techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

View Poll Results: Does watercooling seem useful for Sandy Bridge-E ?
Yes 28 45.16%
Yes, but not with the Intel/Asetek solution 13 20.97%
No, this seems overkill for normal users 21 33.87%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Sep 14, 2011, 06:49 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,036 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 792
Thanked 13,034 Times in 5,721 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Intel Displays Self-Branded Water Cooling Solution for Sandy Bridge-E

Back in August, it was reported that the retail packages of some, if not all, Intel's Sandy Bridge-E Core i7 LGA2011 processors will not pack the certified cooling solution like Core i7 LGA1366 processors do. It was also reported that Intel will sell its own-branded cooling solutions separately. It became a little obvious right then, that Intel won't selling dinky-little heatsinks that cost a couple of dozen Dollars. At the ongoing IDF event, Intel displayed its first retail-packaged cooling solution that's not only LGA2011-compatible, but also supports older socket types such as LGA1155, LGA1156, and LGA1366.

The cooling solution is a closed-loop (self-contained) liquid cooler made by water cooling OEM Asetek. Called the RTS2011LC, the cooler is rated to cool processors with TDP of up to 130W. The cooler consists of an exposed-copper block that also houses the pump, tough and flexible tubing that runs to the radiator assembly, which houses a reservoir, and a fancy-looking 120 mm fan. Along with the fan, the Intel logo on the block lights up blue. The radiator used looks similar to that on the Hydro Series H70, a popular cooler by Corsair, which is also made by Asetek. Expected to be available around the same time as Core i7 LGA2011 processors, the Intel RTS2011LC could command a price over $99.



Source: LegitReviews
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 14, 2011, 06:56 AM   #2
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,633 (3.07/day)
Thanks: 1,366
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

If they're priced similarly to their "insert brand here" counterparts, then I fully support this move by Intel.
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DanishDevil For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 14, 2011, 07:02 AM   #3
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
 
FordGT90Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,655 (6.23/day)
Thanks: 1,788
Thanked 2,634 Times in 1,987 Posts

System Specs

This is strange. Why offer a closed-loop liquid cooling solution and then go out of the way to out source it. It'd make more sense if they built something in-house and included it with all EE processors.
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume.

try { SteamDownload(); }
catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }
FordGT90Concept is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 07:14 AM   #4
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,036 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 792
Thanked 13,034 Times in 5,721 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by FordGT90Concept View Post
This is strange. Why offer a closed-loop liquid cooling solution and then go out of the way to out source it. It'd make more sense if they built something in-house and included it with all EE processors.
Because Intel never makes any cooling solutions in-house, they always source it. The reference LGA775/1156/1155/1366 coolers are all sourced from Sanyo-Denki, OEM'ed by Foxconn.
__________________

Gadgets, Gaming, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 14, 2011, 07:22 AM   #5
LAN_deRf_HA
3500 Posts
 
LAN_deRf_HA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,079 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 295
Thanked 853 Times in 595 Posts

System Specs

LED and some of the most industrious looking tubing I've seen. They only had to pick the fan, block cover, and tubing and they dropped the ball on all of it. If you're sucking air from the back don't use a fan with concave sides. You don't want to suck any air from a case you've turned into an easy-bake oven by ditching an exhaust fan and dumping 130 watts into it. The LED, aside from looking shitty, adds another failure point. They should have taken a cue from the H70 with the chrome logo. Less complexity and reflects any other case light quite nicely. I swear if it weren't for the inefficiency of consumer spending every large company would have imploded long ago.
LAN_deRf_HA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 07:43 AM   #6
Live OR Die
2000 Posts
 
Live OR Die's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth-Westen Australia
Posts: 3,386 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 436
Thanked 315 Times in 256 Posts

System Specs

Most people dont use the crappy stock fan any ways but i wouldn't swap my H100 out for this.
Live OR Die is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 07:53 AM   #7
thunderising
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 685 (0.70/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 64 Times in 52 Posts

System Specs

99$, lol.
thunderising is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 08:29 AM   #8
MikeMurphy
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 314 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 34
Thanked 32 Times in 23 Posts

I don't understand why a 130w CPU necessitates liquid cooling.

^ unless its overclocked, then will crank out much more than 130w, but then this cooling setup will be grossly insufficient as rated to a max of 130w.

I'm not sure who this product is targeted at, other than suckers.
MikeMurphy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 09:32 AM   #9
NC37
1000 Posts
 
NC37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The armpit of California
Posts: 1,068 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 238 Times in 142 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by thunderising View Post
99$, lol.
The glowing Intel logo on it costs more than $99. If they don't charge $150+ for this, I'd be shocked. It's good because it's got "Intel" on it .

Now if it was Apple, they'd charge $300 for the similar kit with a glowing Apple logo .
NC37 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 10:41 AM   #10
techtard
500 Posts
 
techtard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 792 (0.57/day)
Thanks: 113
Thanked 182 Times in 133 Posts

System Specs

I just saw the pics of the X79 mobos that are up. Maybe they're using one of the asetek kits because it will make working with quad channel memory easier.
techtard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 11:06 AM   #11
claylomax
1000 Posts
 
claylomax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 1,385 (1.19/day)
Thanks: 119
Thanked 251 Times in 217 Posts

System Specs

Are LGA1366 cooling solutions compatible with LGA2011?
__________________
At the going down of the sun and in the morning, We will remember them
claylomax is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 11:38 AM   #12
fusionblu
200 Posts
 
fusionblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London, England, UK
Posts: 247 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by claylomax View Post
Are LGA1366 cooling solutions compatible with LGA2011?
Probably, but it's likely you CPU would be running warm as Intel's cooling is generally crap and there is always better cooler solutions than them.

As for my opinion on this cooler even though it's suppose to be the same as a Corsair H50 (just looks like a slightly modified and rebranded version) I would say the Corsair one is slightly better than this Intel one.
fusionblu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 12:07 PM   #13
Live OR Die
2000 Posts
 
Live OR Die's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth-Westen Australia
Posts: 3,386 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 436
Thanked 315 Times in 256 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by techtard View Post
I just saw the pics of the X79 mobos that are up. Maybe they're using one of the asetek kits because it will make working with quad channel memory easier.
Yer space saver maybe why have a big heatsink when you can have water cooling.
Live OR Die is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Live OR Die For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 14, 2011, 12:28 PM   #14
95Viper
3500 Posts
 
95Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: στο άλφα έως ωμέγα
Posts: 3,856 (2.25/day)
Thanks: 2,040
Thanked 1,424 Times in 1,123 Posts

System Specs

Does watercooling seem useful for Sandy Bridge-E ?
The poll gave no stipulations as to the environment, clocking, or other situations, so, I voted yes; and, because, from my personal use of this category of cooler, I have noticed better or equal cooling performance over most other types of finned air coolers (with the exception of custom water loops or exotics), with less intrusion on other components (I can actually, get to the memory modules and fan headers without slicing fingers open).

The Intel branded solution looks good from the pics, but before I bash the cooler or berate Intel... I will wait for some test results(comparisons) and, also, wait to see at what price point the retail market sets.
If all things being equal and/or cheaper at the same perfomance level, I would use one.
Just my opinions.
95Viper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 12:44 PM   #15
Sasqui
Eligible for custom title
 
Sasqui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,135 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 848
Thanked 935 Times in 764 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeMurphy View Post
I don't understand why a 130w CPU necessitates liquid cooling.

^ unless its overclocked, then will crank out much more than 130w, but then this cooling setup will be grossly insufficient as rated to a max of 130w.

I'm not sure who this product is targeted at, other than suckers.
Probably goes without saying, I'd say they are targeting the unlocked CPU / enthusiast sector. For stock, air will be just fine (and cheaper).

Never thought we'd see a boxed Intel watercooling solution, kind of sends mixed signals. Lets hope it's performance is competitive.
__________________
"It's a dog eat dog world, and I'm wearing milkbone underwear.” ― Norm
Heatware
Sasqui is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 02:12 PM   #16
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,036 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 792
Thanked 13,034 Times in 5,721 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by claylomax View Post
Are LGA1366 cooling solutions compatible with LGA2011?
No. But this particular cooler is compatible with 1366, 1155/56.
__________________

Gadgets, Gaming, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 03:40 PM   #17
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,534 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 328
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts

System Specs

This seams like an even better idea than AMD doing it with bulldozer, greatly due to the RAM on either side of the 2011 socket really limiting the cooler options but mainly just with tall RAM.

Although i admit i personally like all these closed loop coolers so i am a little bias towards them.
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 04:45 PM   #18
Live OR Die
2000 Posts
 
Live OR Die's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth-Westen Australia
Posts: 3,386 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 436
Thanked 315 Times in 256 Posts

System Specs

It will also limit people to what cooler they can use, People that like coolers like the NOCTUA NH-D14 will have a cry .
Live OR Die is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 04:57 PM   #19
mauriceh
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

I wonder

How they will screw Asetek on this development?
NONE of this is actually Intel designed (or produced) tech.
mauriceh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 06:03 PM   #20
Hayder_Master
3500 Posts
 
Hayder_Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: IRAQ-Baghdad
Posts: 4,871 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 389
Thanked 641 Times in 446 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Hayder_Master Send a message via Yahoo to Hayder_Master

System Specs

WTF, every brand going with this stayle of cooling, it's new fasion what we call it EMO stayle, LOL‏.‏

And by the way, water cooling is better soltion for X79 cpu i see, cuz the two side of ram's slots make the big heat sink cover it all and that's mean extra heat for ram's-mosfites-phases.
Hayder_Master is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 06:04 PM   #21
twicksisted
2000 Posts
 
twicksisted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,235 (1.07/day)
Thanks: 394
Thanked 358 Times in 285 Posts

System Specs

This is going to prove to be a huge pain in the ass for intel.
Have any of you looked on the forums of brands offering these types of coolers... theres a lot that can go wrong with them and loads of DOA, leaks, breakdowns.

I'm guessing that Intel will regret bundling this with their CPU's as people will end up RMA'ing the lot and as everything gets returned back with the RMA they will end up with loads of opened boxes and fully working CPU's returned.

Anyways its a nice idea.. hell I even bought into the whole "all in one" watercooling with my Corsair H100, but having done that I now realise just how many things can break on that kit and it dosent feel like a long term reliable cooling solution compared to a solid metal one with a fan.
__________________
twicksisted is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 06:08 PM   #22
laszlo
500 Posts
 
laszlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 66 feet from the ground
Posts: 825 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts

System Specs

if they are flat like in the picture where you see the intel logo mirrored on the contact surface and distorted concavely.... this is a failure
__________________
laszlo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 06:10 PM   #23
Live OR Die
2000 Posts
 
Live OR Die's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth-Westen Australia
Posts: 3,386 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 436
Thanked 315 Times in 256 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by twicksisted View Post
This is going to prove to be a huge pain in the ass for intel.
Have any of you looked on the forums of brands offering these types of coolers... theres a lot that can go wrong with them and loads of DOA, leaks, breakdowns.

I'm guessing that Intel will regret bundling this with their CPU's as people will end up RMA'ing the lot and as everything gets returned back with the RMA they will end up with loads of opened boxes and fully working CPU's returned.

Anyways its a nice idea.. hell I even bought into the whole "all in one" watercooling with my Corsair H100, but having done that I now realise just how many things can break on that kit and it dosent feel like a long term reliable cooling solution compared to a solid metal one with a fan.
I have a H100 also had a coolit there not going to leak the most that could go wrong is the pump craps out.
Live OR Die is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 06:11 PM   #24
twicksisted
2000 Posts
 
twicksisted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,235 (1.07/day)
Thanks: 394
Thanked 358 Times in 285 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by laszlo View Post
if they are flat like in the picture where you see the intel logo mirrored on the contact surface and distorted concavely.... this is a failure
I wouldnt say fail about that aspect of it... this isnt for overclocking, its OEM cooling and CPU tops arent very flat themselves.
__________________
twicksisted is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2011, 06:16 PM   #25
laszlo
500 Posts
 
laszlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 66 feet from the ground
Posts: 825 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by twicksisted View Post
I wouldnt say fail about that aspect of it... this isnt for overclocking, its OEM cooling and CPU tops arent very flat themselves.

i have saw flatter contacts at oem coolers like this one,not to mention you pay 99$ and you can start lapping .....
__________________
laszlo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Ivy Bridge Dual-Core Put Through Clock-to-Clock Benches Against Sandy Bridge btarunr News 70 Jul 7, 2011 11:53 PM
MSI Offers Premium Embedded Solution IM-QM67 with Intel Sandy Bridge Processor btarunr News 5 Jun 24, 2011 03:54 PM
Water Cooled, Sandy Bridge 2600K xbonez Project Logs 54 Jan 27, 2011 05:39 AM
G.Skill Launches Its RipjawsX Series Memory Designed for Intel Sandy Bridge btarunr News 16 Jan 4, 2011 03:02 PM
Intel returning to Netburst based architecture for Sandy Bridge DriedFrogPills General Hardware 2 May 23, 2010 02:14 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts