techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 20, 2011, 09:33 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Gigabyte GTX 560 Ti Super Overclock Graphics Card Detailed

Gigabyte is ready with a Super Overclock (SOC) variant of its upcoming GeForce GTX 560Ti graphics card, already. The GV-N560SO-1GI clocks at an impressive 1000 MHz core (vs. 822 MHz reference), and 1145 MHz (actual) or 4580 MHz (effective GDDR5) memory speed, with a CUDA core clock speed of 2000 MHz. Apart from these, the card features 384 CUDA cores, and 1 GB of memory over a 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface.

The GV-N560SO-1GI uses Gigabyte's Ultra Durable VGA+ PCB, which is rich in copper and uses top-grade components. It is cooled by a larger version of WindForce 2X, which the company earlier used on older high-end GPUs. Gigabyte also run its own performance tests on the card. The card yielded X11515 points in 3DMark Vantage Extreme preset, and P24590 in Performance preset. The card is said to be at least made public, if not released to market, on the 25th of this month.

btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 09:36 AM   #2
1nf3rn0x
1000 Posts
 
1nf3rn0x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,709 (1.27/day)
Thanks: 512
Thanked 331 Times in 242 Posts

System Specs

WOW DAMN, if you look in the photo the Super Overclock Edition has 178mhz oc on the core comparing the the normal and 580mhz increase on the memory comparing to the normal. That's what I call customer care and awesome cards chosen by Gigabyte! These should be mini beasts!
__________________

Last edited by 1nf3rn0x; Jan 20, 2011 at 10:15 AM.
1nf3rn0x is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 09:48 AM   #3
R_1
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 449 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 39 Times in 26 Posts

Well, some cores are disabled, so only price can justify this castration.
R_1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 09:52 AM   #4
DarkOCean
1000 Posts
 
DarkOCean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on top of that big mountain on mars(e Eu)
Posts: 1,420 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 272 Times in 234 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1nf3rn0x View Post
wow damn, if you look in the photo the super overclock edition has 188mhz oc on the core comparing the the normal and 580mhz increase on the memory comparing to the normal. That's what i call customer care and awesome cards chosen by gigabyte! These should be mini beasts!
1000-822=178
DarkOCean is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 10:14 AM   #5
killerbee
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

This results are very impressive, X11451 and P24590 ~ HD6970
killerbee is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 10:15 AM   #6
1nf3rn0x
1000 Posts
 
1nf3rn0x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,709 (1.27/day)
Thanks: 512
Thanked 331 Times in 242 Posts

System Specs

LOL, must of misstyped. I didn't see until now.!
__________________
1nf3rn0x is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 11:22 AM   #7
Benetanegia
2000 Posts
 
Benetanegia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by R_1 View Post
Well, some cores are disabled, so only price can justify this castration.
No cores disabled. GF114 has 384 cores.
Benetanegia is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Benetanegia For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 20, 2011, 11:25 AM   #8
sportechie
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 12 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Sorry if it is OOT.. but I am wondering if ASUS will come up with something like this... Asus Mars or Venus or Jupiter...
Installed Gigabyte N450OC2 in my RIIIE but somehow my desktop lockups few minutes into Windows.. Tried installing on Rampage Formula turns out running fine... weird.
sportechie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 01:35 PM   #9
MxPhenom 216
Knowledgeable Posting Whore
 
MxPhenom 216's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,810 (5.82/day)
Thanks: 1,289
Thanked 1,091 Times in 843 Posts

System Specs

I think this might be my next card. well a GTX560Ti really. SLI here i come!

I can only do a 19k preset on Vantage with my 470 at 825mhz


I wonder what MSI has it store? HawkTi????
MxPhenom 216 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 01:43 PM   #10
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,531 (1.50/day)
Thanks: 322
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts

System Specs

With core overclocks like this the 560's are starting to look a little better, i did not have much hope for the stock models as many people were pushing 460's to higher clocks and i would assume a higher clocked 460 would end up close to the same power as a stock clocked 560, kind of like an overclocked 480 vs stock 580.

Yes i know overclocked vs non overclocked is not a fair comparison i just meant as in if people already had about the same power it would be hard to tempt them to upgrade.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nvidiaintelftw View Post
I can only do a 19k preset on Vantage with my 470 at 825mhz
The system spec was not listed so that could be with a 980x or something for all we know, i look forward to the reviews to see some numbers from TPU.
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 01:47 PM   #11
Bjorn_Of_Iceland
2000 Posts
 
Bjorn_Of_Iceland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Húsiđ mitt
Posts: 2,608 (1.32/day)
Thanks: 480
Thanked 358 Times in 266 Posts

System Specs

P24590.. thats like GTX480~GTX570 level performance... how much do these things go? 1Ghz core clock is impressive..
Bjorn_Of_Iceland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 01:48 PM   #12
MxPhenom 216
Knowledgeable Posting Whore
 
MxPhenom 216's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,810 (5.82/day)
Thanks: 1,289
Thanked 1,091 Times in 843 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bjorn_Of_Iceland View Post
P24590.. thats like GTX480~GTX570 level performance... how much do these things go?
Im thinking pricing will be around 260-300. Its suppose to complete with the 6950 and so far it looks like its going to piss on it. well this card at least.
MxPhenom 216 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 01:54 PM   #13
Bjorn_Of_Iceland
2000 Posts
 
Bjorn_Of_Iceland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Húsiđ mitt
Posts: 2,608 (1.32/day)
Thanks: 480
Thanked 358 Times in 266 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by nvidiaintelftw View Post
Im thinking pricing will be around 260-300. Its suppose to complete with the 6950 and so far it looks like its going to piss on it. well this card at least.
That would be for the reference one I reckon (which I doubt would reach 1ghz core clock).. I doubt if thatl be the price for Gigabyte's soc.
Bjorn_Of_Iceland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 01:54 PM   #14
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,531 (1.50/day)
Thanks: 322
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by nvidiaintelftw View Post
Im thinking pricing will be around 260-300. Its suppose to complete with the 6950 and so far it looks like its going to piss on it. well this card at least.
I'm willing to bet this specific model won't come cheap though, most of the super overclock models have been a reasonable amount more than the stock cards but depending on the system used to get the 3dmark score it may be very much worth the extra cost, although i guess it depends on the overclocking results from stock cards.

It would be awesome if the standard models could be clocked up to or even over 1ghz with a little extra voltage, i must admit that would make me very jealous of 560 owners
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 02:19 PM   #15
thunderising
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 682 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 62 Times in 50 Posts

System Specs

Amazing work by Gigabyte. Thumbs up
thunderising is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 05:19 PM   #16
Completely Bonkers
2000 Posts
 
Completely Bonkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,415 (1.05/day)
Thanks: 582
Thanked 533 Times in 374 Posts

System Specs

This is a BIG overclock.

In SLI mode, what will it be called? BIG TITI?
__________________
... some things in life just drive you bonkers. Especially the rubbish you see in forum posts
Completely Bonkers is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Completely Bonkers For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 20, 2011, 06:25 PM   #17
wolf
Performance Enthusiast
 
wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enrichment Center for Aperture Laboratories
Posts: 5,312 (2.40/day)
Thanks: 1,676
Thanked 844 Times in 707 Posts

System Specs

I feel that many GTX560's are going to clock in the area of this card.... this is really nice to see.

well I'd say that given a GTX460 @ 900 core and 1000 mem is already above stock GTX470 performance, this with more shaders, a higher clock and mem clock should sit very very close to GTX570/480 performance, especially at resolutions between 1280x720 and 1920x1200, right in the midrange sweetspot.

last years high end single GPU cards are this years midrange... mmmm value....
__________________


“my goal is speed, full ultra, and extreme gaming” -Ephraim

“Yeah you can always overclock the 2gb memory to 4gb” -jaredpace
wolf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 08:00 PM   #18
GAR
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 75 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GAR

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Completely Bonkers View Post
This is a BIG overclock.

In SLI mode, what will it be called? BIG TITI?
HAHAHAHA
GAR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 08:30 PM   #19
alwayssts
75 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 173 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 34 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Completely Bonkers View Post
This is a BIG overclock.

In SLI mode, what will it be called? BIG TITI?
Immature, classless, etc, but I lol'ed. Imagine the puns..."Look at 'dem TITIs!"

The fact that this is clocked at 1ghz must mean nVIDIA loosened the voltage regulation for partners. IIRC it was clamped down at 1.175v across the range, and it's where 40nm potentially starts to leak badly (It's also the stock voltage for 6970/6870). There is literally no way 1ghz would be reached without going over that rate. That spells good news for more 'vanilla-like' parts after being overvolted/overclocked. That said, I still wish nVIDIA's memory controller didn't suck. The parts will be lovely I'm sure, but it sure could be helped with a little more BW.

nVIDIA must really want to put the hurt to the 6900 series with GTX560. With powertune in place on 6970 and ESPECIALLY 6950, they likely will do just that. I'm not saying 6900 doesn't have it's good points, but the potential is there for nVIDIA to have a smaller core, priced cheaper, that can perform in the same league as those parts; even if at a higher clockspeed (Wait, I've seen this movie before somewhere...). The point, of course, is that power/speed isn't regulated so you are able to make up that difference while AMD has clamped down 560's potential competitor from making up that lost ground.

AMD made their bed the best way they saw fit, now they get to lay in it.

I hope after GTX560 (and probably a 1x6-pin 550 taking on the 6800 series) AMD seriously reconsiders how they go about playing this game. More-efficient architecture or not, it doesn't matter if your competition finds a way to create a better value or more convenient design (IE a 550 could be 145-149W TDP, just like 570 is 219W...they both still will overvolt/overclock, but that one-less power connector looks awfully appealing...).
alwayssts is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 08:32 PM   #20
Wrigleyvillain
3500 Posts
 
Wrigleyvillain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,507 (2.20/day)
Thanks: 1,527
Thanked 1,579 Times in 1,122 Posts

System Specs

The scaling on GTX 460 was pretty damn good in most games, AMD 6xxx still better so I went with some cheap AR 6850's this time around.

Looking forward to news re. how 560 performs in this regard.
__________________
“i dont care what consoles have they dont have mouse and keyboard” -crazyeyesreaper
Wrigleyvillain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 08:45 PM   #21
Robert-The-Rambler
500 Posts
 
Robert-The-Rambler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Shore NY
Posts: 631 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 181
Thanked 118 Times in 80 Posts

System Specs

I prefer....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Completely Bonkers View Post
This is a BIG overclock.

In SLI mode, what will it be called? BIG TITI?
Hooters, snack trays, and sometimes dirty pillows....

Seriously all these anticipatory material of a spectulative nature has me a bit hot and bothered.
__________________
I can see it now. I'm sitting in my underwear in front of an 80" 4:3 image at 1024 * 768 120hz playing a game with my stereoscopic 3D glasses glistening in the reflected light of the image on the screen with 5000 watts of audio blasting and my hair standing up on end as I realize that it is really as my mom has stated; I really am just like Dr. Emmett Brown.
Robert-The-Rambler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 09:38 PM   #22
MxPhenom 216
Knowledgeable Posting Whore
 
MxPhenom 216's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,810 (5.82/day)
Thanks: 1,289
Thanked 1,091 Times in 843 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf View Post
i feel that many gtx560's are going to clock in the area of this card.... This is really nice to see.

Well i'd say that given a gtx460 @ 900 core and 1000 mem is already above stock gtx470 performance, this with more shaders, a higher clock and mem clock should sit very very close to gtx570/480 performance, especially at resolutions between 1280x720 and 1920x1200, right in the midrange sweetspot.

Last years high end single gpu cards are this years midrange... Mmmm value....
sli win!
MxPhenom 216 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2011, 09:40 PM   #23
MxPhenom 216
Knowledgeable Posting Whore
 
MxPhenom 216's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,810 (5.82/day)
Thanks: 1,289
Thanked 1,091 Times in 843 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by alwayssts View Post
Immature, classless, etc, but I lol'ed. Imagine the puns..."Look at 'dem TITIs!"

The fact that this is clocked at 1ghz must mean nVIDIA loosened the voltage regulation for partners. IIRC it was clamped down at 1.175v across the range, and it's where 40nm potentially starts to leak badly (It's also the stock voltage for 6970/6870). There is literally no way 1ghz would be reached without going over that rate. That spells good news for more 'vanilla-like' parts after being overvolted/overclocked. That said, I still wish nVIDIA's memory controller didn't suck. The parts will be lovely I'm sure, but it sure could be helped with a little more BW.

nVIDIA must really want to put the hurt to the 6900 series with GTX560. With powertune in place on 6970 and ESPECIALLY 6950, they likely will do just that. I'm not saying 6900 doesn't have it's good points, but the potential is there for nVIDIA to have a smaller core, priced cheaper, that can perform in the same league as those parts; even if at a higher clockspeed (Wait, I've seen this movie before somewhere...). The point, of course, is that power/speed isn't regulated so you are able to make up that difference while AMD has clamped down 560's potential competitor from making up that lost ground.

AMD made their bed the best way they saw fit, now they get to lay in it.

I hope after GTX560 (and probably a 1x6-pin 550 taking on the 6800 series) AMD seriously reconsiders how they go about playing this game. More-efficient architecture or not, it doesn't matter if your competition finds a way to create a better value or more convenient design (IE a 550 could be 145-149W TDP, just like 570 is 219W...they both still will overvolt/overclock, but that one-less power connector looks awfully appealing...).
with the gtx5xx series their memory cooler is actually pretty good; even if their clocks arent as high, the bus is what really stands out. with the lower clocks but higher bus then the AMD cards is still getting quite a bit more bandwidth. look at the GTX580
MxPhenom 216 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2011, 07:07 PM   #24
[H]@RD5TUFF
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 5,589 (4.34/day)
Thanks: 1,825
Thanked 1,710 Times in 1,431 Posts

System Specs

Pretty sexy, but price will dictate adoption, and FFS Gigabyte can't you have some professional photos for a press release rather than a picture of a projection .. .!
__________________
Stuff 4 Sale!
Heat Ware
ebay



[H]@RD5TUFF is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 560 Ti Graphics Card Pictured btarunr News 53 Jan 18, 2011 05:46 PM
Gigabyte GV-N480SO-15I Super Overclock Graphics Card in Works btarunr News 13 Nov 3, 2010 05:19 PM
Gigabyte Announces GeForce GTX 460 Super Overclock Graphics Card btarunr News 6 Oct 22, 2010 12:42 PM
Gigabyte Announces GeForce GTX 470 Super Overclock (SOC) Graphics Card btarunr News 6 Aug 30, 2010 03:06 AM
Gigabyte Launches New Super Overclock Graphics Cards btarunr News 19 Sep 5, 2009 08:18 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts