techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 15, 2011, 09:03 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Sandy Bridge-E Won't Pack Stock Coolers, Intel to Sell them Separately

Intel's upcoming Core i7 processors in the LGA2011 package, codenamed "Sandy Bridge-E," will come in a unique package that's completely different from what's being reported as AMD's, in which self-contained liquid CPU coolers will be bundled with some FX-series processors. Intel's upcoming Core i7-3820, Core i7-3930K and the Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition processor boxes will lack Intel's certified (stock) heatsink-fan (HSF). Instead, Intel plans to sell the certified coolers separately, probably having the same market reach and availability as the processors themselves.

The idea behind this is that the target users of Sandy Bridge-E will most likely use third-party cooling solutions. Hence it makes sense to save them of a chunk of metal they'll probably never use. For those who do use stock cooling, seldom/never overclock, and rely on the Intel certification to go with the cooler, Intel will have the certified cooler available separately for purchase, with its retail partners. Sandy Bridge-E processors have a rated TDP of 130W, though tests by those having access to engineering samples have shown that it can reach as much as 180W on load, even without overclocking. It is expected that PC cooling products manufacturers will have entire lines of LGA2011-ready coolers in time for the launch of Sandy Bridge-E.



Source: VR-Zone
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 09:22 AM   #2
63jax
25 Posts
 
63jax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 45 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts

180W
63jax is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 09:35 AM   #3
LAN_deRf_HA
3500 Posts
 
LAN_deRf_HA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,069 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 295
Thanked 853 Times in 595 Posts

System Specs

That's what they get for sticking to 32nm on the E chip. I wonder if the 22nm parts will clock better, maybe make up for the decreased cache.
LAN_deRf_HA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 09:50 AM   #4
Fourstaff
TPU Janitor
 
Fourstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 6,140 (4.73/day)
Thanks: 267
Thanked 1,493 Times in 1,232 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAN_deRf_HA View Post
That's what they get for sticking to 32nm on the E chip. I wonder if the 22nm parts will clock better, maybe make up for the decreased cache.
22nm is not ready yet I think, they will probably do a shrink like IvyBridge.
Fourstaff is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 09:59 AM   #5
cheesy999
1000 Posts
 
cheesy999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Near Canterbury, uk
Posts: 1,898 (1.75/day)
Thanks: 634
Thanked 563 Times in 454 Posts

System Specs

does this mean for once it'll be AMD with the more efficient proccesor?

or does it mean these will be really fast?
__________________
“if you run short on cash, theres always that option. dont forget to use vasaline” -Freedomeclipse

“Before you complain about lag, think about Jesus. He lagged three days before respawning.” -repman244
cheesy999 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 10:16 AM   #6
Fourstaff
TPU Janitor
 
Fourstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 6,140 (4.73/day)
Thanks: 267
Thanked 1,493 Times in 1,232 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesy999 View Post
does this mean for once it'll be AMD with the more efficient proccesor?

or does it mean these will be really fast?
Highly unlikely. If you look at the old 9xx they were massive power hogs, but absolutely destroyed all competition.
Fourstaff is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fourstaff For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2011, 12:24 PM   #7
fullinfusion
1.21 Gigawatts
 
fullinfusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CANADA
Posts: 5,497 (2.77/day)
Thanks: 2,709
Thanked 1,299 Times in 1,096 Posts

System Specs

Intel thinks up and scheam to rape there customers every chance they get hmmm...
And the price difference for cpu only? is going to be no difference, but for the poor guy that wants the cooler I betcha Intel charge $60 bucks or so for there cheapo cooler
fullinfusion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 12:30 PM   #8
Melvis
2000 Posts
 
Melvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,984 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 619
Thanked 471 Times in 392 Posts

System Specs

lol isnt this a good thing? Intel heatsinks SUCKED, most people pushed the stock heatsink to the side and put an aftermarket one anyway. So this would therefore bring down the price (by a little bit) for these new CPU's? since there wont be any heatsink?
Melvis is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Melvis For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2011, 12:37 PM   #9
Fourstaff
TPU Janitor
 
Fourstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 6,140 (4.73/day)
Thanks: 267
Thanked 1,493 Times in 1,232 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Melvis View Post
lol isnt this a good thing? Intel heatsinks SUCKED, most people pushed the stock heatsink to the side and put an aftermarket one anyway. So this would therefore bring down the price (by a little bit) for these new CPU's? since there wont be any heatsink?
Ah, but then Intel is going to sell the CPUs at same price with no heatsink. Tbh the Sandy Bridge heatsinks are good, even for light overclocking.
Fourstaff is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fourstaff For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2011, 12:40 PM   #10
Melvis
2000 Posts
 
Melvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,984 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 619
Thanked 471 Times in 392 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourstaff View Post
Ah, but then Intel is going to sell the CPUs at same price with no heatsink. Tbh the Sandy Bridge heatsinks are good, even for light overclocking.
Yea that wouldnt surprise me at all, then charge $50 for a heatsink if you want it? And yes i agree the sandybridge heatsinks seem to be better, or is it that the CPU just runs cooler?
Melvis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 12:57 PM   #11
Tatty_One
Senior Mod3rator
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,900 (4.76/day)
Thanks: 1,108
Thanked 1,967 Times in 1,458 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourstaff View Post
Ah, but then Intel is going to sell the CPUs at same price with no heatsink. Tbh the Sandy Bridge heatsinks are good, even for light overclocking.
You don't know that, for me, choice is good and this gives me more choice, if I felt however, like you assume that they were charging more for less or the "optional" HSF was at rip off prices (if they were noone would buy them anyways as there will always be a cheaper 3rd party alternative) then I would jump ship fast.
__________________
Tatty_One is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 01:05 PM   #12
Fourstaff
TPU Janitor
 
Fourstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 6,140 (4.73/day)
Thanks: 267
Thanked 1,493 Times in 1,232 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tatty_One View Post
You don't know that, for me, choice is good and this gives me more choice, if I felt however, like you assume that they were charging more for less or the "optional" HSF was at rip off prices (if they were noone would buy them anyways as there will always be a cheaper 3rd party alternative) then I would jump ship fast.
Yes, you do get more choices, but based on past marketing practices, Intel is going to price things with a nice "round number" ending with 9 or 99. This makes me suspicious, especially with the top of the range $999 price bracket. They are not going to reduce to $989 just because they took away the heatsink methinks.
Fourstaff is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 02:11 PM   #13
ensabrenoir
500 Posts
 
ensabrenoir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 741 (0.64/day)
Thanks: 242
Thanked 92 Times in 74 Posts

System Specs

This is an extreme ......execuse me intel extreme edition cpu. Who at this level is concerned about Power consumption or uses stock hsf? U don't buy a lambo and complain about gas milage or the cost of tires.
ensabrenoir is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 02:20 PM   #14
Red_Machine
1000 Posts
 
Red_Machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Marlow, ENGLAND
Posts: 1,454 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 149
Thanked 279 Times in 226 Posts

System Specs

Why only 1.6GHz? Even for an engineering sample, that's pretty slow.
__________________
Alienware M11x R1 Netbook:
1.3GHz Core2 Duo U7300 (OC'd to 1.7GHz) | 8GB Corsair DDR3 1333MHz | nVIDIA GeForce GT 335M 1GB/Intel GMA 4500MHD Hyrbid Graphics System | Western Digital Scorpio Black 500GB | Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit


Microsoft Certified Desktop Support Technician | CompTIA A+ Certified
Heatware
Red_Machine is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 02:51 PM   #15
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts

System Specs

Now most people who will buy this CPU will be OC this thing like a bitch. So them not shipping a cooler with it IS NOT a big deal. They know most HSF wont even leave the original box.

With that being said they will be charging top tier prices for these things. If they didn't offer a cooler I would be ok with this decision. However they will be. So in essence they are charging adopters of this CPU to pay twice which I think is bullshit.

I say ship it without a cooler ok. But don't come back and offer a cooler for an extra price. Just leave it to the third party distributors. This is just a greed manuver......which I can respect, I just dont like being on the receiving end.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheMailMan78 For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2011, 02:58 PM   #16
TheLaughingMan
3500 Posts
 
TheLaughingMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Douglasville, GA USA
Posts: 3,734 (2.48/day)
Thanks: 1,371
Thanked 1,271 Times in 937 Posts
Send a message via MSN to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Yahoo to TheLaughingMan Send a message via Skype™ to TheLaughingMan

System Specs

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16835203004

It will be a version of that if they are just going to sell the certified cooler separately.
__________________
My Heat

TheLaughingMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 03:22 PM   #17
Hotobu
200 Posts
 
Hotobu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 270 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 39 Times in 32 Posts

System Specs

I was just saying in the AMD thread that they need to do this. A lot of folks don't use these damned things anyway. Of course the only way to know if things are discounted is if they offer a package together with the heatsink, but I still like this. It saves on waste both on the manufacturing and shipping end.
Hotobu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 03:25 PM   #18
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLaughingMan View Post
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16835203004

It will be a version of that if they are just going to sell the certified cooler separately.
I like it. IMO if they wanna save money and waste then don't ship a HSF. But don't sell a HSF separate. Leave it to the third party ONLY. Whats next? Selling a CPU but the pins separate??
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 03:29 PM   #19
Damn_Smooth
1000 Posts
 
Damn_Smooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: A frozen turdberg.
Posts: 1,362 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 1,434
Thanked 502 Times in 329 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMailMan78 View Post
I like it. IMO if they wanna save money and waste then don't ship a HSF. But don't sell a HSF separate. Leave it to the third party ONLY. Whats next? Selling a CPU but the pins separate??
I thought they already did that with LGA. Isn't that why Intel boards are more expensive?
Damn_Smooth is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Damn_Smooth For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2011, 03:34 PM   #20
ensabrenoir
500 Posts
 
ensabrenoir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 741 (0.64/day)
Thanks: 242
Thanked 92 Times in 74 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMailMan78 View Post
I like it. IMO if they wanna save money and waste then don't ship a HSF. But don't sell a HSF separate. Leave it to the third party ONLY. Whats next? Selling a CPU but the pins separate??
Theyv shifted the cost of the cpu pins to the board makers and
To get a better mounting system than intel's pushpins...... yeah i'd pay extra
ensabrenoir is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 03:35 PM   #21
cadaveca
My name is Dave
 
cadaveca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 10,922 (4.16/day)
Thanks: 4,709
Thanked 5,449 Times in 3,301 Posts

System Specs

All i know is that I have these:




and only have them because there is heatsinks in them.


I'll never use a stock cooler...as far as I am concerned, no CPU should come with a cooler, not even entry-level ones, and prices should be lowered accordingly without an included heatsink.


I'm all for keeping the metal outta the box, and saving some resources. I'm not even too concerned about paying the same price, with no heatsink, TBH...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	001.jpg
Views:	2045
Size:	201.5 KB
ID:	43181  
cadaveca is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to cadaveca For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2011, 03:35 PM   #22
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damn_Smooth View Post
I thought they already did that with LGA. Isn't that why Intel boards are more expensive?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ensabrenoir View Post
Theyv shifted the cost of the cpu pins to the board makers and
To get a better mounting system than intel's pushpins...... yeah i'd pay extra


You peoples sarcasm detectors are broken today I see.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 03:39 PM   #23
Damn_Smooth
1000 Posts
 
Damn_Smooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: A frozen turdberg.
Posts: 1,362 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 1,434
Thanked 502 Times in 329 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMailMan78 View Post
You peoples sarcasm detectors are broken today I see.
Cough*bullshit*cough.
Damn_Smooth is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Damn_Smooth For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2011, 04:06 PM   #24
ensabrenoir
500 Posts
 
ensabrenoir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 741 (0.64/day)
Thanks: 242
Thanked 92 Times in 74 Posts

System Specs

and only have them because there is heatsinks in them



Nice collection. I eneded up taking the cover off my dead hdd and made post modern wall art with them but havenkt come up with any uses for hsf other than recycling.




















Pp
ensabrenoir is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2011, 04:19 PM   #25
Jegergrim
200 Posts
 
Jegergrim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 373 (0.55/day)
Thanks: 150
Thanked 38 Times in 37 Posts

System Specs

I think it's a brilliant idea, worst case scenario we pay the same price as if with the HSF, best case scenario we save some cash to spend on anything else in the new rig, all in all a win-win situation. Saying this with overclockers and enthusiasts in mind
Jegergrim is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Ivy Bridge Dual-Core Put Through Clock-to-Clock Benches Against Sandy Bridge btarunr News 70 Jul 7, 2011 11:53 PM
Sandy Bridge Build - won't boot and help needed hun77777 System Builder's Advice 9 May 6, 2011 02:15 AM
Intel Sandy Bridge IGP drfelip GPU-Z 4 Jan 3, 2011 05:14 PM
Intel confirms special accelerators in Sandy Bridge CDdude55 General Hardware 0 Nov 30, 2010 05:12 PM
Intel Speeding Up Sandy Bridge Launch btarunr News 30 Jul 18, 2010 04:45 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts