![]() |
|
|
#10476 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,053 (1.60/day)
Thanks: 6,950
Thanked 2,646 Times in 1,137 Posts
|
Whoa, damn. As much as I like BOINC sometimes it really does some strange stuff. I suppose waiting won't for this kind of problem though
![]() Keep us posted if you find a solution. Starting to think at this rate there'll be enough material to start a tech support thread for WCG
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10477 |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,793 (7.86/day)
Thanks: 8,305
Thanked 9,487 Times in 4,321 Posts
|
There might be. I'm not too worried, it doesn't seem to hurt PPD too badly
![]() Maybe a newer BOINC would fix it. I'll see what's available later
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10478 |
|
WCG Team Captain
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 23,926 (11.78/day)
Thanks: 15,179
Thanked 12,324 Times in 7,786 Posts
|
BOINC might do weird stuff, but I do prefer it over F@H clients. No offense as I fold my self, but man I've had nightmares with F@H.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10479 |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,793 (7.86/day)
Thanks: 8,305
Thanked 9,487 Times in 4,321 Posts
|
As have I, especially w/ multiple GPUs. BOINC is just an install and forget, no need to mess with different client types, multiple clients, flags, etc. It just (for the most part) works
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10480 | |
|
WCG Team Captain
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 23,926 (11.78/day)
Thanks: 15,179
Thanked 12,324 Times in 7,786 Posts
|
Quote:
However, my GX2 is not folding anymore. It'll be out of the rig soon, just produced wayyyy tooo much heat everything else wanted to catch fire when the GX2 was folding!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10481 | |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,793 (7.86/day)
Thanks: 8,305
Thanked 9,487 Times in 4,321 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() A GTX470 would be nice, lower power usage & better PPD ![]() ![]() Or even a GTX460 W/ my 9600GT & GTX260 folding and the OCed i7 crunching, my rig draws ~425w ![]() Makes it very hot in here
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10482 | |
|
WCG Team Captain
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 23,926 (11.78/day)
Thanks: 15,179
Thanked 12,324 Times in 7,786 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10483 |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,793 (7.86/day)
Thanks: 8,305
Thanked 9,487 Times in 4,321 Posts
|
What sort of 8800?
A 3rd real rig is a dream for me, as is I'm contemplating a 2nd (mostly for crunching). What do you think I should do? Get a cheap P55 board, an i3 530, and a cheap PSU, steal 1GB from my i7 and set up that? Or (what I'm leaning towards), an i3 or an AII X4 45w, an ITX case, and then a H55/880G board? The ITX setup would be a bit more expensive and couldn't OC, but would use less power, be smaller, and hopefully then it could be on more. Or just build a DP Sossaman rig. They're about $200, do ~1.3k (BOINC) and use under 100w. But they're big (EATX boards) ![]() Or maybe just try and get more @ NCSU crunching, they're free and I don't have to worry about electric
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10484 | |
|
WCG Team Captain
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 23,926 (11.78/day)
Thanks: 15,179
Thanked 12,324 Times in 7,786 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10485 |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,793 (7.86/day)
Thanks: 8,305
Thanked 9,487 Times in 4,321 Posts
|
But I want a 2nd rig, preferably low-power and small
![]() Of the options for a 2nd rig, what do you think is best?
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10486 | |
|
F@H&WCG addict
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Newark ohio
Posts: 9,916 (4.43/day)
Thanks: 3,158
Thanked 2,215 Times in 1,685 Posts
|
Quote:
I don't understand why he would do that but i'm sure there has to be a reason for it ![]() as for the 2nd rig. I would go with the i3 just because they can overclock like mad or undervolt if needed. The 45w x4 would most likely be at its limit for undervolting.
__________________
![]() crunching for TPU on 30 CPU Threads + 688 Cuda cores More to come Last edited by p_o_s_pc; Sep 30, 2010 at 11:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10487 |
|
WCG Team Captain
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 23,926 (11.78/day)
Thanks: 15,179
Thanked 12,324 Times in 7,786 Posts
|
I think an i3 or the AII X4 in a ITX case will better suit what you are looking for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10488 |
|
F@H&WCG addict
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Newark ohio
Posts: 9,916 (4.43/day)
Thanks: 3,158
Thanked 2,215 Times in 1,685 Posts
|
i got to ask... Is a Intel Dual core Atom even worth it for crunching?
I was thinking about getting a tiny case and a Atom along with 2 lappy HDD's and having that as a small low power file server (and maybe a FEAR server when i have friends over that want to play)
__________________
![]() crunching for TPU on 30 CPU Threads + 688 Cuda cores More to come |
|
|
|
|
|
#10489 | ||
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,793 (7.86/day)
Thanks: 8,305
Thanked 9,487 Times in 4,321 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() I'm also leaning towards the i3, I figure I should be able to OC a bit, even in an ITX setup (probably going to go for one of the larger ITX cases). I'd like to have room for a GTS450/GTX460 as well (small gaming setup to take with me) Quote:
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to [Ion] For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#10490 |
|
habe fidem
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 6,668 (4.41/day)
Thanks: 2,320
Thanked 3,219 Times in 1,937 Posts
|
Atom for WCG? I want to say no, install BOINC then run the benchmark and see what numbers it gives you. I don't remember the exact figure, but when I had WCG setup on my CULV it was pretty bad
Let me know what numbers you get if you decide to try it out though
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to theonedub For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#10491 | |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,793 (7.86/day)
Thanks: 8,305
Thanked 9,487 Times in 4,321 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10492 | |
|
F@H&WCG addict
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Newark ohio
Posts: 9,916 (4.43/day)
Thanks: 3,158
Thanked 2,215 Times in 1,685 Posts
|
Quote:
thanks for the input. as for power draw i'm sure that a sempron 140 undervolted wouldn't be alot more then a overclocked Atom
__________________
![]() crunching for TPU on 30 CPU Threads + 688 Cuda cores More to come |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10493 | |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,793 (7.86/day)
Thanks: 8,305
Thanked 9,487 Times in 4,321 Posts
|
Quote:
Atom isn't worth it IMO, I considered an ION for my (hopefully upcoming) ITX setup, but the Celeron E3200/Geforce 9300 was ~$20 more, so I decided that I'd pass on Atom
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to [Ion] For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#10494 |
|
habe fidem
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 6,668 (4.41/day)
Thanks: 2,320
Thanked 3,219 Times in 1,937 Posts
|
I like the Sempron option better. I am very impressed with the Sempron 140 I built a little while ago. A very high success rate when unlocking also sweetens the deal.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to theonedub For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#10495 |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,793 (7.86/day)
Thanks: 8,305
Thanked 9,487 Times in 4,321 Posts
|
Unlocking is a risky game I wouldn't play (considering the price of a real dual). IMO, for a low power setup, an AII X2 45w is probably the best for the $, unless you want to spring for an i3
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10496 |
|
F@H&WCG addict
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Newark ohio
Posts: 9,916 (4.43/day)
Thanks: 3,158
Thanked 2,215 Times in 1,685 Posts
|
thanks for the input.
I'm just looking at really cheap(to build and to run) options for a file server/cruncher sometime in the future. If i went with a Semperon (or even dual core celly) i could then get a M-atx board and have a PCI-E slot for later on and more flexibility for case/PSU options.
__________________
![]() crunching for TPU on 30 CPU Threads + 688 Cuda cores More to come |
|
|
|
|
|
#10497 |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,793 (7.86/day)
Thanks: 8,305
Thanked 9,487 Times in 4,321 Posts
|
That sounds good
![]() An X2 and cheap AM2+/AM3 board should be under $150...about as much as an ION ITX board...and far faster ![]() Not a hard choice, unless you want ITX (and I do)
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10498 |
|
habe fidem
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 6,668 (4.41/day)
Thanks: 2,320
Thanked 3,219 Times in 1,937 Posts
|
Frys used to run a deal on Sempron 140s: CPU and archaic mATX Nforce board for $26.99. Almost every other week they would sell it. Thats where I got my 140 from, but they have not run the deal since.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10499 | |
|
F@H&WCG addict
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Newark ohio
Posts: 9,916 (4.43/day)
Thanks: 3,158
Thanked 2,215 Times in 1,685 Posts
|
Quote:
goals of the project would be cheap low power draw low heat decent cruncher decent speed (nothing super fast or slow) silent(couple low speed fans should cool something like i have planed just fine) i think the goals could be met with a undervolted Aii x2 or undervolted Sempron 140 ![]() @onedub wow that is cheap!
__________________
![]() crunching for TPU on 30 CPU Threads + 688 Cuda cores More to come |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10500 | |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,793 (7.86/day)
Thanks: 8,305
Thanked 9,487 Times in 4,321 Posts
|
Quote:
My A05S is about the size of many mATX cases, hence why I want ITX (mATX isn't much smaller) MC and Frys frequently have great deals, if they exist in your area
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TPU's F@H Team | W2hCYK | Folding@Home | 16586 | Jun 14, 2013 07:23 PM |
| Team launches Triple Channel Xtreem DDR3, Triple Bandwidth, X-Triple Speed | btarunr | News | 4 | Dec 8, 2008 06:55 AM |
| Team Launches Brand New Elite DDR3 Series | alexp999 | News | 4 | Nov 1, 2008 07:48 PM |
| Team Fortress 2 Goldrush Update out! | wiak | Games | 9 | May 23, 2008 06:48 PM |
| Team Fortress 2 Megathread! | ktr | Games | 16 | Jan 11, 2008 01:28 AM |