fast enough to calculate PhysX and not hold back the GTX480. The same way a weak CPU would hold back a stong GPU.

The issue is that people think PhysX takes a lot of computing power, when it really doesn't, so a very basic card can handle it easily without limitting the more powerful graphics card.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to newtekie1 For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 3, 2010, 06:42 PM   #15
$immond$
200 Posts
 
$immond$'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 392 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 23 Times in 20 Posts

System Specs

I wonder 2 of these in SLI would be like.
__________________


I hate people that say "worth every penny" on reviews.
$immond$ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 07:03 PM   #16
xkche
75 Posts
 
xkche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 82 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by ktr View Post
Again, it is independent, therefore it does not have to "stay on par" with the GPU. PhysX aids the CPU, not the GPU.
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
I think what he is asking is if the GT240 is fast enough to calculate PhysX and not hold back the GTX480. The same way a weak CPU would hold back a stong GPU.

The issue is that people think PhysX takes a lot of computing power, when it really doesn't, so a very basic card can handle it easily without limitting the more powerful graphics card.
tnks! that's the point!
__________________
PC: Phenom II X4 965 - Gigabyte GA-870A-USB - 12GB 1600 DDR3 Patriot Sector 5 / Vector 3 - Asus GTX660 Direct CU OC
All Hail Britannia!
xkche is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 07:37 PM   #17
v12dock
1000 Posts
 
v12dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,286 (0.79/day)
Thanks: 281
Thanked 240 Times in 160 Posts

System Specs

Anyway they can get rid of there massive G92 stock
v12dock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 07:42 PM   #18
OnBoard
2000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.14/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by v12dock View Post
Anyway they can get rid of there massive G92 stock
It's not G92 anymore. GT215 40nm and DX10.1.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 07:55 PM   #19
wahdangun
1000 Posts
 
wahdangun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: indonesia ku tercinta
Posts: 1,465 (0.86/day)
Thanks: 231
Thanked 116 Times in 94 Posts

System Specs

shame they don't put hydra chip in there, its maybe more useful than that nforce chip, so if you don't want to use physix you can still get performance boost
__________________
visit indonesia 2010 , dangerously beautiful
btw if you really like a very cool music then please go to this site :dangdut
"i love opencl and would love to see applications for it.
i love porn too, but didnt install it and didnt benchmark it. stop complaining and suggest opencl applications to use"
~W1zzard~
wahdangun is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 07:56 PM   #20
trt740
Eligible for custom title
 
trt740's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 10,186 (3.96/day)
Thanks: 1,578
Thanked 1,135 Times in 960 Posts

System Specs

Galaxy is really coming around this will be a great card.
trt740 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 08:35 PM   #21
ShRoOmAlIsTiC
500 Posts
 
ShRoOmAlIsTiC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 790 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 161 Times in 120 Posts

System Specs

nvidia should start integrating a gt240 physx processor into motherboards and make it so they dont disable them when ati is present. Then lisence the chips to amd and intel.
__________________
Heatware/Ebay=Shroomalistic
ShRoOmAlIsTiC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 09:30 PM   #22
LittleLizard
2000 Posts
 
LittleLizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Latin America, Uruguay
Posts: 3,380 (2.06/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 584 Times in 516 Posts

System Specs

did anyone noticed that it STILL USE 6+8, even with the gt240 on board?!?!?!
__________________


"oh no, i make a very good person. I eat poop and sleep just like everyone else.
My sense of humour just happens to fall under the DnD category of Chaotic Evil." - Mussels
"I was expecting a line of EVGA FTW condoms or something like that." - DrPepper
"I like my sex like my basketball, one on one, and with as little dribbling as possible" - Robert-The-Rambler
LittleLizard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 10:37 PM   #23
Steevo
Eligible for custom title
 
Steevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,567 (2.02/day)
Thanks: 238
Thanked 979 Times in 729 Posts

System Specs

They should shut off the 480 core and memory when in 2D clocks and save a shitload of power. Then it would be worth it.
__________________

“it would have been perfect....its got trains and the line"tech your kids not to do what iv done"(or similar) because i had obviously done something to warrent 2 e-thugs to come 4000miles out of their way and kill me.” -Solaris17
“yeah i failed. i noticed the "coming soon" part after i posted.” -Mussels
“people are just stupid.” -W1zzard
Yes I am evil, yes you can have some.
Steevo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 10:39 PM   #24
_JP_
2000 Posts
 
_JP_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,121 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 1,956
Thanked 647 Times in 468 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleLizard View Post
did anyone noticed that it STILL USE 6+8, even with the gt240 on board?!?!?!
Your question can be easily answered by reading the whole news. Especially here:

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
The GT 240 packs 96 CUDA cores, and is DirectCompute 4.1 compliant. It has enough compute power for offloading PhysX processing from the main GPU. Since the GT 240 in its standalone card form is very energy efficient by not requiring auxiliary power, its presence didn't affect the electricals of this card in any big way. The GTX 480 component seems to be powered by a 6+2 phase digital PWM circuit, while the GT 240 uses a simpler 2+1 phase PWM circuit. Power inputs remain 8-pin and 6-pin. More details as they emerge.


I'm looking forward to see reviews of this card! Galaxy is making some very bold moves with these new exiting cards!
Too bad they don't sell in my country, though.
_JP_ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2010, 10:42 PM   #25
Taskforce
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

I don't need PhysX, what am i going to do with it?

Where dah games at to run it?
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Galaxy Designs Dual-Core GeForce GTS 250 Graphics Accelerator btarunr News 60 Sep 7, 2010 02:16 AM
[FS] Galaxy GTX 480 DDR5 video card trt740 Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 23 May 24, 2010 10:38 PM
[FS] Galaxy Gtx 480 DDR5 video card trt740 Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 11 May 17, 2010 12:14 AM
NVIDIA Announces the GeForce GTX 480 and GeForce GTX 470 Graphics Cards btarunr News 41 Mar 29, 2010 11:39 AM
GeForce GTX 480 has 480 CUDA Cores? btarunr News 79 Mar 20, 2010 05:47 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts