![]() |
|
|
#126 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in retarded hell
Posts: 765 (0.44/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 202 Times in 146 Posts
|
yeah, i'll bite
2DividedbyZero | 4750 | 188.6 | HD5970+HD5850 @ 1000/1275 | i7 980X @ 4.4GHz | DX11 and no, no DX10 bench, nearly killed my PC with this
__________________
RETARDS Last edited by 2DividedbyZero; Apr 4, 2011 at 07:30 PM. Reason: /img |
|
|
|
|
|
#127 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,584 (1.48/day)
Thanks: 4,300
Thanked 1,091 Times in 622 Posts
|
I'll ask again, is it normal for the HD4000 to have such a low min fps compared to HD5K and NV's offerings?
__________________
Crunching Badges ![]() Crunching Hardware CPU: i5 3570K and i5 2400 = 8 cores GPU: 7870 (8 wu's) and 7770 (4 wu's) = 1920 GCN cores (no GPU wu's atm)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
The Watchful Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Cold North
Posts: 4,343 (2.82/day)
Thanks: 3,975
Thanked 2,869 Times in 1,540 Posts
|
Best way to know is to compare your score versus another HD4000 score:
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/sh...24&postcount=2 http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/sh...29&postcount=2 I believe those scores you posted (including the low min fps) look about right. You are talking about gpu's from almost three years ago... Still good cards though, however I imagine they struggle with tessellation. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to HammerON For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#129 | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,929 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 602
Thanked 459 Times in 381 Posts
|
Quote:
Or what he said ^
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Melvis For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#130 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,407 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 477
Thanked 734 Times in 451 Posts
|
Updated Nice scores guys that was exciting to watch the fight for the top spot that is....
__________________
Heatware 35 + 0 | 0 - |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to 20mmrain For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#131 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.71/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts
|
rickss69 - 5091 - 202.1 - 5970/5870 @ 950/1200 - i7 2600K @ 4.8GHz - DX11
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to rickss69 For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#132 | ||
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in retarded hell
Posts: 765 (0.44/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 202 Times in 146 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() rly
__________________
RETARDS |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#133 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in retarded hell
Posts: 765 (0.44/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 202 Times in 146 Posts
|
ohhh
5970 + 2x 5870
__________________
RETARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.71/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts
|
Too much cpu frequency kills scores in this benchmark. Check my post's about it in the older threads...there be a "sweet spot" for every cpu.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in retarded hell
Posts: 765 (0.44/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 202 Times in 146 Posts
|
i see you added another card, check my post above yours, and that statement is bs
__________________
RETARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
#136 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.71/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts
|
My cards are on air and really hard to stabilize. Keep knocking the drivers out of some of the gpu's...got lucky on that last run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#137 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.71/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#138 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in retarded hell
Posts: 765 (0.44/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 202 Times in 146 Posts
|
applicable to the older version like you say- maybe, but i haven't found it applicable to this version in my testing, so yeah, bs and i will do it my way
__________________
RETARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
#139 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in retarded hell
Posts: 765 (0.44/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 202 Times in 146 Posts
|
fixed it for ya, didn't want people getting confused
__________________
RETARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
#140 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 744 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 796
Thanked 620 Times in 370 Posts
|
Quote:
) either way great score man.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to MetalRacer For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#141 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.71/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts
|
Quote:
I have run this benchmark at least a thousand times with multiple cpu/gpu combination's in all the versions to arrive at that conclusion. The Heaven benchmark is the only one of the Unigine series to have this quirk as can be seen by my multiple entries in the earlier threads. Had a higher cpu frequency resulted in a better score for Heaven it would be so recorded as it is plain to see I was easily able to run much higher overclocks. http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=112995 What really appears to be BS here is your lack of sportsmanship in this thread... Not your place to be attempting any "fixes" here and the only one confused appears to be yourself. Last edited by rickss69; Apr 12, 2011 at 03:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#142 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in retarded hell
Posts: 765 (0.44/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 202 Times in 146 Posts
|
Quote:
cry me a river won't you
__________________
RETARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#143 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.71/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts
|
Same run as above with different drivers...
rickss69 - 5121 - 203.3 - 5970/5870 @ 975/1200-950/1200 - i7 2600K @ 4.8GHz - DX11 |
|
|
|
|
|
#144 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.71/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts
|
Your problem seems to be too much talk and too little benching...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#145 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,919 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 802
Thanked 553 Times in 361 Posts
|
Infraction be damned. Fight to the death!
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Maban For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#146 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.71/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts
|
^
|
|
|
|
|
|
#147 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in retarded hell
Posts: 765 (0.44/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 202 Times in 146 Posts
|
__________________
RETARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
#148 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.71/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts
|
Finally! A proper reply!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#149 |
|
Senior Moderator™
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,057 (3.23/day)
Thanks: 2,167
Thanked 1,837 Times in 1,103 Posts
|
Not fighting for the top spot but I'm glad my old E8400 and P5B mobo I've been torturing since 2007 are still holding it
![]() Black Panther | 2113 | 83.9 | HD5970 @ 735/1010 | E8400 @ 4.08GHz | DX11
Last edited by Black Panther; Apr 18, 2011 at 06:20 PM. Reason: Sorry typo! Clocks are 735/1010 not 835/1010 |
|
|
|
|
|
#150 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
Posts: 2,335 (1.71/day)
Thanks: 545
Thanked 613 Times in 480 Posts
|
Doing more with less...
![]() rickss69 - 5210 - 206.8 - 5970/5870 @ 975/1200-950/1200 - i7 2600K @ 4.7GHz - DX11 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Unigine Benchmark Compilation | Binge | General Software | 506 | May 24, 2011 01:18 PM |
| Unigine Releases Heaven 2.1 Benchmark | btarunr | News | 25 | May 26, 2010 06:33 AM |
| Can't run Unigine Heaven benchmark in DX11 | Paulieg | AMD / ATI | 18 | Mar 31, 2010 04:47 AM |
| Unigine Releases Version 2 of Heaven Benchmark | btarunr | News | 39 | Mar 28, 2010 05:17 PM |
| Unigine DX11 "Heaven" Benchmark | HeX_00 | AMD / ATI | 156 | Jan 21, 2010 04:28 PM |