![]() |
|
|
#13376 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South Colton, New York
Posts: 1,653 (0.94/day)
Thanks: 755
Thanked 664 Times in 401 Posts
|
__________________
"I didn't want my Mom to know I was drag racing for 20 years so I told her I was in prison." |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Bow For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#13377 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hartford SD
Posts: 1,041 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 488
Thanked 325 Times in 218 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() Also, does anyone know why FAH Tracker reports my PPD on my i7 less than what HFM reports it as? HFM is giving me 28.2k on a 2686 with 2 gpu2 clients running, and FAH tracker is giving me 26.3k PPD. Both numbers on the gpu are equal though, just the -bigadv that's off. I would also like to thank Oily 17, for the sig image and teaching me how to change the colors Now i can sport off that new 1 million points!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13378 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portland, OR USA
Posts: 2,141 (1.20/day)
Thanks: 1,559
Thanked 880 Times in 627 Posts
|
I don't believe that FAH tracker considers the bonus points. HFM.net does
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13379 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hartford SD
Posts: 1,041 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 488
Thanked 325 Times in 218 Posts
|
Quote:
Honestly guys, what do you think about folding on the GPU's as well as the i7? Im getting 39k total with both gpu's running, and i get about 34.8k with just the CPU. Is it worth the extra power and heat for 5k? I managed to get a little cash on some PC repairs, i could fix a laptop for $125, and sell it for around $300-350, so a profit of $175-225 and then i could sell my itouch for probably $100. Hopefully i could make some hardware changes and get me a dedicated system so i don't need to interrupt my folding machine and my folding machine can get some gts 450's or something of that sort. Edit: So i managed to get down to 25k PPD with my i7 and gpu2 clients running. Not worth it to me, so i'll only be folding the i7 for now on this rig till i can find some different cards or something. So only expect points every 2 to 2 and a half days for me for now at the moment. Last edited by Josh154; Jan 24, 2011 at 03:00 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13380 | |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portland, OR USA
Posts: 2,141 (1.20/day)
Thanks: 1,559
Thanked 880 Times in 627 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13381 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hartford SD
Posts: 1,041 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 488
Thanked 325 Times in 218 Posts
|
No i haven't yet. What should 1 less core drop my PPD too?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13382 |
|
F@H Mod & 4P Enthusiust
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tallahassee, FL. U.S.A.
Posts: 4,047 (1.91/day)
Thanks: 3,378
Thanked 2,907 Times in 1,474 Posts
|
Nope, you'll actually gain ppd. By using a spare core for the GPU's, you are avoiding any conflict between the -bigadv client and the GPU clients.
__________________
“I'll finally be able to drool over 8 gpu in one rig... And get sued by my wallet for violent physical damage...” -Feanor
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to BUCK NASTY For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#13383 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hartford SD
Posts: 1,041 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 488
Thanked 325 Times in 218 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() Okay, so with the cpu flag at -smp7 and running 2 gpu2 clients my total CPU usage is between 88% and 90%. Seem right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13384 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Philly, PA (US)
Posts: 1,084 (1.20/day)
Thanks: 277
Thanked 323 Times in 197 Posts
|
100/8 = 12.5
So, yeah about 88% seems correct because your two GPUs will use a little of the eighth core. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to xbonez For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#13385 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hartford SD
Posts: 1,041 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 488
Thanked 325 Times in 218 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Josh154 For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#13386 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 149 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 312
Thanked 58 Times in 35 Posts
|
I hope to be getting a 2nd hand asus M4A79T Deluxe soon, so i can finally go dedicated!
|
|
|
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to PhysXerror For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#13387 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hartford SD
Posts: 1,041 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 488
Thanked 325 Times in 218 Posts
|
Hey guys quick question, so now that i have my 1 million points folding badge, what happens when i get a average of over 25k again? Does my 1 million points badge turn into a crazy folders badge or do i get both?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13388 |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,666 (7.92/day)
Thanks: 8,249
Thanked 9,329 Times in 4,261 Posts
|
Current badge morphs into the "Crazy Folder" badge. You don't get both, unfortunately
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13389 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hartford SD
Posts: 1,041 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 488
Thanked 325 Times in 218 Posts
|
Quote:
I like showing off my million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13390 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Philly, PA (US)
Posts: 1,084 (1.20/day)
Thanks: 277
Thanked 323 Times in 197 Posts
|
Just make sure you don't churn put more than 25k points a day, then
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13391 | |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,666 (7.92/day)
Thanks: 8,249
Thanked 9,329 Times in 4,261 Posts
|
I think that the X million badges are more for the slow-and-steady type, and the Crazy Folder badges are for those doing high PPD. It can safely be assumed about most crazy folders that they have at least a million anyways, it would only take 40 days top @ 25k PPD to get a mil after all
![]() Quote:
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13392 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hartford SD
Posts: 1,041 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 488
Thanked 325 Times in 218 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() Smp-7 seemed to help me out a lot! Running steadily at a good 43k PPD. Think it's worth trying to find a stable 4.2 clock? Im at 1.216 at 4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13393 |
|
F@H Mod & 4P Enthusiust
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tallahassee, FL. U.S.A.
Posts: 4,047 (1.91/day)
Thanks: 3,378
Thanked 2,907 Times in 1,474 Posts
|
What are your current load temps?
__________________
“I'll finally be able to drool over 8 gpu in one rig... And get sued by my wallet for violent physical damage...” -Feanor
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13394 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hartford SD
Posts: 1,041 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 488
Thanked 325 Times in 218 Posts
|
About 60-65C
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13395 |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,666 (7.92/day)
Thanks: 8,249
Thanked 9,329 Times in 4,261 Posts
|
Only if it doesn't require the voltage to go up much. I run my 860 @ 3.8ghz and get upper 60s load temps with it, 4ghz requires a lot more voltage and temps are in the mid-upper 70s.
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13396 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hartford SD
Posts: 1,041 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 488
Thanked 325 Times in 218 Posts
|
Hmm. Well i guess i could see what it takes for 4.2 but im gonna wait till after this work unit finishes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13397 |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,666 (7.92/day)
Thanks: 8,249
Thanked 9,329 Times in 4,261 Posts
|
Smart, you don't want to loose one in the middle
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13398 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hartford SD
Posts: 1,041 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 488
Thanked 325 Times in 218 Posts
|
Exactly, im 56% done and that would suck!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13399 |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 10,666 (7.92/day)
Thanks: 8,249
Thanked 9,329 Times in 4,261 Posts
|
I usually suspend WCG, OC, and then boot up and run LinX or Prime95 for 30 minutes. If it passes that, I typically fire up WCG again, but I was less willing to play with things "on-the-fly" when I was running FAH and it could lose more work at once.
__________________
Crunching (64 Threads + 896 CUDA Cores + 6272 Shaders): i3-2100@ 3.1 + HD7850 -- Atom D510 @ 1.66 -- C2D-M T9600 @ 2.8 -- i7-3612QM @ 2.8 -- i7-860 @ 2.9 + HD7950 -- i7-2700k @ 4.4 + 2xGTX470 -- PentDC-M T4200 @ 2.0 -- i7-920 @ 3.83 + 3xHD7770 -- DP Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 + HD7930 -- E1600 @ 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13400 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Philly, PA (US)
Posts: 1,084 (1.20/day)
Thanks: 277
Thanked 323 Times in 197 Posts
|
So, the GTX 560 finally has a price to it ($250) and reviews show it to perform midway between the 470 and the 480. Considering 470s sell for almost the same price and give lesser performance, their price should start going down pretty soon.
Folders should be able to start picking up 470s a lot cheaper soon. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to xbonez For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|