techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Overclocking & Cooling

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 8, 2011, 08:41 AM   #451
LAN_deRf_HA
3500 Posts
 
LAN_deRf_HA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,079 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 295
Thanked 853 Times in 595 Posts

System Specs

Vista and 7 have always had issues detecting cpu speed on the system page. Sometimes it'll get it right, and then if you change the clock speed later it just won't update. I doubt it'll get fixed until they do another massive overhaul like xp to vista. Microsoft doesn't have a good track record of addressing the little annoyances. They still haven't fixed the bug where aero peek can get disabled if you update your graphics driver.
LAN_deRf_HA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2011, 03:53 AM   #452
random
2000 Posts
 
random's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,474 (1.45/day)
Thanks: 1,248
Thanked 627 Times in 407 Posts

System Specs

Would you guys think 0.30+ vcore is worth it from 4.4ghz to 4.5ghz?
random is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2011, 03:54 AM   #453
OneMoar
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,345 (2.01/day)
Thanks: 91
Thanked 442 Times in 380 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by random View Post
Would you guys think 0.30+ vcore is worth it from 4.4ghz to 4.5ghz?
no
OneMoar is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OneMoar For This Useful Post:
Old May 11, 2011, 03:55 AM   #454
random
2000 Posts
 
random's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,474 (1.45/day)
Thanks: 1,248
Thanked 627 Times in 407 Posts

System Specs

lol I wouldn't have thought so either, there seems to be a big difference in stability when going from 4.4ghz to 4.5ghz on my chip
random is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2011, 03:56 AM   #455
OneMoar
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,345 (2.01/day)
Thanks: 91
Thanked 442 Times in 380 Posts

System Specs

other then just for fun anything over 3.8-4.0 is pretty useless
OneMoar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2011, 04:37 PM   #456
WhiteNoise
500 Posts
 
WhiteNoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 964 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 157
Thanked 200 Times in 150 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by OneMoar View Post
other then just for fun anything over 3.8-4.0 is pretty useless


Says you.
__________________
PS3 Fat 120GB // PS3 Slim 250GB // XBOX 360 Elite 120GB // XBOX 360 4GB w/ Kinect

EK-Supreme HF - Full Nickel - Rev 2 // Swiftech MCP655-B // Danger Den Reservoir // XSPC RX480 Quad 120mm Radiator // Bitspower True Silver & Enzotech fittings // DangerDen Tube Active UV Hose // (4x) Scythe Gentle Typhoon 120mm Fan, 1850 RPM
WhiteNoise is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2011, 04:40 PM   #457
Fourstaff
TPU Janitor
 
Fourstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 6,149 (4.73/day)
Thanks: 267
Thanked 1,496 Times in 1,235 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by OneMoar View Post
other then just for fun anything over 3.8-4.0 is pretty useless
Obviously you never used your rig to model a 3d surface, or try to crack a relatively strong RSA encryption.
Fourstaff is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2011, 05:03 PM   #458
heky
500 Posts
 
heky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Slovenia, Europe
Posts: 873 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 891
Thanked 144 Times in 122 Posts
Send a message via MSN to heky

System Specs

Hy guys. Finally completed my sandy bridge build. My 2600K is IntelBurn 2.51 stable @4.6Ghz @1.3v in Bios, 1.36v full load. The ram runs at 1866 at the moment with 8-9-8-24-1T @ 1.5v.
Cant go any higher with cpu clocks due to temps, they get over 70 with IBT.
heky is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to heky For This Useful Post:
Old May 11, 2011, 05:22 PM   #459
Finners
75 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 94 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 30 Times in 14 Posts

System Specs

Has anybody else find that Intelburn doesn't prove Stability with Sandybridge? i had my 2500k stable with IBt, but would fail Prime and BSOD

I've found Prime blend test best for me
Finners is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Finners For This Useful Post:
Old May 11, 2011, 05:53 PM   #460
heky
500 Posts
 
heky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Slovenia, Europe
Posts: 873 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 891
Thanked 144 Times in 122 Posts
Send a message via MSN to heky

System Specs

Try 2.51, report back. I pass prime with ease, Ibt gives me way higher temps.
heky is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2011, 06:05 PM   #461
OneMoar
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,345 (2.01/day)
Thanks: 91
Thanked 442 Times in 380 Posts

System Specs

prime does a better job of testing for stability
ibt just runs a in-place fft test and doesn't really test true-stability
OneMoar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2011, 06:07 PM   #462
WhiteNoise
500 Posts
 
WhiteNoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 964 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 157
Thanked 200 Times in 150 Posts

System Specs

None of those progies prove stability with sanyBridge IMO. I can run those all day long @ 5GHz and pass all along...then bsod while sitting at a desktop doing nothing.

CPU volts fix these problems but this cpu just requires too many for me to want to clock that high.

4.7Ghz is 100% stable for me and has been for some time now. Anything over 4.7GHz though requires voltages that I don't feel good about using.
__________________
PS3 Fat 120GB // PS3 Slim 250GB // XBOX 360 Elite 120GB // XBOX 360 4GB w/ Kinect

EK-Supreme HF - Full Nickel - Rev 2 // Swiftech MCP655-B // Danger Den Reservoir // XSPC RX480 Quad 120mm Radiator // Bitspower True Silver & Enzotech fittings // DangerDen Tube Active UV Hose // (4x) Scythe Gentle Typhoon 120mm Fan, 1850 RPM
WhiteNoise is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to WhiteNoise For This Useful Post:
Old May 11, 2011, 06:09 PM   #463
KieX
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,056 (1.61/day)
Thanks: 6,957
Thanked 2,655 Times in 1,141 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to KieX

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finners View Post
Has anybody else find that Intelburn doesn't prove Stability with Sandybridge? i had my 2500k stable with IBt, but would fail Prime and BSOD

I've found Prime blend test best for me
I have found that almost nothing does for 24/7 clocks on Sandybridge. What is fine for months of full load, still crashes randomly sometimes in another applications. I found a guide with some explanations to BSOD, you might find useful:

Quote:
BSOD Codes
0x124 = add/remove vcore or QPI/VTT voltage (usually Vcore, once it was QPI/VTT)
0x101 = add more vcore
0x50 = RAM timings/Frequency add DDR3 voltage or add QPI/VTT
0x1E = add more vcore
0x3B = add more vcore
0xD1 = add QPI/VTT voltage
0x9C = QPI/VTT most likely, but increasing vcore has helped in some instances”
0X109 = add DDR3 voltage
0x0A = add QPI/VTT voltage
__________________
KieX is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KieX For This Useful Post:
Old May 11, 2011, 06:26 PM   #464
WhiteNoise
500 Posts
 
WhiteNoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 964 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 157
Thanked 200 Times in 150 Posts

System Specs

Thats some good info there dude thanks!
__________________
PS3 Fat 120GB // PS3 Slim 250GB // XBOX 360 Elite 120GB // XBOX 360 4GB w/ Kinect

EK-Supreme HF - Full Nickel - Rev 2 // Swiftech MCP655-B // Danger Den Reservoir // XSPC RX480 Quad 120mm Radiator // Bitspower True Silver & Enzotech fittings // DangerDen Tube Active UV Hose // (4x) Scythe Gentle Typhoon 120mm Fan, 1850 RPM
WhiteNoise is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2011, 07:15 PM   #465
cadaveca
My name is Dave
 
cadaveca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 10,932 (4.16/day)
Thanks: 4,718
Thanked 5,464 Times in 3,308 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finners View Post
Has anybody else find that Intelburn doesn't prove Stability with Sandybridge? i had my 2500k stable with IBt, but would fail Prime and BSOD

I've found Prime blend test best for me
IBT doesn't use AVX extensions, as far as I know. Prime 95 uses varied instructions, so if run for long enough, does test multiple loading scenarios within a single session, so does provide much differnt testing than IBT does.

Those having issues with idle...there are three specific causes for that, that no real test out there is programmed for.


#1 cause is PLL Overvoltage.
__________________
Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp


-Only real men play games THIS way.
cadaveca is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cadaveca For This Useful Post:
Old May 11, 2011, 09:39 PM   #466
heky
500 Posts
 
heky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Slovenia, Europe
Posts: 873 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 891
Thanked 144 Times in 122 Posts
Send a message via MSN to heky

System Specs

I think the new 2.51 version of IBT uses AVX.
heky is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2011, 09:57 PM   #467
random
2000 Posts
 
random's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,474 (1.45/day)
Thanks: 1,248
Thanked 627 Times in 407 Posts

System Specs

I found that Prime95 Blend test to show the best results for instability on a system that crashes while idle.

While I could pass 25 linx run and 20 IBT runs, I could not pass an hour of Prime Blend.
random is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 12, 2011, 12:40 AM   #468
LAN_deRf_HA
3500 Posts
 
LAN_deRf_HA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,079 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 295
Thanked 853 Times in 595 Posts

System Specs

What I've found to be a good test for 24/7 is watching dvds in windows media player and playing a bunch of flash games in the browser. For the initial hardcore testing I've found IBT with AVX instructions set on normal with 100 runs to be more effective than doing slow maximum runs. I'm guessing because IBT is most likely to fail at the end of a run. Other than that I do OCCT large data sets. The flash and dvd tests really seem to do the trick for me.
LAN_deRf_HA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 12, 2011, 12:27 PM   #469
heky
500 Posts
 
heky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Slovenia, Europe
Posts: 873 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 891
Thanked 144 Times in 122 Posts
Send a message via MSN to heky

System Specs

Hey guys, turns out you were right. I was not stable in prime blend. Had to set 1.34v in bios, and get 1.4v full load. Thats stable for now.
heky is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 12, 2011, 12:38 PM   #470
random
2000 Posts
 
random's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,474 (1.45/day)
Thanks: 1,248
Thanked 627 Times in 407 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by heky View Post
Hey guys, turns out you were right. I was not stable in prime blend. Had to set 1.34v in bios, and get 1.4v full load. Thats stable for now.
Yeah I suggest anyone who is testing 24/7 settings to use Prime Blend, it finds the error pretty quickly as opposed to having to wait til it eventually crashes on idle.
random is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 27, 2011, 11:27 AM   #471
FreedomEclipse
Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t!
 
FreedomEclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,588 (3.37/day)
Thanks: 827
Thanked 1,623 Times in 1,299 Posts

System Specs

I think this is a very positive start for a P8Z68 board



I had to rar some files up in the background otherwise the CPU would trip down to 1.6Ghz lol but ive played BC2 like this for hours and this is all good. this screenshot is a little old but ive OC'd my ram to balance the whole lot out which gave me an exta 1k in vantage
__________________

“I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse
FreedomEclipse is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FreedomEclipse For This Useful Post:
Old May 27, 2011, 11:31 AM   #472
Chosen Juan
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 82 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

When you overclock (let's say, to 4.4Ghz), is it supposed to be at 4.4Ghz the whole time, or is it supposed to be downclocked and only go to 4.4Ghz when a full load is applied?

I'm wondering because I've been reading about overclocking my 2500K recently (still waiting for second fan for push-pull), and many articles talk about overclocking the Turbo Boost so the idle is low.
Chosen Juan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 27, 2011, 11:35 AM   #473
FreedomEclipse
Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t!
 
FreedomEclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,588 (3.37/day)
Thanks: 827
Thanked 1,623 Times in 1,299 Posts

System Specs

you can turn it off if you want, Its only speed step
__________________

“I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse
FreedomEclipse is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old May 28, 2011, 09:15 AM   #474
Chosen Juan
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 82 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomEclipse View Post
you can turn it off if you want, Its only speed step
See for some reason it's not working for me. I was checking under CPU-Z earlier, and when everything was completely stock, my 2500K would be at 1.6Ghz on idle, then it would go up to 3.4Ghz under full load.

Now I'm just doing a simple overclock to 4.0Ghz on 1.2v (just testing it out), and it is always at 4.0Ghz, even when there is no load. I go into the UEFI, and Intel Speed Step is Enabled. Am I doing something wrong, or is this how overclocking is on ASRock motherboards? I have no problem with it, it would just be nice to save some power on idle you know?
Chosen Juan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 28, 2011, 10:26 AM   #475
FreedomEclipse
Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t!
 
FreedomEclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,588 (3.37/day)
Thanks: 827
Thanked 1,623 Times in 1,299 Posts

System Specs

try disabling the C1E or C3 states in the bios.

or setting the power options within windows for full power usage. instead of balanced by default.

if its not either of those then i dont know. I havent really played around with the bios since i only put this rig together thursday just gone
__________________

“I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse
FreedomEclipse is online now  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Sandy Bridge IGP drfelip GPU-Z 4 Jan 3, 2011 05:14 PM
Overclock3D's Intel Sandy Bridge 2600K @5GHz Review and Benchmarks. CDdude55 General Hardware 9 Jan 3, 2011 07:26 AM
NVIDIA SLI Technology and Intel Sandy Bridge Form the Ultimate Gaming PC btarunr News 15 Dec 8, 2010 11:23 PM
[Swedish]New ASUS mobo and Intel Sandy Bridge quick preview @ sweclockers HalfAHertz Motherboards & Memory 1 Nov 4, 2010 10:47 PM
Intel Sandy Bridge Quad-Core Processor Tested btarunr News 72 Jun 12, 2010 10:02 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts