AMD FX 8150 Looks Core i7-980X and Core i7 2600K in the Eye: AMD Benchmarks

btarunr · Sep 24, 2011, 01:02 PM

The bets are off, it looks like Intel is in for a price-performance shock with AMD's Bulldozer, after all. In the press deck of AMD FX Processor series leaked by DonanimHaber ahead of its launch, AMD claims huge performance leads over Intel. To sum it up, AMD claims that its AMD FX 8150 processor is looking Intel's Core i7-980X in the eye in game tests, even edging past it in some DirectX 11 titles.

It is performing on par with the Core i7-2600K in several popular CPU benchmarks such as WinRAR 4, X.264 pass 2, Handbrake, 7Zip, POV Ray 3.7, ABBYY OCR, wPrime 32M, and Bibble 5.0. AMD FX 8150 is claimed to be genuinely benefiting from the FMA4 instruction set that Sandy Bridge lacks, in the OCL Performance Mandelbrot test, the FX 8150 outperforms the i7-2600K by as much as 70%. Lastly, the pricing of the FX 8150 is confirmed to be around the $250 mark. Given this, and the fact that the Core i7-2600K is priced about $70 higher, Intel is in for a price-performance shock.

Source: DonanimHaber

FreedomEclipse · Sep 24, 2011, 01:05 PM

But will it blend??

btarunr · Sep 24, 2011, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FreedomEclipse

But will it blend??

Yes, it will blend, its Blender rendering performance should be comparable to Core i7-990X.

chrone · Sep 24, 2011, 01:09 PM

it's about time! yay

LifeOnMars · Sep 24, 2011, 01:09 PM

Oh My....good news

More benchmarks please!!

FreedomEclipse · Sep 24, 2011, 01:10 PM

still be interested in how it overclocks though. stock performance is nice and all, but were not in the habbit of not tickering here

Frick · Sep 24, 2011, 01:10 PM

If this is accurate.. Sweet times ahead.

Melvis · Sep 24, 2011, 01:10 PM

Surprise!!!!

naoan · Sep 24, 2011, 01:10 PM

finally! or is it?

btw, afaik there's no 990x and the slide says 980x.

Cybrnook · Sep 24, 2011, 01:11 PM

Shabbadooo!!!!

JrRacinFan · Sep 24, 2011, 01:12 PM

If they want to boast numbers, show actual screenshots. Just a few slides does not have me beleiving this.

Crap Daddy · Sep 24, 2011, 01:15 PM

Read more carefully. Out of 8 multithreaded tests the higher clocked 8150 8 core wins in 2 against 2600k. And that's from AMD marketing. In gaming it is compared with 980X which is under 2600-2500 performance in 95% of the games out there, and it is just able to be on par.
Cinebench is a joke, performance is worse than phenom 2 x6. 2600k has a score of 6,8 on stock speed. So look behind the marketing smoke.

Frick · Sep 24, 2011, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crap Daddy

Read more carefully. Out of 8 multithreaded tests the higher clocked 8150 8 core wins in 2 against 2600k. And that's from AMD marketing. In gaming it is compared with 980X which is under 2600-2500 performance in 95% of the games out there, and it is just able to be on par.

Considering it was talks about how it would never be able to reach 2600k in anything it's still good news, if true.

DaJMasta · Sep 24, 2011, 01:23 PM

Looks like performance is good - let's hope power efficiency is at least in the neighborhood too.

My question is why the hell does it show memory as 1/2 the price in the example build saying you save $800. Wouldn't it be more expensive if anything since the memory controller supports higher frequencies officially? Oh marketing...

FordGT90Concept · Sep 24, 2011, 01:23 PM

Chart #1: FX-8150 has a natural clockspeed advantage and the 980X is an old architecture (Gulftown which is based on Bloomfield that is over two years old). Would have been more fair to leave the 980X out of it but, they did it for a reason (cherry picking).

Chart #2: Why is everything normalized to 2500K? I'll tell you why, it makes little differences look bigger. Take with a leathal dose of salt.

Chart #3: Fantastic! AMD processors work with instructions only their software uses. Kind of pointless.

Chart #4: Comparing to the most expensive Intel platform (LGA1356) with the second most expensive CPU (980X) proves nothing that isn't already known (its expensive). If they had a case to argue, they'd be comparing it to the price of a Core i7 2600 system...

To AMD: Give the FX-8150 to someone that isn't you to benchmark.

Crap Daddy · Sep 24, 2011, 01:26 PM

I don't say it's bad news but I would not consider it to be good either. Expectations were very high. It seems that FX is having a fierce competitor in Phenom 2 X6. Would be interesting to have a clock per clock comparison between these 2.

Frick · Sep 24, 2011, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FordGT90Concept

Chart #2: Why is everything normalized to 2500K? I'll tell you why, it makes little differences look bigger. Take with a leathal dose of salt.

It also shows where 2600k is so I don't really know what you're talking about here.

FordGT90Concept · Sep 24, 2011, 01:28 PM

They should have normalized it to the FX-8150 and/or given the actual numbers instead of percentages.

naoan · Sep 24, 2011, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crap Daddy

Cinebench is a joke, performance is worse than phenom 2 x6. 2600k has a score of 6,8 on stock speed. So look behind the marketing smoke.

I may be missing something here, but I don't see any cinebench score on this news...

mtosev · Sep 24, 2011, 01:29 PM

internal amd tests aren't relevant.somebody else who isn't associated with the company should review the cpu

damric · Sep 24, 2011, 01:29 PM

Frick · Sep 24, 2011, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FordGT90Concept

They should have normalized it to the FX-8150 and/or given the actual numbers instead of percentages.

The first thing wouldn't really matter as the results would still be the same, the second is obvious but that is probably above marketing slides. ^^

Crap Daddy · Sep 24, 2011, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by naoan

I may be missing something here, but I don't see any cinebench score on this news...

Look on the link posted to donanimhaber. There are more slides there.

btarunr · Sep 24, 2011, 01:36 PM

Btw, price confirmation of $245 for the FX8150:

I'm off for the evening.

Argue to your heart's content, but please don't flame/get personal. Report comments you don't like.

Recus · Sep 24, 2011, 01:43 PM

Paper benchmarks. I wonder why they didn't include SiSoft Sandra benchmarks?

http://www.legitreviews.com/news/11430/

System Name:	Blackbox
Processor:	Intel Core i7-950
Motherboard:	Intel Extreme Series DX58OG
Cooling:	Xigmatek Aegir SD128264 with IC Diamond 24 Thermal Compound
Memory:	12GB ADATA Premier (3x 4GB) DDR3-1333 MHz
Video Card:	Palit GeForce GTX 680 JetStream 2GB outfitted with IC Diamond 24 TIM
Hard Disk:	Samsung 840 Series 250GB, Random 8 TB storage
Optical Drive:	HT-LG DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	ViewSonic VX2450wm-LED
Case:	Cooler Master CM690 Window
Sound Card:	Creative SB Recon3D
PSU:	Corsair HX850W
Software:	Windows 8 Pro 64-bit

System Name:	Codename: Rapture X {MoonPig Edition}
Processor:	Intel 3930k@4.6Ghz
Motherboard:	Asus P9X79 PRO
Cooling:	Corsair H80i {2xScythe G.T AP-15}
Memory:	16GB DDR3 Kingston Hyper X 2133Mhz {4x4GB}
Video Card:	2xMSI GTX680 Twin Frozr OC {SLi}
Hard Disk:	256GB Plextor M5 Pro Xtreme (Boot) \|WD: 2x1.5TB FAEX\|1x2TB EARS\|1x1.5TB Samsung F4EG
Optical Drive:	N/A
CRT/LCD Model:	NEC MultiSync EA231WMi 23" {Black}
Case:	Fractal Define XL {3x140mm,1x180mm Silverstone A.P'}
Sound Card:	Creative SB Z {Speakers: Logitech Z-5500 }
PSU:	Corsair HX1050 Bro'fessional
Software:	Windows 7 7600 x64
Benchmarks:	(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻

System Name:	Blackbox
Processor:	Intel Core i7-950
Motherboard:	Intel Extreme Series DX58OG
Cooling:	Xigmatek Aegir SD128264 with IC Diamond 24 Thermal Compound
Memory:	12GB ADATA Premier (3x 4GB) DDR3-1333 MHz
Video Card:	Palit GeForce GTX 680 JetStream 2GB outfitted with IC Diamond 24 TIM
Hard Disk:	Samsung 840 Series 250GB, Random 8 TB storage
Optical Drive:	HT-LG DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	ViewSonic VX2450wm-LED
Case:	Cooler Master CM690 Window
Sound Card:	Creative SB Recon3D
PSU:	Corsair HX850W
Software:	Windows 8 Pro 64-bit

System Name:	chronic inc.
Processor:	intel core 2 quad q6600
Motherboard:	asus p5b deluxe wifi-ap
Memory:	v-gen ddr2 800 cl5 8gb
Video Card:	sapphire hd 5850 xtreme
Hard Disk:	wd2002faex, wd20ears
Optical Drive:	sony dru-830a
CRT/LCD Model:	dell s2209w
Case:	thermaltake jr.
PSU:	seasonic x-660
Software:	windows 7 pro sp1 x64, ubuntu 12.04 x32

Sep 24, 2011, 01:10 PM	#6
FreedomEclipse Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t! Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom Posts: 7,533 (3.38/day) Thanks: 825 Thanked 1,609 Times in 1,288 Posts System Specs	still be interested in how it overclocks though. stock performance is nice and all, but were not in the habbit of not tickering here __________________ “I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse

Sep 24, 2011, 01:02 PM	#1
btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Hyderabad, India Posts: 14,984 (7.29/day) Thanks: 788 Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts System Specs	AMD FX 8150 Looks Core i7-980X and Core i7 2600K in the Eye: AMD Benchmarks The bets are off, it looks like Intel is in for a price-performance shock with AMD's Bulldozer, after all. In the press deck of AMD FX Processor series leaked by DonanimHaber ahead of its launch, AMD claims huge performance leads over Intel. To sum it up, AMD claims that its AMD FX 8150 processor is looking Intel's Core i7-980X in the eye in game tests, even edging past it in some DirectX 11 titles. It is performing on par with the Core i7-2600K in several popular CPU benchmarks such as WinRAR 4, X.264 pass 2, Handbrake, 7Zip, POV Ray 3.7, ABBYY OCR, wPrime 32M, and Bibble 5.0. AMD FX 8150 is claimed to be genuinely benefiting from the FMA4 instruction set that Sandy Bridge lacks, in the OCL Performance Mandelbrot test, the FX 8150 outperforms the i7-2600K by as much as 70%. Lastly, the pricing of the FX 8150 is confirmed to be around the $250 mark. Given this, and the fact that the Core i7-2600K is priced about $70 higher, Intel is in for a price-performance shock. Source: DonanimHaber Last edited by btarunr; Sep 24, 2011 at 01:20 PM.

Sep 24, 2011, 01:05 PM	#2
FreedomEclipse Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t! Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom Posts: 7,533 (3.38/day) Thanks: 825 Thanked 1,609 Times in 1,288 Posts System Specs	But will it blend?? __________________ “I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse

Sep 24, 2011, 01:09 PM	#4
chrone Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: planet earth Posts: 11 (0.02/day) Thanks: 4 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts System Specs	it's about time! yay

Sep 24, 2011, 01:09 PM	#5
LifeOnMars Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kettering,Northants. UK Posts: 2,242 (1.25/day) Thanks: 1,718 Thanked 401 Times in 337 Posts System Specs	Oh My....good news More benchmarks please!!

Sep 24, 2011, 01:10 PM	#7
Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Sweden Posts: 7,907 (2.99/day) Thanks: 1,076 Thanked 1,449 Times in 1,155 Posts System Specs	If this is accurate.. Sweet times ahead. __________________ Typemachine: Acer Aspire One D250 \| Atom N280 1.6 Ghz \| 1GB DDR2 \| 160GB SATA \| 10.1' 1024 x 600 \| Lubuntu 12.10 Oldbox: HP D530 \| Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz \| 1GB DDR \| 40GB \| Windows XP "The 'gentle biker' look is overdone. I'm going for 'psycho hillbilly.' "

System Name:	Ongoing scavanging
Processor:	Sempron 140
Motherboard:	MSI 760GM-P23 (FX)
Cooling:	Yes
Memory:	2GB DDR3
Video Card:	Something
Hard Disk:	160GB + 1TB
Optical Drive:	Yes
CRT/LCD Model:	19" 1280 x 1024
Case:	Arctic Cooling Silentium T11
Sound Card:	Creative Audigy 2 ZS with front panel
PSU:	FSP400-60APN
Software:	Windows 7 Pro

Sep 24, 2011, 01:10 PM	#8
Melvis Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Australia Posts: 2,932 (1.55/day) Thanks: 606 Thanked 459 Times in 381 Posts System Specs	Surprise!!!!

System Name:	Night Rider \| Mini PC \| Transcoder
Processor:	AMD FX 8350 \| AMD Phenom II 955 \| Phenom II X6 1055T
Motherboard:	GA-990FXA-UD3 AM3+ \| GA-MA78LMT-S2 \| Gigabyte 880GM-UD2H AM3
Cooling:	All three systems have the AMD 4 Copper Pipe Heat Sink
Memory:	4x2GB DDR3 G.Skill 1600 6-8-6-24\| 2x4GB Ripgaws 1333 \| DDR3 Corsair 1600 Dominator
Video Card:	2 X HIS 7870's \| Gainward GTX 650 TI \| Onboard ATI 4250
Hard Disk:	300GB VRaptor /160 Raptor X/1TB WD Black \| Raptor/WD Black \| WD 320/WD BK 1TB
Optical Drive:	Pioneer x2 \| Sony DVD \| Sony DVD Burner
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell 2007FPS 20.5" LCD 16001200 \| Dell 20" LCD 16801050 \| 15" Dell LCD
Case:	Atrix 9001-C4 \| Mini ATX Case (custom) \| Coolermaster Elite 342
Sound Card:	Onboard \| Onbaord \| Onboard
PSU:	Corsair HX-850 \| Silverstone Mini 450W \| Corsair CX-400
Software:	Windows 7 Pro 64 \| Windows 7 Pro 64 \| Windows 7 Pro 64
Benchmarks:	3DMark 06 with SLi rig = 7964 8600GT's...

Sep 24, 2011, 01:10 PM	#9
naoan Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 292 (0.21/day) Thanks: 14 Thanked 63 Times in 50 Posts System Specs	finally! or is it? btw, afaik there's no 990x and the slide says 980x.

System Name:	AMD?
Sound Card:	onboard
Software:	7 X64

Sep 24, 2011, 01:11 PM	#10
Cybrnook Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: C:\Kitteh Posts: 683 (0.51/day) Thanks: 185 Thanked 136 Times in 120 Posts System Specs	Shabbadooo!!!!

Processor:	i7 2600K \| Phenom II 840
Motherboard:	ASUS P8Z68 Deluxe \| ASUS M4A88T-M
Cooling:	Corsair H60 \| Scythe Samurai ZZ
Memory:	4x4GB Samsung Green 1600 @ 1866 \| 2x2GB Corsair XMS3 1333
Video Card:	Evga GTX 670 FTW \| On Board AMD
Hard Disk:	2 x 64GB Samsung 830, Velociraptor 300GB,1TB Black,1.5TB Black \|10TB server
Optical Drive:	Plextor DVD burner, LG Bluray
CRT/LCD Model:	HP 2509m 25" 1080p
Case:	Lian Li PC-V1020A \| Lian Li PC-V354A
Sound Card:	Azuntech Bravuria 7.1 \| On-Board (Disabled)
PSU:	Seasonic X-series 760 , Seasonic X-series 760
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate X64 \| UnRaid (CentOS)

Sep 24, 2011, 01:12 PM	#11
JrRacinFan Served 5k and counting ... Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Youngstown, OH Posts: 16,121 (7.13/day) Thanks: 4,149 Thanked 4,552 Times in 4,027 Posts System Specs	If they want to boast numbers, show actual screenshots. Just a few slides does not have me beleiving this. __________________ Graphics Artists United™ Request Thread Low Cache CPU Club Solaris Utility DVD 3.0 DanishDevil's Logitech Soundroom TPU Video Gallery Sciencemark Revisited

System Name:	Mine; Hers; Our HTPC; NAS Box
Processor:	i7 2600k : i3 2120 : Celeron G440 : P4 2.6Ghz Nwood
Motherboard:	Asrock Z68 Extreme4 : Asus P8P67 Pro : Asrock H61M/U3S3 : Dell
Cooling:	CM 212+ w/ scythe jyuni : Stock : Stock :Stock
Memory:	2x4GB Ripjawx 1866 cl9 : 2x2GB Corsair 1600 cl9 : 2x2GB Ridgebacks 1066 cl5 : 768MB PC3200
Video Card:	Palit GTX560Ti 2Gb : XFX HD5770 : Integrated : Integrated
Hard Disk:	2x 750GB Raid 0 + Maxtor 500GB : WD Black 1TB+Corsair Nova 2 64GB : Toshiba 750GB : Leftover ATA133
Optical Drive:	Lite-On DVD-RW : Samsung DVD-RW : None : None
CRT/LCD Model:	AOC 21" : AOC 20" : Philips 42" HDTV : Headless
Case:	Rocketfish : CM HAF 912 : Bgears Cube Style case : Dell
Sound Card:	X-Fi Xtremegamer : Onboard : Onboard : Onboard
PSU:	Tt 750W Modular : Antec 500W Earthwatts : Corsair CX430 : Dell's OEM

Sep 24, 2011, 01:15 PM	#12
Crap Daddy Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 2,293 (2.44/day) Thanks: 951 Thanked 964 Times in 672 Posts System Specs	Read more carefully. Out of 8 multithreaded tests the higher clocked 8150 8 core wins in 2 against 2600k. And that's from AMD marketing. In gaming it is compared with 980X which is under 2600-2500 performance in 95% of the games out there, and it is just able to be on par. Cinebench is a joke, performance is worse than phenom 2 x6. 2600k has a score of 6,8 on stock speed. So look behind the marketing smoke.

System Name:	Dusty/Rusty
Processor:	i5-2500K/E8400
Motherboard:	ASRock P67Extreme4/ASRock 4core1600P35
Cooling:	CM Hyper TX3/Intel stock
Memory:	4x2GB Kingston HyperX/2x2GB DDR2
Video Card:	EVGA GTX570SC/Palit GTX560SE
Hard Disk:	WD BlueCaviar 500GB/Spinpoint F3 1TB/Seagate Barracuda 500 GB
Optical Drive:	LG/Asus
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung SyncMaster T220/Samsung 32" LCD TV
Case:	Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced/El Cheapo
Sound Card:	Asus Xonar D1/Denon PMA500AE/Senn HD518/Sony SSB1000
PSU:	Corsair TX650/Corsair TX650M
Software:	Windows 7/Windows 8 Pro

Sep 24, 2011, 01:23 PM	#14
DaJMasta Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 473 (0.17/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 37 Times in 21 Posts System Specs	Looks like performance is good - let's hope power efficiency is at least in the neighborhood too. My question is why the hell does it show memory as 1/2 the price in the example build saying you save $800. Wouldn't it be more expensive if anything since the memory controller supports higher frequencies officially? Oh marketing...

Processor:	Core i7 860
Motherboard:	Gigabyte P55M-UD4
Cooling:	Scythe Big Shuriken
Memory:	8GB Corsair @ 1600MHz
Video Card:	Sapphire HD5750 1GB
Hard Disk:	Intel X25-M G2 80GB, Seagate 7200.11 500GB SATA2
Optical Drive:	SATA DVD Burner
CRT/LCD Model:	24 Inch Samsung T240
Case:	Lian Li PC-A351B
Sound Card:	Asus Xonar DX
PSU:	Corsair CMPSU-400CX 400W
Software:	Windows 7 Pro x64

Sep 24, 2011, 01:23 PM	#15
FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!" Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: IA, USA Posts: 10,583 (6.28/day) Thanks: 1,755 Thanked 2,601 Times in 1,963 Posts System Specs	Chart #1: FX-8150 has a natural clockspeed advantage and the 980X is an old architecture (Gulftown which is based on Bloomfield that is over two years old). Would have been more fair to leave the 980X out of it but, they did it for a reason (cherry picking). Chart #2: Why is everything normalized to 2500K? I'll tell you why, it makes little differences look bigger. Take with a leathal dose of salt. Chart #3: Fantastic! AMD processors work with instructions only their software uses. Kind of pointless. Chart #4: Comparing to the most expensive Intel platform (LGA1356) with the second most expensive CPU (980X) proves nothing that isn't already known (its expensive). If they had a case to argue, they'd be comparing it to the price of a Core i7 2600 system... To AMD: Give the FX-8150 to someone that isn't you to benchmark. __________________ Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume. try { SteamDownload(); } catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }

System Name:	BY-2009
Processor:	Intel Core i7 920 (4 x 2.66 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard:	DFI LP DK X58
Cooling:	Sythe MUGEN-2 w/ Stock Fan
Memory:	3 x 2 GiB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600 @ DDR-1066
Video Card:	Sapphire Vapor-X HD 5870 1 GiB
Hard Disk:	2 x Seagate Barracuda 250GB 7200.7 RAID0
Optical Drive:	Samsung 16x DVD-ROM, Pioneer 16x DVD+/-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung Syncmaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200)
Case:	Coolermaster HAF 932
Sound Card:	Realtek Onboard, HT OMEGA Striker 7.1
PSU:	Enermax Liberty 620w
Software:	Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Benchmarks:	Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.

Sep 24, 2011, 01:26 PM	#16
Crap Daddy Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 2,293 (2.44/day) Thanks: 951 Thanked 964 Times in 672 Posts System Specs	I don't say it's bad news but I would not consider it to be good either. Expectations were very high. It seems that FX is having a fierce competitor in Phenom 2 X6. Would be interesting to have a clock per clock comparison between these 2.

Sep 24, 2011, 01:28 PM	#18
FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!" Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: IA, USA Posts: 10,583 (6.28/day) Thanks: 1,755 Thanked 2,601 Times in 1,963 Posts System Specs	They should have normalized it to the FX-8150 and/or given the actual numbers instead of percentages. __________________ Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume. try { SteamDownload(); } catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }

Sep 24, 2011, 01:29 PM	#20
mtosev Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Maribor, Slovenia Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day) Thanks: 72 Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts System Specs	internal amd tests aren't relevant.somebody else who isn't associated with the company should review the cpu __________________ My notebook: Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset [img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG] CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"

Processor:	Core i7 930
Motherboard:	Asus P6X58D Premium
Memory:	6gb SuperTalent WB200UX6G8
Video Card:	xfx radeon hd 5970 black edition
Hard Disk:	Intel X25-M 80
Optical Drive:	Asus dvd-+rw/ram
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell UltraSharp 2209wa
Case:	Haf 932
Sound Card:	Integreted sound card
Software:	w7

Sep 24, 2011, 01:29 PM	#21
damric Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: In a troll cave Posts: 295 (0.25/day) Thanks: 227 Thanked 72 Times in 44 Posts System Specs	__________________ CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked

System Name:	pron finder
Processor:	Core 42% Overclocked NB 50% Overclocked
Motherboard:	20% Overclocked
Cooling:	78% Nitrogen, 21% Oxygen, 1% Argon
Memory:	80% Overclocked
Video Card:	Core 29% Overclocked VRAM 20% Overclocked

Sep 24, 2011, 01:36 PM	#24
btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Hyderabad, India Posts: 14,984 (7.29/day) Thanks: 788 Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts System Specs	Btw, price confirmation of $245 for the FX8150: I'm off for the evening. Argue to your heart's content, but please don't flame/get personal. Report comments you don't like. __________________ Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp

Sep 24, 2011, 01:43 PM	#25
Recus Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 349 (0.51/day) Thanks: 165 Thanked 144 Times in 74 Posts System Specs	Paper benchmarks. I wonder why they didn't include SiSoft Sandra benchmarks? http://www.legitreviews.com/news/11430/

Processor:	Intel
Motherboard:	Asus
Cooling:	Thermaltake/Noctua
Memory:	Crucial
Video Card:	Nvidia
Hard Disk:	Samsung/Western Digital
Optical Drive:	Samsung
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung
Case:	Thermaltake
Sound Card:	On Board
PSU:	Chieftec
Software:	Windows 7 x64

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)