![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,899 Times in 5,650 Posts
|
AMD Unveils Radeon HD 6450 Entry-Level Graphics Card
AMD apparently unveiled its new entry-level GPU, the Radeon HD 6450 today, with some leading sites publishing mini performance reviews (check out Today's Reviews on the front page). The new GPU is intended to be an integrated graphics substitute, which gives desktops all the essential features that today's desktop environments demand, such as DirectX 11 support, Aero acceleration, various kinds of HD video hardware acceleration features, apart from the obvious benefit of discrete GPUs: not taxing the system memory as frame buffer.
The HD 6450 is based on the 40 nm Caicos GPU, it packs twice the amount of shader compute power as the previous generation, packing 160 VLIW5 stream processors, 8 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and a transistor count of 370 million. The 160 stream processors, with a core speed of 625~750 MHz (differs between AIBs), churn out compute power of up to 240 GFLOPs. It packs a 64-bit wide memory interface, that supports GDDR5 (clocks: 3.20 GHz to 3.60 GHz) and GDDR3 (1066 MHz to 1600 MHz). It has an idle board power of 9W, and max board power of 27W. Most implementations are low-profile single-slot, some even passive. The reference board features display outputs that include DVI, HDMI 1.4a, and D-Sub. Expect a $50~$60 price point. The official announcement however, is slated for April 19, or at least that's what we were told. ![]() Image Courtesy: TechReport |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2 |
![]() |
PCIe x4 would have been nice. x16 slot clearly not needed for performance reasons, and x4 would make it compatible with more mainboards particularly as a secondary GPU...
Nice to hear we can expect a passive version. I wonder what this device is "equivalent to" in old-card terms. Do you think it would match the performance of an old x800 or HD3650? Looking at the TPU GPU database it is hard to assess. Shame the database doesnt include some kind of rudimentary performance metric or benchmark.
__________________
... some things in life just drive you bonkers. Especially the rubbish you see in forum posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() |
probably better than HD3650, as it is closing to GT220 performance.
I'd say gaming performance is more like HD4650. But who'd buy this card for gaming (even as a casual gaming) anyway? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t!
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,526 (3.38/day)
Thanks: 824
Thanked 1,606 Times in 1,285 Posts
|
someone one with a seriously low budget who would also overclock it to make up for the lost fps
__________________
![]() “I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
|
160 ALUs?!
This should have been called the HD 6150. It's about as powerful as an HD 2600 Pro, from 4 years ago.. and costs about half as much. Yuck. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
TPU Janitor
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 5,964 (4.70/day)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 1,460 Times in 1,210 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Fourstaff For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Green Jakarta
Posts: 288 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
|
you cant expect a lot for gaming, HTPC's are more considerable..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
TPU Janitor
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 5,964 (4.70/day)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 1,460 Times in 1,210 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Dhaka,Bangladesh.
Posts: 46 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
It'll provide nice boost from the IGP nevertheless.
Damn, when will AMD release the 6670 on to the retail market?
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to RONX GT For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#10 |
|
Doctor Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,553 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,690 Times in 6,390 Posts
|
more like a high end HTPC card with low end gaming capability.
__________________
![]() Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,739 (1.18/day)
Thanks: 364
Thanked 347 Times in 251 Posts
|
Doubling the shaders and using gddr5 is definitely a step in the right direction albeit a small one. I would have preferred to see something in the range of 200-240 shaders instead tho
![]() AT puts it roughly 75% ahead of the 5450 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,531 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 322
Thanked 200 Times in 162 Posts
|
A passive version with GDDR5 would be a great upgrade from my HTPC's ATI 3450.
__________________
The pastafarian jesus |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 535 (0.21/day)
Thanks: 108
Thanked 56 Times in 46 Posts
|
you need at least tri-sli gtx580`s to play any game.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to craigo For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,531 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 322
Thanked 200 Times in 162 Posts
|
Really? I thought dual 590's was the only way to play console ports these days?
__________________
The pastafarian jesus |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Zummerzet UK
Posts: 679 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 90 Times in 58 Posts
|
On the face of it this looks like a great HTPC card. Unfortunately as Anand have shown the HD5570 is only slightly more expensive, significantly faster and only sips 10w more power under load (and a similar amount more when idling).
As long as the HD5570 is around the HD6450 is a poor choice (unless there is a specific feature it has that the HD5570 lacks).
__________________
Now in Surround BF3 (Origin) - Xaser04 |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,531 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 322
Thanked 200 Times in 162 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
The pastafarian jesus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Zummerzet UK
Posts: 679 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 90 Times in 58 Posts
|
Quote:
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showpr...56&subcat=1699 Half height with active cooling: http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showpr...56&subcat=1699 EDIT: In both cases I assume the card comes with both full height and half height brackets.
__________________
Now in Surround BF3 (Origin) - Xaser04 |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Xaser04 For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#18 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts
|
No, dual 590's is what you want to use if you hate your computer and want to burn it down. tri-sli 580's is the bare-minimum for actual work.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,531 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 322
Thanked 200 Times in 162 Posts
|
Quote:
both half height and passive i meant so the second one is a no but the first is 100% perfect for my HTPC case due to the PSU placement as half height passive card where the heatsink goes over the top of the card as it almost touches the PSU fan grill helping it cool better.Quote:
oh my mistake
__________________
The pastafarian jesus |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Zummerzet UK
Posts: 679 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 90 Times in 58 Posts
|
Quote:
What case are you using if you don't mind me asking?
__________________
Now in Surround BF3 (Origin) - Xaser04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() |
Is this card better than my 7600GS???
How much better? Just to know! |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,531 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 322
Thanked 200 Times in 162 Posts
|
Quote:
I'm unsure on the name of the case as i cant find it but it looks almost exactly the same as this apart from the power switch and its black not blue Full size cards fit but press pretty hard against the PSU fan grill as it sticks out on the PSU i have.
__________________
The pastafarian jesus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 172 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 20 Times in 18 Posts
|
That's exactly what I was thinking myself.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 353 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 29 Times in 26 Posts
|
So when can we expect a review? I'm in the market possibly to build an HTPC
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Porto
Posts: 845 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 172 Times in 135 Posts
|
A Caicos for desktop is kinda "meh" these days. I'd say the latest sandybridges are more interesting for "pure" HTPCs because of the dedicated hardware for high-performance video encoding/decoding.
I'd expect these GPUs to come in some notebooks with the A4 series of Fusion APUs, which already have this exact same GPU (for Crossfiring, of course). Crossfired Caicos... imagine a thin-and-light 11.6-13" notebook with the performance of a HD5650, that's about it. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AMD Outs Radeon HD 6670, HD 6570, HD 6450 for OEMs | btarunr | News | 55 | Feb 9, 2011 09:48 PM |
| QNAP Unveils New Entry-level 4-drive Rack-Mounted NAS | btarunr | News | 4 | Jan 10, 2011 02:57 PM |
| NVIDIA introduces entry-level GeForce 300-series graphics cards | francis511 | General Hardware | 10 | Feb 24, 2010 03:48 PM |
| Entry level gaming card? | niko084 | Graphics Cards | 36 | May 19, 2008 11:07 PM |
| NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS Raises the Performance Bar for Entry-Level PC Graphics | malware | News | 19 | Nov 13, 2007 10:21 PM |