![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,761 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,208 Times in 3,157 Posts
|
AMD Fusion A8-3850 GPU Performance Analysis
To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...U_Performance/
Last edited by W1zzard; Jul 21, 2011 at 08:50 PM. |
|
|
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Poland,Slask
Posts: 1,102 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 200
Thanked 174 Times in 142 Posts
|
Nice review. I like the comparison of 3 theoretic setups very much.
__________________
"Let me noobilize you"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Húsið mitt
Posts: 2,606 (1.33/day)
Thanks: 479
Thanked 356 Times in 265 Posts
|
You think this will reach the netbook scene?
or are those for the upcoming Deccan?
__________________
![]() SIEG HEIL!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 202 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
|
What a great review - thanks for all the time and effort. So, from what I can see, the A8-3850 only makes sense if you're buying a vanilla pc for vanilla pc work - an office PC, where some gpu acceleration would be nice, but you're not going to go to a full graphics card...
__________________
"thinking about a Cooler Master Elite 360..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
But with the loss of performance compared to Sandy Bridge, it doesn't seem worth it. That is, unless your programs gain more from GPU performance... But then, you'd probably get a graphics card. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,920 (1.02/day)
Thanks: 461
Thanked 282 Times in 230 Posts
|
It seems AMD still has a long way to go where APU with crossfire is concerned: it's actually worse to add a discrete card on many occasions then it is to simply use the discrete card.
__________________
HTC - Hugo Teve Cá I'm PORTUGUESE: apologies for any spelling mistakes! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banstick Dummy
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,109 (6.93/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,829 Times in 3,739 Posts
|
Great review W1zz. Tough one to make I bet considering this is new waters.
Anyway I think the APU is pretty much where is should be for a first gen. APU is the future and as a first step I think its a damn good one. Oh and marketing is marketing. Always delete at least 10% of the "Facts" to get a better picture. I'm still trying to get 30mpg out of my car
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Green Jakarta
Posts: 288 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
|
what's differences between "AMD HD 6670" and "AMD Fusion A3850 + 6670"?
are the first one use sandy bridge as the processor?
__________________
~ "Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.." |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,761 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,208 Times in 3,157 Posts
|
Quote:
the second is the igp and the hd 6670 working in dual graphics (crossfire) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 7 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
I think this w1zzard guy haven't done the review honestly.
1. A motherboard for AMD Athlon X4 640 has its own integrated graphics, so why we need a HD 6450 for internet browsing? 2. I didn't see any HD5770 in the review, then I saw HD5770 stated in the conclusion. why HD5770, not HD6670? 3. A8-3850 iGP is equivalent to a HD5550 DDR3. For entry level gaming, it is more than enough to play while other two systems need HD 5550s to match its speed. 4. Electricity bills |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banstick Dummy
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,109 (6.93/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,829 Times in 3,739 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to TheMailMan78 For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Marlow, ENGLAND
Posts: 1,454 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 149
Thanked 279 Times in 226 Posts
|
Wow, that was so full of fail I can't think of a coherant retort.
__________________
Alienware M11x R1 Netbook: 1.3GHz Core2 Duo U7300 (OC'd to 1.7GHz) | 8GB Corsair DDR3 1333MHz | nVIDIA GeForce GT 335M 1GB/Intel GMA 4500MHD Hyrbid Graphics System | Western Digital Scorpio Black 500GB | Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit ![]() Microsoft Certified Desktop Support Technician | CompTIA A+ Certified Heatware |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() |
the no cuda/physx is actually a positive thing. cant wait for the unlocked version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,761 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,208 Times in 3,157 Posts
|
Quote:
geforce 6150 which is popular for these motherboards can barely handle aero. those dirt cheap motherboards often dont have any digital output (analog VGA only) Last edited by W1zzard; Jul 19, 2011 at 01:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Green Jakarta
Posts: 288 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
|
Quote:
2. 2100K + mobo + 6670 : $250++ (2) is cheaper and faster for daily application, but for graphic performances, (2) is not far enough behind (2) configuration. first i dont believe this review. but now, i think i get your conclusion
__________________
~ "Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 353 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 29 Times in 26 Posts
|
The 11.6 hotfixes are designed specifically for the Fusion based GPUs, a lot of the 'problems' with the crossfire setup with the A-3850 and the 6670 seem to stem from drivers rather than raw power. Great review! Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,761 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,208 Times in 3,157 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manteca, Ca
Posts: 775 (0.57/day)
Thanks: 69
Thanked 109 Times in 85 Posts
|
Couple years and fusion will be a monster. AMD needs to pair this with BD for it to become popular. Intel has AMD surrounded but AMD has the potential to change the game very quickly and beat intel in the market where it counts, Mainstream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 57 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
That's what Trinity is for, and it'll come eventually, and hopefully it'll maintain socket backward compatibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,761 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,208 Times in 3,157 Posts
|
i seriously doubt that for the forseeable future, processor integrated graphics can be faster than a low-end card.
igps will get better, but so will discrete gpus. both are using the same technology, architecture and production process. heat density limits will always limit IGP performance. i see the big advantage in massive cost savings. why should a 250 mm² silicon die with cpu+gpu cost significantly more than a 250 mm² silicon die with just a cpu? |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#21 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 57 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Is it all the same production process? I know Redwood is 40nm, but I thought all of Llano was 32nm?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Douglasville, GA USA
Posts: 3,697 (2.51/day)
Thanks: 1,365
Thanked 1,264 Times in 930 Posts
|
Just curious about in game numbers from the APU when you overclocked it. I didn't see any of the overclocked figures on the real world gaming charges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,761 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,208 Times in 3,157 Posts
|
Quote:
i don't have any data for that, but any gpu limited game should scale similarly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,198 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 171 Times in 133 Posts
|
Quote:
Thank you for you memory comparison on Llano! It was nice to see that timings had almost no effect on the APU, and that it was all speed (kinda the opposite of most AMD CPUs).
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Douglasville, GA USA
Posts: 3,697 (2.51/day)
Thanks: 1,365
Thanked 1,264 Times in 930 Posts
|
Well, for the Productivity and Internet Browsing catagory, why get the A8-3850? I say drop down to the A6-3650 which will shave off $30 and put the price in line with the i3 setup. While CPU performance would suffer, it would still have much better graphics for GPU accelerated web browsers, Flash based games, HTML5, and GPU accelerated programs like Photoshop.
I am actually using the A6 right now and for a basic system it is far more than enough muscle for Win7 64-bit. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AMD Fusion advance HTPC market – GIGABYTE E350N-USB3 Performance and OC Guide | windwithme | General Hardware | 4 | Apr 2, 2011 04:15 PM |
| AMD Readies New Multi-GPU Technology for Fusion Llano APUs | btarunr | News | 23 | Jan 22, 2011 02:27 AM |
| AMD Catalyst 10.12 Performance Analysis | W1zzard | Reviews | 95 | Jan 7, 2011 06:52 PM |
| 18W AMD Fusion Beats Intel Core i5 at Graphics Performance | btarunr | News | 52 | Sep 16, 2010 09:58 PM |
| GIGABYTE MA790FXT-UD5P with AMD Phenom II X4 965 OC Performance Analysis | windwithme | Motherboards & Memory | 5 | Dec 3, 2009 05:20 PM |