techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > General Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 12, 2011, 09:13 PM   #1
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

Why are there no Sandybridge reviews using top end C2Q CPUs?

I've looked at a few reviews and found no inclusion of Q9650 and maybe one or 2 using a Q9550. Perhaps I missed it? Does anyone have a 2500 series or 2600 series SB review that compares th Q9650, etc CPUs?

Edit:
Below you will find a few benchmark results showing the differences between the Q9650 at 3.70GHz vs i7 2600k at stock. I'm using a 5870 at 900/1200. I didn't bother overclocking the 2600k. The same drivers were used.


Q9650 OC'd


i7 2600k Stock




Q9650 OC'd


i7 2600k Stock





Q9650 OC'd


i7 2600k Stock





Q9650 OC'd


i7 2600k Stock






Q9650 OC'd


i7 2600k Stock





Q9650 OC'd


2600k Stock


2600k HT Off




Q9650 OC'd


2600K Stock


2600k Stock HT Off



Q9650 OC'd


2600K Stock




q9650 OC'd


2600K stock
(I didn't complete all of the tests in SuperPI Mod).

Last edited by EastCoasthandle; Apr 21, 2011 at 07:51 PM.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to EastCoasthandle For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 12, 2011, 09:22 PM   #2
KieX
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: A Coruņa, Spain
Posts: 2,050 (1.60/day)
Thanks: 6,950
Thanked 2,643 Times in 1,136 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to KieX

System Specs

Q6600 and Phenom II X4 close enough?

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4083/t...2100-tested/16
__________________
KieX is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KieX For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 12, 2011, 09:27 PM   #3
EarthDog
2000 Posts
 
EarthDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,057 (1.63/day)
Thanks: 247
Thanked 353 Times in 307 Posts

System Specs

Are you just trying to put a number on how much better it is clock for clock or something? Thats like 2 FULL generations ago...
EarthDog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2011, 09:27 PM   #4
Molignar
25 Posts
 
Molignar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 30 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

System Specs

Is this closer to what your looking for? http://www.overclock.net/intel-cpus/...-gains-i5.html This guy did his own comparison with his Q9650 setup and his new i5 2500k setup.
Molignar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2011, 09:31 PM   #5
jimmyz
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 92 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 34 Times in 23 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jimmyz

System Specs

I own a QX9650 as well as a few Nehalems, a Gulftown and a 2600k. If you are looking for whether it is faster clock per clock, yes, by far!! also better IPC than even the Gulftowns, and blows Nehalems out of the water as well. The only place Sandy Bridge is lacking is once it hits it's wall that's it. Even LN2 didn't get mine a bit farther than the 5.35 Ghz it can do on air.
jimmyz is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jimmyz For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 12, 2011, 11:32 PM   #6
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

The Q6600 won't work as even the Q8000 series beat it but thanks. There has been a lot of talk but it's odd there is no reviews showing the comparison from it. I was looking for either a Q9650 or a Q9550 but the later is at a lower clock rate.

I honestly have no idea what the performance differences between the 2 are. As noted, I want to see how well clock for clock the 2500/2600 series are compared to the Q9650. For example at 3.40GHz or 4.0GHz. But there is no such information as of yet. As for the linked user thread that's still on going with the OP making a new set of video(s). But it's a start, thanks.

Last edited by EastCoasthandle; Apr 13, 2011 at 12:31 AM.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 12:22 AM   #7
cadaveca
My name is Dave
 
cadaveca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 10,922 (4.16/day)
Thanks: 4,709
Thanked 5,449 Times in 3,301 Posts

System Specs

Find me the cpu, I'll gladly do it for ya. Unfortunately, I only have Q6600 left in 775.
__________________
Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp


-Only real men play games THIS way.
cadaveca is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 12:28 AM   #8
Delta6326
2000 Posts
 
Delta6326's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 3,362 (1.81/day)
Thanks: 570
Thanked 616 Times in 451 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Delta6326

System Specs

Q6600 FTW!! i still love mine.

I do agree I wish in reviews they had some older cpus to compare on
__________________
Delta6326 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 12:44 AM   #9
dank1983man420
200 Posts
 
dank1983man420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near Chicago, IL
Posts: 435 (0.23/day)
Thanks: 285
Thanked 138 Times in 88 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to dank1983man420

System Specs

If you need me to do anything , I have a 2500k and a q9650 I can do some tests on.
dank1983man420 is offline  
More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 02:24 PM   #10
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by dank1983man420 View Post
If you need me to do anything , I have a 2500k and a q9650 I can do some tests on.
Please do if you don't mind. Below are some suggestions:
Applications:
Winrar has it's own built in benchmark.
3DMark11
SuperPI Mod


Games:
AVP benchmark
Crysis Benchmark tool (for Crysis) and/or FBWH Too (for Crysis Warhead)
FFXIV Benchmark
Lost Planet 2 Benchmark

Last edited by EastCoasthandle; Apr 13, 2011 at 02:43 PM.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 02:29 PM   #11
LifeOnMars
2000 Posts
 
LifeOnMars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kettering,Northants. UK
Posts: 2,242 (1.23/day)
Thanks: 1,718
Thanked 401 Times in 337 Posts

System Specs

This should be interesting. I know personally how much of a step up these chips are having had a 3.8GHz Q6600 GO and a 4GHz 1090T previously.
LifeOnMars is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 02:30 PM   #12
slyfox2151
2000 Posts
 
slyfox2151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,522 (1.56/day)
Thanks: 57
Thanked 530 Times in 472 Posts

System Specs

just to point out, winrar is very ram dependant last time i checked, latency and bandwidth will have a very large impack on the score.




intel burn test bandwidth should be a fair comparison... or run True Crypt benchmark. cinebench.
__________________
“it's still EA.. they will F*** it up. F***ing up games is the only thing they do consistently.” -TRIPTEX_MTL
slyfox2151 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 02:51 PM   #13
dank1983man420
200 Posts
 
dank1983man420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near Chicago, IL
Posts: 435 (0.23/day)
Thanks: 285
Thanked 138 Times in 88 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to dank1983man420

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoasthandle View Post
Please do if you don't mind. Below are some suggestions:
Applications:
Winrar has it's own built in benchmark.
3DMark11
SuperPI Mod


Games:
AVP benchmark
Crysis Benchmark tool (for Crysis) and/or FBWH Too (for Crysis Warhead)
FFXIV Benchmark
Lost Planet 2 Benchmark
Quote:
Originally Posted by LifeOnMars View Post
This should be interesting. I know personally how much of a step up these chips are having had a 3.8GHz Q6600 GO and a 4GHz 1090T previously.
Quote:
Originally Posted by slyfox2151 View Post
just to point out, winrar is very ram dependant last time i checked, latency and bandwidth will have a very large impack on the score.




intel burn test bandwidth should be a fair comparison... or run True Crypt benchmark. cinebench.


Sounds good, I would have to do these tomorrow morning on my day off though when the time to do this is there though. I just downloaded the necessary programs I didn't have already, so that is taken care of. Would you like me to run both of the chips at their stocks, both at the same clocks OC'd, or both stock clocks and matched OC's?
dank1983man420 is offline  
More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 02:58 PM   #14
TRIPTEX_CAN
2000 Posts
 
TRIPTEX_CAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: BC.CAN
Posts: 2,342 (1.20/day)
Thanks: 805
Thanked 726 Times in 554 Posts

System Specs

I'm on the verge of pulling the trigger on a SB upgrade so there is a good chance I will have something to add to this thread down the road.

I think matching the clocks is the best way to do it. I can say for sure this will be a complete shitkicking in all synthetics where the q9650 will show it's age.

You should also add BC2 to this comparison even though it's proven that C2Qs just can't keep up with i5/i7 let alone SB i5/i7.
__________________
“come to canada and I'll put my maple syrup in your mouth”
TRIPTEX_CAN is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 03:00 PM   #15
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by dank1983man420 View Post
Sounds good, I would have to do these tomorrow morning on my day off though when the time to do this is there though. I just downloaded the necessary programs I didn't have already, so that is taken care of. Would you like me to run both of the chips at their stocks, both at the same clocks OC'd, or both stock clocks and matched OC's?
Thanks, I would prefer both at the same OC settings.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 03:10 PM   #16
trickson
OH, I have such a headache
 
trickson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,154 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,947
Thanked 922 Times in 757 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRIPTEX_CAN View Post
the q9650 will show it's age.
It may be aged , But it still is a great CPU . I love mine and have seen no real reason to upgrade it as of yet . Just a supper solid and fast CPU that can take any thing I through at it and then some .
trickson is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to trickson For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 13, 2011, 03:52 PM   #17
francis511
2000 Posts
 
francis511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.Ireland
Posts: 2,363 (0.97/day)
Thanks: 145
Thanked 277 Times in 257 Posts

System Specs

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/charts...d%5B4413%5D=on
__________________
francis511 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to francis511 For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 13, 2011, 04:11 PM   #18
dank1983man420
200 Posts
 
dank1983man420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near Chicago, IL
Posts: 435 (0.23/day)
Thanks: 285
Thanked 138 Times in 88 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to dank1983man420

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by francis511 View Post
Damn, that review would have been perfect if they used an i2500k instead of the 2600k. It would have been comparing both 4 core and 4 thread processors instead of the 2600k having the 8 thread advantage.
dank1983man420 is offline  
More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 04:16 PM   #19
silkstone
2000 Posts
 
silkstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: HCM Vietnam
Posts: 2,302 (1.36/day)
Thanks: 371
Thanked 381 Times in 313 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by slyfox2151 View Post
just to point out, winrar is very ram dependant last time i checked, latency and bandwidth will have a very large impack on the score.




intel burn test bandwidth should be a fair comparison... or run True Crypt benchmark. cinebench.
It thought it would be more FSB Dependant? which i guess would also be tied to the ram, but it uses the cache more than anything else, right?
__________________
Thanks to BradleyKZN for polishing my sig

“oooooooooooh fire!!! and girls...GIRLS and fire!!!!!!! oooooooooooooh *runz around clapping hands together*” -Marineborn
silkstone is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 04:25 PM   #20
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,903 (6.47/day)
Thanks: 785
Thanked 5,185 Times in 3,754 Posts

System Specs

2600K vs. Q9650

2500K vs. Q9650

There you go. SandyBridge definitely wins, but unless you are doing video/audio/photo/3D editting, I see no reason to upgrade if you already have a high end 775 quad.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to newtekie1 For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 13, 2011, 04:39 PM   #21
AltecV1
1000 Posts
 
AltecV1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Republic of Estonia
Posts: 1,248 (0.77/day)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 175 Times in 144 Posts

System Specs

DAMN that is a lot faster then i thought it would be ! but now im sad because i just realised how old my cpu is
AltecV1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 04:46 PM   #22
LifeOnMars
2000 Posts
 
LifeOnMars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kettering,Northants. UK
Posts: 2,242 (1.23/day)
Thanks: 1,718
Thanked 401 Times in 337 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
2600K vs. Q9650

2500K vs. Q9650

There you go. SandyBridge definitely wins, but unless you are doing video/audio/photo/3D editting, I see no reason to upgrade if you already have a high end 775 quad.
Crossfire/Sli scaling is alot better for the very top end, plus that only shows a handful of games. I've seen improvements in alot more and has been an altogether smoother gaming experience.
LifeOnMars is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 05:01 PM   #23
TRIPTEX_CAN
2000 Posts
 
TRIPTEX_CAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: BC.CAN
Posts: 2,342 (1.20/day)
Thanks: 805
Thanked 726 Times in 554 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by trickson View Post
It may be aged , But it still is a great CPU . I love mine and have seen no real reason to upgrade it as of yet . Just a supper solid and fast CPU that can take any thing I through at it and then some .
I agree the Q9xx0 quads are/were great chips for their time but imo that time has passed when running current highend multiple GPU configs and intensive encoding tasks.
__________________
“come to canada and I'll put my maple syrup in your mouth”
TRIPTEX_CAN is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2011, 05:08 PM   #24
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

dank1983man420,
One more thing, please make sure that all IQ settings are on max. As for resolution make it the highest possible.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18, 2011, 10:29 PM   #25
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

OP updated with some results.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why aren't there any CPU reviews? mtosev Comments & Feedback 0 Jul 29, 2009 07:39 PM
C2Q, C2D and AMD CPUs comparisons using a 4870 X2 EastCoasthandle AMD / ATI 56 Sep 5, 2008 07:35 PM
Why are we not seeing Video Card reviews using other games? EastCoasthandle Graphics Cards 23 Jul 29, 2007 04:24 AM
Who's using top-end SCSI RAID-0 these days? s1rrah General Hardware 6 Feb 19, 2007 12:16 AM
Why 99% of Power Supply Reviews Are Wrong peach1971 General Hardware 2 Dec 23, 2006 01:23 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts