techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 7, 2011, 08:12 AM   #1
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,790 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,273 Times in 3,173 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

AMD Fusion A8-3850 GPU Performance Analysis

To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...U_Performance/

Last edited by W1zzard; Jul 21, 2011 at 08:50 PM.
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 19, 2011, 10:55 AM   #2
caleb
1000 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Poland,Slask
Posts: 1,109 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 200
Thanked 174 Times in 142 Posts

System Specs

Nice review. I like the comparison of 3 theoretic setups very much.
__________________
"Let me noobilize you"
caleb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 10:59 AM   #3
Bjorn_Of_Iceland
2000 Posts
 
Bjorn_Of_Iceland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Húsið mitt
Posts: 2,608 (1.32/day)
Thanks: 480
Thanked 357 Times in 266 Posts

System Specs

You think this will reach the netbook scene? or are those for the upcoming Deccan?
__________________

SIEG HEIL!!
Bjorn_Of_Iceland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 11:39 AM   #4
tonyd223
200 Posts
 
tonyd223's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 202 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts

System Specs

What a great review - thanks for all the time and effort. So, from what I can see, the A8-3850 only makes sense if you're buying a vanilla pc for vanilla pc work - an office PC, where some gpu acceleration would be nice, but you're not going to go to a full graphics card...
__________________
"thinking about a Cooler Master Elite 360..."
tonyd223 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 11:58 AM   #5
Trackr
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 265 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyd223 View Post
What a great review - thanks for all the time and effort. So, from what I can see, the A8-3850 only makes sense if you're buying a vanilla pc for vanilla pc work - an office PC, where some gpu acceleration would be nice, but you're not going to go to a full graphics card...
That's what I was thinking too..

But with the loss of performance compared to Sandy Bridge, it doesn't seem worth it.

That is, unless your programs gain more from GPU performance...

But then, you'd probably get a graphics card.
Trackr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 12:07 PM   #6
HTC
1000 Posts
 
HTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,920 (1.02/day)
Thanks: 461
Thanked 282 Times in 230 Posts

System Specs

It seems AMD still has a long way to go where APU with crossfire is concerned: it's actually worse to add a discrete card on many occasions then it is to simply use the discrete card.
__________________
HTC - Hugo Teve Cá

I'm PORTUGUESE: apologies for any spelling mistakes!
HTC is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 12:28 PM   #7
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,111 (6.92/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,834 Times in 3,741 Posts

System Specs

Great review W1zz. Tough one to make I bet considering this is new waters.

Anyway I think the APU is pretty much where is should be for a first gen. APU is the future and as a first step I think its a damn good one.

Oh and marketing is marketing. Always delete at least 10% of the "Facts" to get a better picture. I'm still trying to get 30mpg out of my car
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 12:44 PM   #8
Jonap_1st
200 Posts
 
Jonap_1st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Green Jakarta
Posts: 288 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts

System Specs

what's differences between "AMD HD 6670" and "AMD Fusion A3850 + 6670"?

are the first one use sandy bridge as the processor?
__________________
~ "Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.."
Jonap_1st is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 12:45 PM   #9
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,790 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,273 Times in 3,173 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonap_1st View Post
what's differences between "AMD HD 6670" and "AMD Fusion A3850 + 6670"?

are the first one use sandy bridge as the processor?
the first one is just the hd 6670 installed in the fusion system and running as only, primary card.

the second is the igp and the hd 6670 working in dual graphics (crossfire)
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 01:01 PM   #10
aBigRat
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 7 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

I think this w1zzard guy haven't done the review honestly.
1. A motherboard for AMD Athlon X4 640 has its own integrated graphics, so why we need a HD 6450 for internet browsing?
2. I didn't see any HD5770 in the review, then I saw HD5770 stated in the conclusion. why HD5770, not HD6670?
3. A8-3850 iGP is equivalent to a HD5550 DDR3. For entry level gaming, it is more than enough to play while other two systems need HD 5550s to match its speed.
4. Electricity bills
aBigRat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 01:02 PM   #11
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,111 (6.92/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,834 Times in 3,741 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by aBigRat View Post
I think this w1zzard guy haven't done the review honestly.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TheMailMan78 For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 19, 2011, 01:03 PM   #12
Red_Machine
1000 Posts
 
Red_Machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Marlow, ENGLAND
Posts: 1,454 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 149
Thanked 279 Times in 226 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by aBigRat View Post
I think this w1zzard guy haven't done the review honestly.
Wow, that was so full of fail I can't think of a coherant retort.
__________________
Alienware M11x R1 Netbook:
1.3GHz Core2 Duo U7300 (OC'd to 1.7GHz) | 8GB Corsair DDR3 1333MHz | nVIDIA GeForce GT 335M 1GB/Intel GMA 4500MHD Hyrbid Graphics System | Western Digital Scorpio Black 500GB | Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit


Microsoft Certified Desktop Support Technician | CompTIA A+ Certified
Heatware
Red_Machine is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 01:07 PM   #13
reverze
1000 Posts
 
reverze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,271 (0.64/day)
Thanks: 86
Thanked 132 Times in 102 Posts

System Specs

the no cuda/physx is actually a positive thing. cant wait for the unlocked version.
reverze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 01:09 PM   #14
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,790 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,273 Times in 3,173 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by aBigRat View Post
A motherboard for AMD Athlon X4 640 has its own integrated graphics, so why we need a HD 6450 for internet browsing?
that's a good point, there are indeed cheap am3 motherboards with integrated graphics which could further offset the cost of that system.

geforce 6150 which is popular for these motherboards can barely handle aero.
those dirt cheap motherboards often dont have any digital output (analog VGA only)

Last edited by W1zzard; Jul 19, 2011 at 01:16 PM.
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 01:25 PM   #15
Jonap_1st
200 Posts
 
Jonap_1st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Green Jakarta
Posts: 288 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
the first one is just the hd 6670 installed in the fusion system and running as only, primary card.

the second is the igp and the hd 6670 working in dual graphics (crossfire)
1. A3850 + mobo + 6670 : $290++
2. 2100K + mobo + 6670 : $250++

(2) is cheaper and faster for daily application, but for graphic performances, (2) is not far enough behind (2) configuration.

first i dont believe this review. but now, i think i get your conclusion
__________________
~ "Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.."
Jonap_1st is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 01:29 PM   #16
Semi-Lobster
200 Posts
 
Semi-Lobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 353 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 29 Times in 26 Posts

The 11.6 hotfixes are designed specifically for the Fusion based GPUs, a lot of the 'problems' with the crossfire setup with the A-3850 and the 6670 seem to stem from drivers rather than raw power. Great review! Thanks!
Semi-Lobster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 01:41 PM   #17
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,790 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,273 Times in 3,173 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Semi-Lobster View Post
The 11.6 hotfixes
i used the driver from june 28, not the launch day driver
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 01:42 PM   #18
dir_d
500 Posts
 
dir_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manteca, Ca
Posts: 777 (0.57/day)
Thanks: 69
Thanked 109 Times in 85 Posts

System Specs

Couple years and fusion will be a monster. AMD needs to pair this with BD for it to become popular. Intel has AMD surrounded but AMD has the potential to change the game very quickly and beat intel in the market where it counts, Mainstream.
dir_d is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 02:13 PM   #19
DeerSteak
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 57 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by dir_d View Post
Couple years and fusion will be a monster. AMD needs to pair this with BD for it to become popular. Intel has AMD surrounded but AMD has the potential to change the game very quickly and beat intel in the market where it counts, Mainstream.
That's what Trinity is for, and it'll come eventually, and hopefully it'll maintain socket backward compatibility.
DeerSteak is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 02:34 PM   #20
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,790 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,273 Times in 3,173 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

i seriously doubt that for the forseeable future, processor integrated graphics can be faster than a low-end card.

igps will get better, but so will discrete gpus. both are using the same technology, architecture and production process. heat density limits will always limit IGP performance.

i see the big advantage in massive cost savings. why should a 250 mm² silicon die with cpu+gpu cost significantly more than a 250 mm² silicon die with just a cpu?
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 19, 2011, 02:36 PM   #21
DeerSteak
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 57 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

System Specs

Is it all the same production process? I know Redwood is 40nm, but I thought all of Llano was 32nm?
DeerSteak is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 02:38 PM   #22
TheLaughingMan
3500 Posts
 
TheLaughingMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Douglasville, GA USA
Posts: 3,701 (2.50/day)
Thanks: 1,365
Thanked 1,264 Times in 930 Posts
Send a message via MSN to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Yahoo to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Skype™ to TheLaughingMan

System Specs

Just curious about in game numbers from the APU when you overclocked it. I didn't see any of the overclocked figures on the real world gaming charges.
__________________
My Heat

TheLaughingMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 02:38 PM   #23
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,790 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,273 Times in 3,173 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeerSteak View Post
Is it all the same production process? I know Redwood is 40nm, but I thought all of Llano was 32nm?
A-Series uses Redwood architecture, on a 32 nm process.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLaughingMan View Post
Just curious about in game numbers from the APU when you overclocked it. I didn't see any of the overclocked figures on the real world gaming charges.
i don't have any data for that, but any gpu limited game should scale similarly
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 03:42 PM   #24
devguy
1000 Posts
 
devguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,198 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 171 Times in 133 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
that's a good point, there are indeed cheap am3 motherboards with integrated graphics which could further offset the cost of that system.

geforce 6150 which is popular for these motherboards can barely handle aero.
those dirt cheap motherboards often dont have any digital output (analog VGA only)
I think he was referring to a cheap 780G/790GX/890GX type motherboard with the HD 3200/4200 to run Aero like a champ, and offload 1080p. Those are pretty decent for office machines. Ex: cheap and no need for an HD 5450.

Thank you for you memory comparison on Llano! It was nice to see that timings had almost no effect on the APU, and that it was all speed (kinda the opposite of most AMD CPUs).
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
devguy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2011, 04:07 PM   #25
TheLaughingMan
3500 Posts
 
TheLaughingMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Douglasville, GA USA
Posts: 3,701 (2.50/day)
Thanks: 1,365
Thanked 1,264 Times in 930 Posts
Send a message via MSN to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Yahoo to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Skype™ to TheLaughingMan

System Specs

Well, for the Productivity and Internet Browsing catagory, why get the A8-3850? I say drop down to the A6-3650 which will shave off $30 and put the price in line with the i3 setup. While CPU performance would suffer, it would still have much better graphics for GPU accelerated web browsers, Flash based games, HTML5, and GPU accelerated programs like Photoshop.

I am actually using the A6 right now and for a basic system it is far more than enough muscle for Win7 64-bit.
__________________
My Heat

TheLaughingMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Fusion advance HTPC market – GIGABYTE E350N-USB3 Performance and OC Guide windwithme General Hardware 4 Apr 2, 2011 04:15 PM
AMD Readies New Multi-GPU Technology for Fusion Llano APUs btarunr News 23 Jan 22, 2011 02:27 AM
AMD Catalyst 10.12 Performance Analysis W1zzard Reviews 95 Jan 7, 2011 06:52 PM
18W AMD Fusion Beats Intel Core i5 at Graphics Performance btarunr News 52 Sep 16, 2010 09:58 PM
GIGABYTE MA790FXT-UD5P with AMD Phenom II X4 965 OC Performance Analysis windwithme Motherboards & Memory 5 Dec 3, 2009 05:20 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts