techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 10, 2011, 10:32 PM   #51
Completely Bonkers
2000 Posts
 
Completely Bonkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,415 (1.04/day)
Thanks: 582
Thanked 533 Times in 374 Posts

System Specs

Big Bang Conqueror

ROFL

For once, I score the marketing department 10/10! I like it
__________________
... some things in life just drive you bonkers. Especially the rubbish you see in forum posts
Completely Bonkers is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2011, 11:09 PM   #52
jmcslob
2000 Posts
 
jmcslob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Internet Heaven
Posts: 2,733 (1.75/day)
Thanks: 793
Thanked 424 Times in 328 Posts

System Specs

LOL it sounds like a Pron movie
"Big Bang Conqueror"
jmcslob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2011, 11:12 PM   #53
kakang140603
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

so nice bro....
kakang140603 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2011, 11:22 PM   #54
[H]@RD5TUFF
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 5,595 (4.26/day)
Thanks: 1,825
Thanked 1,711 Times in 1,432 Posts

System Specs

PGA still . . . ?

I know AMD preaches all about budget this and that, and compatibility, but they will need to dump PGA sooner or later, and I was really hoping they would do so this gen.
__________________
Stuff 4 Sale!
Heat Ware
ebay



[H]@RD5TUFF is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2011, 11:39 PM   #55
CDdude55
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
 
CDdude55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,437 (2.97/day)
Thanks: 3,511
Thanked 1,285 Times in 937 Posts

System Specs

Currently in the process of switching from i7/X58 and over to Phenom II X6/880G, so i have no plans at all to get in on Bulldozer as it's to much for what i need.(mainly gaming).

Still can't wait to see the gaming and synthetic benchmark's for Bulldozer though.
__________________
Currently playing: Team Fortress 2 (PC)

"And remember if you didn't build it yourself, it's not really yours."
CDdude55 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 12:18 AM   #56
hellrazor
1000 Posts
 
hellrazor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,361 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 1,414
Thanked 276 Times in 194 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Kurgan1 View Post
Wow, now thats a Name, Bulldozer, Big Bang, Conqueror. Is there any more dominant names they could toss in there?
Terminator, Dominator, Destroyer, etc., etc.
__________________
"Doom means two things: demons and shotguns." -John Carmack
hellrazor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 12:47 AM   #57
kaneda
75 Posts
 
kaneda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rainy-old England
Posts: 154 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by nINJAkECIL View Post
I hope AMD doesn't targeted LGA1366 with buldozer. Intel already have sandy bridge, and LGA 2011 soon.

AMD, plz make a competitive cpus, and we'll be glad to buy it whatever price you thrown into. Just like the old A64 days
Bulldozer uses a modular architecture, it's going to scale to combat all markets.
kaneda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 12:51 AM   #58
nINJAkECIL
200 Posts
 
nINJAkECIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 232 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcslob View Post
Actually of all the new P-67 boards I think the Best looking board is the ECS and it's black
I like it too, except for the graphics

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcslob View Post
Anyone hear about when to expect Bulldozer?
Around April, I think....hope it's not April fool :lol:
And I remember the first Phenom CPUs expected to compete really well, but...hey we all know how that goes

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDdude55 View Post
Currently in the process of switching from i7/X58 and over to Phenom II X6/880G, so i have no plans at all to get in on Bulldozer as it's to much for what i need.(mainly gaming).

Still can't wait to see the gaming and synthetic benchmark's for Bulldozer though.
Even if you plan to get bulldozer, you have to replace the mobo. It's AMD's new compatibility:
* New cpus can't be installed on old mobo (maybe it's because there's some feature which doesn't work on old chipset)
* old cpus can be installed on new mobo.

cmiiw
__________________

my lovely LE-1620
nINJAkECIL is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nINJAkECIL For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 11, 2011, 12:54 AM   #59
copenhagen69
2000 Posts
 
copenhagen69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 3,457 (2.79/day)
Thanks: 1,529
Thanked 1,212 Times in 1,158 Posts

System Specs

LOL AMD/MSI will be pissed ... we were not suppose to talk about this but but to say it was AM3 platform ...
__________________
|| Heatware || Build: A Wooden Beast || Build: The Wooden Beast's Desk || Case Mod: Tribal Strikes Again ||
|| Intel I7 920 @ 4.3 // ASUS Rampage III Extreme// ASUS 580 // 3x2GB Mushkin// CM Silent Pro 1200 // Water Cooled ||
|| My Ever Changing For Sale Thread
copenhagen69 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 01:17 AM   #60
JrRacinFan
Served 5k and counting ...
 
JrRacinFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 16,121 (7.05/day)
Thanks: 4,149
Thanked 4,552 Times in 4,027 Posts
Send a message via AIM to JrRacinFan Send a message via Yahoo to JrRacinFan

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by nINJAkECIL View Post
[COLOR="Black"]Around April, I think....hope it's not April fool :lol:
And I remember the first Phenom CPUs expected to compete really well, but...hey we all know how that goes
They did compete. They just didn't overclock that great.
JrRacinFan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 01:38 AM   #61
nINJAkECIL
200 Posts
 
nINJAkECIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 232 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts

System Specs

That's what I meant.
And with Intel limiting SB OC performance only on K-series (but K-series really did OC well and easily), maybe AMD will gaining some market on sub $200 cpus. And I'll be pissed if AMD follow Intel's step. Limiting OCability. It's just doesn't make sense.
__________________

my lovely LE-1620
nINJAkECIL is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 01:38 AM   #62
CDdude55
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
 
CDdude55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,437 (2.97/day)
Thanks: 3,511
Thanked 1,285 Times in 937 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by nINJAkECIL View Post

Even if you plan to get bulldozer, you have to replace the mobo. It's AMD's new compatibility:
* New cpus can't be installed on old mobo (maybe it's because there's some feature which doesn't work on old chipset)
* old cpus can be installed on new mobo.
That's not to bad then, cause then if i want to switch to a Bulldozer chip at some point i can still use my 1055T with the new chipset and later upgrade to a Bulldozer CPU at some point.
__________________
Currently playing: Team Fortress 2 (PC)

"And remember if you didn't build it yourself, it's not really yours."
CDdude55 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 01:54 AM   #63
AsRock
TPU addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,908 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,726
Thanked 1,381 Times in 1,199 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Kurgan1 View Post
Wow, now thats a Name, Bulldozer, Big Bang, Conqueror. Is there any more dominant names they could toss in there?
I hope not but Big Bang, Conqueror 2 or they do some thing even more lame and take some naming from ASUS like Big Bang, Conqueror Xtreme

Nice board just hope they have some thing else that looks good in a year or so .

Last edited by AsRock; Jan 11, 2011 at 01:59 AM.
AsRock is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 02:49 AM   #64
wolf
Performance Enthusiast
 
wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enrichment Center for Aperture Laboratories
Posts: 5,313 (2.38/day)
Thanks: 1,676
Thanked 844 Times in 707 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDdude55 View Post
Currently in the process of switching from i7/X58 and over to Phenom II X6/880G, so i have no plans at all to get in on Bulldozer as it's to much for what i need.(mainly gaming).

Still can't wait to see the gaming and synthetic benchmark's for Bulldozer though.
I find myself wondering why you are doing that? my i7 920 @ ~4ghz is a decent whack more CPU than my x6 1090T @ 3.8ghz...

don't get me wrong I love the 1090T too, the whole platform is cheaper than X58 and gaming is the same experience, its just you have an X58 now...
__________________


“my goal is speed, full ultra, and extreme gaming” -Ephraim

“Yeah you can always overclock the 2gb memory to 4gb” -jaredpace
wolf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 03:20 AM   #65
CDdude55
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
 
CDdude55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,437 (2.97/day)
Thanks: 3,511
Thanked 1,285 Times in 937 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf View Post
I find myself wondering why you are doing that? my i7 920 @ ~4ghz is a decent whack more CPU than my x6 1090T @ 3.8ghz...

don't get me wrong I love the 1090T too, the whole platform is cheaper than X58 and gaming is the same experience, its just you have an X58 now...
X58 and i7's are to overboard for what i need (gaming being the main priority). It's a very rock solid platform, but it's really something not meant for what i like to do, sure, it excels in gaming immensely, but there is still a lot of untapped power that's being pushed behind because it's not being taken advantage of. There is no point in me keeping the Enzo Ferrari around if im just going to be driving it around the block every once in a while. That's why i figured i'd just sell it off and go with a different/cheaper platform this time around.

Plus... I like playing with new hardware. lol
__________________
Currently playing: Team Fortress 2 (PC)

"And remember if you didn't build it yourself, it's not really yours."

Last edited by CDdude55; Jan 11, 2011 at 03:28 AM.
CDdude55 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CDdude55 For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 11, 2011, 05:45 AM   #66
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,534 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 328
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDdude55 View Post
That's not to bad then, cause then if i want to switch to a Bulldozer chip at some point i can still use my 1055T with the new chipset and later upgrade to a Bulldozer CPU at some point.
According to hardwarecanucks.com "Since AM3+ boards are backwards compatible with AM3 CPUs, MSI is looking to launch the Conqueror far in advance of Bulldozer’s official availability."

So i could see many people with AM3 CPU's buying an AM3+ board before bulldozer is even out so they are ready for it's release.
I had thought about getting a new AM3 board and DDR3 ram to go with my current CPU many times before now so depending on the boards available i would consider getting an AM3+ board so i can pair my CPU with some DDR3 and assuming bulldozer does quite well i would grab one at a later date.
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to bear jesus For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 11, 2011, 05:51 PM   #67
ROad86
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 21 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by bear jesus View Post
According to hardwarecanucks.com "Since AM3+ boards are backwards compatible with AM3 CPUs, MSI is looking to launch the Conqueror far in advance of Bulldozer’s official availability."

So i could see many people with AM3 CPU's buying an AM3+ board before bulldozer is even out so they are ready for it's release.
I had thought about getting a new AM3 board and DDR3 ram to go with my current CPU many times before now so depending on the boards available i would consider getting an AM3+ board so i can pair my CPU with some DDR3 and assuming bulldozer does quite well i would grab one at a later date.
I tottaly agree with you. And the best thing is for somenone like me who has the 790FX chipset will get USB3 and sata3 connenctivity. And I don't think that bulldozer will perfom poor. In worst case I believe it will be slighty slower than sandy bridge but this has the possitive side better price for a very good cpu
ROad86 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 06:12 PM   #68
jmcslob
2000 Posts
 
jmcslob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Internet Heaven
Posts: 2,733 (1.75/day)
Thanks: 793
Thanked 424 Times in 328 Posts

System Specs

Eh if the reports are right and this board will retail for about $275 I think it will bomb...
How can a board with an unproven Platform be seriously considered at such a high price.
jmcslob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 06:30 PM   #69
ROad86
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 21 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcslob View Post
Eh if the reports are right and this board will retail for about $275 I think it will bomb...
How can a board with an unproven Platform be seriously considered at such a high price.
Cheaper boards will comeout soon it doesn't worth 275 unless you are overclocking a lot or you use 3 or 4 graphic cards.
ROad86 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 06:33 PM   #70
fullinfusion
1.21 Gigawatts
 
fullinfusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CANADA
Posts: 5,497 (2.77/day)
Thanks: 2,709
Thanked 1,299 Times in 1,096 Posts

System Specs

Nice
Now to see what the others bring to the table.
fullinfusion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 06:47 PM   #71
jmcslob
2000 Posts
 
jmcslob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Internet Heaven
Posts: 2,733 (1.75/day)
Thanks: 793
Thanked 424 Times in 328 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ROad86 View Post
Cheaper boards will comeout soon it doesn't worth 275 unless you are overclocking a lot or you use 3 or 4 graphic cards.
Oh I get other boards will be out and at a much better price I just don't get why MSI would expect any board to sell at a premium price point for something that is yet unproven and likely priced higher or as high as the top priced Bulldozer CPU that will be but is not yet out.

I bet this board will have MSRP of $279 but will start off selling at $189
jmcslob is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jmcslob For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 11, 2011, 08:53 PM   #72
MicroUnC
200 Posts
 
MicroUnC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 234 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 63
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs

I want to see PCI-E 3.0 on this thing + USB 3.0 on a chipset level as well. Cus Intel's Socket 2011 gonna have this for sure.
__________________
MicroUnC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 09:26 PM   #73
H82LUZ73
1000 Posts
 
H82LUZ73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cobourg,Ontario
Posts: 1,369 (0.72/day)
Thanks: 1,139
Thanked 253 Times in 210 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by bear jesus View Post
According to hardwarecanucks.com "Since AM3+ boards are backwards compatible with AM3 CPUs, MSI is looking to launch the Conqueror far in advance of Bulldozer’s official availability."

So i could see many people with AM3 CPU's buying an AM3+ board before bulldozer is even out so they are ready for it's release.
I had thought about getting a new AM3 board and DDR3 ram to go with my current CPU many times before now so depending on the boards available i would consider getting an AM3+ board so i can pair my CPU with some DDR3 and assuming bulldozer does quite well i would grab one at a later date.
Exactly what i`m doing.
H82LUZ73 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2011, 09:34 PM   #74
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts

System Specs

As soon as Asus makes a 990FX board Ill be all over it.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TheMailMan78 For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 11, 2011, 09:52 PM   #75
fullinfusion
1.21 Gigawatts
 
fullinfusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CANADA
Posts: 5,497 (2.77/day)
Thanks: 2,709
Thanked 1,299 Times in 1,096 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMailMan78 View Post
As soon as Asus makes a 990FX board Ill be all over it.
Makes two of us Mailman lol!
Asus ROG 990FX! That's what im talking about!

I just hope they incorporate the Lucid Hydra chip-set to run X-fire/SLI mode with out problems
I wouldn't mind running a couple 580's and/or 6990's for testing
fullinfusion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MSI Big Bang Marshall P67 Motherboard with Lucid Hydra Pictured btarunr News 36 Feb 24, 2011 03:12 AM
MSI Announces Big Bang XPower Gaming Series Motherboard btarunr News 14 May 3, 2010 03:20 PM
MSI Readies Big Bang XPower X58 Motherboard btarunr News 41 Feb 2, 2010 09:18 AM
MSI ''Big Bang'' P55 Motherboard Implements Lucid Hydra btarunr News 87 Dec 18, 2009 02:38 PM
MSI Big Bang Fuzion Motherboard Picture MicroUnC General Hardware 2 Nov 20, 2009 01:26 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts