![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Portsmouth,UK
Posts: 370 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 46 Times in 41 Posts
|
Is SATA 6Gb backward compatible with SATA 3Gb?
Simple as it is question.After research Im pretty much sure about positive answer,but wanted to ask you guys too...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Semi-Retired Folder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,748 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts
|
Yes.
__________________
Rig1: System Specs. Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5 Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Portsmouth,UK
Posts: 370 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 46 Times in 41 Posts
|
Thanks..after I started the thread,on the bottom of the page another exactly same thread showed up..So moderators feel free to delete mine.I honestly was looking for it,but didnt spot it in the endless sea of threads
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London, England, UK
Posts: 246 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
|
It is compatible, although it would work like this:
SATA III Device/ Cable into SATA II Port: The connection would be running at the fastest speed of the port which would be SATA II Speed which would be a speed decrease.Of course for ultimate speed it would be using a SATA III Device/ Cable that is connected into a SATA III Port. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Semi-Retired Folder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,748 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts
|
Quote:
It works at the lowest common denominator. So SATA II device connected to a SATA III port will run at SATA II speed, there will be no speed increase. Not that it really matters because SATA II devices don't actually use all of the bandwidth available to them with SATA II anyway, except for maybe a few very high end SSDs. But most mechanical drives barely max out SATA I.
__________________
Rig1: System Specs. Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5 Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vermont
Posts: 2,636 (1.75/day)
Thanks: 196
Thanked 405 Times in 363 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
hmmmm cant have cpu-z or hwbot anymore me is sad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Semi-Retired Folder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,748 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts
|
Yeah, and I always shake my head when I see a mechanical SATA 6.0Gbp/s drive. Because it is a total marketting gimmick. Even the fastest consumer level mechanical drive doesn't top 150MB/s transfer speeds.
__________________
Rig1: System Specs. Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5 Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London, England, UK
Posts: 246 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
|
Thanks you people for correcting that misconception of mine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,766 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,215 Times in 3,159 Posts
|
you also dont need any special cables for sata 6 gb/s. the specification recommends "good" cables because of the high data rate. any cheap cable should be able to handle that, but some companies try to make extra money off consumers by marketing cables as sata 6 gb/s
|
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#10 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Portsmouth,UK
Posts: 370 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 46 Times in 41 Posts
|
Quote:
Im so excited guys,Im making some upgrades to my system.Selling my Asus P6T Deluxe along with i7 920 and instead getting the mighty ROG Rampage III Extreme with i7 950..also you could give a bit of a help to decide wether to change the Noctua NH-U12P SE for H70( my girl is willing to buy it for me for Xmas ![]() The thing is,the Noctua (even with i7 920) above 3.2GHz simply is not giving satisfying results and Prime 95 is murdering it...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 8,304 (5.22/day)
Thanks: 1,205
Thanked 1,420 Times in 1,153 Posts
|
Quote:
It was back when SATA III was brand spanking new though, so I forgive myself
__________________
My Heatware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Doctor Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,553 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts
|
i edited the title to say Gb instead of GB, it annoys me when people mess that up.
__________________
![]() Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United! |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Mussels For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#13 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cooloongup, Western Australia
Posts: 315 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 57 Times in 42 Posts
|
Computers used to more or less tend to run as fast overall as the slowest component (hence the term bottleneck). Not so much these days, but depending on how a system is bottlenecked it can determine if one specific thing is going to drag down the rest of the system. Regarding SATA standards, this is one of the things besides as mentioned the exception of a few select high end SSD's that doesn't really matter. Also short answer, yes, SATA 2 is backwards compatible with SATA 3 and vice versa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Portsmouth,UK
Posts: 370 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 46 Times in 41 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is sata 3 backwards compatible with sata 2 | Achilles1600 | General Hardware | 27 | May 31, 2011 05:26 PM |
| SATA 6Gb/s and the SATA Revision 3.0 Specification | 95Viper | Storage | 1 | Apr 5, 2010 06:51 PM |
| ? on sata 2 and sata 1 are they compatible? | Achilles1600 | General Hardware | 5 | Jul 5, 2009 08:41 AM |
| Is SATA 3.0 backward compatable? | Slater | Storage | 4 | Aug 1, 2008 08:42 PM |
| sata laptop hdd compatible with sata from pc's? | pt | General Hardware | 3 | Jan 25, 2008 08:26 PM |