techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 3, 2011, 01:31 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Seagate Breaks Areal Density Barrier, Unveils First HDD with 1 TB per Platter

Seagate, the leader in hard drives and storage solutions, today unveiled the world’s first 3.5-inch hard drive featuring 1TB of storage capacity per disk platter, breaking the 1TB areal density barrier to help meet explosive worldwide demand for digital content storage in both the home and the office.

Seagate’s GoFlex Desk products are the first to feature the new hard drive, delivering storage capacities of up to 3TB and an areal density of 625 Gigabits per square inch, the industry’s highest. Seagate is on track to ship its flagship 3.5-inch Barracuda desktop hard drive with 3TBs of storage on 3 disk platters – enough capacity to store up to 120 high-definition movies, 1,500 video games, thousands of photos or virtually countless hours of digital music – to the distribution channel in mid-2011. The drive will also be available in capacities of 2TB, 1.5TB and 1TB.



“Organizations of all sizes and consumers worldwide are amassing digital content at light speed, generating immense demand for storage of digital content of every imaginable kind,” said Rocky Pimentel, Seagate Executive Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing. “We remain keenly focused on delivering the storage capacity, speed and manageability our customers need to thrive in an increasingly digital world.”

GoFlex Desk external drives are compatible with both the Windows operating system and Mac computers. Each drive includes an NTFS driver for Mac, which allows the drive to store and access files from both Windows and Mac OS X computers without reformatting. The GoFlex Desk external drive’s sleek black 3.5-inch design sits either vertically or horizontally to accommodate any desktop environment.

Last edited by btarunr; May 3, 2011 at 01:44 PM.
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 01:34 PM   #2
entropy13
2000 Posts
 
entropy13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Philippines
Posts: 3,442 (2.19/day)
Thanks: 42
Thanked 1,136 Times in 717 Posts

System Specs

Are there even 1,500 games released in the past 10 years? I wonder...
__________________
MSI P67A-GD65 (B3), Intel Core i5 2500K, Corsair H60, 2x MSI GTX 570 Twin Frozr II/OC, G.Skill RipjawsX (2x4GB) DDR3-1600 RAM, OCZ Agility 3 120GB + 2TB, Corsair AX1200, Corsair Carbide 400R

MSI Z68MA-ED55, i5 2500K, Noctua NH-U9B SE2, Inno3D GTX 570, Corsair Vengeance LP 8GB, OCZ Agility 3 120GB + 1TB, Seasonic X660, Lian Li PC-V600FB

The Big Useful List of Free Useful Programs To Use Usually For Free
entropy13 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 01:38 PM   #3
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
 
FordGT90Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,648 (6.23/day)
Thanks: 1,785
Thanked 2,632 Times in 1,986 Posts

System Specs

Why not offer a 5 TB drive with 5 of those platters? What's with the run on 3-4 platter drives lately? Lemme guess, the industry has priced itself out of shipping 5 platter drives.
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume.

try { SteamDownload(); }
catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }
FordGT90Concept is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 01:38 PM   #4
LAN_deRf_HA
3500 Posts
 
LAN_deRf_HA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,067 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 295
Thanked 851 Times in 594 Posts

System Specs

Finally. I've been holding out for 2 platter 2 TB drives. Let's see what WD comes up with and then I'll be replacing both my drives.... well in a perfect world anyways. If these drives turn out like others in the past few years they'll either be prone to massive amounts of noise or horrendous reliability. Let's hope seagate takes a quiet cue from their new samsung tech without the spotty smart data readings.
LAN_deRf_HA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 02:09 PM   #5
_JP_
2000 Posts
 
_JP_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,142 (1.85/day)
Thanks: 1,968
Thanked 650 Times in 471 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by entropy13 View Post
Are there even 1,500 games released in the past 10 years? I wonder...
3072 GB / 1500 games = 2,048 GB per game. Last time I checked, the 1st DiRT was around ten times that size. So they must be making an average.
_JP_ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 02:22 PM   #6
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
 
FordGT90Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,648 (6.23/day)
Thanks: 1,785
Thanked 2,632 Times in 1,986 Posts

System Specs

It would hold 66,666 copies of Minecraft (45 MB). XD
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume.

try { SteamDownload(); }
catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }
FordGT90Concept is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FordGT90Concept For This Useful Post:
Old May 3, 2011, 02:22 PM   #7
micropage7
3500 Posts
 
micropage7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 3,713 (3.15/day)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 852 Times in 558 Posts

System Specs

i just can say wow
its kinda fast when first hdd touched 1 tera now is 3 tera. sometimes it looks too much for motherboard to handle
__________________
:: New Cases, Tips And All About Your Cases Visit CaseGear ::

Don't Ever Ask About Love And Honesty That You Don't Ever Have
micropage7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 02:35 PM   #8
caleb
1000 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Poland,Slask
Posts: 1,119 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 204
Thanked 176 Times in 144 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
i just can say wow
Whats so wow about it? That we use the same mechanical technology for more than 30 years and they are still "improving it" lol.
I find it kinda sad we still dont get nice TB size SSD's with a decent price.
I saw this guy in a movie once and he could store other peoples mind in his neural net !
__________________
"Let me noobilize you"
caleb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 03:08 PM   #9
theJesus
2000 Posts
 
theJesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 3,127 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 2,307
Thanked 866 Times in 613 Posts

System Specs

Wake me up when they hit 2tb/platter and sell single platter drives for ~$100. Then I'll buy five or six for a nice RAID 5 or 10 or something like that. Single platter drives are sexy.
__________________
HEAT
“congratulations! you have successfully been inflicted with tpuitis! symptons include: prolonged computer usage, urge to make tpu your homepage, posting at rapid posts-per-day ratios (also known as post whoring), and the urge to waste lots of money on high end computer hardware that you dont need!” -panchoman
“Modding to me is something best shared with others.... Kind of like a fine wine, but without the drunk driving arrest and hangovers.” -MKmods
“i'm going to punch you in the face now Jesus..” -BumbleBee
theJesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 03:11 PM   #10
wolf
Performance Enthusiast
 
wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enrichment Center for Aperture Laboratories
Posts: 5,313 (2.38/day)
Thanks: 1,676
Thanked 844 Times in 707 Posts

System Specs

hard drives are still improving at a fantastic rate imo. good to have such clear definition between super fast read/write drives, and cheap HUGE storage drives.
__________________


“my goal is speed, full ultra, and extreme gaming” -Ephraim

“Yeah you can always overclock the 2gb memory to 4gb” -jaredpace
wolf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 03:13 PM   #11
DanTheBanjoman
Señor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by caleb View Post
Whats so wow about it? That we use the same mechanical technology for more than 30 years and they are still "improving it" lol.
I find it kinda sad we still dont get nice TB size SSD's with a decent price.
I saw this guy in a movie once and he could store other peoples mind in his neural net !
I agree, I even saw this documentary about a robot from the future who came to kill some lady. And there was this computer that could think for itself and decided humans should die. Quite interesting.
I'm not sure why we don't get this tech at home.


Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf View Post
hard drives are still improving at a fantastic rate imo. good to have such clear definition between super fast read/write drives, and cheap HUGE storage drives.

I disagree, improvements have been slow in the past few years. Though this is because the market for huge multi-TB disks is not that big. Not yet anyway.
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DanTheBanjoman For This Useful Post:
Old May 3, 2011, 03:19 PM   #12
micropage7
3500 Posts
 
micropage7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 3,713 (3.15/day)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 852 Times in 558 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by caleb View Post
Whats so wow about it? That we use the same mechanical technology for more than 30 years and they are still "improving it" lol.
yep with kinda same technology we can push it into now 3 tera. this is what called evolution
although the size is promising, if it fails the pain is kinda 'promising' too, the safest way maybe just place it on raid configuration
__________________
:: New Cases, Tips And All About Your Cases Visit CaseGear ::

Don't Ever Ask About Love And Honesty That You Don't Ever Have
micropage7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 04:13 PM   #13
blibba
500 Posts
 
blibba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 807 (0.60/day)
Thanks: 109
Thanked 177 Times in 121 Posts

System Specs

I struggle to half-fill my 640GB main drive
blibba is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 04:17 PM   #14
FreedomEclipse
Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t!
 
FreedomEclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,588 (3.37/day)
Thanks: 827
Thanked 1,623 Times in 1,299 Posts

System Specs

I bet that technology originally belonged to samsung....
__________________

“I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse
FreedomEclipse is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 04:19 PM   #15
crazyeyesreaper
Chief Broken Rig
 
crazyeyesreaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 04578
Posts: 6,036 (3.90/day)
Thanks: 767
Thanked 2,269 Times in 1,570 Posts

System Specs

dosent matter who it belonged to the better density will push HDD speed up even higher

just look at the performance numbers of samsungs F4 drives of the 7200rpm variety hitting 155mb/s read write speeds. doubling the density of a 1TB drive from 500gb x2 to 1000gb x1 should give a nice bump in speed id say about 15-25mb/s improvement

The Spinpoint F3s sequential read writes were around 110-115. id expect upping them to single platter would be a nice 130-145 maybe higher so a short stroked drive 1tb reduced to say 700gb per drive x2 in Raid 0 would make for some damn damn nice numbers for mechanical hdds. as that raises the min read write do to cutting off the slowest part of the disk. so average should go up to 125 + the improvement from a single platter upping that to 150+ oh man, cant wait for the new drives and actual performance numbers.
crazyeyesreaper is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 04:38 PM   #16
theJesus
2000 Posts
 
theJesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 3,127 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 2,307
Thanked 866 Times in 613 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanTheBanjoman View Post
I agree, I even saw this documentary about a robot from the future who came to kill some lady. And there was this computer that could think for itself and decided humans should die. Quite interesting.
I'm not sure why we don't get this tech at home.
Have I ever told you that I love you?
__________________
HEAT
“congratulations! you have successfully been inflicted with tpuitis! symptons include: prolonged computer usage, urge to make tpu your homepage, posting at rapid posts-per-day ratios (also known as post whoring), and the urge to waste lots of money on high end computer hardware that you dont need!” -panchoman
“Modding to me is something best shared with others.... Kind of like a fine wine, but without the drunk driving arrest and hangovers.” -MKmods
“i'm going to punch you in the face now Jesus..” -BumbleBee
theJesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 05:47 PM   #17
Thefumigator
200 Posts
 
Thefumigator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 347 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 45 Times in 27 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by theJesus View Post
Wake me up when they hit 2tb/platter and sell single platter drives for ~$100. Then I'll buy five or six for a nice RAID 5 or 10 or something like that. Single platter drives are sexy.
Wait a second....
Aren't single platter drives slower than multiplatter drives? (considering the platters being the same size in both cases, single and multi).

It makes me think that a drive with 2 x 1TB platters would perform similary to 2x drives of 1TB (single platter) in RAID 0. This is rational, since there's a kind of RAID 0 in between the platters of a multiplatter drive. internally I mean.

But yeah of course improving density will improve performance but I'm not discussing that in this case...
Thefumigator is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 05:55 PM   #18
digibucc
3500 Posts
 
digibucc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: In the mountains :) Adirondacks in NY (US)
Posts: 3,709 (2.49/day)
Thanks: 4,547
Thanked 1,449 Times in 1,040 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thefumigator View Post
Wait a second....
Aren't single platter drives slower than multiplatter drives?
not in general, no. the platters are linked, but the mechanics still have to read individual platters, in different spots. that slows it all down.
__________________

Donate to TPU TeamSpeak Server

TPU TS: ts21.gameservers.com:9207

PSN / XBL / Steam = digibucc | Origin / BF3 = digibuc
digibucc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 05:55 PM   #19
cheesy999
1000 Posts
 
cheesy999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Near Canterbury, uk
Posts: 1,898 (1.75/day)
Thanks: 634
Thanked 562 Times in 453 Posts

System Specs

no, the platters do not work the same as hard drives do in a raid set up, the 1tb f3 is actually slightly slowr then the 500gb f3
__________________
“if you run short on cash, theres always that option. dont forget to use vasaline” -Freedomeclipse

“Before you complain about lag, think about Jesus. He lagged three days before respawning.” -repman244
cheesy999 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 06:17 PM   #20
Thefumigator
200 Posts
 
Thefumigator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 347 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 45 Times in 27 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by digibucc View Post
not in general, no. the platters are linked, but the mechanics still have to read individual platters, in different spots. that slows it all down.
Now I see what that means.

I actually thought the opposite, that more platters would increase speed because the data would have been written sequencially in platter 1, platter 2, platter 3 and then platter 1, platter 2, platter 3 and so on. making lower amount if seekings for each spot as all heads are in the desired spot in that single instant. If you know what I mean (at least it this idea would work faster in sequencial readings)

Now, if they have to read individual platters in different spots, we are doomed. speeds drops. Unless the heads were independent from each other, which are not.
Thefumigator is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Thefumigator For This Useful Post:
Old May 3, 2011, 06:29 PM   #21
repman244
500 Posts
 
repman244's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 970 (1.21/day)
Thanks: 227
Thanked 413 Times in 238 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomEclipse View Post
I bet that technology originally belonged to samsung....
Yes it did, just google samsung 1TB platter and it's there
repman244 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 06:41 PM   #22
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,900 (6.47/day)
Thanks: 785
Thanked 5,185 Times in 3,754 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by FordGT90Concept View Post
Why not offer a 5 TB drive with 5 of those platters? What's with the run on 3-4 platter drives lately? Lemme guess, the industry has priced itself out of shipping 5 platter drives.
The problem with having more than 3 platters is that they hit the height limit of the drive.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 06:55 PM   #23
theJesus
2000 Posts
 
theJesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 3,127 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 2,307
Thanked 866 Times in 613 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thefumigator View Post
Now I see what that means.

I actually thought the opposite, that more platters would increase speed because the data would have been written sequencially in platter 1, platter 2, platter 3 and then platter 1, platter 2, platter 3 and so on. making lower amount if seekings for each spot as all heads are in the desired spot in that single instant. If you know what I mean (at least it this idea would work faster in sequencial readings)

Now, if they have to read individual platters in different spots, we are doomed. speeds drops. Unless the heads were independent from each other, which are not.
Yeah, I understand the logic you were using, but unfortunately it just doesn't work that way

Regardless, I also want single-platter drives because they're sleek and thin and sexy (and I imagine cooler and quieter)
__________________
HEAT
“congratulations! you have successfully been inflicted with tpuitis! symptons include: prolonged computer usage, urge to make tpu your homepage, posting at rapid posts-per-day ratios (also known as post whoring), and the urge to waste lots of money on high end computer hardware that you dont need!” -panchoman
“Modding to me is something best shared with others.... Kind of like a fine wine, but without the drunk driving arrest and hangovers.” -MKmods
“i'm going to punch you in the face now Jesus..” -BumbleBee
theJesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 08:30 PM   #24
wiak
1000 Posts
 
wiak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,682 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 199 Times in 156 Posts

so where is ma 5TB hard drive?
they have the technology :P
5 platters at 1TB earch = 5TB and 5 platters are max in a 3,5" harddrive
wiak is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2011, 08:33 PM   #25
DanTheBanjoman
Señor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
The problem with having more than 3 platters is that they hit the height limit of the drive.
Height limit? I thought full height meant two 5,25" bays. ie four Bigfoots stacked.
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eurocom Breaks the 3TB Barrier in its Notebooks with Seagate Momentus 7200rpm HDDs btarunr News 5 Aug 17, 2010 08:57 AM
Western Digital Ups Platter Density, to Launch 2 TB HDD btarunr News 8 Jan 13, 2009 11:00 PM
Seagate Ships Desktop Hard Drive With World's Highest Areal Density - 500GB Per Disk malware News 5 Jan 6, 2009 06:36 AM
Seagate Ups Storage Density With Single Platter 500GB HDD btarunr News 7 Dec 31, 2008 02:16 PM
Seagate Ships the World's Highest Areal Density 3.5" Desktop Drive malware News 11 Jun 11, 2007 06:35 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts