techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 8, 2011, 06:40 PM   #26
ensabrenoir
500 Posts
 
ensabrenoir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 725 (0.64/day)
Thanks: 230
Thanked 90 Times in 72 Posts

System Specs

My 1156.... such good times...(going 2 the wifey) bring on 2011
ensabrenoir is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2011, 06:44 PM   #27
WhiteLotus
3500 Posts
 
WhiteLotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 4,808 (2.26/day)
Thanks: 530
Thanked 856 Times in 682 Posts

System Specs

There is no argument...?

It's an observation on business practices that's it. And in this case instead of the consumer driving the market forward it's the companies.

That's it.
__________________
http://tpucdn.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic41435_1.gif

“Sorry but I cannot respond now, I am running a full virus scan on the internet.” -brandonwh64
WhiteLotus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2011, 07:03 PM   #28
ensabrenoir
500 Posts
 
ensabrenoir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 725 (0.64/day)
Thanks: 230
Thanked 90 Times in 72 Posts

System Specs

Everybody's right We don't need half of what we buy and (successful)companies set the pace instead of follow the trends. Evey one failed at the tablet pc until apple called it a pad and boom an instant must have(I still don't get it though). We're all sheep. In the pc world, there is little software that fully utilize a modern computers power.We should b looking to supercharge the software industry. Maybe Team Group should write software
ensabrenoir is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2011, 08:35 PM   #29
Completely Bonkers
2000 Posts
 
Completely Bonkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,415 (1.05/day)
Thanks: 582
Thanked 533 Times in 374 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayder_Master View Post
Bye bye blackbird
If I had a Hammer...
__________________
... some things in life just drive you bonkers. Especially the rubbish you see in forum posts
Completely Bonkers is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 8, 2011, 10:28 PM   #30
yogurt_21
3500 Posts
 
yogurt_21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,057 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 2,244
Thanked 542 Times in 443 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteLotus View Post
There is no argument...?

It's an observation on business practices that's it. And in this case instead of the consumer driving the market forward it's the companies.

That's it.
so intel's out there pushing new products that no one buys? there is no such thing as a company driven sale. None of these were huge profitmakers currently that intel just killed off because it felt like it. All of them had their hayday and it was time to retire them.


this is especially true of the 1366 cpu's considering they eol the same time lga 2011 comes out.
yogurt_21 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2011, 03:32 AM   #31
WarraWarra
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 268 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts

Gen1 i7 laptop cpu's and older could have been removed as well.
Can not think for the life of me why someone would want to buy Gen1 i7 anything anymore.

R.I.P. Q9550 I take my hat off to you old friend.
WarraWarra is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2011, 07:19 AM   #32
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.48/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by vanyots View Post
Not when you have to buy new MB and RAM for that relatively cheap Sandy Bridge.
What, do you want them to still be making P4's while they are at it?


These cpus have outlived their usefulness on the market. They no longer make Intel any money. It would be stupid for them to continue selling things that don't profit them.

To be perfectly honest, I thought some of these should have been killed off ages ago.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wile E For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 9, 2011, 01:08 PM   #33
WhiteLotus
3500 Posts
 
WhiteLotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 4,808 (2.26/day)
Thanks: 530
Thanked 856 Times in 682 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by yogurt_21 View Post
so intel's out there pushing new products that no one buys? there is no such thing as a company driven sale. None of these were huge profitmakers currently that intel just killed off because it felt like it. All of them had their hayday and it was time to retire them.


this is especially true of the 1366 cpu's considering they eol the same time lga 2011 comes out.
LOL

You don't get it.

Person wants a computer. Person goes to shop, buys computer.

Intel knows people want computers, Intel make CPUs.
AMD knows people want computers, AMD make better CPU, everybody buys AMD computers from shops because it's got "better", "faster" all over the box.
Intel sees this and makes CPUs better than AMD.
Cycle repeat.

Just for one second realise that only a VERY small percentage of computer users are enthusiasts, and you'd realise that a very basic computer is more than enough for most users.
People buy the computers and laptops that have the higher numbers on them. They think it's better (it probably is) but they have NO CLUE as to why, nor do they care why.

It's a business practice that Intel are doing, continually killing of the older processors so that all the Intel computers constantly have "faster", "better", on the box. That's it.
__________________
http://tpucdn.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic41435_1.gif

“Sorry but I cannot respond now, I am running a full virus scan on the internet.” -brandonwh64
WhiteLotus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2011, 01:55 PM   #34
jpierce55
1000 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,291 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 134
Thanked 92 Times in 84 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ensabrenoir View Post
Everybody's right We don't need half of what we buy and (successful)companies set the pace instead of follow the trends. Evey one failed at the tablet pc until apple called it a pad and boom an instant must have(I still don't get it though). We're all sheep. In the pc world, there is little software that fully utilize a modern computers power.We should b looking to supercharge the software industry. Maybe Team Group should write software
I still wish the mfg's would work on power consumption while the market is this way. We have seen they can make low power cpu's, and now is the time to do it.
jpierce55 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2011, 03:47 PM   #35
yogurt_21
3500 Posts
 
yogurt_21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,057 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 2,244
Thanked 542 Times in 443 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteLotus View Post
LOL

You don't get it.

Person wants a computer. Person goes to shop, buys computer.

Intel knows people want computers, Intel make CPUs.
AMD knows people want computers, AMD make better CPU, everybody buys AMD computers from shops because it's got "better", "faster" all over the box.
Intel sees this and makes CPUs better than AMD.
Cycle repeat.

Just for one second realise that only a VERY small percentage of computer users are enthusiasts, and you'd realise that a very basic computer is more than enough for most users.
People buy the computers and laptops that have the higher numbers on them. They think it's better (it probably is) but they have NO CLUE as to why, nor do they care why.

It's a business practice that Intel are doing, continually killing of the older processors so that all the Intel computers constantly have "faster", "better", on the box. That's it.
actually i get it, 99% of the people on here get it, you seem to be the hold over.

performance isn't the only thing gained with new cpu's but lets go back to my original quote shall we?

Quote:
yeah I really don't get the argument against this? Sandy bridge is faster per clock than nehalem, a cheaper solution than nehalem when factoring in motherboard + memory, cheaper to manufacture, uses less power, and overclocks better.
lets look at the average consumer, for them the mobile market is huge and most are going to buy a laptop before a desktop these days. So lower power = longer battery life. Less heat = no need for a cooling pad and less heat on your legs when you use it. And at the same time you get better performance.

No, even for the average consumer getting rid of the old cpu's makes sense. Not to mention this is more than likely consumer driven infact all are. People want better and faster these days. Why do you think the phone market is so competitive? It's not because the companies are over delivering and competing with each other despite poor sales. It's because the faster devices sell better.

none of the eol cpu's were making intel money, ie that means poor sales. So why continue to sell them when the majority is out buying the newer cpus? You're not making a lick of sense.
yogurt_21 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2011, 04:12 PM   #36
AsRock
TPU addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,794 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,675
Thanked 1,348 Times in 1,170 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
What, do you want them to still be making P4's while they are at it?


These cpus have outlived their usefulness on the market. They no longer make Intel any money. It would be stupid for them to continue selling things that don't profit them.

To be perfectly honest, I thought some of these should have been killed off ages ago.
Yeah it's been some time now since 775 came out. Although it was nice of INTEL to keep them running as long as they did.

Although i see no real reason of going to a new socket just yet maybe when the 2011 socket comes out.
AsRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2011, 04:51 PM   #37
WhiteLotus
3500 Posts
 
WhiteLotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 4,808 (2.26/day)
Thanks: 530
Thanked 856 Times in 682 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by yogurt_21 View Post
actually i get it, 99% of the people on here get it, you seem to be the hold over.

performance isn't the only thing gained with new cpu's but lets go back to my original quote shall we?



lets look at the average consumer, for them the mobile market is huge and most are going to buy a laptop before a desktop these days. So lower power = longer battery life. Less heat = no need for a cooling pad and less heat on your legs when you use it. And at the same time you get better performance.

No, even for the average consumer getting rid of the old cpu's makes sense. Not to mention this is more than likely consumer driven infact all are. People want better and faster these days. Why do you think the phone market is so competitive? It's not because the companies are over delivering and competing with each other despite poor sales. It's because the faster devices sell better.

none of the eol cpu's were making intel money, ie that means poor sales. So why continue to sell them when the majority is out buying the newer cpus? You're not making a lick of sense.
You know what, I can't be bothered. I'll concede. Just note that this sort of thing is common business to ensure they sell their newer stuff.
__________________
http://tpucdn.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic41435_1.gif

“Sorry but I cannot respond now, I am running a full virus scan on the internet.” -brandonwh64
WhiteLotus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2011, 04:55 PM   #38
[H]@RD5TUFF
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 5,589 (4.35/day)
Thanks: 1,825
Thanked 1,710 Times in 1,431 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesy999 View Post
They're only slightly more expensive then a 775 Mobo and ram, and the people this will affect the most is the OEM's, who will be building new PC's, and if you want to upgrade the proccesor on your 775 PC it's not as if there are any cheap and good upgrade paths anyway at the moment

You do not need a high end proccesor to play solitaire, and for that group of people intel sells celerons and Atoms, so your point is?
Exactly the end of Core 2 is not the end of the low end market by any means just people bitching about pointless stuff.
__________________
Stuff 4 Sale!
Heat Ware
ebay



[H]@RD5TUFF is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2011, 07:58 PM   #39
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,748 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by [H]@RD5TUFF View Post
Exactly the end of Core 2 is not the end of the low end market by any means just people bitching about pointless stuff.
And they aren't even getting rid of the low end 775 market. They Celeron E3300 is going EOL, but the E3400 is still there at the same exact price point and the E3500 is slightly more expensive and the E5700 slightly more than that, filling the low end gap.

The other stuff that is being EOL'd has been replaced by new products. Yes, this means all us 775 holdouts that are looking to upgrade are now going to find it harder to do so, but seriously did you expect Intel to keep making those processors forever? They are now 2 generations old. If you haven't upgraded by now, you probably aren't going to. And guess what, they are telling you before they stop making them, so now is your chance to upgrade if you really have that in mind.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2011, 08:11 PM   #40
[H]@RD5TUFF
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 5,589 (4.35/day)
Thanks: 1,825
Thanked 1,710 Times in 1,431 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
And they aren't even getting rid of the low end 775 market. They Celeron E3300 is going EOL, but the E3400 is still there at the same exact price point and the E3500 is slightly more expensive and the E5700 slightly more than that, filling the low end gap.

The other stuff that is being EOL'd has been replaced by new products. Yes, this means all us 775 holdouts that are looking to upgrade are now going to find it harder to do so, but seriously did you expect Intel to keep making those processors forever? They are now 2 generations old. If you haven't upgraded by now, you probably aren't going to. And guess what, they are telling you before they stop making them, so now is your chance to upgrade if you really have that in mind.

Exactly!


Some people will complain about anything.
__________________
Stuff 4 Sale!
Heat Ware
ebay



[H]@RD5TUFF is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Readies 32 nm Cedar View Atom Processors for Late 2011 btarunr News 16 May 4, 2011 01:04 AM
OCZ Technology to Extend Enterprise SSD Reach at Storage Visions 2011 Conference btarunr News 4 Jan 3, 2011 02:20 PM
Intel EOL Core 2 Processors malware News 10 Oct 3, 2007 03:03 PM
AMD Energy Efficient Processors Reach Retail D_o_S News 2 Jul 9, 2006 06:48 PM
AMDs socket 939 to reach EOL by the end of 2006 Darksaber News 5 Apr 3, 2006 08:50 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts