techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 5, 2011, 06:11 AM   #251
jimmyz
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 92 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 34 Times in 23 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jimmyz

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by vvulture View Post
Would anyone here be able to speculate as to when we could expect an updated RBE with 69xx support ?

Getting very itchy here... lol
I have been working with Baggzlash to get it working. He will have progress very soon, like by friday I am betting.
jimmyz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 5, 2011, 07:31 AM   #252
vvulture
25 Posts
 
vvulture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 48 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Awesome ! Good to hear.
__________________
AMD FX-8350 Stock, Custom water cooling, 8 gig DDR3 2133, Asus CH-V, SilverStone ST-1500 PSU, Auzentech X-Fi Prelude, Logitech Z-5500D, Crossfire 6950's unlocked shaders,
Win 7 HP 64Bit
vvulture is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 5, 2011, 01:52 PM   #253
trt740
Eligible for custom title
 
trt740's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 10,186 (3.97/day)
Thanks: 1,578
Thanked 1,135 Times in 960 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by trt740 View Post
Anyone with a 6950 when flashed to a 6970 is this card loud under load.
anyone?
trt740 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 5, 2011, 02:04 PM   #254
PopcornMachine
1000 Posts
 
PopcornMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Los Angeles/Orange County CA
Posts: 1,124 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 1,986
Thanked 372 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by trt740 View Post
anyone?
Depends on your overclock and fan settings. But yes, mine gets very loud at > 50% whether or not I'm using the 6970 bios.
PopcornMachine is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PopcornMachine For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 5, 2011, 02:09 PM   #255
horik
200 Posts
 
horik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 235 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 44 Times in 22 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by trt740 View Post
Anyone with a 6950 when flashed to a 6970 is this card loud under load.
compared to my old HD4890 i can tell you the 6950 is more silent,but strange thing is that at full load temps go arround 87 degrees but the fan speed is under 40%.
horik is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to horik For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 5, 2011, 02:16 PM   #256
PopcornMachine
1000 Posts
 
PopcornMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Los Angeles/Orange County CA
Posts: 1,124 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 1,986
Thanked 372 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by horik View Post
compared to my old HD4890 i can tell you the 6950 is more silent,but strange thing is that at full load temps go arround 87 degrees but the fan speed is under 40%.
You can adjust that to increase fan speed so that it won't reach those temps, but at the cost of being a bit louder.

87C is too high for my tastes.
PopcornMachine is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PopcornMachine For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 5, 2011, 02:17 PM   #257
gumpty
500 Posts
 
gumpty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Posts: 564 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 229
Thanked 135 Times in 96 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by trt740 View Post
Anyone with a 6950 when flashed to a 6970 is this card loud under load.
Given that they seem to be pretty much the same card, and that it would be using the 6970 bios, I'd guess it'd be pretty much the same as the 6970 in terms of noise.

My 6870 is loud. It annoys me. I'm not anticipating that the 6950 I have on the way will be any better.
__________________
"It's going to install and overwrite the OS. It will kill all your family pets and everything in the 'fridge will go bad. The shingles on your roof will curl and ants will infest your underwear drawer."Kreij

gumpty is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gumpty For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 5, 2011, 02:31 PM   #258
PopcornMachine
1000 Posts
 
PopcornMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Los Angeles/Orange County CA
Posts: 1,124 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 1,986
Thanked 372 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

I have an idea on how to improve these default coolers, but it would require me taking my card apart.

The heatsink itself is very good. It's the paddle wheel fan that is the problem.

My thought is to remove that fan while leaving the heatsink in place, and put a 120 fan at the rear blowing down the length of the card, using shroud of some sort to funnel the air to the heatsink.

This would be both quieter and I think cooler.

My worry is getting the cooler back together in case I'm wrong!
PopcornMachine is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PopcornMachine For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 5, 2011, 03:43 PM   #259
trt740
Eligible for custom title
 
trt740's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 10,186 (3.97/day)
Thanks: 1,578
Thanked 1,135 Times in 960 Posts

System Specs

thx
trt740 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 5, 2011, 07:47 PM   #260
Dj-ElectriC
1000 Posts
 
Dj-ElectriC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Trollithia
Posts: 1,577 (1.56/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 643 Times in 300 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by PopcornMachine View Post
I have an idea on how to improve these default coolers, but it would require me taking my card apart.

The heatsink itself is very good. It's the paddle wheel fan that is the problem.

My thought is to remove that fan while leaving the heatsink in place, and put a 120 fan at the rear blowing down the length of the card, using shroud of some sort to funnel the air to the heatsink.

This would be both quieter and I think cooler.

My worry is getting the cooler back together in case I'm wrong!
Well... it might improve overall temps but IDK about disassembling the fan. and add the fact that the card is gonna take 2.5 slots and not 2.
Dj-ElectriC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 5, 2011, 07:49 PM   #261
PopcornMachine
1000 Posts
 
PopcornMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Los Angeles/Orange County CA
Posts: 1,124 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 1,986
Thanked 372 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dj-ElectriC View Post
Well... it might improve overall temps but IDK about disassembling the fan. and add the fact that the card is gonna take 2.5 slots and not 2.
Yeah, uh, I didn't say it was a perfect plan.
PopcornMachine is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 5, 2011, 08:36 PM   #262
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

W1zz's reviews say that the 6870 is louder than the 6970 and the 6950, so I'm hoping that my flashed 6950 is going to be a bit quieter than this card. Not that the 6870 is a very loud card. If you're really sensitive to fan noise, it can be a both bothersome if doing something quietly without headphones on. I'll let you guys know how they compare later this week.
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DanishDevil For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 6, 2011, 01:32 AM   #263
BababooeyHTJ
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 868 (0.58/day)
Thanks: 165
Thanked 84 Times in 81 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanishDevil View Post
W1zz's reviews say that the 6870 is louder than the 6970 and the 6950, so I'm hoping that my flashed 6950 is going to be a bit quieter than this card. Not that the 6870 is a very loud card. If you're really sensitive to fan noise, it can be a both bothersome if doing something quietly without headphones on. I'll let you guys know how they compare later this week.
IT's not especially if you want reasonable temps. I have noticed that 40% fan speed is louder on the 6870 than on the 6950 but I never needed that much with the 6870. That isn't the case with the 6950 flashed with a 6970 bios.
BababooeyHTJ is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BababooeyHTJ For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 6, 2011, 01:35 AM   #264
TheGuruStud
1000 Posts
 
TheGuruStud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Police/Nanny State of America
Posts: 1,394 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 142 Times in 109 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by BababooeyHTJ View Post
IT's not especially if you want reasonable temps. I have noticed that 40% fan speed is louder on the 6870 than on the 6950 but I never needed that much with the 6870. That isn't the case with the 6950 flashed with a 6970 bios.
I hit a max of mid 70s at around 41-42% fan (controlled with MSI Afterburner). That's with BC2 pretty much maxing the card out (such a disastrously optimized game).
__________________
TheGuruStud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 2011, 05:42 AM   #265
Digital Dissent
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 12 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

Well +1 to the mix here. Just unlocked my gigabyte 6950 into a 6970. It took some work mind you. Had to go through dos prompt, and then got some artifacts that have since gone away, after I raised the tdp, lowered it, and then reinstalled the drivers. I am now at +2% tdp, and have my clocks at 900 core and 1390 memory. Yes, thats OVERCLOCKED. I also had some slowdowns in crysis and assassins creed before I reinstalled the drivers...so Im guessing its a good idea for anyone who flashes to kick the drivers and reinstall them. So far its fully stable and Im getting fairly good results across the board, including 3dmark (not as high as I had hoped but thats likely due to a minor bottleneck somewhere) and unigine heaven. I can post them up if anyone is interested. Temps top at about 75C. Oh! This is my first post in the forums..so hi!
Digital Dissent is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Digital Dissent For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 6, 2011, 06:03 AM   #266
turbobeta
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 12 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Thoughts: You're almost guaranteed to take your $300 6950, and turn it into an equivalent of a 6960, or a 6965. The chances of you turning your 6950 into a perfectly stable, flawless $370 6970? Slim.

More thoughts: I think if more people tested thier oc's/mods throughly, they'd notice instability as well. I don't think this is a manufacture specific issue. I think 99.9% of the 6950 gpus out there can do full shaders at 800mhz, but most can't do full shaders at 880. Also, these 6950 cards are built with slower ram chips as well based on the info we've seen from the ram product numbers. Expecting your ram to go from 1250 to 1375 is unrealistic.

Conclusion: Buyer be educated, buyer beware. Go into this knowing that if you have a reference card, you're getting a great deal. Have realistic expectations.

Last edited by turbobeta; Jan 6, 2011 at 06:14 AM. Reason: didn't change my opinion, just fleshed it out. :)
turbobeta is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 2011, 06:07 AM   #267
Digital Dissent
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 12 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

Well what do you suggest for proper testing to verify if its stable?
Digital Dissent is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 2011, 06:11 AM   #268
turbobeta
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 12 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital Dissent View Post
Well what do you suggest for proper testing to verify if its stable?
I really wish I had the answer to that. Most people say Furmark, but I've used Furmark stably for hours, only to have Borderlands throw artifacts, and WoW crash on startup. I don't think there really is a good tool or testing methodology out there at the moment.
turbobeta is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 2011, 06:14 AM   #269
Digital Dissent
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 12 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbobeta View Post
I really wish I had the answer to that. Most people say Furmark, but I've used Furmark stably for hours, only to have Borderlands throw artifacts, and WoW crash on startup. I don't think there really is a good tool or testing methodology out there at the moment.
I cant really think of anything either except extended testing on various games.
Digital Dissent is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 2011, 03:49 PM   #270
Digital Dissent
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 12 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

I am seeing pixel artifacts that appear at boot on the windows loading screen, and then vanish after it has started up (they were around once windows had loaded when I first flashed). Has anyone else encountered this and what might cause it? I have set the tdp to 0%, the core clock to 840 and the memory to 1375, the lowest.
Digital Dissent is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 2011, 05:20 PM   #271
sirbaili
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Israel
Posts: 13 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts

System Specs

I have 2 sapphire HD6950 cards - at first I flashed them with Asus EAH6970 bios - one of them was giving me artifacts at Bad company 2. Also I did'nt like increased temperatures/].
I had to set for Asus HD6950 bios that unlocks shader cores - Asus Smart doctor recognizes them also not like HD6970 bios. I increased Vcore to 1.170 on both cards and had 940Mhz stable withb 1300 Mhz memory.
That's te way to go for those with artifacting cards.
sirbaili is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 2011, 06:02 PM   #272
Digital Dissent
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 12 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

I think Im just going to return it since I still have time to do so. I might get a 6970 because I want the option to do eyefinity and crossfire. Thing is amd hasnt released any 6900 series linux drivers, which I find very annoying. Im very close to just going ahead and getting a gtx 570 for this very reason, even though I wont be able to sli it on my current psu due to it being 750w rather than 850... Honestly I love all this stuff and Id like to experiment with the voltages and bios's more but it voids warranty and no one knows yet how long these cards will last the way we are pushing them...so if its not working perfectly now I think its best for me (I cant afford to blow this thing and have to buy something else in a few months) to just buy a straight up 6970 and have done with it.
Digital Dissent is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 2011, 08:31 PM   #273
Digital Dissent
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 12 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

An interesting note is that when the card heats up it no longer artifacts, even on restart. Its only on cold (literally cold) boot that it artifacts. I wonder if I used a 6970 bios from anyone other than gigabyte if it would work better? I think for my uses a reflash to 6850 is the best idea though.
Digital Dissent is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 2011, 09:17 PM   #274
fullinfusion
1.21 Gigawatts
 
fullinfusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CANADA
Posts: 5,448 (2.79/day)
Thanks: 2,687
Thanked 1,293 Times in 1,091 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital Dissent View Post
An interesting note is that when the card heats up it no longer artifacts, even on restart. Its only on cold (literally cold) boot that it artifacts. I wonder if I used a 6970 bios from anyone other than gigabyte if it would work better? I think for my uses a reflash to 6850 is the best idea though.
Sapphire bios works the best imo.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
fullinfusion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 2011, 11:19 PM   #275
crazyeyesreaper
Chief Broken Rig
 
crazyeyesreaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 04578
Posts: 6,010 (3.97/day)
Thanks: 760
Thanked 2,219 Times in 1,556 Posts

System Specs

Hurray i can post again!!!!!!

more on topic

i wonder if anyone as tested the performance difference between 6950 ram speeds and 6970 speeds on there cards after flashing to see if theres a performance gain or loss since if the rams clocked to high the gpus will just work around it but at a penalty to performance.
crazyeyesreaper is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to crazyeyesreaper For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6950 using 6970 Bios? dom99 AMD / ATI 7 Dec 29, 2010 12:14 AM
[GPU-Z Test Build] Support for AMD Radeon HD 6950 & HD 6970 W1zzard GPU-Z Test Builds 3 Dec 27, 2010 10:02 AM
Radeon reference design 6970/6950 failure! musek AMD / ATI 59 Dec 23, 2010 01:26 PM
MSI Announces its Radeon HD 6970 and Radeon HD 6950 Graphics Cards btarunr News 6 Dec 20, 2010 12:38 AM
[US] HD 6970 & 6950 @ Newegg. erocker Hot Deals 26 Dec 15, 2010 05:19 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts