NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Full Specs and Release Date

boredgunner · Oct 31, 2010, 02:19 AM

Quote:

The GTX 580 is NVIDIA's next flagship GPU. Being a single card utilizing their new GF110 chipset, the GTX 580 looks to be a very impressive product. Full specifications and release date have been revealed!

More

char[] rager · Oct 31, 2010, 02:25 AM

Well, I am glad I waited to November to purchase my next video card. It will either be a 69xx or a GTX 580.

LAN_deRf_HA · Oct 31, 2010, 02:27 AM

I don't get where this performance increase is coming from. There already was a one off 512 version of the 480 reviewed, it only performed 5% better and used insanely more power. A small clock bump shouldn't be adding another 20% improvement.

char[] rager · Oct 31, 2010, 02:29 AM

Quote:

The GTX 580 is the replacement for the current GTX 480, which did very well in our review. With the GTX 580, NVIDIA hopes to not only improve performance but also improve efficiency, making this card run cooler and use less power! The specifications for the GTX 580 are as follows.

The GTX 580 uses the GF110 chipset, which is a reworked GTX 480.

I am assuming it is like a car. They rework their base engines to increase the horsepower for other variants of the same car.

KainXS · Oct 31, 2010, 03:01 AM

so they reworked the GF100 based on what they learned from the GF104 so this card should use less power but I'm going to hold my breath on this, the GF104 isn't that much faster than the GF100 like most people say it is, more than a solution for lowering the power requirements and increase clock speeds but at the same clock as a similar GF100 part it always loses.

i wanna see how it compares to a GTX480 at the same clock.

erocker · Oct 31, 2010, 03:06 AM

Seems to be a re-worked memory contoller and better/more expensive power delivery stuff. 10 - 15% performance gains sounds fairly legit.

boredgunner · Oct 31, 2010, 03:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KainXS

so they reworked the GF100 based on what they learned from the GF104 so this card should use less power but I'm going to hold my breath on this, the GF104 isn't that much faster than the GF100 like most people say it is, more than a solution for lowering the power requirements and increase clock speeds but at the same clock as a similar GF100 part it always loses.

i wanna see how it compares to a GTX480 at the same clock.

GF104 isn't faster, unless you're referring specifically to clock speeds. It's not an enthusiast chipset like GF100. If you had a GTX 480 running at those speeds, you'd have a 46.320 billion/sec texture fill rate vs the 580's 49.4 billion/sec. You'd also have the same pixel fill rate and same memory bandwidth. GTX 580 is just a refresh so not much more powerful, but it is supposed to have fixed some of the thermal design issues with the GTX 480 which turned off lots of customers. If you have a GTX 480 don't bother with this card.

3volvedcombat · Oct 31, 2010, 03:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boredgunner

GF104 isn't faster, unless you're referring specifically to clock speeds. It's not an enthusiast chipset like GF100. If you had a GTX 480 running at those speeds, you'd have a 46.320 billion/sec texture fill rate vs the 580's 49.4 billion/sec. You'd also have the same pixel fill rate and same memory bandwidth. GTX 580 is just a refresh so not much more powerful, but it is supposed to have fixed some of the thermal design issues with the GTX 480 which turned off lots of customers. If you have a GTX 480 don't bother with this card.

What I hate. Is how dam fast ATI and Nvidia are really moving threw the video cards.

ATI HD 5000 series cards have barly hit the age of 1 year

and Nvidia GTX 400 series cards are still under 10 months sense release.

ATI's HD 5000 series just barly settled in the mind of the not so informed gamers.

and theres a GTX 500 series already falling down the block

and HD 6000 series just came out of no were ALREADY,

To many video cards are coming out.

and in return, its barly for a 20% performance increase, so its bullshit, but it is better.

MxPhenom 216 · Oct 31, 2010, 03:35 AM

wow. I wanted 128TMUs! DAMN you nvidia

My eyes got real

(big) when i read that 30% increase in vantage

Nice to know they reworked the memory controller and got it to run more efficient. Looks like a winner on nvidia's hands if its not priced over $450

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3volvedcombat

What I hate. Is how dam fast ATI and Nvidia are really moving threw the video cards.

ATI HD 5000 series cards have barly hit the age of 1 year

and Nvidia GTX 400 series cards are still under 10 months sense release.

ATI's HD 5000 series just barly settled in the mind of the not so informed gamers.

and theres a GTX 500 series already falling down the block

and HD 6000 series just came out of no were ALREADY,

To many video cards are coming out.

and in return, its barly for a 20% performance increase, so its bullshit, but it is better.

I wouldn't say barely 20% increase. id say without a doubt 20% increase and could be more. Come on reviews!

AltecV1 · Oct 31, 2010, 03:45 AM

a little bit reading material
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/10/...h-gtx580-week/

MxPhenom 216 · Oct 31, 2010, 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AltecV1

a little bit reading material
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/10/...h-gtx580-week/

semiaccurate is a terrible source, but okay

They are just as bad as Fudzilla

God what a terrible read. Extremely Bias. they are all Ati fanboys just rippin apart nvidia

AltecV1 · Oct 31, 2010, 03:52 AM

one thing i dont get is why are they naming it 580 its not a new series its just a bug fixed 480 and should be named 485 what seems proper.

MxPhenom 216 · Oct 31, 2010, 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AltecV1

one thing i dont get is why are they naming it 580 its not a new series its just a bug fixed 480 and should be named 485 what seems proper.

its nvida though. you know them and their naming

Delta6326 · Oct 31, 2010, 03:57 AM

only 20% faster would have expected them to try for more

MxPhenom 216 · Oct 31, 2010, 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delta6326

only 20% faster would have expected them to try for more

they noticed 30% more in vantage. and overclocking could be insane on this thing

Delta6326 · Oct 31, 2010, 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nvidiaintelftw

they noticed 30% more in vantage. and overclocking could be insane on this thing

well vantage is just a benchmark but that is true the oc could be crazy

20mmrain · Oct 31, 2010, 04:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nvidiaintelftw

semiaccurate is a terrible source, but okay

They are just as bad as Fudzilla

God what a terrible read. Extremely Bias. they are all Ati fanboys just rippin apart nvidia

While I would normally agree with you on both of those statements..... Semi accurate has been fairly accurate as of late.

When the 5000 series released they were correct on specs and performance. When the GTX 400 series released they were also correct on it's performance and it's downside.

When the GTX 460 released they did praise the card saying it was great also they were correct on the performance on the GF104 too.

So far they have been correct on the 6000 series as well.

While I do agree their views at semi accurate are very on sided....I will also say that if you look past that part they have had their information correct as of late.

MxPhenom 216 · Oct 31, 2010, 04:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 20mmrain

While I would normally agree with you on both of those statements..... Semi accurate has been fairly accurate as of late.

When the 5000 series released they were correct on specs and performance. When the GTX 400 series released they were also correct on it's performance and it's downside.

When the GTX 460 released they did praise the card saying it was great also they were correct on the performance on the GF104 too.

So far they have been correct on the 6000 series as well.

While I do agree their views at semi accurate are very on sided....I will also say that if you look past that part they have had their information correct as of late.

It just sounds like their articles are written by like 5 year olds

20mmrain · Oct 31, 2010, 05:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nvidiaintelftw

It just sounds like their articles are written by like 5 year olds

No I agree it does sound like..........."My card is beter then your card nan r nan r Boo Boo"

Agreed

Rado D · Oct 31, 2010, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3volvedcombat

What I hate. Is how dam fast ATI and Nvidia are really moving threw the video cards.

ATI HD 5000 series cards have barly hit the age of 1 year

and Nvidia GTX 400 series cards are still under 10 months sense release.

ATI's HD 5000 series just barly settled in the mind of the not so informed gamers.

and theres a GTX 500 series already falling down the block

and HD 6000 series just came out of no were ALREADY,

To many video cards are coming out.

and in return, its barly for a 20% performance increase, so its bullshit, but it is better.

I totally agree with you on this.I had the GTX 470 soon after the release,but I wanted better performance,so I waited until the GTX 480 drops on price and got that one.And believe me or not,or at least my experience was like that it wasnt true that the GTX470 has better thermal performance than GTX480.so Im quite happy with mine...and now there is a GTX580 coming so soon?this product update policy is made to make those who like to have top performace,feel that they've just lost it...I mean why they just dont fine tune every product in every aspect?everybody would be happy to wait longer for a new line of product if the actual would be as good as possible.And to be honest both the red and the green team are in the terms of new technologies and functions not pulling out much.how could they right?in such a short time..

Rado D · Oct 31, 2010, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nvidiaintelftw

semiaccurate is a terrible source, but okay

They are just as bad as Fudzilla

God what a terrible read. Extremely Bias. they are all Ati fanboys just rippin apart nvidia

Quote from that article: "..Heck, it won't be enough to beat the current champ, AMD's HD5970/Hemlock, much less the upcoming Cayman and Antilles parts. Is is going to be a slaughter.."
when people stop writing this bullshit??? Im not an NVIDIA fanboy,used ATI before..but for godshake the HD5970 is a godamn DUAL gpu,If Im right based on 2 5870's..If there would be a similar setup from NVIDIA..man that would be a (ATI)slaughter...

Red_Machine · Oct 31, 2010, 12:15 PM

Holy shit, that's going to be released in just over a week! If nVidia can pull that off, it just might save them.

crow1001 · Oct 31, 2010, 12:19 PM

I would take any Nvidia card over an AMD card currently, even if the AMD card was slightly faster. Like say if the 6970 is 10% quicker than a 580, I would go 580. From my experience coming from a 5870 to a 480, Nvidia drivers are more stable, latest games are better supported on Nvidia hardware, the CP is 100x better than the CCC, power management sucks on AMD cards, with Nvidia at least you have an option to configure whether you want power management active in games or not. Overall AMD has decent hardware but IMO they are let down by poor drivers and software when compared to Nvidia, that is enough reason to take an Nvidia card over AMD even if it's slower.

Red_Machine · Oct 31, 2010, 12:21 PM

Do we have an MRRP yet?

Rado D · Oct 31, 2010, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crow1001

I would take any Nvidia card over an AMD card currently, even if the AMD card was slightly faster. Like say if the 6970 is 10% quicker than a 580, I would go 580. From my experience coming from a 5870 to a 480, Nvidia drivers are more stable, latest games are better supported on Nvidia hardware, the CP is 100x better than the CCC, power management sucks on AMD cards, with Nvidia at least you have an option to configure whether you want power management active in games or not. Overall AMD has decent hardware but IMO they are let down by poor drivers and software when compared to Nvidia, that is enough reason to take an Nvidia card over AMD even if it's slower.

By the way congrats on your GTX480 core speed.mine is showing artifacts over 810 core,so Im just keeping it at 800 perfectly stable..but maybe its because Im too high on shaders or/and memory...what are yours?

System Name:	The Monolith
Processor:	Intel Core i5 760 @ 4.2 GHz
Motherboard:	EVGA P55 FTW
Memory:	Mushkin Enhanced Radioactive 8GB DDR3 1600 CL9
Video Card:	EVGA GeForce GTX 680 FTW LE
Hard Disk:	Intel 330 Series 180GB + WD Caviar 320GB
Optical Drive:	ASUS DRW-24B1ST SATA
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell ST2310
Case:	Raidmax RAPTOR
Sound Card:	Cooler Master Storm Sirus Headset
PSU:	Antec TruePower New 750W
Software:	Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Benchmarks:	3DMark 11: P9808 SuperPI 32M: 9m 09s

Oct 31, 2010, 02:25 AM	#2
char[] rager Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Computer Science Student Posts: 270 (0.25/day) Thanks: 133 Thanked 26 Times in 24 Posts System Specs	Well, I am glad I waited to November to purchase my next video card. It will either be a 69xx or a GTX 580. __________________ Code: unsigned whatYouAreThinking = getch(); cout << "Did I Help You?" << endl; if(whatYouAreThinking == 'y') cout << "Press Thanks" << endl; else if(whatYouAreThinking == 'n') cout << "Thanks For Reading My Post" << endl; else cout << "Think Again ;)" << endl;

System Name:	Obsidianight
Processor:	Intel Core i7 950 @ ~ 4 GHz
Motherboard:	Asus P6T Deluxe
Cooling:	Custom Liquid Cooling
Memory:	6GB (3 x 2GB) Corsair XMS3 DDR3 Triple-Channel @ ~ 1.6 GHz (9-9-9-24-1T)
Video Card:	Zotac AMP! GTX 580 @ 900 MHz Core / 1025 MHz Memory / 1800 MHz Shader
Hard Disk:	180 GB OCZ Vertex 2 SSD
Optical Drive:	Asus Reader Drive And Asus Writer Drive
CRT/LCD Model:	Sceptre 24 Inch (1920 x 1200) 2 MS Response
Case:	Corsair Obsidian 800D
Sound Card:	Onboard
PSU:	1 kW Antec TruePower Quattro
Software:	Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit / Linux Mint 9 And Fedora 13 KDE Through VirtualBox

System Name:	Obelisc
Processor:	i7 2600k @ 4.5 GHz
Motherboard:	Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling:	H110
Memory:	16GB(4x8) @ 2133 MHz 9-11-10-28 2T
Video Card:	Galaxy GTX 660 Ti GC 3GB SLI
Hard Disk:	M4 256GB, 2x 3TB Seagate XT
Optical Drive:	Samsung 12x Bluray
CRT/LCD Model:	Crossover 27Q
Case:	Corsair 550D
Sound Card:	X-Fi Titanium HD with HD598
PSU:	Kingwin LZP-550
Software:	Win7 64bit SP1

System Name:	Obsidianight
Processor:	Intel Core i7 950 @ ~ 4 GHz
Motherboard:	Asus P6T Deluxe
Cooling:	Custom Liquid Cooling
Memory:	6GB (3 x 2GB) Corsair XMS3 DDR3 Triple-Channel @ ~ 1.6 GHz (9-9-9-24-1T)
Video Card:	Zotac AMP! GTX 580 @ 900 MHz Core / 1025 MHz Memory / 1800 MHz Shader
Hard Disk:	180 GB OCZ Vertex 2 SSD
Optical Drive:	Asus Reader Drive And Asus Writer Drive
CRT/LCD Model:	Sceptre 24 Inch (1920 x 1200) 2 MS Response
Case:	Corsair Obsidian 800D
Sound Card:	Onboard
PSU:	1 kW Antec TruePower Quattro
Software:	Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit / Linux Mint 9 And Fedora 13 KDE Through VirtualBox

Oct 31, 2010, 02:27 AM	#3
LAN_deRf_HA Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 4,024 (2.14/day) Thanks: 290 Thanked 831 Times in 588 Posts System Specs	I don't get where this performance increase is coming from. There already was a one off 512 version of the 480 reviewed, it only performed 5% better and used insanely more power. A small clock bump shouldn't be adding another 20% improvement.

Oct 31, 2010, 03:01 AM	#5
KainXS Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 4,694 (2.27/day) Thanks: 184 Thanked 465 Times in 382 Posts System Specs	so they reworked the GF100 based on what they learned from the GF104 so this card should use less power but I'm going to hold my breath on this, the GF104 isn't that much faster than the GF100 like most people say it is, more than a solution for lowering the power requirements and increase clock speeds but at the same clock as a similar GF100 part it always loses. i wanna see how it compares to a GTX480 at the same clock. Last edited by KainXS; Oct 31, 2010 at 03:11 AM.

System Name:	GhetO.O
Processor:	Core2Quad Q8400@4.1Ghz/2500K
Motherboard:	MSI P35 Neo 2 FR/Sabertooth
Cooling:	GEMINII+2 120MM fans/Corsair
Memory:	8GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2 1066/16GB Crucial Ballistix
Video Card:	ASUS GTX460 SliFire/GTX680 SLI
Hard Disk:	1TB Spinpoint/2 SSD + 1 500GB WD
Optical Drive:	Lite On DVD+DL/None
CRT/LCD Model:	Acer 22 inch/ IPS Asus 26inch
Case:	Antec 300/CM HAF
Sound Card:	Xonar Essence
PSU:	Thermaltake 600
Software:	Windows 7

Oct 31, 2010, 03:06 AM	#6
erocker Senior Moderator Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Milwaukee, WI. Posts: 31,944 (12.77/day) Thanks: 2,793 Thanked 12,309 Times in 7,827 Posts System Specs	Seems to be a re-worked memory contoller and better/more expensive power delivery stuff. 10 - 15% performance gains sounds fairly legit.

Processor:	Intel i7 3770K @ 4.6ghz 1.256v
Motherboard:	Asus Maximus V Formula
Cooling:	Water
Memory:	2x4gb Patriot Viper 2133mhz 10-11-10-25 2T 1.55v
Video Card:	Sapphire HD 7970 1125/1575 1.14v
Hard Disk:	Crucial M4 128Gb / Corsair Force 3 120Gb / Samsung 240Gb / 2Tb Seagate
Optical Drive:	None
CRT/LCD Model:	Acheiva Shimian 27" IPS 2560x1440
Case:	Corsair 500R White
Sound Card:	Onboard
PSU:	NZXT Hale90 1Kw
Software:	Windows 8 x64

System Name:	My Computer
Processor:	Core 2 Q9550 4Ghz 1.23volts
Motherboard:	Gigabyte
Cooling:	Corsair
Memory:	OCZ
Video Card:	Galaxy
Hard Disk:	Western Digital
Optical Drive:	HP
CRT/LCD Model:	Acer
Case:	Lian li
Sound Card:	Asus
PSU:	Corsiar
Software:	Microsoft
Benchmarks:	25,000 3dmark06 at 4.35Ghz processor, 835core card!

System Name:	My System
Processor:	Intel Core i5 2500k @ 4.5GHZ 1.36v
Motherboard:	AsRock Extreme4 Gen3 P67
Cooling:	Prolimatech Megahalem w/ Push/Pull Corsair SP120s and H2O GPU
Memory:	Corsair Dominator Plats 8GB 4GBx2 2133mhz 1.5v
Video Card:	.........................................................
Hard Disk:	Samsung 830 128GB SSD, Corsair Neutron 240GB, Samsung F3 500GB
Optical Drive:	Asus 24x SATA DVD
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell U2412M IPS 24" 1920 x 1200
Case:	Corsair Carbide Series 500r w/ 2x Corsair AF120 fans
Sound Card:	HT Omega Striker 7.1
PSU:	Corsair HX850 Gen1 Silver
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1
Benchmarks:	P33304 Vantage

Oct 31, 2010, 03:45 AM	#10
AltecV1 Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Republic of Estonia Posts: 1,248 (0.78/day) Thanks: 158 Thanked 175 Times in 144 Posts System Specs	a little bit reading material http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/10/...h-gtx580-week/

Processor:	C2D E8400@3.6 ghz
Motherboard:	ASUS P5KPL-AM
Cooling:	Freezer 7 pro
Memory:	Kingston 4GB 800Mhz cl6
Video Card:	Sapphire HD4850 700/1000 + Accelero S1 Rev. 2
Hard Disk:	WD 250 GB AAKS
Optical Drive:	broken samsung
CRT/LCD Model:	22" Samsung SyncMaster 226BW
Sound Card:	int.
PSU:	Forton Blue Storm II 500W
Software:	Windows 7 64bit Ultimate

Oct 31, 2010, 03:52 AM	#12
AltecV1 Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Republic of Estonia Posts: 1,248 (0.78/day) Thanks: 158 Thanked 175 Times in 144 Posts System Specs	one thing i dont get is why are they naming it 580 its not a new series its just a bug fixed 480 and should be named 485 what seems proper.

Oct 31, 2010, 03:57 AM	#14
Delta6326 Join Date: May 2008 Location: Iowa, USA Posts: 3,290 (1.80/day) Thanks: 558 Thanked 600 Times in 438 Posts System Specs	only 20% faster would have expected them to try for more __________________ Diablo III- Delta6326#1894 TechPowerUp WCG Forum Skyrim Skill Perks By Delta6326

System Name:	THE CUBE
Processor:	Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield V1.28
Motherboard:	ASUS P5Q Pro Bios 2102
Cooling:	XIGMATEK S1283 w/crossbow(120mm x4 Left, Back, Back, HSF)
Memory:	Mushkin Blackline 4GB (2 x 2GB) 800Mhz @ 1Ghz 5-5-5-15
Video Card:	2x SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 4850 1GB.
Hard Disk:	WD Black 500GB/WD EXT 2TB/ Toshiba 250GB Test Drive
Optical Drive:	SAMSUNG 22X DVD Burner
CRT/LCD Model:	ASUS VH226H 1080p Black 21.5" 2ms LCD
Case:	"THE CUBE" Custom built pure Red Alder wood
Sound Card:	Onboard/ Logitech Z-2300 200 watts 2.1
PSU:	XION AXP Lan-Party AMP Edition 146A 800W
Software:	Windows 8 Pro x64

System Name:	My Gaming System
Processor:	Intel i7 3930K @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard:	Asus X79Pro
Cooling:	Custom Full System Water cooling Loop
Memory:	G.Skill 1866 Mhz Sniper 16 Gb
Video Card:	EVGA GTX Titan
Hard Disk:	2x Intel X25 SSD 80GB 2x Western Digital 500GB Black Caviar 1x Seagate 500Gb 2.5 Storage drive
Optical Drive:	Samsung External CDD DVD Burner USB 3.0
CRT/LCD Model:	ASUS W246H - 24" - widescreen TFT active matrix LCD
Case:	Fractal Arc Midi R2
PSU:	XFX Pro Modular 1050 Watt PSU
Software:	Windows 8 Home Primeum

Processor:	Core i7 950 @ 4.025GHz 1.3125V
Motherboard:	Asus Rampage III Extreme
Cooling:	Corsair H70
Memory:	G.SKill PI Silver Edition 6GB Kit 1600MHz 3- Channel (@1403MHz 7-7-7-20)
Video Card:	MSI GTX 480 835 Core/1670 Shader/1900 Memory
Hard Disk:	Primary: Velociraptor 300GB,Secondary:Caviar Black 500GB,External:WD Elements 500GB ,SG 300GB
Optical Drive:	Generic Samsung Multi DVD drive
CRT/LCD Model:	LG W2261VP 22" full HD LCD @ 1920 x 1080 via HDMI
Case:	HAF 932 default fan setup + 120mm Akasa Apache + 2 x 120mm Noctua NF-P12 Vortex
Sound Card:	On Board 7.1
PSU:	Hiper 880W
Software:	Windows 7 Home Premium x64
Benchmarks:	3dMark Vantage GPU:21754 / CPU:66169 / Total:P26141 3dMark11 P5857

Oct 31, 2010, 12:15 PM	#22
Red_Machine Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Marlow, ENGLAND Posts: 1,454 (1.51/day) Thanks: 149 Thanked 279 Times in 226 Posts System Specs	Holy shit, that's going to be released in just over a week! If nVidia can pull that off, it just might save them. __________________ Alienware M11x R1 Netbook: 1.3GHz Core2 Duo U7300 (OC'd to 1.7GHz) \| 8GB Corsair DDR3 1333MHz \| nVIDIA GeForce GT 335M 1GB/Intel GMA 4500MHD Hyrbid Graphics System \| Western Digital Scorpio Black 500GB \| Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit Microsoft Certified Desktop Support Technician \| CompTIA A+ Certified Heatware

System Name:	Chachamaru-III
Processor:	Intel Core i7 3770K (OC'd to 4.5GHz)
Motherboard:	BIOSTAR TZ77XE4 (Intel Z77 Chipset)
Cooling:	Thermaltake CLW0217 Water 2.0 Extreme, case fully populated
Memory:	16GB G.Skill Ares 1600MHz (2x8GB) [10 10-10-10]
Video Card:	Palit GeForce GTX 580 1.5GB
Hard Disk:	128GB Samsung 830 (OS), Seagate Barracuda 3TB RAID1 Array (Storage), Seagate Barracuda 750GB (Steam)
Optical Drive:	LG GGW-H20L DVD±RW/BD-RW/HD DVD-ROM Drive
CRT/LCD Model:	DGM L-2231WD 22" @ 1680x1050, Toshiba Regza 32" @ 1920x1080 & Dell 1708fp 17" @ 1280x1024
Case:	Coolermaster HAF 922
Sound Card:	Creative SoundBlaster X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Alienware Edition
PSU:	Silverstone Olympia SST-OP1000 1kW
Software:	Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64-bit

Oct 31, 2010, 12:19 PM	#23
crow1001 Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 361 (0.16/day) Thanks: 9 Thanked 29 Times in 20 Posts System Specs	I would take any Nvidia card over an AMD card currently, even if the AMD card was slightly faster. Like say if the 6970 is 10% quicker than a 580, I would go 580. From my experience coming from a 5870 to a 480, Nvidia drivers are more stable, latest games are better supported on Nvidia hardware, the CP is 100x better than the CCC, power management sucks on AMD cards, with Nvidia at least you have an option to configure whether you want power management active in games or not. Overall AMD has decent hardware but IMO they are let down by poor drivers and software when compared to Nvidia, that is enough reason to take an Nvidia card over AMD even if it's slower.

Processor:	i5 2500k @4.7Ghz
Motherboard:	ASUS P8Z68-V
Cooling:	Noctua se2 u12p
Memory:	8GB CORSAIR 1600Mhz
Video Card:	EVGA GTX 480 850 core
Hard Disk:	CORSAIR P64GB SSD SAMSUNG 1TB
Optical Drive:	LG DVD/RW
CRT/LCD Model:	NEC 20WGX2
Case:	Lian Li PC-60FW
Sound Card:	Asus Xonar D2X
PSU:	CORSAIR HX750W
Software:	WINDOWS 7 64

Oct 31, 2010, 12:21 PM	#24
Red_Machine Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Marlow, ENGLAND Posts: 1,454 (1.51/day) Thanks: 149 Thanked 279 Times in 226 Posts System Specs	Do we have an MRRP yet? __________________ Alienware M11x R1 Netbook: 1.3GHz Core2 Duo U7300 (OC'd to 1.7GHz) \| 8GB Corsair DDR3 1333MHz \| nVIDIA GeForce GT 335M 1GB/Intel GMA 4500MHD Hyrbid Graphics System \| Western Digital Scorpio Black 500GB \| Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit Microsoft Certified Desktop Support Technician \| CompTIA A+ Certified Heatware

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Reference Design Graphics Card Pictured	btarunr	News	213	Nov 9, 2010 12:02 AM
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 Specs and Launch Date Leaked	r9	NVIDIA	5	Jun 3, 2010 06:51 AM
Shattered Horizon Gets Release Date and Specs.	TheMailMan78	Games	37	Nov 13, 2009 12:36 AM
Diablo 3 System Specs and Release Date?	Castiel	Games	42	Mar 11, 2009 08:47 PM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX Card Specs and Pictures	malware	News	51	Feb 27, 2008 01:44 PM