![]() |
|
|
#101 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.67/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts
|
rickss69 - 2483 - 98.6 - ASUS GTX 580 @ 976/1132/1952 - i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz - DX11
|
|
|
|
|
|
#102 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington, US
Posts: 902 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 562
Thanked 237 Times in 130 Posts
|
xvi | 631 | 25.0 | HD4870 @ 750/900 | Phenom II 550 BE @ 3.8GHz | DX10
![]() xvi | 640 | 25.4 | HD4870 @ 750/900 and HD4850 @ 665/993 Crossfire | Phenom II 550 BE @ 3.8GHz | DX10 ![]() Previous 4850 runs: Spoiler
__________________
Any computer, no matter how old, can serve a meaningful purpose.
Behind every closet door is a dusty computer waiting to be reborn. Last edited by xvi; Mar 24, 2011 at 10:35 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,413 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 478
Thanked 741 Times in 452 Posts
|
Thanks.... Yes I did get the promotion at my Work.... So I am happy! Started it last week. It was rough though... allot of learning plus 12 hour days while I was training. So thanks for the congrats!!!
![]() 2. I got my new i7 2600k Water cooled rig up and running (For all intents and purposes) I might mount the Micro Res somewhere else or get a new Res.... but here it is for right now....Sorry about the blurry pic.....(And yes I was one of the ten lucky people to get the new Maximus Extreme IV while it was in stock at New Egg and no I am not kidding there were only 10 of us!) 3. And Finally Scores are updated!!! WTG to RICKSS69 for taking over the ATI DX11 Leader Board!!! I can't wait to get some new benches with my i7 2600k now Well keep the scores coming guys I am back.
__________________
Heatware 35 + 0 | 0 - Last edited by 20mmrain; Mar 28, 2011 at 04:03 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.67/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts
|
RICKSS69 Dammit!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#105 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: In a troll cave
Posts: 295 (0.24/day)
Thanks: 227
Thanked 72 Times in 44 Posts
|
Why such a low resolution? Whatever. I'll give you my score at your low resolution and a score at 1080p. High end cards, and crossfire configurations really need a high resolution to breathe.
Downloading now, then I'll edit my scores into this post.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
#106 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,413 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 478
Thanked 741 Times in 452 Posts
|
LMFAO My bad..... I will change it
![]() Quote:
__________________
Heatware 35 + 0 | 0 - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,986 (1.56/day)
Thanks: 619
Thanked 471 Times in 392 Posts
|
Quote:
they should of scored close to my single 4870X2.Have you tested with different drivers? it doesn't seem like crossfire was even working when you did that run? Im going to retest mine soon with older drivers and see what happens. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: In a troll cave
Posts: 295 (0.24/day)
Thanks: 227
Thanked 72 Times in 44 Posts
|
damric - 2415 - 95.6 - HD 6850 CF @1000/1200 - Thuban 1090T @4.0GHZ - DX11
![]() CPU-Z does not support my mobo so I included the Core-temp gadget that shows my 1090T @4GHZ. Here is a score at 1920x1080 res with AAx4, AFx16, Extreme Tessellation. Top tier and CF/SLI configurations need these higher settings to breathe.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked Last edited by damric; Mar 28, 2011 at 07:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 2,058 (0.64/day)
Thanks: 601
Thanked 551 Times in 231 Posts
|
15th Warlock - 2663 - 105.7 - PNY GTX580 SLI @ 833/1666/1050 - Intel 2600K @ 5Ghz- DX 11
![]() Quote:
__________________
Project Crimson Dragon, custom watercooled SLI EVGA Titan SCs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,413 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 478
Thanked 741 Times in 452 Posts
|
Quote:
Yeah I had to call to.... just to make sure they were really there. Shortly after I bought one as well they were out. Although it wasn't as quick as it was for you. But in the past I have had their site glitch out on me. When the 5870's released.... It told me it completed my order...but it really wasn't there. That's why I didn't take any chances either.... and I also called them twice with this motherboard. Just to make sure it didn't glitch out on me again! Awsome Board Hey man?!!! Fun as hell to play with. By far one of the better boards I have owned!BTW This new Board and CPU is the Shit just reran this benchmark with only a Overclock on the CPU of 4.5 Ghz and a GPU increase of 40Mhz (So up to 840 Mhz) and I am already in the 90 FPS Range. Before I had my GPU clocks up to 950Mhz + and a 4.0 GHZ i7 860 to get 93 FPS.... So man O man I should have no problem breaking my goal of 100 FPS now
__________________
Heatware 35 + 0 | 0 - Last edited by 20mmrain; Mar 28, 2011 at 12:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 680 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 162
Thanked 205 Times in 152 Posts
|
Apparent great efficiency in AMD GPU's
Just out of curiousity, i did some quick simple math to calculate the efficiency difference between the highest scoring AMD DX11 set-up, and the lowest scoring AMD DX11 one.
Highest score: rickss69, with a score of 3715, his GPU is a HD5970+5850 @ 950Mhz Lowest score: Mathragh, with a score of 275, my GPU is a single mobility 5650 @ 750 Now, ricks GPU set-up has a total of 4640 stream processors, whereas mine has 400. With rickss69's score of 3715, divided by 4640 stream processors, and divided by a clock of 950Mhz, he gets 0,000843 score per streamprocessor per Mhz. With my score of 275, divided by 400 stream processors, and divided by a clock of 750Mhz, I get a score of 0,000917 per streamprocessor per Mhz. Now to compare both scores, i divide ricks69's score per streamprocessor per Mhz, by mine, and multiply times a hundred to get a percentage. (0,000843/0,000917)*100=91,94027 -> ~92% Imho thats some serious efficiency trough all that upscaling of the core itself(the difference between the 5650 core, and the 5870 core), the inclusion of crossfire two times(between the 2 GPU's on the 5970, and between the 5970 and the 5850), and the addition of a slightyly different configured core(the 5850 in ricks69's set-up). I guess things could be a bit off as my memory might run a bit slow compared to the core speed(I overclocked to 750/960, opposed to default clocks of 550/800), but I thought it was worth mentioning nonetheless! Also, my lower CPU clocks could potentially be of some influence, but I guess i'll never find out. Maybe its interesting to see how all these architectures scale when they get compared to each other purely streamprocessor and clockwise, and include that information in the spreadsheet aswell. Would be awesome to analyze different set-up with eachother that way. Edit: Also, feel free to point out any errors i've made in case I've gone horribly wrong somewhere :P Last edited by Mathragh; Mar 28, 2011 at 02:18 PM. Reason: just in case |
|
|
|
|
|
#112 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in retarded hell
Posts: 765 (0.43/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 202 Times in 146 Posts
|
Quote:
wonder why you missed it?
__________________
RETARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#113 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,413 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 478
Thanked 741 Times in 452 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Heatware 35 + 0 | 0 - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,413 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 478
Thanked 741 Times in 452 Posts
|
20mmrain - 2466 - 97.9 - XFX HD6950 1GB Xfire - 991/1302 - i7 2600k @ 4.5 Ghz - DX 11 My New Run.... I don't think I will have a problem hitting over 100 FPS...My Max temps on bot cards (Now Water cooled) didn't even hit 42c. My Vregs on the cards only hit 59c (They are not water cooled) I believe I have allot more head room! Woo Hoo I am happy!!!
__________________
Heatware 35 + 0 | 0 - |
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
![]() |
Hi all,
can you tell me whether my results are GOOD or there is something wrong with my performance? Rig 5970 quadfire @ stock clock, i965 @ 4.05 Ghz what score should i get with the system I have? |
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,986 (1.56/day)
Thanks: 619
Thanked 471 Times in 392 Posts
|
@zanat0s Well it would be better if you benched your machine the same as everyone else has here in this thread and then we can compare yours to everyone elses and tell you yes its good or bad etc.
Please go back to post 1 and read how to set up the benchmark and do it again and show us your score.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Melvis For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#117 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 147 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
|
p3gaz_001| 2665 | 105.4 | EVGA GTX580 @ 980/1860/1198 | i7 975 XE @ 4.5GHz | DX9
p3gaz_001 | 2586 | 102.4 | EVGA GTX580 @ 980/1860/1198 | i7 975 XE @ 4.5GHz | DX10 p3gaz_001 | 1978 | 78.5 | EVGA GTX580 @ 980/1860/1198 | i7 975 XE @ 4.5GHz | DX11
__________________
*OLDRIG* Last edited by p3gaz_001; Apr 3, 2011 at 05:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in retarded hell
Posts: 765 (0.43/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 202 Times in 146 Posts
|
2DividedbyZero | 3767 | 149.6 | HD5970+5850 @ 888/1250 | i7 980X @ 4.4GHz | DX11
DX10 run incoming..., oh and yeah, I'm bored. system memory tweaked and cpu upped a tad. ![]() 2DividedbyZero | 4559 | 181.0 | HD5970+5850 @ 888/1250 | i7 980X @ 4.4GHz | DX10 ![]()
__________________
RETARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
#119 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in retarded hell
Posts: 765 (0.43/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 202 Times in 146 Posts
|
when we gonna see some tri-69xx scores heh?
__________________
RETARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
#120 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,696 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 4,439
Thanked 1,170 Times in 669 Posts
|
Direct X 10
![]() AlienIsGOD - 948 - 37.6 FPS - 4850 512MB Xfire 665/1015 - Q9450 2.66ghz - DX 10 Open GL run ![]() AlienIsGOD - 261 - 10.3 FPS - 4850 512MB Xfire 665/1015 - Q9450 2.66ghz - Open GL My first run @ stock clocks, yes i consider the 4850s clocks stock cause they are flashed to those values. More runs to come in the coming days
__________________
Distributed Computing Hardware CPU: i5 3570K and i5 2400 = 8 cores (Crunching for TPU atm) GPU: 7870 (8 wu's) and 7770 (4 wu's) = 1920 GCN cores (Folding for TPU atm) ![]() Last edited by AlienIsGOD; Mar 31, 2011 at 09:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#121 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,696 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 4,439
Thanked 1,170 Times in 669 Posts
|
Is it normal for the HD4000's to have such a low min fps ? xvi and I seem to have very low min avgs....
__________________
Distributed Computing Hardware CPU: i5 3570K and i5 2400 = 8 cores (Crunching for TPU atm) GPU: 7870 (8 wu's) and 7770 (4 wu's) = 1920 GCN cores (Folding for TPU atm) ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#122 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,696 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 4,439
Thanked 1,170 Times in 669 Posts
|
get me on that list plz 20mm
__________________
Distributed Computing Hardware CPU: i5 3570K and i5 2400 = 8 cores (Crunching for TPU atm) GPU: 7870 (8 wu's) and 7770 (4 wu's) = 1920 GCN cores (Folding for TPU atm) ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.67/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts
|
rickss69 - 4364 - 173.2 - 5970/5870 @ 950/1200 - i7 2600K @ 5.0GHz - DX11
rickss69 - 4552 - 180.7 - 5970/5870 @ 950/1200 - i7 2600K @ 5.0GHz - DX10 Last edited by rickss69; Apr 2, 2011 at 07:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#124 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 745 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 799
Thanked 622 Times in 372 Posts
|
MetalRacer - 4274 - 169.7 - 2 x 5970's @ 950/1250 - i7 980X @ 4.2GHz - DX11
![]() MetalRacer - 4997 - 198.4 - 2 x 5970's @ 940/1200 - i7 980X @ 4.2GHz - DX10
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,413 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 478
Thanked 741 Times in 452 Posts
|
Will be updating today.... so no worries.
__________________
Heatware 35 + 0 | 0 - |
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 20mmrain For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Unigine Benchmark Compilation | Binge | General Software | 506 | May 24, 2011 01:18 PM |
| Unigine Releases Heaven 2.1 Benchmark | btarunr | News | 25 | May 26, 2010 06:33 AM |
| Can't run Unigine Heaven benchmark in DX11 | Paulieg | AMD / ATI | 18 | Mar 31, 2010 04:47 AM |
| Unigine Releases Version 2 of Heaven Benchmark | btarunr | News | 39 | Mar 28, 2010 05:17 PM |
| Unigine DX11 "Heaven" Benchmark | HeX_00 | AMD / ATI | 156 | Jan 21, 2010 04:28 PM |