techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Sep 24, 2011, 01:44 PM   #26
Black Hades
200 Posts
 
Black Hades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ambugaton
Posts: 294 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 32 Times in 28 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by FordGT90Concept View Post
[...]Chart #3: Fantastic! AMD processors work with instructions only their software uses. Kind of pointless. [...]
Intel will introduce hardware FMA3 in 2011 (or later).[link, japanese] These instructions may arrive with the 22 nm process, also slated for march 2012.

FMA4 will be supported in AMD processors from 2011.
AMD will support FMA3 in the future for compatibility reasons if Intel sticks to FMA3 only.[link]

A member of the Intel forum asked:
"I have heard that Sandy Bridge won't have FMA implementation." True?
Answer from an Intel official representative:
"Sandy Bridge will not have FMA, it's targeted for a future processor. I apologize if there is any confusion I (or Intel) caused. In our defense, we did discuss feature timing in the last two Intel developer forums [...]"
__________________

Last edited by Black Hades; Sep 24, 2011 at 01:52 PM.
Black Hades is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 01:45 PM   #27
HTC
1000 Posts
 
HTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,925 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 461
Thanked 282 Times in 230 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by LifeOnMars View Post
Oh My....good news More benchmarks please!!
All the slides i found on this topic @ XS:

__________________
HTC - Hoje Tive Cá

I'm PORTUGUESE: apologies for any spelling mistakes!
HTC is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to HTC For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 24, 2011, 01:46 PM   #28
Aleksander
2000 Posts
 
Aleksander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,038 (2.35/day)
Thanks: 653
Thanked 283 Times in 229 Posts

System Specs

Simply insane xD
Aleksander is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 01:47 PM   #29
AMDfur
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 12 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

System Specs

Ok, I know now what my next CPU will be. Thanks for sharing the info. Good luck Intel fans.
AMDfur is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 01:48 PM   #30
RejZoR
3500 Posts
 
RejZoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia
Posts: 3,979 (1.25/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 758 Times in 542 Posts

System Specs

Now just release the damn thing...
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk
RejZoR is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RejZoR For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 24, 2011, 01:48 PM   #31
HTC
1000 Posts
 
HTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,925 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 461
Thanked 282 Times in 230 Posts

System Specs

All i want to know now is:

1 - How will it underclock

2 - When will it be available for purchase in my area
__________________
HTC - Hoje Tive Cá

I'm PORTUGUESE: apologies for any spelling mistakes!
HTC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 01:53 PM   #32
legends84
200 Posts
 
legends84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jitra, Malaysia
Posts: 239 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 105
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to legends84 Send a message via Skype™ to legends84

System Specs

ok. I'll go for this.. early next year
legends84 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 01:59 PM   #33
ViperXTR
1000 Posts
 
ViperXTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pasig City, Philippines
Posts: 1,034 (1.19/day)
Thanks: 111
Thanked 339 Times in 190 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to ViperXTR

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Recus View Post
Paper benchmarks. I wonder why they didn't include SiSoft Sandra benchmarks?

http://www.legitreviews.com/news/11430/ http://i56.tinypic.com/2e1sp3m.gif
what processor are they exactly comparing? i see 4C/8T but only 6mb cache, isnt the 2600K 3.4Ghz and 8mb cache?
ViperXTR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:06 PM   #34
YautjaLord
75 Posts
 
YautjaLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Israel
Posts: 172 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 130
Thanked 69 Times in 65 Posts

System Specs

Finally, some paper numbers; hope it'll be the same when you TPU staff guys bench this monster. Plus i wonder what mobo they used; i hope it was either Crosshair V Formula or Sabertooth 990FX.
__________________

Last edited by YautjaLord; Sep 24, 2011 at 02:23 PM.
YautjaLord is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:20 PM   #35
catnipkiller
1000 Posts
 
catnipkiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: canada
Posts: 1,067 (0.92/day)
Thanks: 343
Thanked 475 Times in 327 Posts

System Specs

Oh yes it will run crysis.
__________________
MyHeatWare
My FS/FT
catnipkiller is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:21 PM   #36
repman244
500 Posts
 
repman244's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 970 (1.21/day)
Thanks: 227
Thanked 413 Times in 238 Posts

System Specs

FX-4170 will be a best for gaming IMO, great price and great clock and same amount of L3 cache as the 8 core model.
__________________
Storage server:
HP Proliant ML350 G4|2 x Xeon "Nocona" 3GHz|4GB DDR1 ECC|Storage (SCSI): 3x10k 72GB + 10k 300GB + 15k 300GB + Ultrium460 tape drive|Storage (SATA): Adaptec 2810SA + WD Caviar 250GB + Seagate 250GB|
Other:
HP Proliant DL380 G5|Xeon 5150|4GB FB DDR2 ECC|HP Smart Array P400-256MB cache|3x10k 146GB SAS in RAID 0 + 10k 146GB SAS|2x800W|ATi FireGL V7700|
HP Proliant DL320 G5|Xeon 3150|1GB FB DDR2 ECC|2x80GB RAID 0
repman244 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:24 PM   #37
JrRacinFan
Served 5k and counting ...
 
JrRacinFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 16,121 (7.05/day)
Thanks: 4,149
Thanked 4,552 Times in 4,027 Posts
Send a message via AIM to JrRacinFan Send a message via Yahoo to JrRacinFan

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by repman244 View Post
FX-4170 will be a best for gaming IMO, great price and great clock and same amount of L3 cache as the 8 core model.
Unlockable 8 core? Hmmmm
JrRacinFan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:24 PM   #38
FreedomEclipse
Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t!
 
FreedomEclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,588 (3.37/day)
Thanks: 827
Thanked 1,623 Times in 1,299 Posts

System Specs

In bit-tech.net reviews of a 990x, they said a 2500k was a little faster when both processors were overclocked. but the 990x's saving grace was when it came to heavy multitasking
__________________

“I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse
FreedomEclipse is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FreedomEclipse For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:27 PM   #39
Recus
200 Posts
 
Recus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 359 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 165
Thanked 145 Times in 75 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ViperXTR View Post
what processor are they exactly comparing? i see 4C/8T but only 6mb cache, isnt the 2600K 3.4Ghz and 8mb cache?
Probably 2500k.
Recus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:30 PM   #40
Shihabyooo
200 Posts
 
Shihabyooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hell on Earth -or someplace similar-
Posts: 488 (0.55/day)
Thanks: 160
Thanked 107 Times in 87 Posts

System Specs

Nah, I'm still sceptic about this. tis hard for me to believe AMD will own intel with a single release. Nope thx, I think I'll wait for a third party benchmarks and reviews.

It would be nice if these benches were accurate though. Wouldn't mind intel pushing down the prices on their sandy bridge to sub $150
__________________
MAL

-~--Please excuse my poor English.
Shihabyooo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:34 PM   #41
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts

System Specs

Well judging those MARKETING slides I would say AMD hit the spot I figured. About equal with Sandy. Thats about all anyone can ask for honestly. I'm looking forward to the upgrade. Ill take it all with a grain of salt until I see a TPU bench.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheMailMan78 For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:36 PM   #42
KieranD
Eligible for custom title
 
KieranD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 5,464 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 1,641
Thanked 823 Times in 713 Posts
Send a message via MSN to KieranD

System Specs

8 cores vs 4 cores i would be surprised they couldn't match the i5 2500k, IMO its bollocks that it needs double the cores to just match it. Im more interested in those 6 core and 4 core bulldozer performance.

Still i call fud on everything until i see multiple random reviewers get their hands on them.
KieranD is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to KieranD For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:37 PM   #43
TRWOV
2000 Posts
 
TRWOV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mexico
Posts: 2,136 (3.15/day)
Thanks: 813
Thanked 1,142 Times in 591 Posts

System Specs

Finally. Although I'll likely wait until the socket change before deciding to upgrade to IB or BD these results are promising and Trinity just got more interesting.
__________________

CRUNCHERS - 1090t - 2x1055t - X4 620
OCTANUX - Conroe865PE - QX6800 - 4GB DDR-400 - HD4670 AGP - Audigy 2 ZS - Physx PPU
phenomenal - AM2NF3-VSTA - 965BE - 8GB DDR2-1066 - HD3850 AGP - X-Fi - Physx PPU *WIP*
Green Tea - 939A8X-M - FX60 - 4GB DDR-500 - 7950GT AGP
Re-build - CT-6VTA2 - PIII 600E - 384MB PC133 - Voodoo 5500 AGP - SB16 ISA
RB scraps - IC7-G - P4 3.4E - 4GB DDR500 - HD2600XT AGP - X-Fi - iRAM *WIP*
TRWOV is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:38 PM   #44
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by KieranD View Post
8 cores vs 4 cores i would be surprised they couldn't match the i5 2500k, IMO its bollocks that it needs double the cores to just match it. Im more interested in those 6 core and 4 core bulldozer performance.

Still i call fud on everything until i see multiple random reviewers get their hands on them.
One thing ya gotta keep in mind with AMD is they are not real cores as AMD markets them. They are modular. So when you see this whole "8 core vs 4 core" debate its bulls@!t. An AMD 8 core vs a Intel 4 core is equal for all given circumstances.

Even if it was a true 8 core it shouldn't matter to you. All the consumer should care about it bang for the buck. I wouldn't care if it used 50 cores as long as its faster AND cheaper then the last generation.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:41 PM   #45
Crap Daddy
2000 Posts
 
Crap Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,314 (2.40/day)
Thanks: 966
Thanked 974 Times in 678 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shihabyooo View Post
Nah, I'm still sceptic about this. tis hard for me to believe AMD will own intel with a single release. Nope thx, I think I'll wait for a third party benchmarks and reviews.

It would be nice if these benches were accurate though. Wouldn't mind intel pushing down the prices on their sandy bridge to sub $150
Read again between the lines. This is AMD advertising and we don't know if it's true.
It's under sandy bridge in 6 out of eight multithreaded benches. Plus the cinebench which is awfull if true. Hence the price they're asking. In gaming the comparison are made against phenom II x6 1100 and 980x which is slower than sandy when we talk games. The only good thing is high OC potential - hence the OC record presented to the world -
Crap Daddy is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Crap Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:46 PM   #46
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crap Daddy View Post
Read again between the lines. This is AMD advertising and we don't know if it's true.
It's under sandy bridge in 6 out of eight multithreaded benches. Plus the cinebench which is awfull if true. Hence the price they're asking. In gaming the comparison are made against phenom II x6 1100 and 980x which is slower than sandy when we talk games. The only good thing is high OC potential - hence the OC record presented to the world -
I count 4 not 6 and its cheaper. So like I said on par with Sandy. Not above. Exactly where AMD should be.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:46 PM   #47
nINJAkECIL
200 Posts
 
nINJAkECIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 232 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMailMan78 View Post
One thing ya gotta keep in mind with AMD is they are not real cores as AMD markets them. They are modular. So when you see this whole "8 core vs 4 core" debate its bulls@!t. An AMD 8 core vs a Intel 4 core is equal for all given circumstances.

Even if it was a true 8 core it shouldn't matter to you. All the consumer should care about it bang for the buck. I wouldn't care if it used 50 cores as long as its faster AND cheaper then the last generation.
Couldn't agree more than that.
Although I've used Intel cpus for the past 5 years, I'm ready to jump ship if AMD FX 8150 is on par with 2600K.
__________________

my lovely LE-1620
nINJAkECIL is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:52 PM   #48
TRWOV
2000 Posts
 
TRWOV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mexico
Posts: 2,136 (3.15/day)
Thanks: 813
Thanked 1,142 Times in 591 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Recus View Post
Probably 2500k.
2500K is 4C/4T



The 4170 looks interesting: 4 core with 125w TDP? Am I smelling an unlockable FX?
__________________

CRUNCHERS - 1090t - 2x1055t - X4 620
OCTANUX - Conroe865PE - QX6800 - 4GB DDR-400 - HD4670 AGP - Audigy 2 ZS - Physx PPU
phenomenal - AM2NF3-VSTA - 965BE - 8GB DDR2-1066 - HD3850 AGP - X-Fi - Physx PPU *WIP*
Green Tea - 939A8X-M - FX60 - 4GB DDR-500 - 7950GT AGP
Re-build - CT-6VTA2 - PIII 600E - 384MB PC133 - Voodoo 5500 AGP - SB16 ISA
RB scraps - IC7-G - P4 3.4E - 4GB DDR500 - HD2600XT AGP - X-Fi - iRAM *WIP*
TRWOV is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 02:56 PM   #49
xenocide
1000 Posts
 
xenocide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 1,709 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 228
Thanked 405 Times in 298 Posts

System Specs

I always take performance numbers directly from a marketing department with a quarry full of salt.
__________________
If BF3 doesn't turn out to be the biggest selling PC shooter of all time, then I will eat my graphics card. -MatTheCat
xenocide is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2011, 03:00 PM   #50
TRWOV
2000 Posts
 
TRWOV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mexico
Posts: 2,136 (3.15/day)
Thanks: 813
Thanked 1,142 Times in 591 Posts

System Specs

Of course, they are cherry picked benchs, maybe at settings that benefit AMD the most but still even if it ends being between Gulftown and Sandy Bridge plus the overclocking potential and the cheaper price, FX is an enticing platform, no doubt, and far from the catastrophic failure that a lot of people though it would be.

Is this keeps up for PD and IB I might buy my first AMD CPU. I'm somewhat tired of having to buy an entire new platform to upgrade.
__________________

CRUNCHERS - 1090t - 2x1055t - X4 620
OCTANUX - Conroe865PE - QX6800 - 4GB DDR-400 - HD4670 AGP - Audigy 2 ZS - Physx PPU
phenomenal - AM2NF3-VSTA - 965BE - 8GB DDR2-1066 - HD3850 AGP - X-Fi - Physx PPU *WIP*
Green Tea - 939A8X-M - FX60 - 4GB DDR-500 - 7950GT AGP
Re-build - CT-6VTA2 - PIII 600E - 384MB PC133 - Voodoo 5500 AGP - SB16 ISA
RB scraps - IC7-G - P4 3.4E - 4GB DDR500 - HD2600XT AGP - X-Fi - iRAM *WIP*
TRWOV is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD FX 8 Core and 4 Core Processor Systems Seen Running at E3 btarunr News 178 Jun 10, 2011 11:23 PM
AMD Starts Shipping 12-core and 8-core ''Magny Cours'' Opteron Processors btarunr News 125 Feb 25, 2010 11:49 PM
AMD Roadmap Shows 6-core and 12-core Opteron Processors malware News 39 May 10, 2008 07:03 AM
AMD Quad-Core and Triple-Core Phenom Production Schedule malware News 13 Feb 3, 2008 08:09 AM
help with amd single-core and duel core joinmeindeath417 Motherboards & Memory 12 Jul 29, 2006 07:15 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts