![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Does watercooling seem useful for Sandy Bridge-E ? | |||
| Yes |
|
28 | 45.16% |
| Yes, but not with the Intel/Asetek solution |
|
13 | 20.97% |
| No, this seems overkill for normal users |
|
21 | 33.87% |
| Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,036 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 792
Thanked 13,034 Times in 5,721 Posts
|
Intel Displays Self-Branded Water Cooling Solution for Sandy Bridge-E
Back in August, it was reported that the retail packages of some, if not all, Intel's Sandy Bridge-E Core i7 LGA2011 processors will not pack the certified cooling solution like Core i7 LGA1366 processors do. It was also reported that Intel will sell its own-branded cooling solutions separately. It became a little obvious right then, that Intel won't selling dinky-little heatsinks that cost a couple of dozen Dollars. At the ongoing IDF event, Intel displayed its first retail-packaged cooling solution that's not only LGA2011-compatible, but also supports older socket types such as LGA1155, LGA1156, and LGA1366.
The cooling solution is a closed-loop (self-contained) liquid cooler made by water cooling OEM Asetek. Called the RTS2011LC, the cooler is rated to cool processors with TDP of up to 130W. The cooler consists of an exposed-copper block that also houses the pump, tough and flexible tubing that runs to the radiator assembly, which houses a reservoir, and a fancy-looking 120 mm fan. Along with the fan, the Intel logo on the block lights up blue. The radiator used looks similar to that on the Hydro Series H70, a popular cooler by Corsair, which is also made by Asetek. Expected to be available around the same time as Core i7 LGA2011 processors, the Intel RTS2011LC could command a price over $99. ![]() Source: LegitReviews |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,633 (3.07/day)
Thanks: 1,366
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
|
If they're priced similarly to their "insert brand here" counterparts, then I fully support this move by Intel.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to DanishDevil For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#3 |
|
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,655 (6.23/day)
Thanks: 1,788
Thanked 2,634 Times in 1,987 Posts
|
This is strange. Why offer a closed-loop liquid cooling solution and then go out of the way to out source it. It'd make more sense if they built something in-house and included it with all EE processors.
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume. try { SteamDownload(); } catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); } |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,036 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 792
Thanked 13,034 Times in 5,721 Posts
|
Because Intel never makes any cooling solutions in-house, they always source it. The reference LGA775/1156/1155/1366 coolers are all sourced from Sanyo-Denki, OEM'ed by Foxconn.
|
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#5 |
![]() |
LED and some of the most industrious looking tubing I've seen. They only had to pick the fan, block cover, and tubing and they dropped the ball on all of it. If you're sucking air from the back don't use a fan with concave sides. You don't want to suck any air from a case you've turned into an easy-bake oven by ditching an exhaust fan and dumping 130 watts into it. The LED, aside from looking shitty, adds another failure point. They should have taken a cue from the H70 with the chrome logo. Less complexity and reflects any other case light quite nicely. I swear if it weren't for the inefficiency of consumer spending every large company would have imploded long ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth-Westen Australia
Posts: 3,386 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 436
Thanked 315 Times in 256 Posts
|
Most people dont use the crappy stock fan any ways but i wouldn't swap my H100 out for this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 685 (0.70/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 64 Times in 52 Posts
|
99$, lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 314 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 34
Thanked 32 Times in 23 Posts
|
I don't understand why a 130w CPU necessitates liquid cooling.
^ unless its overclocked, then will crank out much more than 130w, but then this cooling setup will be grossly insufficient as rated to a max of 130w. I'm not sure who this product is targeted at, other than suckers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The armpit of California
Posts: 1,068 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 238 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() |
I just saw the pics of the X79 mobos that are up. Maybe they're using one of the asetek kits because it will make working with quad channel memory easier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 1,385 (1.19/day)
Thanks: 119
Thanked 251 Times in 217 Posts
|
Are LGA1366 cooling solutions compatible with LGA2011?
__________________
At the going down of the sun and in the morning, We will remember them |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London, England, UK
Posts: 247 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
|
Probably, but it's likely you CPU would be running warm as Intel's cooling is generally crap and there is always better cooler solutions than them.
As for my opinion on this cooler even though it's suppose to be the same as a Corsair H50 (just looks like a slightly modified and rebranded version) I would say the Corsair one is slightly better than this Intel one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth-Westen Australia
Posts: 3,386 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 436
Thanked 315 Times in 256 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Live OR Die For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: στο άλφα έως ωμέγα
Posts: 3,856 (2.25/day)
Thanks: 2,040
Thanked 1,424 Times in 1,123 Posts
|
Does watercooling seem useful for Sandy Bridge-E ?
The poll gave no stipulations as to the environment, clocking, or other situations, so, I voted yes; and, because, from my personal use of this category of cooler, I have noticed better or equal cooling performance over most other types of finned air coolers (with the exception of custom water loops or exotics), with less intrusion on other components (I can actually, get to the memory modules and fan headers without slicing fingers open). The Intel branded solution looks good from the pics, but before I bash the cooler or berate Intel... I will wait for some test results(comparisons) and, also, wait to see at what price point the retail market sets. If all things being equal and/or cheaper at the same perfomance level, I would use one. Just my opinions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,135 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 848
Thanked 935 Times in 764 Posts
|
Quote:
Never thought we'd see a boxed Intel watercooling solution, kind of sends mixed signals. Lets hope it's performance is competitive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,036 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 792
Thanked 13,034 Times in 5,721 Posts
|
No. But this particular cooler is compatible with 1366, 1155/56.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,534 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 328
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts
|
This seams like an even better idea than AMD doing it with bulldozer, greatly due to the RAM on either side of the 2011 socket really limiting the cooler options but mainly just with tall RAM.
Although i admit i personally like all these closed loop coolers so i am a little bias towards them.
__________________
The pastafarian jesus |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth-Westen Australia
Posts: 3,386 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 436
Thanked 315 Times in 256 Posts
|
It will also limit people to what cooler they can use, People that like coolers like the NOCTUA NH-D14 will have a cry
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I wonder
How they will screw Asetek on this development?
NONE of this is actually Intel designed (or produced) tech. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: IRAQ-Baghdad
Posts: 4,871 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 389
Thanked 641 Times in 446 Posts
|
WTF, every brand going with this stayle of cooling, it's new fasion what we call it EMO stayle, LOL.
And by the way, water cooling is better soltion for X79 cpu i see, cuz the two side of ram's slots make the big heat sink cover it all and that's mean extra heat for ram's-mosfites-phases.
__________________
![]() Easiest way to overclock the graphic card guide Easiest way to overclock your graphic card , my other overclocking threads , Core i7-1156 Overclocking and Feedback Thread , C2Q overclocking and feedback thread , C2QX overclocking and feedback thread ,C2D overclocking and feedback thread ,AMDX2 overclocking and feedback thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,235 (1.07/day)
Thanks: 394
Thanked 358 Times in 285 Posts
|
This is going to prove to be a huge pain in the ass for intel.
Have any of you looked on the forums of brands offering these types of coolers... theres a lot that can go wrong with them and loads of DOA, leaks, breakdowns. I'm guessing that Intel will regret bundling this with their CPU's as people will end up RMA'ing the lot and as everything gets returned back with the RMA they will end up with loads of opened boxes and fully working CPU's returned. Anyways its a nice idea.. hell I even bought into the whole "all in one" watercooling with my Corsair H100, but having done that I now realise just how many things can break on that kit and it dosent feel like a long term reliable cooling solution compared to a solid metal one with a fan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 66 feet from the ground
Posts: 825 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts
|
if they are flat like in the picture where you see the intel logo mirrored on the contact surface and distorted concavely.... this is a failure
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth-Westen Australia
Posts: 3,386 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 436
Thanked 315 Times in 256 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,235 (1.07/day)
Thanks: 394
Thanked 358 Times in 285 Posts
|
I wouldnt say fail about that aspect of it... this isnt for overclocking, its OEM cooling and CPU tops arent very flat themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 66 feet from the ground
Posts: 825 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts
|
Quote:
i have saw flatter contacts at oem coolers like this one,not to mention you pay 99$ and you can start lapping .....
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Intel Ivy Bridge Dual-Core Put Through Clock-to-Clock Benches Against Sandy Bridge | btarunr | News | 70 | Jul 7, 2011 11:53 PM |
| MSI Offers Premium Embedded Solution IM-QM67 with Intel Sandy Bridge Processor | btarunr | News | 5 | Jun 24, 2011 03:54 PM |
| Water Cooled, Sandy Bridge 2600K | xbonez | Project Logs | 54 | Jan 27, 2011 05:39 AM |
| G.Skill Launches Its RipjawsX Series Memory Designed for Intel Sandy Bridge | btarunr | News | 16 | Jan 4, 2011 03:02 PM |
| Intel returning to Netburst based architecture for Sandy Bridge | DriedFrogPills | General Hardware | 2 | May 23, 2010 02:14 AM |