techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Motherboards & Memory

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 22, 2011, 06:14 PM   #1
teribilis
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

OCZ Blade ST 1600Mhz don't want to go over 1616Mhz :O

Hello after having some problems with my previous ram kit, I'm currently overclocking my new config:
Gigabyte 790XTA-UD4
AMD Phenom II X4 955 Be C2
OCZ Blade ST 12800 DDR3 1.65V

At first, I wanted to know ram limits: It is supposed to be run at
7-8-8-24/1600Mhz/1.65V
Okay, the only way to be stable was to put the CPU-NB voltage at 1.3V
But when I put the FSB further than 202, it will be prime95 unstable.
So, is my ram showing its limits at 1616Mhz ??

I saw a topic where a guy was a 1.71V ram voltage but at 6-7-6-21/1600Mhz
Am I making a mistake ?
teribilis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 06:15 PM   #2
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts

System Specs

Try adding RAM voltage. 1.71v is perfectly safe with an AMD system. It's possible the RAM you have just isn't capable of doing much overclocking.
__________________
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 06:26 PM   #3
teribilis
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Well as I said i saw someone going to 6-7-6-21 1600 at 1.71V
On another topic I can read :"OCZ Blade ST with Elpida BBSE IC's that can reach 1600 6-7-6 easily"
And effectively Elpida BBSE seems to be a terrifying chip.

Even at 1.71V I can't be prime stable at 7-7-7-24 1600Mhz
teribilis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 06:30 PM   #4
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,633 (3.07/day)
Thanks: 1,366
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

RAM goes through a lot of revisions, and the number 1 revision that they go through is a change of IC's. You might not have BBSE's.

This is a far from complete, and not perfectly updated, but helpful guide:

http://ramlist.i4memory.com/ddr3/
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 06:41 PM   #5
teribilis
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Yes i read this guide and my ram is not listed
I'm becoming crazy, only 16Mhz of overclocking is unbelievable. Do you think that lowering timings might be useful ?
teribilis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 06:45 PM   #6
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,633 (3.07/day)
Thanks: 1,366
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

Lowering timings means higher performance. They are often referred to as "tighter" timings to imply that they are faster, rather than "lower" timings.

Many kits out there today are binned extremely well so that they won't overclock much, but the manufacturer can offer different price points for RAM.

For your system, I would recommend leaving the RAM as it is, and focus on overclocking the processor. It's a BE, so all you've got to do is raise the multi and voltage on it, and you should be good to go.

Also, keep in mind that Your Mileage May Vary with any overclocking. Just because Joe clocked his sticks to whatever doesn't mean your kit should do the same.
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 06:55 PM   #7
teribilis
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

When saying lowering I effectively wanted to say tightening, being french, English can be an obstacle in technical language

I can understand chips are different but i could not imagine that puting the fsb at 203 instead of 200 might make the ram unstable ..
teribilis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:03 PM   #8
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,182 (6.41/day)
Thanks: 460
Thanked 2,810 Times in 2,256 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

sounds like a 790FX board and C2 chip combined with PSC. what revision are your memory and whats the manuf. date

OCZ Blade SuperTuned 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SD...

that kit is not BBSE that kit is PSC.
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:04 PM   #9
cadaveca
My name is Dave
 
cadaveca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 10,929 (4.16/day)
Thanks: 4,713
Thanked 5,453 Times in 3,304 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by teribilis View Post
I can understand chips are different but i could not imagine that puting the fsb at 203 instead of 200 might make the ram unstable ..
You also increase northbridge speed when increasing the cpu's bus, so it might not have anything to do with the memory at all.
__________________
Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp


-Only real men play games THIS way.
cadaveca is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:21 PM   #10
teribilis
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
sounds like a 790FX board and C2 chip combined with PSC. what revision are your memory and whats the manuf. date

OCZ Blade SuperTuned 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SD...

that kit is not BBSE that kit is PSC.
Hm I don't really understand the problem. For the revision, I don't know and the manuf date is last january, dimms are brand new and coming from Taiwan after a RMA.


Quote:
You also increase northbridge speed when increasing the cpu's bus, so it might not have anything to do with the memory at all.
I don't think so because I'm currently prime stable with a 2600Mhz CPU-NB and 3700Mhz CPU with my ram at 1600. Furthermore when I put the FSB at 250 but lower the multi and desynchro the ram at 6.66x to test, everything is prime stable.

Last edited by teribilis; Feb 22, 2011 at 07:27 PM.
teribilis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:28 PM   #11
timta2
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 788 (0.40/day)
Thanks: 94
Thanked 106 Times in 97 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Do you think that lowering timings might be useful ?
Yes, you might have to back off on the timings to increase clock speed. Sometimes you have to compromise.

Try 8-8-8-24 and see where that gets you.
timta2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:37 PM   #12
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,182 (6.41/day)
Thanks: 460
Thanked 2,810 Times in 2,256 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by teribilis View Post
Hm I don't really understand the problem. For the revision, I don't know and the manuf date is last january, dimms are brand new and coming from Taiwan after a RMA.

ram is PSC what BIOS revision is your board on
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:43 PM   #13
teribilis
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

I'm on the last F3 bios
teribilis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:45 PM   #14
sneekypeet
Unpaid Babysitter
 
sneekypeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19,115 (7.28/day)
Thanks: 3,062
Thanked 5,500 Times in 3,959 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by timta2 View Post
Try 8-8-8-24 and see where that gets you.
not if they are PSC chips. you need to run at least a +1 tRCD for IC for stability
__________________
Hers: ASUS Maximus V Gene / i7 3770K / Swiftech H220 / 4X8GB Corsair Dominators / ASUS GTX660 / Corsair AX-760 / Windows 7 64bit / Fractal Design ARC Midi R2

Test: Gigabyte Z68X-UD4-B3 / i7 2600K / A lot Of Coolers / Ripjaws Currently / HIS HD7950 IceQ Turbo / Silverstone SST-ST85F-G / Windows 7 64bit / InWin D-Frame Limited Edition
sneekypeet is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:47 PM   #15
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,182 (6.41/day)
Thanks: 460
Thanked 2,810 Times in 2,256 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by sneekypeet View Post
not if they are PSC chips. you need to run at least a +1 tRCD for IC for stability
they aren't fun on AMD i would bet that the chips wont be stable over 1600 he can try 7-9-7 and see were that goes.
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:51 PM   #16
sneekypeet
Unpaid Babysitter
 
sneekypeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19,115 (7.28/day)
Thanks: 3,062
Thanked 5,500 Times in 3,959 Posts

System Specs

I agree, most PSC sticks are super tuned to Intel rigs.
__________________
Hers: ASUS Maximus V Gene / i7 3770K / Swiftech H220 / 4X8GB Corsair Dominators / ASUS GTX660 / Corsair AX-760 / Windows 7 64bit / Fractal Design ARC Midi R2

Test: Gigabyte Z68X-UD4-B3 / i7 2600K / A lot Of Coolers / Ripjaws Currently / HIS HD7950 IceQ Turbo / Silverstone SST-ST85F-G / Windows 7 64bit / InWin D-Frame Limited Edition
sneekypeet is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 08:18 PM   #17
teribilis
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

7-9-7-24 1T @1.71V at 1620Mhz is not prime stable :S
teribilis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 08:20 PM   #18
sneekypeet
Unpaid Babysitter
 
sneekypeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19,115 (7.28/day)
Thanks: 3,062
Thanked 5,500 Times in 3,959 Posts

System Specs

wait...you're testing ram with Prime? Try memtest86+ ver.4.2

Also are you changing anything else with the ram clocking? 1620 is an odd number, seems to me multiple things are changing at once.
__________________
Hers: ASUS Maximus V Gene / i7 3770K / Swiftech H220 / 4X8GB Corsair Dominators / ASUS GTX660 / Corsair AX-760 / Windows 7 64bit / Fractal Design ARC Midi R2

Test: Gigabyte Z68X-UD4-B3 / i7 2600K / A lot Of Coolers / Ripjaws Currently / HIS HD7950 IceQ Turbo / Silverstone SST-ST85F-G / Windows 7 64bit / InWin D-Frame Limited Edition
sneekypeet is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 08:23 PM   #19
teribilis
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Well, with the HT at 205Mhz, if I put my ram at 6.66x to be sure it is not the cause, I can prime blend during 8 hours. Then, when I get errors at 8x I effectively conclude it is the ram fault.

Effectively it is 1640 and not 1620: 205*8
teribilis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 08:25 PM   #20
sneekypeet
Unpaid Babysitter
 
sneekypeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19,115 (7.28/day)
Thanks: 3,062
Thanked 5,500 Times in 3,959 Posts

System Specs

ahh I got ya now.
__________________
Hers: ASUS Maximus V Gene / i7 3770K / Swiftech H220 / 4X8GB Corsair Dominators / ASUS GTX660 / Corsair AX-760 / Windows 7 64bit / Fractal Design ARC Midi R2

Test: Gigabyte Z68X-UD4-B3 / i7 2600K / A lot Of Coolers / Ripjaws Currently / HIS HD7950 IceQ Turbo / Silverstone SST-ST85F-G / Windows 7 64bit / InWin D-Frame Limited Edition
sneekypeet is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 08:32 PM   #21
teribilis
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Hmm 7-9-8-24 at 1640Mhz seems more stable as prime doesn't return errors ftm.
Anyway when I'm benching my ram, results in read, copy, write at 7-8-8-24 1600 are quite the same as 7-9-8-24 1640.
Is the second option preferable as it lets me play a little more with the HT?
teribilis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 08:34 PM   #22
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,182 (6.41/day)
Thanks: 460
Thanked 2,810 Times in 2,256 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by teribilis View Post
Hmm 7-9-8-24 at 1640Mhz seems more stable as prime doesn't return errors ftm.
Anyway when I'm benching my ram, results in read, copy, write at 7-8-8-24 1600 are quite the same as 7-9-8-24 1640.
Is the second option preferable as it lets me play a little more with the HT?
you could try 6-9-6 also and for HT clocking there isn't any reason to do so but you could just drop the ram speed
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 08:36 PM   #23
teribilis
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by teribilis View Post
7-9-7-24 1T @1.71V at 1620Mhz is not prime stable :S
I don't think 6-9-6-24 will be more stable
teribilis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 08:38 PM   #24
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
 
brandonwh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chatsworth, GA
Posts: 13,667 (9.89/day)
Thanks: 2,165
Thanked 5,382 Times in 3,729 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to brandonwh64 Send a message via AIM to brandonwh64 Send a message via MSN to brandonwh64 Send a message via Yahoo to brandonwh64

System Specs

Have you tried CL8?
__________________
Cruncher's:
All GPU's
GPU's:
7970 3GB = 8 Threads
5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads
brandonwh64 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 08:39 PM   #25
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,182 (6.41/day)
Thanks: 460
Thanked 2,810 Times in 2,256 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonwh64 View Post
Have you tried CL8?
thats not the issue PSC and old AMD IMC's don't play together
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[FS] Default OCZ DDR3 6GB 1600MHZ Platinum RAM jellyrole Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 11 Apr 5, 2010 12:30 AM
[WTB][US] 4GB OCZ Blade LV PC2-9200 Wrigleyvillain Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 0 Jan 11, 2010 09:06 PM
ocz pc9600 blade...? stevednmc Motherboards & Memory 10 Jul 18, 2009 06:33 AM
OCZ FlexXLC DDR3 1600mhz OC question fps_dean Overclocking & Cooling 0 Sep 20, 2008 11:31 PM
OCZ Announces 1600MHz DDR3 Modules With Enhanced Bandwidth malware News 1 Jul 18, 2007 01:19 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts