techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 7, 2011, 03:31 PM   #1
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,772 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,220 Times in 3,163 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

ASUS Radeon HD 6990 4096 MB

To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/Radeon_HD_6990/

Last edited by W1zzard; Mar 8, 2011 at 05:50 AM.
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 8, 2011, 04:47 AM   #2
zhadlp
25 Posts
 
zhadlp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Philippines
Posts: 70 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 30 Times in 14 Posts
Send a message via MSN to zhadlp Send a message via Yahoo to zhadlp Send a message via Skype™ to zhadlp

System Specs

fast and loud
__________________
I am no man's master, nor would I ever want to be...
zhadlp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 04:48 AM   #3
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.27/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Very disappointing really.
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 04:52 AM   #4
random
2000 Posts
 
random's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,473 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 1,248
Thanked 627 Times in 407 Posts

System Specs

That is damned impressive! Now lets see the GTX590 so we can see a lower price.
random is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 04:53 AM   #5
Jstn7477
2000 Posts
 
Jstn7477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,136 (2.30/day)
Thanks: 387
Thanked 1,193 Times in 805 Posts

System Specs

Well, at least it seems to be a worthy replacement of the 5970, but it is not too shy with the power consumption it seems.
__________________
Intel Crunchers (27 threads): 2x 3770K 4.3G (14t), 2600K 4G (7t), X3210 (3t), P-M 735A, P4 HT 3G
AMD Crunchers (11 cores):1100T 3.6G (3t), 1045T 3.4G (2t), X3 8550 2.5G, X2 4200+, T64 ML-37
AMD Folders (6272 GCN cores): 2x 7950 1125/1475, 7970 1150/1650, 7770 1100/1200
NV Folders (2336 GF10x + 1344 GK104 cores):GTX 470 & 465 720/1715, 4x 460 768MB 825/2000, GTS 450, 660Ti 1228/6000

HEATWARE
Jstn7477 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 04:54 AM   #6
hanzi
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 41 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

yeah especially the power output. If the power consumption is just the same or at least closer to the 5970's this will be greatest card to date.
hanzi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 04:56 AM   #7
Hayder_Master
3500 Posts
 
Hayder_Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: IRAQ-Baghdad
Posts: 4,860 (2.62/day)
Thanks: 388
Thanked 639 Times in 444 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Hayder_Master Send a message via Yahoo to Hayder_Master

System Specs

nice work w1zzard
Hayder_Master is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 05:03 AM   #8
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,701 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by hanzi View Post
yeah especially the power output. If the power consumption is just the same or at least closer to the 5970's this will be greatest card to date.
338W in Maximum load is not bad really, it is only 18W more than a 580.
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ
“but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zubasa For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 8, 2011, 05:07 AM   #9
afw
500 Posts
 
afw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 628 (0.41/day)
Thanks: 93
Thanked 129 Times in 97 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to afw

System Specs

Not impressed a lot ... but a good card nevertheless ... ...


EDIT: quick ques - These tests were done in stock settings (BIOS 1) or with the overclocked settings (BIOS 2) ... ???

EDIT 2: ppl complaining abt performance ... please check this (6990 vs. 580SLI) --> http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...gb-review.html
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Main Rig : Asus Sabertooth z77 , Intel i7 2700k, Corsair Vengeance 8GB , Corsair FORCE GT 120GB, Seasonic x650 GOLD , Acer G235H , SilverStone Raven RV02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Last edited by afw; Mar 8, 2011 at 06:19 AM.
afw is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 05:13 AM   #10
Tensa Zangetsu
25 Posts
 
Tensa Zangetsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Nairobi,Kenya
Posts: 32 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

System Specs

Meh, too expensive & noisy for the performance
Tensa Zangetsu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 05:16 AM   #11
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,772 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,220 Times in 3,163 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by afw View Post
These tests were done in stock settings (BIOS 1) or with the overclocked settings (BIOS 2) ... ???
stock bios, i'll have data for the oc bios soon
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 8, 2011, 05:22 AM   #12
v12dock
1000 Posts
 
v12dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,286 (0.80/day)
Thanks: 281
Thanked 240 Times in 160 Posts

System Specs

I EXPECT performance gains with driver maturity.
v12dock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 05:31 AM   #13
Melvis
2000 Posts
 
Melvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,929 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 602
Thanked 459 Times in 381 Posts

System Specs

YES!!! Finally a card that draws more power then the 4870X2 lol, i feel so good now

Edit: and nosier haha
Melvis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 05:40 AM   #14
mtosev
1000 Posts
 
mtosev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

The switch is covered by a scary big, yellow sticker which basically tells you that switching the BIOS will void your warranty.
During production AMD does a "bootup" test at the overclocked settings, but they do not guarantee stability of the card in this mode. The sticker itself did not pose a big problem, it can be removed, moved and put back easily.

LOL. So they added a second BIOS profile and if you use it it voids your warranty. Overclock your GFX in Windows and keep you warranty.
__________________
My notebook:

Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset

[img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG]

CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"

Last edited by W1zzard; Mar 8, 2011 at 05:50 AM.
mtosev is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 05:41 AM   #15
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,772 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,220 Times in 3,163 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

added the data for the oc mode to the graphs
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 05:43 AM   #16
LAN_deRf_HA
3500 Posts
 
LAN_deRf_HA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,024 (2.15/day)
Thanks: 290
Thanked 831 Times in 588 Posts

System Specs

PCB looks nice and tidy compared to nvidia's latest dual gpu board. Wonder if that's down to power draw, part quality, or both.
LAN_deRf_HA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 05:47 AM   #17
Swamp Monster
500 Posts
 
Swamp Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Latvia
Posts: 543 (0.58/day)
Thanks: 127
Thanked 83 Times in 75 Posts

System Specs

This is a monster! (and costs like a monster too).
Swamp Monster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 06:01 AM   #18
HellasVagabond
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Athens , GREECE
Posts: 2,695 (1.16/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 168 Times in 140 Posts

System Specs

A 30% performance increase compared to a stock GTX580 is simply disappointing and proves that the GTX590(595?) will be quite faster, if NVIDIA decides to release it (they also had a GTX490 ready which they never did release). That aside the noise levels are expected and bad, the power draw at Peak is too much and the price is more than two 6970's.
As for driver optimizations this is not possible since the card is based on the 6970/CF, however since AMD (ATI) did perform an IQ cut-down recently to improve performance they may do it again so i guess we never can be sure of anything.
Bottom line i had higher expectations. Perhaps ASUS and the others can further improve the card, that however will result in even higher price tags.
__________________

Guides For GPU Power Users
(Sometimes its Good to pay tribute to some people instead of copy pasting their guides.)
HellasVagabond is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 06:02 AM   #19
beautyless
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: No sign of life, I'm look like the machine.
Posts: 43 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to beautyless

System Specs

Great review as always!

The card looks awesome, especially considering by the label "The World Fastest Graphic Card".
I hope they're successed to create the comparable opponent to NVDIA GTX 595/590.
If not, the thing still looks real HIGH-END enough to satisfy AMD Lover.


I heard that the card should come with free "ACTIVE MiniDPP to SL-DVI converter" in every box, is it true?
It's add more value.


I waiting for 3 monitors resolution test result such as 5760x1080, becauses this kind of the tech is more commonly today.
__________________

Last edited by beautyless; Mar 8, 2011 at 06:21 AM.
beautyless is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 06:15 AM   #20
Jamborhgini313
75 Posts
 
Jamborhgini313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 173 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 33
Thanked 26 Times in 22 Posts

System Specs

should be closer to $600
__________________
Jamborhgini313 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 06:27 AM   #21
Cuzza
500 Posts
 
Cuzza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 932 (0.43/day)
Thanks: 136
Thanked 213 Times in 166 Posts

System Specs

All rather predictable really. Still... if I win the lottery... ... no actually if I win the lottery it will go on fast cars and fast women, not fast gfx cards.
__________________

My Sega Mod Project - - - - - - - My Macintosh Mod Project
“I don't want to get sued by any 9 fungered modders cause I gave them the idea. My wife concurs with me on that, too.” -Mark_Hardware
"For one believes he may eat all things, but he who is weak eats only vegetables." - Romans 14:2
Cuzza is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cuzza For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 8, 2011, 08:34 AM   #22
mtosev
1000 Posts
 
mtosev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

http://geizhals.at/eu/?in=&fs=hd+6990
__________________
My notebook:

Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset

[img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG]

CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"
mtosev is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 08:36 AM   #23
HalfAHertz
1000 Posts
 
HalfAHertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,741 (1.18/day)
Thanks: 364
Thanked 348 Times in 252 Posts

System Specs

Thanks for the review W1z.
Well the card is really impressive from an engineering pov but as a consumer i think that the only people that should be interested in this card is those upgrading from a 4870x2. (or 4870x2x2 lol)
__________________
smile or the devil will get in your head and sing karaoke forever...
HalfAHertz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 08:47 AM   #24
Benetanegia
2000 Posts
 
Benetanegia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zubasa View Post
338W in Maximum load is not bad really, it is only 18W more than a 580.
That's on Furmark which is irrelevant. It's artificial and they have measures to fake power consumption under stress tests like this. You have to look at how much it consumes under real games which are represented by the peak numbers on the charts.

Compared to GTX580 which does not have the best consumption to begin with, peak power consumption is 75w higher, which is 33% higher. And if you compare it to the HD5970 you can start crying already.

I think that Nvidia can win this dual-GPU round easily on performance and performance per watt. Maybe even consume less than the HD6990. Same thing that happened with the GTX295:



The relevant thing about the chart above is comparing HD4870 vs GTX285/275 and then comparing HD4870 X2 vx GTX295. The same can happen now, because despite being underclocked, at 301w peak, the power consumption is horrible compared to HD6970 (+63% higher), let alone the 6950 (+135%).
Benetanegia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2011, 09:16 AM   #25
H82LUZ73
1000 Posts
 
H82LUZ73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cobourg,Ontario
Posts: 1,361 (0.72/day)
Thanks: 1,136
Thanked 249 Times in 206 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by afw View Post
Not impressed a lot ... but a good card nevertheless ... ...


EDIT: quick ques - These tests were done in stock settings (BIOS 1) or with the overclocked settings (BIOS 2) ... ???

EDIT 2: ppl complaining abt performance ... please check this (6990 vs. 580SLI) --> http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...gb-review.html
I think most of them forget that the cards are at a lower stock clock then the 6970`s,That review how ever does go in depth with overclocks and puts the card ahead of a 580 sli setup in some games with beta drivers which is good.I can not wait for the green team`s gtx590 which will also be at lower then normal 580 clocks,and we will here why is it slower in benches.It seems the card industry is going going gone green on all of us with these monster dual cards.But they leave that ""USE AT YOUR OWN RISK""Option that voids the warranty (IE ASUS) So they can charge a higher price (IE $40 -$60) on there so called OC line which will only use there own smart doctor program.

Great review Wizz,I just wish you would have put a sli setup in the first review (ASUS one) And also are you going for the new Heaven benchmark in the future ?
H82LUZ73 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASUS Radeon HD 6990 Listed on Pre-Order btarunr News 54 Mar 10, 2011 03:20 AM
AMD Radeon HD 6990 Press Deck Leaked btarunr News 48 Mar 5, 2011 05:53 PM
AMD Radeon HD 6990 Pictured Up Close btarunr News 124 Jan 29, 2011 01:03 PM
ASUS ARES 4096 MB - Dual HD 5870 W1zzard Reviews 47 Jul 15, 2010 10:01 AM
ASUS MARS Dual GeForce GTX 285 4096 MB W1zzard Reviews 42 Oct 21, 2009 02:52 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts