techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Storage

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 30, 2010, 02:06 PM   #1
djisas
200 Posts
 
djisas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Darkness
Posts: 300 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 324 Times in 284 Posts

System Specs

Best 500GB hdd

Ok, here's a question for the masses:

Which is the best overall 500GB drive, speed is preferred, it's for an OS + gaming drive...
Been using Seagate for ages and even had one of the infamous 7200.11 drives die one me (t'was a raido setup with 2 single plate 320Gb disks), been slowly moving to the WD camp but they are on average 10€ more expensive or worse for 1TB drives (up to 20€ difference), but i feel they are more stable, i also have a 500GB seagate single plate on the 7200.12 generation as the Bt workhorse and it works fine...

So my doubt really is between a new 7200.12 or a nice WD black 12€ more expensive...

Cant find on the net any decent hdd roundup with recent drives, it seems hardware sites dont play much with them, it would be nice if TPU did some hdd charts using new drives including ssd's...
__________________
I am a beast forced to feed,
Not on blood I have different needs.
Fear and misery line my plate,
Pain and suffering make it great.
As for the wine to this meal,
There's nothing better than the death I'll deal
djisas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30, 2010, 02:10 PM   #2
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

samsung F3's are my favourite, they're up there with performance but unlike the other brands they stay very quiet as well.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mussels For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 30, 2010, 02:14 PM   #3
Radical_Edward
2000 Posts
 
Radical_Edward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 3,139 (2.59/day)
Thanks: 2,559
Thanked 1,964 Times in 1,073 Posts

System Specs

I love my WD Blue 500GB. Once I got all the settings done right it's been nice and quiet ever since.
Radical_Edward is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Radical_Edward For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 30, 2010, 02:40 PM   #4
djisas
200 Posts
 
djisas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Darkness
Posts: 300 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 324 Times in 284 Posts

System Specs

Are those samsung single plate??
__________________
I am a beast forced to feed,
Not on blood I have different needs.
Fear and misery line my plate,
Pain and suffering make it great.
As for the wine to this meal,
There's nothing better than the death I'll deal
djisas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30, 2010, 02:46 PM   #5
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by djisas View Post
Are those samsung single plate??
dual platter i think, but they're still very quiet anyway.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30, 2010, 02:46 PM   #6
DonInKansas
3500 Posts
 
DonInKansas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 4,261 (1.95/day)
Thanks: 779
Thanked 1,273 Times in 1,007 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DonInKansas Send a message via MSN to DonInKansas Send a message via Yahoo to DonInKansas

System Specs

Seagate's 7200.12 500gb drives are pretty quick as well. I bought six of them for use in our office and they're quiet and reliable.
__________________
Sneekypeet on my disappearance from TPU: "He went to school for a while to learn how to deal with douchebags and delight in pastries and exotic coffees....or in English, he is a cop now."

You know what time it is......
DonInKansas is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DonInKansas For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 30, 2010, 02:49 PM   #7
Soylent Joe
2000 Posts
 
Soylent Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,030 (2.08/day)
Thanks: 2,777
Thanked 676 Times in 460 Posts

System Specs

I don't think there is a whole lot of difference between the Sammy F3, WD Blue, and SG 7200.12 500GB drives. I recommend going for which ever one of those 3 that is the cheapest and has the best warranty.
__________________
Soylent Joe is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Soylent Joe For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 30, 2010, 02:49 PM   #8
djisas
200 Posts
 
djisas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Darkness
Posts: 300 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 324 Times in 284 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
dual platter i think, but they're still very quiet anyway.
I thought so, new drives carry 32MB buffer and single plate, at least i think both Segate and WD do...

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonInKansas View Post
Seagate's 7200.12 500gb drives are pretty quick as well. I bought six of them for use in our office and they're quiet and reliable.
I have one too actually like i mentioned, mb i should just go and buy a new one to replace the old dual plate one to increase performance, efficiency and reliability...

@ Joe: If id go WD would be the faster Black, and i think warranty wise WD is better, i think i remember contacting segate when my drive died but they didnt help at all, so i sent the drive to the store for rma and it was just a bios issue...
__________________
I am a beast forced to feed,
Not on blood I have different needs.
Fear and misery line my plate,
Pain and suffering make it great.
As for the wine to this meal,
There's nothing better than the death I'll deal
djisas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30, 2010, 02:54 PM   #9
Hardi
5 Posts
 
Hardi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe,Estonia
Posts: 17 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts

System Specs

Samsung 500GB F3 is on platter.
__________________
Everyone is born right handed, only the gifted overcome it.
Hardi is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hardi For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 30, 2010, 02:56 PM   #10
djisas
200 Posts
 
djisas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Darkness
Posts: 300 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 324 Times in 284 Posts

System Specs

Samsung drives never really atracted me, but i used hitaichi long ago, their 250GB drives where the best back then, but their drives are behind the times nowadays...
__________________
I am a beast forced to feed,
Not on blood I have different needs.
Fear and misery line my plate,
Pain and suffering make it great.
As for the wine to this meal,
There's nothing better than the death I'll deal
djisas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30, 2010, 03:47 PM   #11
inferKNOX
500 Posts
 
inferKNOX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SouthERN Africa
Posts: 880 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 77
Thanked 118 Times in 93 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to inferKNOX

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
dual platter i think, but they're still very quiet anyway.
Nope, the F3s are 500GB per platter, so it's single platter. The F1s were 333GB or so per platter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonInKansas View Post
Seagate's 7200.12 500gb drives are pretty quick as well. I bought six of them for use in our office and they're quiet and reliable.
-1
I bought 2 different Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB HDDs and although spin-up is quiet, read/write is like a jackhammer compared to the Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB that I had.
Also, about 3 months after getting my 2nd one, I started getting warnings from S.M.A.R.T to change it because it was becoming unstable and about to crash, so I sent it back for warranty (to Shop, not directly to Seagate) and am waiting for the new one.

I'd say undoubtedly get a Samsung Spinpoint F3 500GB. My F1 was simply excellent, and the F3s are better in every way according to all I've heard.
I'd get them in a heartbeat and sell my 7200.12s off if they were available to me, but everyone is only stocking Seagates, etc, around here...
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
inferKNOX is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to inferKNOX For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 30, 2010, 04:04 PM   #12
ERazer
1000 Posts
 
ERazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 1,421 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 334
Thanked 500 Times in 337 Posts

System Specs

i got wd blacks and blues, black they very fast but pretty loud and the blue they okay in speed but silent, i still consider my old 7200.11 my best drive fast and silent, my 2 cents
__________________
*Gaming Rig: i7 2600k | ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z Intel Z68 | 8gb Corsair Dominator GT | ASUS ENGTX580 DCII | Intel 510 series 120gb | Corsair 650d
*Daily Rig: i7 860 | GA-P55A-UD6 | 8gb Corsair Dominator III | HD5770 | x2 250gb WD RE4 Raid0 | Haf932 Modded
*Server: i3 540 | GA-H55N-USB3 | 4gb Corsair XMS DDR3 | x4 500gb WD Blue | lian li pc-q08b


| My HeatWare | My For Sale | SteamID |
ERazer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30, 2010, 04:07 PM   #13
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ERazer View Post
i got wd blacks and blues, black they very fast but pretty loud and the blue they okay in speed but silent, i still consider my old 7200.11 my best drive fast and silent, my 2 cents
samsung F1's and F3's are the only modern drive as quiet (or quieter) as the old seagates
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mussels For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 30, 2010, 04:07 PM   #14
RejZoR
3500 Posts
 
RejZoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia
Posts: 3,963 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 752 Times in 540 Posts

System Specs

Single platter 500GB Samsung's are probably the fastest drives you can get at that size. Except Velociraptor with 600GB...
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk
RejZoR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30, 2010, 04:10 PM   #15
djisas
200 Posts
 
djisas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Darkness
Posts: 300 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 324 Times in 284 Posts

System Specs

Interesting so many samsung supporters...

inferKNOX, it happened with me before, getting smart warning from a segate drive, dont remember if the old or new generation thought, but indeed my wd drives show better reliability stats on smart using hard drive inspector...
__________________
I am a beast forced to feed,
Not on blood I have different needs.
Fear and misery line my plate,
Pain and suffering make it great.
As for the wine to this meal,
There's nothing better than the death I'll deal
djisas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30, 2010, 04:12 PM   #16
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,744 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,114 Times in 3,705 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by djisas View Post
Ok, here's a question for the masses:

Which is the best overall 500GB drive, speed is preferred, it's for an OS + gaming drive...
Been using Seagate for ages and even had one of the infamous 7200.11 drives die one me (t'was a raido setup with 2 single plate 320Gb disks), been slowly moving to the WD camp but they are on average 10€ more expensive or worse for 1TB drives (up to 20€ difference), but i feel they are more stable, i also have a 500GB seagate single plate on the 7200.12 generation as the Bt workhorse and it works fine...

So my doubt really is between a new 7200.12 or a nice WD black 12€ more expensive...

Cant find on the net any decent hdd roundup with recent drives, it seems hardware sites dont play much with them, it would be nice if TPU did some hdd charts using new drives including ssd's...
IMO, brand doesn't really matter. I've found that whatever you tend to use most, is also what you seem to notice fail the most. And that makes sense really, if you've got 10 Seagate drives and only 1 WD, then you are 10 times more likely to see a Seagate drive fail. That doesn't mean WD is better.

Anyway, I say go with whichever is cheapest. Of course warranty is a concern also. I believe the WD Black drives have a 5 year warranty, at least they do in the states, while most others have a 3 year. That might be worth the extra few bucks.

Speed wise they are all going to be pretty close, the different won't really be noticeable. It might be measurable in benchmarks, but not noticeable in real world use.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to newtekie1 For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 30, 2010, 04:24 PM   #17
djisas
200 Posts
 
djisas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Darkness
Posts: 300 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 324 Times in 284 Posts

System Specs

Well i have 2 of which in my case, 2 different generation 500Gb seagate, one 640GB dual plate WD black and one 1TB green for storage, its slow seek time really pisses me of having to wait for the drive to wake up and speed is just average, but it'll do for now...

Further investigation proved that these samsung are neat drives being some of the fastest and efficient ones, with but one noticeable flaw in seek time...

Ill be further investigating and red you comments...

The WD is really the most expensive of the lot, so mb ill go with a different one...

Last year's chart from tom's harware, good numbers from both samsung and seagate with samsung being better most of the tests, WD drive looks bad in the picture, its 1TB drive, probably old model or just bad, no 500Gb WD for direct comparison...

Tom's Hardware - Benchmark h2benchw 3.12: Max Write Throughput
__________________
I am a beast forced to feed,
Not on blood I have different needs.
Fear and misery line my plate,
Pain and suffering make it great.
As for the wine to this meal,
There's nothing better than the death I'll deal

Last edited by djisas; Aug 30, 2010 at 04:36 PM.
djisas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30, 2010, 04:45 PM   #18
RejZoR
3500 Posts
 
RejZoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia
Posts: 3,963 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 752 Times in 540 Posts

System Specs

The more platters, the longer it takes to spin up. My WD Caviar Black 2TB (4 platters) takes forever to start from zero to 7200RPM. But once it's going, the performance is just incredible for such a massive drive.
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk
RejZoR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30, 2010, 04:50 PM   #19
djisas
200 Posts
 
djisas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Darkness
Posts: 300 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 324 Times in 284 Posts

System Specs

I couldnt get a dual plate green, i suppose its a 3 plater one, the green only goes up to 5400rpm, also couldn't get 1TB segate dual plater, so im stuck with slow but reliable, quiet and cool drive, if only it would be faster...
New article on HDD from XBIT lab, samsung blasts competition and 7200.12 tailing it from slight behind, WD looks slower, it looks like an old generation with those speeds, the worst thing about WD is that its not easy to know which generation from its name without going to their site...

Testing here: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/sto...d-roundup.html

EDIT: Im surprised that by the end of the long battery of tests the seagate wins the day and WD dual plater black second with F3 probably 3rd, the Sg model is on average close to F3 is speed, but better in some other critical parameters, power consumption is slightly lower on read\write, while f3 is lower on idle, not that is really matters when both drives are lower than 7w max, while the wd due to faster heads is faster on sequential reads, etc only loosing when it comes to pure speed...

By the way can anyone tell me if those f3 are slim or regular size, like the seagate ones, they are quite thiner than dual platters??
__________________
I am a beast forced to feed,
Not on blood I have different needs.
Fear and misery line my plate,
Pain and suffering make it great.
As for the wine to this meal,
There's nothing better than the death I'll deal

Last edited by djisas; Aug 30, 2010 at 05:21 PM.
djisas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31, 2010, 02:10 AM   #20
OnBoard
2000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.14/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by djisas View Post
By the way can anyone tell me if those f3 are slim or regular size, like the seagate ones, they are quite thiner than dual platters??
Normal size and I've likes Samsungs for a while now as they run so cool. 10C difference with Seagate few years back, dunno how it's currently. 23C an 26C for my drives and that's after benchmark run

Used to have a Maxtor few years back and it wan 56C (sure case was worse in airflow then too), but anyhow hated how it heated other things as well.

Another thing is seek noise, that can be horribly metallic on some drives, F1 was already quiet and F3 is even quieter, but my F1 is 2 platter, so might be that too. Oh and it doesn't hurt that Samsung is also one of the cheapest if not the cheapest out there

But all current perpendicular recording drives are fast and this second generation got even faster. WD has double the cache compared to Samsung, if I don't remember totally wrong.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31, 2010, 02:44 AM   #21
Maban
1000 Posts
 
Maban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,919 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 802
Thanked 553 Times in 361 Posts

System Specs

Here's a quick comparison between the F3 and 72.12. Quick edit here. Reran for 72.12 and got 115.4MB/s Random Read. Everything else was the same.


Last edited by Maban; Aug 31, 2010 at 02:51 AM.
Maban is offline  
More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Maban For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 31, 2010, 03:09 AM   #22
IINexusII
500 Posts
 
IINexusII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 859 (0.57/day)
Thanks: 53
Thanked 174 Times in 128 Posts

System Specs

f3's are nice and quiet. but the 1gb caviar black i had was faster
__________________

IINexusII is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31, 2010, 03:50 AM   #23
v12dock
1000 Posts
 
v12dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,286 (0.80/day)
Thanks: 281
Thanked 240 Times in 160 Posts

System Specs

I vote samsung F3 or WD caviar black
v12dock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31, 2010, 11:48 AM   #24
scaminatrix
2000 Posts
 
scaminatrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: By the Channel Tunnel, Kent, England
Posts: 2,432 (2.07/day)
Thanks: 1,834
Thanked 802 Times in 672 Posts

System Specs

Top one WDC Black SATA3 1TB 64 MB cache
Middle WDC Black SATA2 500GB 32 MB cache
Bottom WDC Green SATA2 500GB 8 MB cache (2 years old)




I'm sure I had over 150 MB/s read on the 1TB when I didn't have it as the OS drive...
__________________
MKMods Tribute Rig - the Power of the Community
HeatWare
Did I make the 2,000,000th post?
If an 8 Core can hit 6Ghz with an H100 i'll post pictures of my hot fiance - Pestilence
Every day I come to this site, I am reminded why I come to this site every day!!! - Iggster
scaminatrix is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to scaminatrix For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 31, 2010, 11:51 AM   #25
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
 
brandonwh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chatsworth, GA
Posts: 13,562 (10.03/day)
Thanks: 2,146
Thanked 5,338 Times in 3,695 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to brandonwh64 Send a message via AIM to brandonwh64 Send a message via MSN to brandonwh64 Send a message via Yahoo to brandonwh64

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Radical_Edward View Post
I love my WD Blue 500GB. Once I got all the settings done right it's been nice and quiet ever since.
+1

Got two blues in raid 0 and they are peppy!
__________________
Cruncher's:
All GPU's
GPU's:
7970 3GB *Unlocked* = 8 Threads
5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads
brandonwh64 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[FS][US] WD 500gb Sata 2.5" HDD BrooksyX Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 7 Jul 11, 2010 08:41 PM
Copy 500gb main hdd to new 500gb hdd and swap? Possible? Rexter Storage 8 Jan 10, 2010 03:59 PM
[WTB] 4gb Ddr3, <500gb Hdd wolf2009 Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 11 Jul 11, 2009 07:32 PM
[WTB][EU] Sata DVDRW or 500gb HDD DrPepper Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 10 Jun 23, 2008 04:59 PM
Seagate: Portable Perpendicular Recording HDD & 500GB eSATA Pushbutton Back-up HDD Dark Ride News 1 Jan 17, 2006 11:45 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts