techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 26, 2010, 05:43 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Hitachi and Partners Develop New HDD Technology Providing 8-Fold Density Increase

A consortium led by Hitachi, including Japan's New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), a public-sector body that promotes research of energy-efficient technologies, National University Corporation Tokyo Institute of Technology, and Kyoto University, have developed a new hard drive data recording technology that promises to increase data density 8-fold.

The researchers have developed a new patterning technology for the magnetized bits that are laid on the platters, which are just 10 nm in size. This is made possible by using new materials, and making use of a self-arranged phenomenon of polymer materials. Its practical applications increases areal-density of disk platters to 3.9 Terabits per square inch, an 8-fold increase compared to the 500 Gigabits per square inch that's currently standard. This paves the way for 24 Terabyte (TB) hard drives in the very near future.



Source: CDRInfo
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 26, 2010, 05:49 AM   #2
filip007
75 Posts
 
filip007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 151 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts

System Specs

Great when?, i just want speed, durability and no noise.
filip007 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 05:53 AM   #3
TheLaughingMan
3500 Posts
 
TheLaughingMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Douglasville, GA USA
Posts: 3,734 (2.48/day)
Thanks: 1,371
Thanked 1,271 Times in 937 Posts
Send a message via MSN to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Yahoo to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Skype™ to TheLaughingMan

System Specs

Holy shit Batman!
__________________
My Heat

TheLaughingMan is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 05:57 AM   #4
LAN_deRf_HA
3500 Posts
 
LAN_deRf_HA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,067 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 295
Thanked 851 Times in 594 Posts

System Specs

So... 6 tb single platter drives? That'd be quite the sweet spot for size and perf.
LAN_deRf_HA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 06:45 AM   #5
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,534 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 328
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts

System Specs

If this leads to 24tb drives in the future then I'm sure this will help normal drives stick around for even longer, imagine the cost of a 24tb SSD

Right now I'm happy with 2tb drives but as i move onto storing more HD video i will love the ever increasing capacity for use as secondary storage, as far as i can see though SSD for primary is still the way forward.

Any idea if this will also increase sequential speed as well as capacity?
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 07:04 AM   #6
inferKNOX
500 Posts
 
inferKNOX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SouthERN Africa
Posts: 880 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 77
Thanked 118 Times in 93 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to inferKNOX

System Specs

Daaaayyyyy....mn!!!
I look forward to that! Bring on the new Samsung Spinpoint Fx (assuming they'll be allowed to employ the tech)!
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
inferKNOX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 07:08 AM   #7
zAAm
500 Posts
 
zAAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Africa
Posts: 790 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 74 Times in 50 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by bear jesus View Post
If this leads to 24tb drives in the future then I'm sure this will help normal drives stick around for even longer, imagine the cost of a 24tb SSD

Right now I'm happy with 2tb drives but as i move onto storing more HD video i will love the ever increasing capacity for use as secondary storage, as far as i can see though SSD for primary is still the way forward.

Any idea if this will also increase sequential speed as well as capacity?
If the physical size of the platters stay the same as well as the rotational speed, we could also see an 8-fold (probably less but still significant) increase in sequential performance yes. Latencies will stay roughly the same though unfortunately (given the same spindle speed), so I agree that SSD will be the best bet for system drives. I won't say no for a 24TB secondary drive though! My 2.5TB storage is not nearly enough...
__________________
Intel Extreme DX58SO | i7 920 @ 4.0GHz | 16GB Corsair DDR3-1333 8-8-8-19 | HD4870 @ 780/1000 | 8600GT 256MB | GeForce 210 lol
Intel 520 240GB + Intel X25-M 80GB + 4TB Seagate/WD | 24" Samsung SA350 + 24" BenQ G2410HD + 2x22" Samsung 2253GW's LCD + 1x19" B91D LCD | CoolerMaster CM690 | Corsair TX750 PSU | Logitech Z-5500


Join The Core i7 Overclockers Club
[Core i7 Overclocking Basics] [Logitech Z-5500 Digital Soundroom] [Katy Towells' Childrin R Skary]
zAAm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 07:41 AM   #8
xaira
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 199 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 19 Times in 15 Posts

System Specs

anybody else think we should slow down, i mean come on, wasnt it just the other day we were astounded by the intro of 1tb, now 3tb, very near to 10tb yeh, but24 :O_o:
xaira is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to xaira For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 26, 2010, 07:45 AM   #9
slyfox2151
2000 Posts
 
slyfox2151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,522 (1.56/day)
Thanks: 57
Thanked 530 Times in 472 Posts

System Specs

fuck no we should not slow down... if anything we should be at 100TB drives by now IMO!



the more the better.
__________________
“it's still EA.. they will F*** it up. F***ing up games is the only thing they do consistently.” -TRIPTEX_MTL

Last edited by slyfox2151; Nov 26, 2010 at 08:00 AM.
slyfox2151 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 07:46 AM   #10
TAViX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Good news. Regarding SSD, I will NEVER use an SSD to store backup files. Not if I want to have the files more than 3 years that is...
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 07:46 AM   #11
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,534 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 328
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by xaira View Post
anybody else think we should slow down, i mean come on, wasnt it just the other day we were astounded by the intro of 1tb, now 3tb, very near to 10tb yeh, but24 :O_o:
Even though it says very near future i would not expect anything like 24tb before 2012 if not later, this is newly developed hard drive tech that i would assume is a long way from mass production at this point and even then i would assume for it to start with smaller sizes of just a few tb.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAViX View Post
Good news. Regarding SSD, I will NEVER use an SSD to store backup files. Not if I want to have the files more than 3 years that is...
I would hope right now no one intends to use SSD's for their long term storage, normal hard drives or other removable storage is the only logical option right now and even more so from a cost perspective with 2tb drives being so cheap.

Quote:
Originally Posted by slyfox2151 View Post
fuck no we should not slow down... if anything we should be at 100GB drives by now IMO!



the more the better.
I assume you meant 100tb but i agree, i was so happy to see 100gb drives available back when i was using tens of gb and now I'm finding it easy to fill multiple tb, with future HD video that's well past 1080p hundreds of tb will become easy to fill.
__________________
The pastafarian jesus

Last edited by bear jesus; Nov 26, 2010 at 07:52 AM.
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 08:02 AM   #12
slyfox2151
2000 Posts
 
slyfox2151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,522 (1.56/day)
Thanks: 57
Thanked 530 Times in 472 Posts

System Specs

hehe yeah 100TB :P


i think we will be stuck at 1080p for many years... i cant see it incressing before 2016-2018 etleast .... even pc monitors havnt gone far past 1080p for a wile.
__________________
“it's still EA.. they will F*** it up. F***ing up games is the only thing they do consistently.” -TRIPTEX_MTL
slyfox2151 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 08:09 AM   #13
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,534 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 328
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by slyfox2151 View Post
hehe yeah 100TB :P


i think we will be stuck at 1080p for many years... i cant see it incressing before 2016-2018 etleast .... even pc monitors havnt gone far past 1080p for a wile.
True it wont be for a while yet but the BBC has already used ultra high definition cameras with a res of 7680x4320... although it was for a gig by the charlatans and broadcast in japan so not exactly useful but it shows where we are heading and video at that kind of res will take up a crazy amount of storage space.

"At full resolution, those signals are transmitted at a staggering 24Gb/s"

"Uncompressed, a 20 minute broadcast would require roughly 4TB of storage"
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 08:19 AM   #14
slyfox2151
2000 Posts
 
slyfox2151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,522 (1.56/day)
Thanks: 57
Thanked 530 Times in 472 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by bear jesus View Post
True it wont be for a while yet but the BBC has already used ultra high definition cameras with a res of 7680x4320... although it was for a gig by the charlatans and broadcast in japan so not exactly useful but it shows where we are heading and video at that kind of res will take up a crazy amount of storage space.

"At full resolution, those signals are transmitted at a staggering 24Gb/s"

"Uncompressed, a 20 minute broadcast would require roughly 4TB of storage"
now thats the sort of quality i want
__________________
“it's still EA.. they will F*** it up. F***ing up games is the only thing they do consistently.” -TRIPTEX_MTL
slyfox2151 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 08:25 AM   #15
gumpty
500 Posts
 
gumpty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Posts: 564 (0.30/day)
Thanks: 229
Thanked 135 Times in 96 Posts

System Specs

Nice one. I would like to see some high capacity 2.5" HDDs hit the market. It might once and for all kill off 3.5" drives. Imagine the space that could be saved, even in a high end tower case, by using 2.5" drives rather than 3.5".
__________________
"It's going to install and overwrite the OS. It will kill all your family pets and everything in the 'fridge will go bad. The shingles on your roof will curl and ants will infest your underwear drawer."Kreij

gumpty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 08:28 AM   #16
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,534 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 328
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by slyfox2151 View Post
now thats the sort of quality i want
same here, and monitors to go with it... i wonder if by the time they arrive gpu's will be able to run 3 of them to game at 23580x4320.

Really i can't wait for both ultra high storage amounts to go with ultra high definition but it will take a while
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 08:47 AM   #17
Swamp Monster
500 Posts
 
Swamp Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Latvia
Posts: 543 (0.56/day)
Thanks: 127
Thanked 83 Times in 75 Posts

System Specs

24 TB HDD sounds cool, but to me -making use of a self-arranged phenomenon of polymer materials- doesn't sound long lasting and sturdy. I hope I am wrong on this.
Swamp Monster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 10:45 AM   #18
inferKNOX
500 Posts
 
inferKNOX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SouthERN Africa
Posts: 880 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 77
Thanked 118 Times in 93 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to inferKNOX

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by gumpty View Post
Nice one. I would like to see some high capacity 2.5" HDDs hit the market. It might once and for all kill off 3.5" drives. Imagine the space that could be saved, even in a high end tower case, by using 2.5" drives rather than 3.5".
I had a similar argument with friends about making mini BDs the size of mini DVDs/CDs and using mini BDs for movies & mini DVDs for music, instead of DVDs and CDs respectively, then phasing out the larger discs. EVERYONE argued otherwise with me, that more capacity=better regardless of physical size & portability.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
inferKNOX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 11:21 AM   #19
Easo
500 Posts
 
Easo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Latvia
Posts: 801 (0.54/day)
Thanks: 138
Thanked 79 Times in 65 Posts

System Specs

Just bring it on!
__________________
His will be done.

Easo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 11:23 AM   #20
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.89/day)
Thanks: 3,708
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by xaira View Post
anybody else think we should slow down, i mean come on, wasnt it just the other day we were astounded by the intro of 1tb, now 3tb, very near to 10tb yeh, but24 :O_o:
hell no, i've got about 15TB of data and NEED MOAR.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mussels For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 26, 2010, 11:27 AM   #21
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,534 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 328
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
hell no, i've got about 15TB of data and NEED MOAR.
showing off with your massive amount of data and storage I only have 7TB between all the computers in my house.

I would love a nice fast SSD as my boot drive then a pair of 24TB drives in raid 1 to store everything else but unlike some people (with more data than i have storage space in my house ) that would last me for a year or two
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 11:32 AM   #22
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.19/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swamp Monster View Post
24 TB HDD sounds cool, but to me -making use of a self-arranged phenomenon of polymer materials- doesn't sound long lasting and sturdy. I hope I am wrong on this.

Why not? Ever heard of crystals ? Pretty damn tough and are self arranged materials
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 12:02 PM   #23
Kaleid
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 116 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 16 Times in 8 Posts

System Specs


One can never have too much space and the additional density will increase the performance. So, bring it on!
Kaleid is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2010, 01:25 PM   #24
mechtech
200 Posts
 
mechtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: canada, northern ontario, way up in the sticks
Posts: 250 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs

Hmmm 8 fold increase in density!! I wonder what kind of real world increase in speed it would gain? 3 fold maybe?

If so they could read/write around 300MB/s which would make ssd almost obsolete if not for the quick access/load times.
__________________
Life does'nt change after marriage, it changes after children!!
mechtech is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mechtech For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 26, 2010, 01:32 PM   #25
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,534 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 328
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mechtech View Post
Hmmm 8 fold increase in density!! I wonder what kind of real world increase in speed it would gain? 3 fold maybe?

If so they could read/write around 300MB/s which would make ssd almost obsolete if not for the quick access/load times.
What about future ssd's though? I'm sure in the time it takes to get these hard drives there will be ssd's that saturate the sata 6gb/s connection and then again also pci-e ssd's that already get up to 1.4gb/s with insane iops so just think what they will be doing in the next year or two.
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LSI and Seagate Co-develop Technology for Next-Generation High-Capacity HDDs btarunr News 5 Jul 6, 2010 09:39 AM
Advice needed - SSD suggestions and HDD questions (two fold post) Hellfire Storage 2 Jun 30, 2010 09:44 AM
OCZ Technology Announces High-Density 4GB DDR3 Modules and 8GB Dual Channel Kits btarunr News 8 Apr 21, 2010 06:24 AM
ATTO Technology and Hitachi GST Demonstrate 6 Gb/s SAS Interoperability malware News 1 Apr 14, 2009 07:40 PM
NEC and Hitachi to jointly develop Liquid Cooling System for Desktop PC HellasVagabond Overclocking & Cooling 4 Aug 2, 2007 04:07 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts