techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Dec 21, 2006, 03:30 PM   #1
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.73/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

G.Skill Unveils the World's First DDR2-800 CL4-4-3-5 Memory Modules



G.Skill International Enterprise launches the world 1st DDR2-800 CL4-4-3-5 high performance series memory modules – F2-6400CL4D-2GBHK. Both single module and matched pair packages will be available through G.Skill’s authorized resellers and distributors worldwide. All G.Skill memory modules come with lifetime warranty. For more information and specifications of the new PK series products, please visit this page.

Source: G.Skill
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 03:36 PM   #2
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.11/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,526 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

Talk about milking a dry cow, beating a dead horse, repeating yourself, etc, etc, etc

In other words 800Mhz dram frequency has reach maturity and is on the preverbal downslope. It shouldn't be too long before we start seeing more and more higher frequencies, then DDR3.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 03:38 PM   #3
pead929
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 118 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 1 Post
Send a message via MSN to pead929

Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoasthandle View Post
Talk about milking a dry cow, beating a dead horse, repeating yourself, etc, etc, etc
lol....thats what we call the ROFLcoptar
__________________
If you broke your TV with your Wiimote you're Wiitarded Wii have a problem!
Spore: Computer Simulated Blasphemy!
In Cryis - Crysis Fansite
pead929 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 03:39 PM   #4
bornfree
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 101 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Oh come on now, you love these Press Releases... :>))

I wonder if the tighter memory timings increase PC system performance by more than .000000000000000000000000000000000001 percent ?????????
bornfree is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 04:47 PM   #5
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,765 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,119 Times in 3,709 Posts

System Specs

Nope, but they are an overclockers wet dream.
newtekie1 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 04:50 PM   #6
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,027 (6.42/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,755 Times in 2,224 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

i want some they should be able to reach 1200-1600 mhz with high timings
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 05:19 PM   #7
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.11/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,526 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdawall View Post
i want some they should be able to reach 1200-1600 mhz with high timings
Only stable for few test benchmarks. Waste of money if you ask me.
Right now (Corsair PC8500) I am stable 24/7 @ 1225 @ PC8500. Yes, it's not a high OC but the added performance of PC8500 is noticeable from XP boot up to in game. It open my eyes to the fact that PC6400 has come full circle and moving on to better (be it Pc8500+ or no) is more important then timing (unless K8L turns out to be the fanboy's wet dream).

In other words there is performance gain found going from PC6400 to PC8500 but the current chipsets limit it's full potential (I am hopping that bearlake takes care of this). But only if you can OC your computer at the rated speed of the ram. Anything less then that is a waste of time, IMO. Why? Simple, what Super PI, Cinebench, Aquakmart, etc show as a gain; games like BF2, Fear, Quake 4, etc shows as a waste of time. Running your ram at PC4800 or PC5400 undermines the full potential of your ram. Once we have a chipset that allows you the full benefit of the CPU OC with the full benefit of maintaining the rated speed of the ram then you will see the full benefit of the bandwidth IMO.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 07:08 PM   #8
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.98/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

So they dropped down like 1 cycle each? Pshaw hit me up when you get DDR timings od 2223 or 1221 or something.

-The Eagle.

PS Im still not impressed with DDR2
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 07:17 PM   #9
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Forget trying to squeeze an extra "1" from DDR or DDR2. Why dont the chipset makers just move over to QUAD channel. That would DOUBLE the memory bandwidth, rather than these silly little %ages that require ever more upgrading of memory modules.

ITS A MEMORY MANUFACTURER CARTEL I TELL YOU. WE ARE GETTING RIPPED OFF AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 08:28 PM   #10
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,765 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,119 Times in 3,709 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by WarEagleAU View Post
PS Im still not impressed with DDR2
That is probably because you don't understand that 4-4-3-5 on DDR2-800 is the same latency as 2-2-1.5-2.5 on DDR-400. Which is damn good timings.
newtekie1 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 08:32 PM   #11
Ketxxx
Eligible for custom title
 
Ketxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kingdom of gods
Posts: 6,380 (2.42/day)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 580 Times in 412 Posts

System Specs

lol i was running 3-3-3 1T timings @ ddr800 2.2v when i was testing some mushkin stuff a few months back

pfft i say, pfft g.skill.
__________________
WARNING: I am cracking down on stupidity in the forums. Anyone caught making a dumb statement clearly not knowing many, if any of the facts, will promptly be directed to xtremesystems.

Sig edited. If anyone wants to know about the E4400 (E7200 sold) drop me a PM
Ketxxx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 08:38 PM   #12
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,765 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,119 Times in 3,709 Posts

System Specs

Doing that at 2.2v and G.skill being stock at their rated speeds at 2.0v is very different. I wouldn't be surprised at all if these did 3-3-3 or better at 2.2v.
newtekie1 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 08:41 PM   #13
Ketxxx
Eligible for custom title
 
Ketxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kingdom of gods
Posts: 6,380 (2.42/day)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 580 Times in 412 Posts

System Specs

the point is they were also running 1T. f the gskill stuff defaults 1t fine, but i still had clocking headroom @ 2.2v 3-3-3 1T to around DDR900 i think it was. plus .2v difference aint nuttin lol
__________________
WARNING: I am cracking down on stupidity in the forums. Anyone caught making a dumb statement clearly not knowing many, if any of the facts, will promptly be directed to xtremesystems.

Sig edited. If anyone wants to know about the E4400 (E7200 sold) drop me a PM
Ketxxx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 11:04 PM   #14
sol.fides
25 Posts
 
sol.fides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Merrit BC
Posts: 62 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

Yeah, corsair XMS2-8500C5D running with 2.3v w/ great airflow @ 1030Mhz 4-4-3. These guys can just line up and wish they were somthing new. 3-4-3 @ 832Mhz.
sol.fides is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 11:29 PM   #15
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,765 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,119 Times in 3,709 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ketxxx View Post
the point is they were also running 1T. f the gskill stuff defaults 1t fine, but i still had clocking headroom @ 2.2v 3-3-3 1T to around DDR900 i think it was. plus .2v difference aint nuttin lol
In the world of RAM .2v is more than "nuttin". Again I wouldn't be surprised one bit if these do over DDR1000 with 3-3-3-1T on 2.2v. Though the thing that is really nice is that usually G.Skill ram is on the cheaper side of the RAM spectrum, which is great for someone like me who doesn't want to spend more money on 2GB of RAM than I spend on my processor.
newtekie1 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2006, 12:46 AM   #16
Pinchy
3500 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 4,650 (1.80/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 360 Times in 344 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Pinchy

System Specs

...lawl this new stuff makes my RAM (Which i havent got yet ) look crap !
__________________
mATX rig: TT Lanbox Lite, GA-G33M-DS2R, q9300, 4GB G.Skill Pi PC8000, 2x640GB Samsung F1's in RAID 0, LG 20x DVD+/RW, HIS IceQ HD4670 512MB, Gigabyte G-Power PRO, TT 450W TR2 RX Modular PSU
HTPC: i-Cute iBox, GA-MA780GM-S2H, 4850e, 2GB G.Skill PC6400, 1x640GB WD SE16, Onboard HD3200, D-link XtremeN PCIe, Leadtek WinFast DVR3100 H Tuner, 450W Vantec PSU
Server: Custom made case, EPIA Mini-ITX mobo, 1GHz VIA, 1GB PC2700 SO-DIMM, 1TB WD, Gigabit PCI LAN card, 60W 12V AC adapter
Pinchy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2006, 02:37 AM   #17
b1lk1
500 Posts
 
b1lk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 640 (0.22/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
Send a message via MSN to b1lk1

System Specs

Team Xtreme ram is the shiznat. Hands down.
b1lk1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts