techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Software > General Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 23, 2011, 04:07 PM   #101
rickss69
2000 Posts
 
rickss69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.67/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts

System Specs

rickss69 - 2483 - 98.6 - ASUS GTX 580 @ 976/1132/1952 - i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz - DX11
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Heaven 2.5 - GTX 580.jpg
Views:	110
Size:	189.5 KB
ID:	41264  
__________________
rickss69 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 24, 2011, 09:29 PM   #102
xvi
500 Posts
 
xvi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington, US
Posts: 902 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 562
Thanked 237 Times in 130 Posts

System Specs

xvi | 631 | 25.0 | HD4870 @ 750/900 | Phenom II 550 BE @ 3.8GHz | DX10


xvi | 640 | 25.4 | HD4870 @ 750/900 and HD4850 @ 665/993 Crossfire | Phenom II 550 BE @ 3.8GHz | DX10


Previous 4850 runs:
Spoiler
__________________
Any computer, no matter how old, can serve a meaningful purpose.
Behind every closet door is a dusty computer waiting to be reborn.

Last edited by xvi; Mar 24, 2011 at 10:35 PM.
xvi is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2011, 01:54 AM   #103
20mmrain
2000 Posts
 
20mmrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,413 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 478
Thanked 741 Times in 452 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by xvi View Post
Congrats!
Thanks.... Yes I did get the promotion at my Work.... So I am happy! Started it last week. It was rough though... allot of learning plus 12 hour days while I was training. So thanks for the congrats!!!

2. I got my new i7 2600k Water cooled rig up and running (For all intents and purposes) I might mount the Micro Res somewhere else or get a new Res.... but here it is for right now....Sorry about the blurry pic.....(And yes I was one of the ten lucky people to get the new Maximus Extreme IV while it was in stock at New Egg and no I am not kidding there were only 10 of us!)


3. And Finally Scores are updated!!! WTG to RICKSS69 for taking over the ATI DX11 Leader Board!!!

I can't wait to get some new benches with my i7 2600k now Well keep the scores coming guys I am back.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2750.jpg
Views:	745
Size:	195.5 KB
ID:	41350  
__________________
Heatware 35 + 0 | 0 -

Last edited by 20mmrain; Mar 28, 2011 at 04:03 AM.
20mmrain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2011, 03:50 AM   #104
rickss69
2000 Posts
 
rickss69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.67/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts

System Specs

RICKSS69 Dammit!
__________________
rickss69 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2011, 04:02 AM   #105
damric
200 Posts
 
damric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: In a troll cave
Posts: 295 (0.24/day)
Thanks: 227
Thanked 72 Times in 44 Posts

System Specs

Why such a low resolution? Whatever. I'll give you my score at your low resolution and a score at 1080p. High end cards, and crossfire configurations really need a high resolution to breathe.

Downloading now, then I'll edit my scores into this post.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
damric is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2011, 04:03 AM   #106
20mmrain
2000 Posts
 
20mmrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,413 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 478
Thanked 741 Times in 452 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickss69 View Post
RICKSS69 Dammit!
LMFAO My bad..... I will change it

Quote:
Why such a low resolution? Whatever. I'll give you my score at your low resolution and a score at 1080p. High end cards, and crossfire configurations really need a high resolution to breathe.

Downloading now, then I'll edit my scores into this post.
Yeah I understand.... but this way too people with lower end cards aren't blown out of the water so bad..... hey it's hurting my two 6950's too!
__________________
Heatware 35 + 0 | 0 -
20mmrain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2011, 04:52 AM   #107
Melvis
2000 Posts
 
Melvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,986 (1.56/day)
Thanks: 619
Thanked 471 Times in 392 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by xvi View Post
xvi | 369 | 14.6 | HD4850 @ 665/993 | Phenom II 550 BE @ 3.8GHz | DX10
I think I had a bit of stuttering though. Anyways, if this were golf, I'd be winning.

You know, now that I'm looking at the scores, a 4870x2 managed ~2,000 points. If we assume the 4870x2 scaled perfectly and was slowed down to my clock speeds, I should be seeing roughly 723 points here. What gives?

Maths:
1631 / 2 = 815.5 per card
815.5 / 750 = 1.0873 points per clock
1.0873 * 665 = ~723 points

http://img.techpowerup.org/110320/xlqdhy50.jpg

Edit: WHAT?! I overclock and my points go down. A 9% overclock results in a 24% lower score? Pic after the spoiler.

Second edit: Ran benchmark again with above settings. Got 377. =/
Yea i was just looking at the scores and noticed your score with the 4850 crossfire and was like they should of scored close to my single 4870X2.

Have you tested with different drivers? it doesn't seem like crossfire was even working when you did that run?

Im going to retest mine soon with older drivers and see what happens.
Melvis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2011, 05:02 AM   #108
damric
200 Posts
 
damric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: In a troll cave
Posts: 295 (0.24/day)
Thanks: 227
Thanked 72 Times in 44 Posts

System Specs

damric - 2415 - 95.6 - HD 6850 CF @1000/1200 - Thuban 1090T @4.0GHZ - DX11



CPU-Z does not support my mobo so I included the Core-temp gadget that shows my 1090T @4GHZ.

Here is a score at 1920x1080 res with AAx4, AFx16, Extreme Tessellation. Top tier and CF/SLI configurations need these higher settings to breathe.


__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked

Last edited by damric; Mar 28, 2011 at 07:35 AM.
damric is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2011, 05:57 AM   #109
15th Warlock
2000 Posts
 
15th Warlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 2,058 (0.64/day)
Thanks: 601
Thanked 551 Times in 231 Posts

System Specs

15th Warlock - 2663 - 105.7 - PNY GTX580 SLI @ 833/1666/1050 - Intel 2600K @ 5Ghz- DX 11


Quote:
Originally Posted by 20mmrain View Post
(And yes I was one of the ten lucky people to get the new Maximus Extreme IV while it was in stock at New Egg and no I am not kidding there were only 10 of us!)]
Nice rig! I was able to get my Maximus IV Extreme on March 9, it was sold out in minutes, mine was the last one sold that day, I had to call Newegg the next day to make sure I would get my board as after placing my order and refreshing the board's page it showed as "Sold Out"! Had to ask twice to the rep if I would get my board shipped. Those boards sell out in minutes! Cheers mate!
15th Warlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2011, 12:03 PM   #110
20mmrain
2000 Posts
 
20mmrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,413 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 478
Thanked 741 Times in 452 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 15th Warlock View Post
15th Warlock - 2663 - 105.7 - PNY GTX580 SLI @ 833/1666/1050 - Intel 2600K @ 5Ghz- DX 11
http://img.techpowerup.org/110328/Unigine 5Ghz.jpg



Nice rig! I was able to get my Maximus IV Extreme on March 9, it was sold out in minutes, mine was the last one sold that day, I had to call Newegg the next day to make sure I would get my board as after placing my order and refreshing the board's page it showed as "Sold Out"! Had to ask twice to the rep if I would get my board shipped. Those boards sell out in minutes! Cheers mate!
Updated.....This Morning....

Yeah I had to call to.... just to make sure they were really there. Shortly after I bought one as well they were out. Although it wasn't as quick as it was for you. But in the past I have had their site glitch out on me. When the 5870's released.... It told me it completed my order...but it really wasn't there. That's why I didn't take any chances either.... and I also called them twice with this motherboard. Just to make sure it didn't glitch out on me again!

Awsome Board Hey man?!!! Fun as hell to play with. By far one of the better boards I have owned!

BTW This new Board and CPU is the Shit just reran this benchmark with only a Overclock on the CPU of 4.5 Ghz and a GPU increase of 40Mhz (So up to 840 Mhz) and I am already in the 90 FPS Range. Before I had my GPU clocks up to 950Mhz + and a 4.0 GHZ i7 860 to get 93 FPS.... So man O man I should have no problem breaking my goal of 100 FPS now
__________________
Heatware 35 + 0 | 0 -

Last edited by 20mmrain; Mar 28, 2011 at 12:20 PM.
20mmrain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2011, 01:28 PM   #111
Mathragh
500 Posts
 
Mathragh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 680 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 162
Thanked 205 Times in 152 Posts

System Specs

Apparent great efficiency in AMD GPU's

Just out of curiousity, i did some quick simple math to calculate the efficiency difference between the highest scoring AMD DX11 set-up, and the lowest scoring AMD DX11 one.



Highest score: rickss69, with a score of 3715, his GPU is a HD5970+5850 @ 950Mhz
Lowest score: Mathragh, with a score of 275, my GPU is a single mobility 5650 @ 750

Now, ricks GPU set-up has a total of 4640 stream processors, whereas mine has 400.

With rickss69's score of 3715, divided by 4640 stream processors, and divided by a clock of 950Mhz, he gets 0,000843 score per streamprocessor per Mhz.

With my score of 275, divided by 400 stream processors, and divided by a clock of 750Mhz, I get a score of 0,000917 per streamprocessor per Mhz.

Now to compare both scores, i divide ricks69's score per streamprocessor per Mhz, by mine, and multiply times a hundred to get a percentage.

(0,000843/0,000917)*100=91,94027 -> ~92%



Imho thats some serious efficiency trough all that upscaling of the core itself(the difference between the 5650 core, and the 5870 core), the inclusion of crossfire two times(between the 2 GPU's on the 5970, and between the 5970 and the 5850), and the addition of a slightyly different configured core(the 5850 in ricks69's set-up).

I guess things could be a bit off as my memory might run a bit slow compared to the core speed(I overclocked to 750/960, opposed to default clocks of 550/800), but I thought it was worth mentioning nonetheless! Also, my lower CPU clocks could potentially be of some influence, but I guess i'll never find out.

Maybe its interesting to see how all these architectures scale when they get compared to each other purely streamprocessor and clockwise, and include that information in the spreadsheet aswell. Would be awesome to analyze different set-up with eachother that way.

Edit: Also, feel free to point out any errors i've made in case I've gone horribly wrong somewhere :P

Last edited by Mathragh; Mar 28, 2011 at 02:18 PM. Reason: just in case
Mathragh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2011, 01:48 PM   #112
2DividedbyZero
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in retarded hell
Posts: 765 (0.43/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 202 Times in 146 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by 20mmrain View Post
3. And Finally Scores are updated!!! WTG to RICKSS69 for taking over the ATI DX11 Leader Board!!!
i'll just stick this up again for you....

wonder why you missed it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2DividedbyZero View Post
some tweaking:

2Dividedbyzero | 3750 | 148.9 | HD5970+5850 @ 885/1250 | i7 980X @ 4.33GHz | DX11






feck didn't save my DX10 run, another time maybe
__________________
RETARDS
2DividedbyZero is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29, 2011, 05:38 PM   #113
20mmrain
2000 Posts
 
20mmrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,413 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 478
Thanked 741 Times in 452 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2DividedbyZero View Post
i'll just stick this up again for you....

wonder why you missed it?
Sorry Bout that like I said I have been busy and I did not mean to miss it. With that said... 2DividedbyZero is back on top again
__________________
Heatware 35 + 0 | 0 -
20mmrain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29, 2011, 06:27 PM   #114
20mmrain
2000 Posts
 
20mmrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,413 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 478
Thanked 741 Times in 452 Posts

System Specs



20mmrain - 2466 - 97.9 - XFX HD6950 1GB Xfire - 991/1302 - i7 2600k @ 4.5 Ghz - DX 11

My New Run.... I don't think I will have a problem hitting over 100 FPS...My Max temps on bot cards (Now Water cooled) didn't even hit 42c. My Vregs on the cards only hit 59c (They are not water cooled) I believe I have allot more head room! Woo Hoo I am happy!!!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	New Run New High Score.jpg
Views:	684
Size:	204.4 KB
ID:	41398  
__________________
Heatware 35 + 0 | 0 -
20mmrain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2011, 10:29 AM   #115
zanat0s
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 160 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts

System Specs

Hi all,

can you tell me whether my results are GOOD or there is something wrong with my performance?

Rig 5970 quadfire @ stock clock, i965 @ 4.05 Ghz

what score should i get with the system I have?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	latest.png
Views:	68
Size:	46.7 KB
ID:	41425  
zanat0s is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2011, 10:47 AM   #116
Melvis
2000 Posts
 
Melvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,986 (1.56/day)
Thanks: 619
Thanked 471 Times in 392 Posts

System Specs

@zanat0s Well it would be better if you benched your machine the same as everyone else has here in this thread and then we can compare yours to everyone elses and tell you yes its good or bad etc.

Please go back to post 1 and read how to set up the benchmark and do it again and show us your score.
Melvis is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Melvis For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 30, 2011, 07:40 PM   #117
p3gaz_001
75 Posts
 
p3gaz_001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 147 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts

System Specs

p3gaz_001| 2665 | 105.4 | EVGA GTX580 @ 980/1860/1198 | i7 975 XE @ 4.5GHz | DX9



p3gaz_001 | 2586 | 102.4 | EVGA GTX580 @ 980/1860/1198 | i7 975 XE @ 4.5GHz | DX10




p3gaz_001 | 1978 | 78.5 | EVGA GTX580 @ 980/1860/1198 | i7 975 XE @ 4.5GHz | DX11

__________________
*OLDRIG*

Last edited by p3gaz_001; Apr 3, 2011 at 05:42 PM.
p3gaz_001 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2011, 05:58 PM   #118
2DividedbyZero
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in retarded hell
Posts: 765 (0.43/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 202 Times in 146 Posts

2DividedbyZero | 3767 | 149.6 | HD5970+5850 @ 888/1250 | i7 980X @ 4.4GHz | DX11

DX10 run incoming..., oh and yeah, I'm bored. system memory tweaked and cpu upped a tad.








2DividedbyZero | 4559 | 181.0 | HD5970+5850 @ 888/1250 | i7 980X @ 4.4GHz | DX10




__________________
RETARDS
2DividedbyZero is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2011, 06:04 PM   #119
2DividedbyZero
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in retarded hell
Posts: 765 (0.43/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 202 Times in 146 Posts

when we gonna see some tri-69xx scores heh?
__________________
RETARDS
2DividedbyZero is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2011, 08:48 PM   #120
AlienIsGOD
2000 Posts
 
AlienIsGOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,696 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 4,439
Thanked 1,170 Times in 669 Posts

System Specs

Direct X 10



AlienIsGOD - 948 - 37.6 FPS - 4850 512MB Xfire 665/1015 - Q9450 2.66ghz - DX 10

Open GL run



AlienIsGOD - 261 - 10.3 FPS - 4850 512MB Xfire 665/1015 - Q9450 2.66ghz - Open GL





My first run @ stock clocks, yes i consider the 4850s clocks stock cause they are flashed to those values. More runs to come in the coming days
__________________
Distributed Computing Hardware

CPU: i5 3570K and i5 2400 = 8 cores (Crunching for TPU atm)
GPU: 7870 (8 wu's) and 7770 (4 wu's) = 1920 GCN cores (Folding for TPU atm)


Last edited by AlienIsGOD; Mar 31, 2011 at 09:18 PM.
AlienIsGOD is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU Folding for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2011, 09:16 PM   #121
AlienIsGOD
2000 Posts
 
AlienIsGOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,696 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 4,439
Thanked 1,170 Times in 669 Posts

System Specs

Is it normal for the HD4000's to have such a low min fps ? xvi and I seem to have very low min avgs....
__________________
Distributed Computing Hardware

CPU: i5 3570K and i5 2400 = 8 cores (Crunching for TPU atm)
GPU: 7870 (8 wu's) and 7770 (4 wu's) = 1920 GCN cores (Folding for TPU atm)

AlienIsGOD is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU Folding for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 1, 2011, 02:40 PM   #122
AlienIsGOD
2000 Posts
 
AlienIsGOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,696 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 4,439
Thanked 1,170 Times in 669 Posts

System Specs

get me on that list plz 20mm
__________________
Distributed Computing Hardware

CPU: i5 3570K and i5 2400 = 8 cores (Crunching for TPU atm)
GPU: 7870 (8 wu's) and 7770 (4 wu's) = 1920 GCN cores (Folding for TPU atm)

AlienIsGOD is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU Folding for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2011, 07:18 PM   #123
rickss69
2000 Posts
 
rickss69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.67/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts

System Specs

rickss69 - 4364 - 173.2 - 5970/5870 @ 950/1200 - i7 2600K @ 5.0GHz - DX11

rickss69 - 4552 - 180.7 - 5970/5870 @ 950/1200 - i7 2600K @ 5.0GHz - DX10
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Heaven 2.5 - 4364.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	188.1 KB
ID:	41474   Click image for larger version

Name:	Heaven 2.5 - DX10 - 4552.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	188.9 KB
ID:	41475  
__________________

Last edited by rickss69; Apr 2, 2011 at 07:31 PM.
rickss69 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2011, 01:41 AM   #124
MetalRacer
500 Posts
 
MetalRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 745 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 799
Thanked 622 Times in 372 Posts

System Specs

MetalRacer - 4274 - 169.7 - 2 x 5970's @ 950/1250 - i7 980X @ 4.2GHz - DX11



MetalRacer - 4997 - 198.4 - 2 x 5970's @ 940/1200 - i7 980X @ 4.2GHz - DX10

__________________
MetalRacer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2011, 01:08 PM   #125
20mmrain
2000 Posts
 
20mmrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,413 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 478
Thanked 741 Times in 452 Posts

System Specs

Will be updating today.... so no worries.
__________________
Heatware 35 + 0 | 0 -
20mmrain is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 20mmrain For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unigine Benchmark Compilation Binge General Software 506 May 24, 2011 01:18 PM
Unigine Releases Heaven 2.1 Benchmark btarunr News 25 May 26, 2010 06:33 AM
Can't run Unigine Heaven benchmark in DX11 Paulieg AMD / ATI 18 Mar 31, 2010 04:47 AM
Unigine Releases Version 2 of Heaven Benchmark btarunr News 39 Mar 28, 2010 05:17 PM
Unigine DX11 "Heaven" Benchmark HeX_00 AMD / ATI 156 Jan 21, 2010 04:28 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts